Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, September 25, 2009

Deep Thought

Posted by on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM

So the ousted president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, has the support of both Barack Obama and Hugo Chavez. (That ought to drive the Teabaggers bananas.) And now Zelaya is stuck in the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa, trying to whip up support for a counter-coup. He's also starting to go a little stir crazy:

After a couple of days of street demonstrations, Tegucigalpa was getting back to normal Thursday, and Mr. Zelaya was reduced to making hysterical accusations about being bombarded with radiation and toxic gases by "Israeli mercenaries."

It looks like both sides have violated the Honduran constitution. From the NYT:

According to a recent analysis of the legal issues of the case prepared by the Law Library of Congress in Washington, both Mr. Zelaya and those who ousted him appear to have broken the law.

In Mr. Zelaya’s case, he flouted court rulings ordering him not to conduct a survey on whether to convene a citizens assembly to change the Constitution. Eventually, the chief prosecutor filed a complaint with the Supreme Court accusing Mr. Zelaya of treason and abuse of authority, among other charges. That led to an arrest warrant that was carried out on June 28.

But Mr. Zelaya was not formally arrested when soldiers raided his home. Instead, the army detained him, took him to the airport and put him on a plane to Costa Rica, even though the Honduran Constitution says no citizen may be handed over to foreign authorities.

Obama has called Zelaya's removal a coup and withdrawn aid from Honduras—but would he do the same if the Iranian military turned its guns on Ahmadinejad and installed Mousavi?

Another sticky fact: Zelaya is not only vocally supported by Chavez, but by Brazil—and Ahmadinejad has been crowing about how much he loves Venezuela and Brazil these days. So does that put Obama in the same camp with Chavez, Brazil's da Silva, and Ahmadinejad? Just add a Kim and you have an American conservative's worst nightmare.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The Bush administration conspicuously did not raise the same sorts of objections when Chavez, a democratically elected leader, was ousted in a military coup. This ended up biting them on the ass when, three days later, Chavez was reinstated. Chavez has pointed to this fact ever since as evidence that the CIA was complicit in the coup, and thanks in large part to his tireless repetition of this point, anti-U.S. sentiment has reached unprecedented heights in Venezuela and throughout the region.

So the Obama administration is, to all appearances, behaving appropriately. It damages our country's credibility when we support democracy in some instances (when it produces results we like) and not in others (when democratically elected leaders nationalize their countries' oil production, for instance.)

Ahmadinejad was not democratically elected, so in the event of his ouster there would be no similar onus on the U.S. to protest his removal in a coup.
Posted by Proteus on September 25, 2009 at 10:10 AM
2 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
oh_man 3
This might be the Obama administration trying to change the international community's opinion on the US foreign policy, which you know *ahem* everybody outside the US hates (except for Israel).

And what better way to do that than taking sides with everyone else on some small country's affairs, relatively irrelevant for the world order?

The last thing non-americans want to see is the US backing up another military coup, like it used to happen in the not-so-old days.
Posted by oh_man on September 25, 2009 at 12:35 PM
Gitai 4
If the Iranian military turned its guns on Ahmadi and installed Mousavi, it could quite plausibly spin that as a counter coup and a restoration of democracy. If they returned to the barracks and there was a pretty show trial, we could even look at easing sanctions, and the whole world would applaud.
Posted by Gitai on September 25, 2009 at 2:51 PM
5
Uh, since the DoD is well into the era of nonlethal weapon technology, say,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Deni…

And the Israeli equivalent of Blackwater/Xe guys have already been spotted in LatAm training police/military types since, oh, decades ago, maybe he's not that nuts?

Or maybe they're putting smelly French cheese in the A/C vents.

And even if he does get a li'l burning feeling on his skin when he steps out on the balcony, isn't that better than having New Kids on the Block blasted at you with loudspeakers all night long, like we did to Noriega?

Of course, there's no way anybody in the DoD is helping the Honduran military on this one. Or any ex-W administration folks. Nosiree Bob. That would be wrong. Same goes for the intel agencies. None of these folks have any opinions on this matter, have never operated in Honduras before, and didn't spend a full decade there setting up shop to conduct a war in two neighboring countries, and didn't make any friends there in that decade they weren't there. Oh no. Besides, they've always hated military dictators in Latin America! Dictators don't bring The Freedom.
Posted by CP on September 25, 2009 at 6:55 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy