Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, September 25, 2009

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:19 PM

I'm a 28-year-old guy who's had pretty mundane sexual experiences other than the occasional light bondage and spanking scene. So a couple of weeks ago I had sex with a girl I've known for about a year and it was really good, fairly kinky sex. We had sex one more time together before she invited me to a party of hers that ended in a threesome involving her, myself, and a friend of hers (another girl) whom apparently, like me, she'd been trying to seduce for a while. It was a lot of fun and surprisingly not too awkward—not then. It is now.

Here's the problem: the other participant in the threesome and I have begun seeing each other (movies, great sex, midnight snacks, etc.) on our own, but it's become increasingly clear that my friend—the girl who brought us together—has a crush on me. It's particularly awkward for my new friend who has to field phone calls and texts from our mutual friend attempting to decode my intentions. I probably should have seen both of these developments coming as early as our threesome, when i realized that this other girl was great to kiss—and gag and spank—and I surely should've realized it when my friend left the room when this girl and I started having sex, announcing in a loud voice that "girl on top is the most selfish position in a threeway." My new friend and I don't want to keep hiding from our mutual friend, but we don't want to hurt her either. What do we do?

Any advice is GREATLY appreciated.

Three Is Definitely a Crowd

My advice after the jump...

Girl A is going to get hurt, TIDAC, there's no way around it. Girl A is probably hurting already. The only question is just how bad the hurt is gonna be. The longer you wait to tell Girl A that you and Girl B are officially an item now, the worse the hurt. And the more texts Girl A sends Girl B "attempting to decode [your] intentions," the worse the feelings of betrayal and humiliation will be. So you're not sparing Girl A any pain by dragging this out, TIDAC.

Tell Girl A what's up now. Tell her today.

And if you don't—if you wait until she figures out what's going on—she'll not only be hurt, TIDAC, she'll be angry. And she'll have a right to be angry since your cowardly sneaking around made her pain much worse than it needed to be.

 

Comments (44) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Allyn 1
"girl on top is the most selfish position in a threeway."

I don't get it. I thought that would be the best position so that girl A could position herself over his face... waht am I missing?
Posted by Allyn on September 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM
Allyn 2
...besides spell-check?
Posted by Allyn on September 25, 2009 at 4:32 PM
zephsright 3
Actually the most selfish position in a three way, any three way, is 69. It leaves no place for the third person to go...except...for...the...butt...hrmm maybe I should rethink that initial statement.
Posted by zephsright on September 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM
schmacky 4
If you're doing it right there is no selfish position in a threeway.
Posted by schmacky on September 25, 2009 at 4:40 PM
kim in portland 5
"girl on top is the most selfish position in a threeway."

I agree with, Allyn. I'm missing something, too.

Oh, and Dan is dead right in his advice. Tell the girl.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on September 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM
Matt from Denver 6
Why do you always put the advice after the jump?
Posted by Matt from Denver on September 25, 2009 at 4:46 PM
gloomy gus 7
For drama, Matt! It works for me.
Posted by gloomy gus on September 25, 2009 at 4:51 PM
Sweeney Agonistes 8
@6: That's my question, too. I have to read Slog via RSS during the day because the ads are a little racy for work, and RSS doesn't include anything after the jump, so for the rest of the day I'm left in suspense.
Posted by Sweeney Agonistes on September 25, 2009 at 4:58 PM
9
"Girl A" didn't happen to be Jennife Anniston by any chance, was she?
Posted by Rain Monkey http://classifieds.thestranger.com/seattle/ViewAd?oid=oid%3A68649 on September 25, 2009 at 5:00 PM
10
@8 use Firefox + the AdBlock Plus extension. It'll solve the racy ad problem.
Posted by d-squared on September 25, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Will in Seattle 11
Girl on top works provided there are two girls on top.

That said, Dan's right in his advice.

Next time use a condom.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 25, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Y.F. Redux 12
This is why fourgies are better than threesomes....nobody feels left out.
Posted by Y.F. Redux on September 25, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Vince 13
So, he can't satisfy two women? See them both! They started the three way so keep it going. Really, and stop complaining about having so many sex partners. It just irritates those of us who aren't getting any.
Posted by Vince on September 25, 2009 at 5:11 PM
14
Jesus, "girl on top" is one of my favorite positions in an FMF three-way, as either girl. It might be considered kinda tough in an MFM threeway, though.
Posted by lblah on September 25, 2009 at 5:12 PM
Will in Seattle 15
Well, if the guys are bi it could work.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 25, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Mark in Colorado 16
Slow letter day, huh.
Posted by Mark in Colorado on September 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM
treacle 17
The easiest and best way to make sure no one feels left out in a three way is to always make physical contact with the third when one and two are doing some dyadic fucking (or 69ing, or whatever). Works great!

And yeah, Dan's right, take Girl A out to coffee and tell her what's up, a.s.a.f.p. But try to precede the information with something honestly positive, like how you think she's interesting, hot and intelligent (if in fact you do think those things. Don't lie. That's stupid.)

Also, depending on what Girl A and Girl B are willing to consider, you might be able to date both of them in a polyamorous kinda way. Check in with Girl B first before you consider proposing that to Girl A, of course.
Posted by treacle on September 25, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Doctor Memory 18
Tell her now.

Also, consider that you might be a little bit of an asshole. You were having great kinky sex with this women, she went out on a limb to invite a friend of hers along for a threesome, and you're surprised that she's upset that you're now dating that person? Unless she told you up front that she was looking for no-strings-attached sex, duh she was into you and hoping that this was the start of something bigger, and no shit she's pissed that you're now dating her friend and not considering dating her.
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on September 25, 2009 at 5:28 PM
memorex 19
Hello? Poly anyone?

and #4 ftw.
Posted by memorex on September 25, 2009 at 5:33 PM
Dougsf 20
Dan's advice is right, but I also have to admire the resolve of the couple—if I'm reading the letter correctly—to continue unfazed after being verbally admonished, then abandoned during the act, by the 3rd party.
Posted by Dougsf on September 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM
21
Well now the smart asses - what is left in a 3 way if one is on top

1. hands
2. feet
3. vacant mouths

nothing xesy left to do??

Duh...

Posted by Coffee Boy on September 25, 2009 at 5:56 PM
22
"...ended in a threesome involving her, myself, and a friend of hers (another girl) whom apparently, like me, she'd been trying to seduce for a while.It was a lot of fun and surprisingly not too awkward—not then."

"and I surely should've realized it when my friend left the room when this girl and I started having sex, announcing in a loud voice that "girl on top is the most selfish position in a threeway."

But other than 33.3% of the participants calling the others selfish and storming out it wasn't too awkward.
Posted by Beguine on September 25, 2009 at 6:19 PM
23
This just proves that FFM threeways never come without strings. Never have, never will.
Posted by JesseJB on September 25, 2009 at 6:25 PM
w7ngman 24
All I want to know is... spanking isn't mundane?
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on September 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM
25
Girl on top is hardly selfish in a MMF threeway. Her mouth is perfectly positioned for the second guy to kneel in front of her...

I'll be in my bunk.
Posted by Rhiannon on September 25, 2009 at 6:46 PM
26
Bingo @19! Why does girl A have to be excluded?
Posted by Get Real on September 25, 2009 at 6:53 PM
27
TIIDAC, you're an asshole! You know why? You just totally ruined Girl A's boyfriend's future chances at a threesome. Girl A will forever be dull and monogamous from here on in, due to the fear of losing her man to the third wheel. You totally just pissed in some dude's pool.
Posted by Some of us would kill for that! on September 25, 2009 at 6:56 PM
rob! 28
@6-8: Read the mobile version. No jumps, no drama, no ads.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 25, 2009 at 7:16 PM
rob! 29
Well, there is that NSFW-after-the-jump problem.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 25, 2009 at 7:18 PM
SofaKing 30
TIDAC, what are you looking for? The one perfect girl to make babies with and die? Then yeah, you should choose. But I bet you like them both! And it sounds like they're both good friends with each other and sexually compatible. And they both like you! So... why does anybody need to be left out? Don't hand out titles, don't needlessly end two perfectly good relationship (you and girl A, girl A and girl B). Would there be awkward times? Sure, probably. But imagine the potential for the friendships to flourish and the ridiculous sexual possibilities to continue. If the three of you could manage to look past your personal expectations of what a "normal relationship", I bet the three of you could really have a beautiful, interesting, rewarding experience.
Posted by SofaKing on September 25, 2009 at 9:04 PM
31
I cannot imagine having one of the participants walk out in the middle of a threesome, and just casually keep going... and then not consider it a catastrophe after. I mean, that sounds like pretty bad news to me.
Posted by lymerae on September 26, 2009 at 9:17 AM
32
I cannot imagine having one of the participants walk out in the middle of a threesome, and just casually keep going... and then not consider it a catastrophe after. I mean, that sounds like pretty bad news to me.
Posted by lymerae on September 26, 2009 at 9:17 AM
Max Solomon 33
fun to gag?
Posted by Max Solomon on September 26, 2009 at 9:22 AM
34
@ 29, not usually. And I normally read this stuff at home anyway.
Posted by Matt from Denver, at work without his password on September 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM
35
Are there really that many of you people out there having threesomes? Man, my life is boring.
Posted by Thompson on September 26, 2009 at 10:28 AM
36
Yeah, what Thompson said. I read Dan Savage and feel like my life is 10x more boring than it could have been.
Posted by Gotta Go Beat Off Now. on September 26, 2009 at 12:01 PM
37
I don't think he's even seeing girl B. He just calls her his new friend who's great to kiss and spank. That seems to be what girl A was. There's nothing "up" with them to tell, so tell her that.
Posted by Karey on September 26, 2009 at 7:15 PM
38
JesseJB@23: I need some help drawing the correct inference from your proof. I just flipped a quarter and it came up heads. Does that mean that this particular coin will always come up heads, or that all coins everywhere will always come up heads? I think this matter will be of immediate interest to all NFL teams.
Posted by Quinapalus on September 26, 2009 at 7:21 PM
39
Well, i know many LGBT. espcially bisexual single, bisexual couples and bi curious at Bimingle.com . can view the bisexual style photos. hot but also honest girl and cute.
Posted by Candykon92 on September 27, 2009 at 6:27 PM
40
Girl on top is also ideal for double penetration in an MMF threesome. You just lean forward a bit, the second guy straddles the first guy moves in close behind and . . . I'll be in my bunk,
Posted by AnathemaT on September 27, 2009 at 8:25 PM
41
Well, actually, same thing for a FFM 3some, provided one of the F's has a strap-on . . .
Posted by AnathemaT on September 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM
42
You need two things:
1. Some info on polyamory. Triads are hot, yo.
2. Some info on unselfish threesome positions. I recommend lots of porn.

If 1. pays off, you're going to have a lifetime of having to be unselfish here. Poor you.
Posted by Rophuine on September 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM
43
Maybe I'm reading this all wrong, but seems to me that if Girl A didn't mind sharing TIDAC, why did she get pissed during the threeway? Like so many have said, girl on top doesn't seem selfish at all. She just couldn't handle it when it happened because she was conflicted about sharing TIDAC to begin with.

Unless there was some untold agreement between TIDAC and Girl A, I think Girl A probably should have just waited to invite a third person into a new relationship. Now that the horse is out of the barn, there's really no one to blame but herself.

But yeah, tell her now before it get worse. Unless you get wise and don't go exclusive with the new girl, which seems like the win-win here.

Posted by jack of all trades on September 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM
44
@25
Firefly reference. Shiny.
Posted by MichelleZB on September 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy