Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Sunday, September 27, 2009

The Trap

Posted by Charles Mudede on Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM

No one can say that Roman Polanski has not had a life:

(CNN) — Filmmaker Roman Polanski has been arrested on an arrest warrant stemming from a decades-old sex charge, Swiss police said Sunday.

The Academy Award-winning director pleaded guilty in 1977 to a single count of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, acknowledging he had sex with a 13-year-old girl, but fled the United States before he could be sentenced. U.S. authorities issued a warrant for his arrest in 1978.

He was taken into custody trying to enter Switzerland on Saturday, Zurich police said.

Polanski, 76, has lived in France for decades to avoid being arrested if he enters the U.S. He declined to collect his Academy Award for Best Director in person when he won it for "The Pianist" in 2003.

He was en route to the Zurich Film Festival, which is holding a tribute to him, when he was arrested by Swiss authorities, the festival said.

Polanski was nominated for best director Oscars for "Tess" and "Chinatown," and for best writing for "Rosemary's Baby," which he also directed.

What a life indeed.
sharon_jpg.jpg

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (38) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
the swiss are going to extradite him? wow. good thing the original hanging judge is dead.
Posted by Max Solomon on September 27, 2009 at 7:25 AM
Heather 2
There are legitimate concerns about how the case was handeled decades ago, but if he were a stage hand I doubt people would cut him as much slack as he is getting. He should not get a free pass just because he is Roman Polanski.
Posted by Heather on September 27, 2009 at 7:34 AM
DavidC 3
I blame Susan Atkins
Posted by DavidC on September 27, 2009 at 7:56 AM
4
I don't get it.
Posted by Mary Kay Letourneaw on September 27, 2009 at 8:19 AM
thecatnextdoor 5
hahahahaa!@4
Posted by thecatnextdoor on September 27, 2009 at 8:45 AM
6
@ 4 FTW!
Posted by liblad http://www.wmsallen.com on September 27, 2009 at 9:04 AM
7
Polanski was a concentration camp victim so obviously its the Nazis in the Obama Administration who are doing this. Also, they are "deniers" who are Democrats and their favorite color is blue.
Posted by Ha Ha Got Ya Back on September 27, 2009 at 9:15 AM
8
You can't "have sex with" a 13-year-old. The word is rape.
Posted by Metametameta on September 27, 2009 at 9:16 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 9
Age of consent:

http://www.avert.org/age-of-consent.htm

Spain 13
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on September 27, 2009 at 9:19 AM
10
Ruler Of The Universe Supreme (ROT-US) @9 is John Bailo.
Posted by troll outing on September 27, 2009 at 9:39 AM
11
@8: even with another 13 year old?
Posted by guy on September 27, 2009 at 9:51 AM
12
@11 : if Roman Polanski had been 13, we wouldn't be having this conversation. He was 44.
Posted by lostindc on September 27, 2009 at 10:01 AM
schmacky 13
The whole thing with the 13-year-old was kind of a sham, featuring heavy doses of prosecutorial cluelessness and misconduct...See this doc for more details: http://www.romanpolanskiwantedanddesired…
Posted by schmacky on September 27, 2009 at 10:04 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 14
I don't understand why he went to Switzerland if he knew they'd extradite him. And he would have to know that. When your life is on the line, you make sure you know those kinds of things. This makes no sense.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 27, 2009 at 10:10 AM
yucca flower 15
Actually, it wasn't statutory rape it was just the plain, garden variety rape. However, the victim (now an adult) thinks its pointless to prosecute him after all this time and would just like to drop it.
Posted by yucca flower on September 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 16
#15: However, that is not how the law works.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on September 27, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 17
"Ruler Of The Universe Supreme (ROT-US) @9 is John Bailo."

Thank you for acknowledging my diety.

Next time you see me, please kneel and kiss my ring.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on September 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM
Rotten666 18
Apparently rape is ok if your famous.
Posted by Rotten666 on September 27, 2009 at 11:32 AM
19
Isn't there a statute of limitations?
Posted by apres_moi on September 27, 2009 at 11:38 AM
20
RIght, because slipping a 13-year old a quaalude and sodomizing her is consensual. There may have been issues with court misconduct, but no one disputes the fact that he raped her.
Posted by odonata on September 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM
21
@13
good critique of the doc: http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2009/02…

he's a rapist who escaped punishment.
Posted by coolbeans on September 27, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 22
@19: No, because he already pleaded guilty. He bailed right after that (but before sentencing).
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 27, 2009 at 12:46 PM
Michael of the Green 23
I look forward to this being over (his sentence). He doesn't pose a threat to anyone anymore, and should have access to Hollywood. Yes, because he's Roman Polanski.
Posted by Michael of the Green on September 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Heather 24
@23, I'll bet Polanski imagines himslef to be more important than the girl he raped.
Posted by Heather on September 27, 2009 at 1:36 PM
25
Slightly off topic but wow... According to that age of consent site, in the Vatican State, the age of consent is 12. Holy See, Batman! It doesn't say if the altar boys have to be married or not though.
Posted by idealist on September 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM
yucca flower 26
@ 25,

I think Nuns are called the 'Brides of Christ'....not the altar boys.
Posted by yucca flower on September 27, 2009 at 4:34 PM
27
@13

The transcript of the victim's testimony is here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/pol…

That seems pretty black and white (and disgusting) if you believe her. Whether or not there was judicial misconduct seems like noise.
Posted by mirth on September 27, 2009 at 7:39 PM
28
See how sick perverts in Hollywood have corrupted our culture? Guys like Roman Polanski run around, doing all sorts of decadent, debauched things, and making movies, and then the social fabric of our country is torn, and next thing you know, impressionable young minds like those of Glenn Beck wind up warped, and he's snorting the cocaine! And raping and murdering a girl! At least, that's what I heard. I heard some of that from him. I forget which part. But really, it's the fault of Hollywood! By gum, if you want to sexually abuse somebody, you'd better take the oath, join the Army (just like young Glenn Beck did) and go to an Iraqi prison before you do that kind of sick shit! Wake up, Amurrica!!!
Posted by CP on September 27, 2009 at 10:11 PM
29
He was the R.Kelly of his generation.
Perhaps he needs to get Kelly's lawyer and PR person
cause it didn't seem to hurt his career all that much.
Posted by jane 101 on September 27, 2009 at 10:29 PM
30
14: He didn't know he'd be extradited because he has a vacation home on Switzerland and had been summering there for years. If you had vacationed in a country for decades with immunity, wouldn't you maybe be surprised if they suddenly decided to arrest you?

As for people dredging up the victim's testimony, you may want to consider the fact that she herself has forgiven Polanski and has stated her desire not to be dragged through the public spotlight again. If it were up to her, the charges would have been dropped years ago. People aren't so pro-victim's rights when the victim decides they don't want to a part of the law-and-order mob.
Posted by Jizz-a-belle on September 28, 2009 at 12:49 AM
31
The victim is irrelevant at this point. The laws we have on the books are not there to protect people specifically or to provide justice to victims but to govern the social interactions of the country and prevent non-authorized uses of coercive force. Read Max Weber.

The state often re-victimizes people who have experienced violent crime by forcing them to testify in open court because we believe in a right to confront our accuser - so to say that we should stop the prosecution of Polanski because the victim has forgiven him is really something only people in the middle east do (or at least the UAE, where it's permissible to give blood money to victims and their families instead of going to court).
We had LAWS here, it may not be popular or "fair" but justice is more about equality under the law (meaning directors don't get off scott free and 30 yrold Black men put in jail for life for the same exact crime).
Posted by Kate 134 on September 28, 2009 at 7:39 AM
32
I would have rather had my college paid for than have my ex-step-father go to prison for two measly years for molesting me from age four to age twelve. Kate 134 is correct, the law isn't thinking so much about the specific victim at hand.
Posted by Survivor on September 28, 2009 at 10:07 AM
33
It's not just about the victim, it's also about future potential victims (locking criminals up so they don't have the opportunity to re-offend) and acting as a deterrent to others by publicizing consequences of breaking the law. The civil tort system is supposed to provide compensation to victims if the criminal has the financial resources.
Posted by sf gal on September 28, 2009 at 11:32 AM
34
"justice is more about equality under the law (meaning directors don't get off scott free and 30 yr old Black men put in jail for life for the same exact crime)."

Are you referring to Michael Jackson and R Kelly as those 30 yr old black men in jail for the same crime? This ole "if he was black" has worn thin. If he were black he wold have more support both because of fleeing to France (which named a street after black cop killer Mumia) and his actions 30-something years ago. If anything all those black folks who cry about double standards should be sticking up for Polanski. After all if R Kelly got off the hook and there was a video showing him doing it, wouldn't it be racist if Polanski doesn't get a free pass to? I should add, it was routine for blacks who committed murder to flee to other countries in the 60's and 70's and they were considered heros and martyrs by lefties
Posted by jane 101 on September 28, 2009 at 12:12 PM
35
"justice is more about equality under the law (meaning directors don't get off scott free and 30 yr old Black men put in jail for life for the same exact crime)."

Are you referring to Michael Jackson and R Kelly as those 30 yr old black men in jail for the same crime? This ole "if he was black" has worn thin. If he were black he wold have more support both because of fleeing to France (which named a street after black cop killer Mumia) and his actions 30-something years ago. If anything all those black folks who cry about double standards should be sticking up for Polanski. After all if R Kelly got off the hook and there was a video showing him doing it, wouldn't it be racist if Polanski doesn't get a free pass to? I should add, it was routine for blacks who committed murder to flee to other countries in the 60's and 70's and they were considered heros and martyrs by lefties
Posted by jane 11 on September 28, 2009 at 12:17 PM
36
We've torn apart any mental concept of "society", (well, Thatcher and Reagan did their best), but when it comes to criminal prosecution, yeah, even conservatives believe there's such a thing as society to punish you in the name of.

Heard somebody point out on a BBC radio show today that Los Angeles is the jurisdiciton with 12,000 unprocessed rape kits... which makes this a weird kind of populism, to tear down a celebrity (who, uh, did it! guilty! guilty! guitly!) to show the regular folks that we're a system of laws, not men, but uh... regular folks, 12,000 of them, also need those rape kits processed. Ugh.

Extradition time..... can we trade them Gonzo?
Posted by CP on September 28, 2009 at 7:02 PM
37
33: I would say that Polanski has spent the last three decades demonstrating that he's not an ongoing threat to society.
Posted by Jizz-a-belle on September 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM
lark 38
Charles,
Indeed, Polanski has seen it all. But, I now believe after reading several accounts, he should not escape justice:

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feat…

He is a great artist but is greatly flawed. It is extremely difficult to have any empathy for him.
Posted by lark on September 29, 2009 at 9:08 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use