Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Today in Christopedia

Posted by on Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM

christopedia50cent.png
The Christian folks over at Christopedia have (barely) cleaned up yesterday's article about Barack Obama and made it today's featured article.

But I don't want to feature that article anymore. I want to feature this article: Racial differences between Negroes and Caucasians.

The name Homo sapien was first used by the 18th Century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus. The word "sapien" means "wise." The name was originally used to speak of the Caucasian man and synonymous with "European." As a result, many later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes and other races should be classified as different species. In fact, evolutionist Charles Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the varieties of mankind are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification in different species, if not different genera.

Funny how Christians use Charles Darwin when he's making their racist point, isn't it? You'll also note that there is an illustration from the article at left. You will note that they use 50 Cent as a typical African-American and a stock photo white guy as the typical Caucasian. There's also another photo with this caption:

Negroes looting a store in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Looting was widespread in a city whose population was over two-thirds Negro at the time of divine retribution.

And I know that anybody can edit a wiki and blah blah blah, but I've got to tell you this: If I were a Christian and I discovered that people were repeatedly doing this in my name (it is the Christian Encyclopedia, after all), I would be really fucking angry. This isn't just one troll: This appears to be tolerable behavior on Christopedia, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Christian behavior.

 

Comments (44) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
Next up - Christian Phrenology, or why God's chosen people all look like Nazis and not Jews ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 6, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Julie in Eugene 2
I haven't spent much time there, but I would be willing to bet that Christopedia an ironic/joke site. I mean, here are two of the the "did you knows" on the front page:

* That Barrack Obama was trained to be a homicide bomber by Saddam Hussein himself?
* That George W. Bush's reproductive organ is 21 inches long... when flaccid?
Posted by Julie in Eugene on October 6, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Max Solomon 3
when will the moderate christians take back their religion from the extremists?

same as when the moderate muslims and jews will do the same for their monotheisms: NEVER.
Posted by Max Solomon on October 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM
4
"And I know that anybody can edit a wiki and blah blah blah, but I've got to tell you this: If I was a Christian and I discovered that people were repeatedly doing this in my name (it is the Christian Encyclopedia, after all), I would be really fucking angry. This isn't just one troll: This appears to be tolerable behavior on Christopedia, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Christian behavior."

This is easily one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Do you understand how the internet works? This is some idiotic site run by some jackass racist and populated by trolls.

If I created "DumbInternetColumnistpedia" and wrote racist shit on there, would it mean that you were tolerating racism?

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Christo…

Fail all around.
Posted by oh boy on October 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM
5
So what characteristics are well-predicted by race?

You can imagine doing such an analysis right. Take a large, random sample. Write down many characteristics for each sample member: race, income, IQ, education level, etc. Which characteristics would show a strong correlation with race? More importantly, which would show a strong correlation coefficient in a multi-linear regression, i.e. which would be important when controlling for the others?

I would guess that characteristics related to musical and fashion sense would be well prediced by race, even when controlling for other factors. There might well be a few less poltically correct ones too, such as criminality.

Would it be racist to do such an analysis? To merely consider it? Quick, call out the Stranger's crack "Is It Racist?" squad!
Posted by David Wright on October 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM
6
Also, re: "This isn't just one troll" - did you actually bother to look at the revision history?

THE ENTIRE ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN BY ONE GUY. He has 95+% of the edits on the page and repeatedly changed the article back to his last revision when some other person blanked it.

I'm seriously left wondering if you've ever traversed the internets if you can't figure this basic stuff out.
Posted by more details on October 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM
7
I am pretty convinced this site is a actually a anti-christian troll site. I considered adding my own "edits" but I realized I would be vandalizing my own allies. This site is quite a piece of work, real genius. Most trolls are easier to read but this one is much more clever.
Posted by anonanonanon on October 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Allie 8
Apparently, one racial difference of note is that Caucasian males have receding hairlines. And use cell phones.
Posted by Allie on October 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Allyn 9
I smell an Onion (-type site, that is...)
Posted by Allyn on October 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM
10
I do not know why slog is so obsessed with this bogus website and some how saying this is an example of Christianity. Just look up the word "god" and you will see that it is a joke or else has been taken over by trolls. This is like someone getting upset with the Onion Newspaper.
Posted by bhoff on October 6, 2009 at 12:54 PM
11
This has to be a poor parody site. Too bad a teabagger might read it and believe it is a new source of truth.
http://christopedia.us/Homosexual
Posted by yakdan on October 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM
12
This site cannot be real: http://christopedia.us/Gay
Posted by Velveteen Robot on October 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM
elenchos 13
I wish there was something this cool in Wikipedia about me -- er, sort of about. I use the word "about" loosely, OK? I can't believe Capitaine Homo doesn't have more written about him. Do you have a Chevalier de la Légion d'Honneur? I don't. That's badass.
Posted by elenchos on October 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Jason Josephes 14
Man, you get all worked up about anonymous internet trolls. And then I get all worked up about you being upset over anonymous internet trolls. Shit.

Anyhow, remember one thing about Christianity -- even most of the people who call themselves Christians don't live that way. That's why they'll have sex outside of marriage, but an accidental pregnancy can't be aborted because it's against their religion. Which, since they don't follow it strictly, isn't even their religion to begin with.
Posted by Jason Josephes http://www.myspace.com/bluemoonseattle on October 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Vince 15
More proof that nothing good ever comes from religion. Nothing.
Posted by Vince on October 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM
16
lol at people taking that site even a little seriously
Posted by Reader1 on October 6, 2009 at 1:03 PM
kitschnsync 17
Paul, you are venturing into fallacies of Savage proportion. They are plenty of legitimate ways to impugn Christianity without declaring Christopedia spokeswiki for all Christians.

Unless you are joking, in which case you are a shitty comedian.
Posted by kitschnsync on October 6, 2009 at 1:04 PM
w7ngman 18
"This appears to be tolerable behavior on Christopedia, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Christian behavior."

That assertion is laughable.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on October 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM
19
5 - how would you define race? What about all the 'whites' who have 'black' in them? What about all the 'blacks' who are actually less than half 'black'? There are no separate races. There are only superficial appearances.

You can do all the studies you want based on what you perceive 'race' to be but in the end it will be trash. You might as well do studies on the race of white trash vs. the race of Rich Americans and decide that they are different species. The lines are arbritary.
Posted by subwlf on October 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM
w7ngman 20
#11 #12, I added that last sentence.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on October 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM
21
Paul: non-wacko Christians have long had to deal with people doing stupid shit and calling it "Christian". If I had to disavow or condemn every specific bad thing done under the banner of Christianity, I'd have no time left to go do good, positive, social-justicey things.
Posted by Kevin Erickson on October 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM
22
re: Public Sex and Nasty floors at Eagle
If I was Gay and I discovered that people were repeatedly doing deplorable things in my name (it is a Gay bar, after all), I would be really fucking angry. This wasn't just one guy: This appears to be tolerable behavior in Gay bars like the Eagle, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Gay behavior.
Posted by Sounds pretty stupid, eh? on October 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM
23
If you hit random article a couple of times you get an obviously phony nazi-hitler-swastika "article"

I'll admit, I was a little disappointed that it's a troll site
Posted by A little disappointed on October 6, 2009 at 1:20 PM
24
#5: Correlation is not causation.
Try taking a stats class if you're interested in pursuing your study.
Posted by RDM on October 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM
w7ngman 25
#23 actually the best use for the "Random Article" function is deciding which page you're going to vandalize next.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on October 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM
Lola, Now in Iowa City 26
I'm with @16. Silliness.
Posted by Lola, Now in Iowa City on October 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM
27
This is most likely the work of b/tards. I wouldn't get to0 worked up over it.
Posted by ColinPDX on October 6, 2009 at 1:45 PM
28
@19: Most race data is based on self-identification. That's the sensible, if you are looking for culturally transmitted traits. If you are looking for genetically transmitted traits, you're better off recording specific genetic markers than trying to use an aggregate classification.

@24: Correlation does not have to be causal to have predective power. By the way, I teach statistics.
Posted by David Wright on October 6, 2009 at 1:46 PM
29
Aren't we all so dang smart.
Posted by Paulikin on October 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM
NumberOne 30
If you go the the ED page on the site, it has the exact same material listed as suggested trolling (or as they so eloquently put it, "Crapflooding material") for the christopedia site.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Christo…
Posted by NumberOne on October 6, 2009 at 1:51 PM
julia in dc 31
Also, Darwin's Descent of Man argued that we *should* be classified as a single species. So they're just lying.
Posted by julia in dc on October 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Urgutha Forka 32
@15,
That's not true, religion has provided us with endless hours of hilarious entertainment.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on October 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Hernandez 33
"This appears to be tolerable behavior on Christopedia, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Christian behavior."

Are you really that gullible?
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on October 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Vince 34
@32 I stand corrected.
Posted by Vince on October 6, 2009 at 2:58 PM
35
I suspect "christopedia" is in it for the lulz, like the encyclopedia dramatica.
Posted by So eight years ago on October 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM
36
Yeah, but it's "sapiens," not "sapien."

I win!
Posted by Irving on October 6, 2009 at 10:55 PM
Fistique 37
@28, if you teach statistics, maybe this will interest you.
Posted by Fistique on October 6, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Knat 38
Mr. Constant, putting aside all the other points people have made about how this "accepted behavior" is a bit of a stretch to accuse, have you considered the fact that this website is far less widely known than Wikipedia, so far fewer people would even be browsing it (and therefore editing it) to begin with?
Posted by Knat on October 7, 2009 at 12:40 AM
Knat 39
@38 (I didn't quite finish my thought)

...far fewer people would even be browsing it (and therefore editing it) to begin with, so someone obviously trolling a page could go unnoticed for far longer than it would on a busier site, like Wikipedia?
Posted by Knat on October 7, 2009 at 12:41 AM
40
Fistique @ 37: Thanks for the link. There is a nice model there showing how correlations can arise in sums of shared, uncorrelated factors, which can explain how IQ test scores can be highly correlated without requiring a single "physical" underlying primary factor ("g").

I would just warn you to be careful about drawing too strong a conclusion: this is not a proof that "IQ is a myth." In fact, the author states quite clearly: "All of this, of course, is completely compatible with IQ having some ability ... to predict things like college grades or salaries or the odds of being arrested by age 30."
Posted by David Wright on October 7, 2009 at 1:06 AM
41
This appears to be tolerable behavior on Christopedia, and therefore it appears to be tolerable Christian behavior.


So you're saying some random website Christopedia represents the hundreds of millions (billions?) of Christians worldwide? I'm not even Christian and I find this an incredibly unfair generalization.

I know it's just a blog and not real journalism, but still, damn. I'm disappointed.
Posted by pffft on October 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM
42
You can look at the editing history of this article... it's just one guy advancing his Stormfront-style views. I suspect that this one guy is serious, but occasionally this article gets hijacked by someone clearly doing it for the lulz.
Posted by soundwave106 on October 7, 2009 at 8:23 AM
in-frequent 43
clearly a joke here... it would seem they are being trolled by a larger and/or more skilled and dedicated group. the joke is on the people who made that site, and the people who believe these articles are not a joke.
Posted by in-frequent on October 7, 2009 at 9:44 AM
Mike Smith 44
Read the article on Jesus then tell me it's a a serious website run by devout Christians. You're feeding the trolls, Paul.
Posted by Mike Smith on October 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy