Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

What The Fuck Are These Charter Amendments?!?

Posted by on Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM

By news intern Garrett McCulloch

Your ballot, which you should really use for voting, will be sent to your mailbox on October 16. You probably have some idea already of who you'll vote for for county executive, mayor, city council... and—wait, charter amendments? What the fuck are these?

Whenever the county wants to change its charter (basically the county's constitution), the changes are put to a public vote. Usually the amendments just clean up unnecessary language or other little technical issues. There are four this year (and one of them, the fourth one, is kind of important):

Charter Amendment No. 1, Transitory Provisions: When the King County government merged with Metro in 1992, a bunch of stuff was put into the county charter to help the merger along. The merger is complete, so these provisions are basically obsolete.

Charter Amendment No. 2, Work Programs and Allotments: A section of the charter refers to budget processes established in 1969 that the county doesn't use anymore. This repeals that section.

Charter Amendment No. 3, Charter Review: Every ten years, the county executive appoints a commission that recommends charter amendments (just like these). This amendment would require the county council to confirm the executive's appointees.

Charter Amendment No. 4, High Conservation Value Properties: Way down at the bottom is the one you need to pay attention to. This makes it a lot harder for the county to sell off or otherwise change areas designated as open space. Changes would have to pass the council by a seven-of-nine supermajority and the county would have to schedule public hearings.

That's all. Hope you're still awake.

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Ummmm, what exactly are the implications of #4? I'm surprised it's a charter amendment, but seeing as it is, I haven't heard anything about the implications. Care to fill us in?
Posted by MarkM on October 7, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Will in Seattle 2
Couldn't we just vote down Charter Amendment 1 and break up with King County and form our own county instead?

I'm tired of getting rick rolled by those ... "nice" people.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM
Renton Mike 3
@2 By "we", you mean you live on a bus?
Posted by Renton Mike on October 7, 2009 at 5:43 PM
mason_bryant 4
@2 dude, here is the deal:

Seattle pays the bills
The rest of KC provides nice open spaces for us to play in and cheap rent for our start ups.

It hasn't been a bad deal so far so suck it up.
Posted by mason_bryant on October 8, 2009 at 12:28 PM
5
@1, I'm the campaign manager for the Yes on the Open Space Amendment, and was a staffer for the Charter Review Commission that originally developed the amendment. In terms of implications, the amendment is designed to protect certain conservation open spaces in perpetuity. These places are already protected; this amendment adds another layer of protection by requiring a supermajority vote of the County Council before a property could be sold or transferred. It's insurance, basically.

I'm being totally straight-up when I say there's no subtext here. What you see is what you get. More info at http://www.openspaceamendment.org.
Posted by corrie_sea on October 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM
6
Just so I'm clear, the best way for a tax payer to vote is; Yes on I-1033, Reject R71, and yes on the four charter amendments?

Thank you.

Posted by Overtaxed_in_King_County on October 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM
7
Thank you - Thank you ! I needed just the information you provided!
Posted by SeattleShay on October 25, 2009 at 10:43 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy