Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Ideology Today

Posted by on Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM

This image is on the main page of Seattle Time's website...

Picture_3.png
...a black boy doing science. The meaning of the image (the well-meaning image)? There is actual progress in the world. See, the world is getting better all of the time. Our world, the one we live in, has such a thing as a black boy doing science.

But there is another way of reading the image. It's all about the pleasure of seeing something new. It's more interesting (and therefore more pleasurable) to see a black boy doing science than to see a white boy (or Asian boy) doing the very same thing. The interesting thing about it (and the source of the pleasure) is it's so unusual, so unexpected. This unexpectedness makes the image stick out, and an image that sticks out is always better than one that does not stick out, that is much the same as many other images. The main purpose of photography is to catch the eye; a black boy doing science catches the eye.

 

Comments (61) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Baconcat 1
In the future, they might even show a native american child doing science!

Oh, nah, nevermind.
Posted by Baconcat on September 23, 2009 at 8:47 AM
zephsright 2
My boss at the UW just helped orchestrate the obtaining of an NSF grant called the Pacific Northwest Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation in STEM fields to encourage this very thing. http://uwnews.org/article.asp?articleID=…
Posted by zephsright on September 23, 2009 at 8:48 AM
3
look, if we are ever going to get past the issue of race then people like you need to stop bringing it into EVERY FUCKING THING. this kid is just a student, and maybe (gasp) it's just a picture of students in a science class. you'd probably be bitching if they focused on a white student too.
Posted by taint on September 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM
4
There's also a white boy there, Charles. Being shoved out of the center of the picture by the black boy.

What subliminal message do you think the photographer is sending?
Posted by NapoleonXIV on September 23, 2009 at 8:52 AM
5
Funny, my first thought was, "Why did we not have cool shit like this when I was in elementary school?"
Posted by Reg on September 23, 2009 at 8:59 AM
6
I've seen this image for years....have you been living in a cave Charles? Or just the cave of your own mind?
Posted by Billy Boy on September 23, 2009 at 9:04 AM
Heather 7
It is possible that any of the students in that picture have been influnced by one of the most eloquent spokesman for sciene and skepticism today, Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_deGras…

Tyson credits the late Carl Sagan for influncing his own interest in science (same for hundreds of other young scientists) and Tyson in turn is now filling Sagan's shoes as a popularizer of science
Posted by Heather on September 23, 2009 at 9:05 AM
Baconcat 8
@7: Listening and watching him on TV and in documentaries was one thing that inspired me to be excited about astronomy and cosmology. I filled my days and nights with reading Sagan, Shoemaker, Chandrasekhar, Levy and Lowell.

Thank god the education system in Texas snapped me out of that dream.
Posted by Baconcat on September 23, 2009 at 9:09 AM
9
Different strokes, I guess. I don't know how you can survive (or take seriously) a world where _everything_ is Fraught With Greater Meaning (That I Can Spot!).

Like Reg, and to a lesser extent taint, I didn't see any of what you did, and you still assert it like some greater Truth. I respectfully disagree.
Posted by pablo on September 23, 2009 at 9:10 AM
Vince 10
Seeing a black president has had the same effect.
Posted by Vince on September 23, 2009 at 9:11 AM
11
Minority girl remains in third place.
Posted by Daddy on September 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM
12
Though I should add that she will likely kick both their asses.
Posted by Daddy on September 23, 2009 at 9:17 AM
Irena 13
@10, yes, exactly.

I see what you see, Charles. I love this photo.
Posted by Irena on September 23, 2009 at 9:19 AM
14
Why do you think the stranger has you on the staff Charles? The hipsters love how it looks!
Posted by soggydan on September 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 15
Hell, I'm just pleased as punch to see fourth-graders doing science at all. I don't care if they're purple.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM
16 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
Christin 17
I see it as: The black kid is a cute kid. The white kid next to him is sort of funny-looking and making a weird face. Clearly the more-photogenic one gets top billing.
Posted by Christin on September 23, 2009 at 9:25 AM
foolish-rain 18
I used to work at a mostly white, suburban private school and l recall overhearing several conversations among the enrollment staff along the lines of "Did you get a picture of and " and "Let's put and her friends on the cover." My favorite comments was "Don't use that picture of wearing the bandana. It makes her look like a gangster" (about a 3rd grader).
Posted by foolish-rain on September 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM
Julie in Eugene 19
I see 5 kids in that picture. Only one is white. Maybe he took a picture of a black kid doing science because the scene was of a a class that is predominantly minority kids doing science. What's the racial/ethnic make-up of that school?
Posted by Julie in Eugene on September 23, 2009 at 9:29 AM
nater 20
Nice post, Charles. Channeling Roland Barthes lets a viewer get beyond merely seeing a photograph; images are constructed, have meaning(s), and can be read like any other text. In this text, the studium is a black child learning science. The punctum is the shattering of a visual stereotype (white scientist in lab coat).
Posted by nater on September 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Old Mama Chips 21
@19 Beat me to it. That's what I noticed too.
Posted by Old Mama Chips on September 23, 2009 at 9:34 AM
spoiler alert 22
if this was a white kid doing science, would the underlying meaning be that black kids can't do science? would it mean that every kid not represented in a seattle times photo can't do science?
Posted by spoiler alert on September 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Mahtli69 23
This is nothing new. Or, have we forgotten about George Washington Carver trying to play a phonograph record with a peanut, while Edward "Skippy" Williamson and Frederick "Jif" Armstrong stole his ideas?
Posted by Mahtli69 on September 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM
Old Mama Chips 24
Charles, look at the annual report for the school:

http://www.seattleschools.org/area/siso/…

Demographics from highest percentage to lowest: Hispanic, African American, Asian, White, Native American.

There's your answer.
Posted by Old Mama Chips on September 23, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Michael of the Green 25
You got this one right (although your explication was a bit more suited to one directed at 4th-graders). In a practical sense, while the impulse of the photographer may distort reality, it is for the best.
Posted by Michael of the Green on September 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Old Mama Chips 26
Edit @24: ETHNIC demographic
Posted by Old Mama Chips on September 23, 2009 at 9:43 AM
Max Solomon 27
the picture would have been better if there was an Asian-American, and Indian-American, an African-American, a Caucasian-American, a Hispanic-American, and a Native-American, with an equal mix of boys, girls, and intersex children.
Posted by Max Solomon on September 23, 2009 at 9:44 AM
Julie in Eugene 28
Personally I am offended by the fact that there are two boys in the foreground, while the two girls are relegated to the background. This clearly sends a message that girls can't (or shouldn't!) do science. I have half a mind to write a strongly worded letter
Posted by Julie in Eugene on September 23, 2009 at 9:49 AM
29
Wheres the cross-dresser kid with in a lab coat?

Fucking straightists!
Posted by Ballard Man on September 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM
bengermanj 30
Despite Charles' apparent amazement, it's really not all that uncommon for kids (of any race) to do science. Must we really look for racial overtones in absolutely everything? Fact is, those are American kids doing science. That should be all the explanation necessary. Anything else would be indulging the embarrassing prejudices of the observers, including Charles himself.
Posted by bengermanj http://facebook.com/bengermanj on September 23, 2009 at 10:04 AM
rara avis 31
walk into my (or any other science teacher's room in any metropolitan area) and you'll see black boys (and girls) doing science every day.

honestly, charles, you need to get out more and stop living in your head.
Posted by rara avis on September 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Old Mama Chips 32
@27 and 28, Now, now, you two. If there's anything we've learned from this whole Caster Semenya debacle, it's that we can't judge a person's sex by looks alone. Those two in the front could be girls and the ones in the back boys... Or any of them could be intersex...
Posted by Old Mama Chips on September 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM
33
And Bill Cosby ... playing a doctor? That's World's Fair novelty!
Posted by sall on September 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM
WhItE rAbBiT 34
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auR5qbHsF…

Best quote on Why DIVERSITY Sucks to date!
Posted by WhItE rAbBiT on September 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM
35
Much better than that fake black scientist, George Washington Carver.
Posted by I never saw him and Al Jolson in the same room... on September 23, 2009 at 10:24 AM
nater 36
@30 & 31
I think the point Charles was trying to make was about the IMAGE of the scientist. Regardless of who is actually doing science in our classrooms, a google image search of "scientist" produces images very different from the picture Charles posted.
Posted by nater on September 23, 2009 at 10:25 AM
37
Dear Stranger,
Please fire Charles Mudede. He is as insightful as Glenn Beck, and every bit as crazy.
Thank You,
Seattle
Posted by Seattle on September 23, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Will in Seattle 38
Way to hate on the two non-white girls doing science in the background.

News flash: most new scientists are women, not men.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM
39
If you're interested in the confluence of race and academic achievement in Seattle, take a look at this interactive map. It would take much more than a Slog post to discuss it.
http://mapgap.net/map.html

Posted by wiglet on September 23, 2009 at 10:42 AM
40
Look at the other students at the event in the Seattle Times gallery. Charles would have been upset with any of those pictures it seems. Woman instructor, lots of non-white boys and girls doing science...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ph…
Posted by Winky on September 23, 2009 at 10:52 AM
41
Wish I could edit that—there's much more than race on this map. Money's on the map, and it's a big factor. No mention of fat PTA bankrolls, multilingual immigrant kids, etc. So it's a snapshot, and snapshots miss the details. Still interesting and a tad shocking.
Posted by wiglet on September 23, 2009 at 10:54 AM
42
Lets just pretend that there was a camera randomly shooting pics of the kids, and those pics randomly used by the Seattle Times. And that 40% of the kids in the classroom are black. This would mean that 40% of the time Mudede can claim there are racial undertones. I am white, and honestly, I had no thought at all of race when I saw the picture. Perhaps the message is just kids doing science in this cool science bus. And it is a nice message, until Mudede tosses this red herring. If the message is just the simple one, maybe the picture was used cause it shows the kids with inquisitive expressions on their faces while they hold the tubes. Charles, perhaps you should turn all this reflection inward and analyze why you view the picture as a photo op using a token black kid...
Posted by probablynot on September 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM
43
This was my class and I wanted to weigh in on this article. This is not just a BLACK BOY doing science as your article states. I have a very diverse class with more than 14 languages in 25 students. This was an amazing opportunity for my school to be apart of the 1st Science Adventure Bus, and to think that all you got out of this was a Black boy doing science? I'm just missing the purpose of your writing? I feel disappointed by this article...
Posted by Mr. S on September 23, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Charles Mudede 44
@20, you know all of my tricks. @43, are you for real?
Posted by Charles Mudede on September 23, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 45
Join the club, Mr. S, that's exactly how most of us feel as well.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 23, 2009 at 12:01 PM
46
Didn't you know? It's post racial Amerrica!
Posted by kersy on September 23, 2009 at 12:02 PM
47
Being a mexican/something/whatever but mostly mexican.. I take offense to the fact that the mexican girls are in the back of the photo. Actually I don't. My first thought was pretty much the same as others "oh wow I wish I could've had a science lab on wheels." I didn't notice the colors until I read mudede's paragraph.
Posted by anthony990 http://www.myspace.com/oom748 on September 23, 2009 at 12:06 PM
48
44! Yes sir! We are doing great things here and this article kind of took the wind from my sails... My class looks like the mini-United Nations! ha ha, I'm happy to see people feel the way felt. Take care people and support your local elementary schools!
Mr. S
Posted by Mr. S on September 23, 2009 at 12:18 PM
49
Let's be honest, people... the only racist I see in this situation is the photographer for the Seattle Times. (insert sarcasm here)
Posted by adgirl on September 23, 2009 at 12:21 PM
50
@44, Yes, @43 is "for real"-- he's the teacher of those students and he's "for real" when he says your article is missing a purpose. Your "writing" is a disappointment to all who read print media as well as a disappointment to those who support public schools. Perhaps you should educate yourself a bit more before you decide to make it an issue on race.
Posted by drizzle. on September 23, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Uriel-238 51
Holy shit, guys, have you seen the experts on NOVA?

They're a completely chequered bunch. Scientific genius cares not about race, religious roots or gender. (Or as the recent news on Turing points out, sexual orientation).
Posted by Uriel-238 on September 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM
52
Dear Stranger,
Please fire Charles Mudede. He is a blithering idiot. And a race-baiting jackass to boot.
Thank You,
Seattle
Posted by Seattle on September 23, 2009 at 1:31 PM
nater 53
This photo is about a group of young students learning about science. As many commenters have pointed out, scientists are a diverse bunch, as are science classes.

But this is ALSO a photo about race. In spite of the diversity in the scientific community, the image of the heroic white male scientist in a lab coat is a visual archetype in our culture; this photo both references that archetype and speaks against it. I think that is the progress to which Charles refers.
Posted by nater on September 23, 2009 at 1:33 PM
54
Chuckles you sir, are an idiot.
Posted by why do you continue to post shit like this? on September 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM
55
he has a good point... just could have used a little more refining

the media is feeding you ideas when you don't realize it. this shit isn't chosen at random.
Posted by cubby on September 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM
56
@17 is right! The future belongs to _handsome_ black men.
Posted by CP on September 23, 2009 at 7:33 PM
lark 57
Charles,
Actually that's the exact same reaction I had when I opened up my morning paper. Indeed, I agree with you. Clearly, its a better image than having a mug shot of a black man. That said, it remains problematic both the display of the photo and our reaction to it. I noticed too on the Seattle Times newspaper boxes round town that an image of a handsome black man in a suit is reading the paper. Another positive image. I am all for it. But, the ST editors know exactly what they are doing. Each Front Page image comes with caveats for better or for worse. Alas, racialization in America remains as our reactions indicated.
Posted by lark on September 23, 2009 at 8:37 PM
aaryn 58
WHAT THE FUCK CHARLES!? Why do you have to make EVERYTHING about race? This has ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY *NOTHING* to do with race!

You pull the damn race card every chance you get and its getting OLD. *YOU* are the ignorant one here!

I HOPE THE STRANGER COMES TO THEIR SENSES AND FINALLY FIRES YOU.

You are just as bad as the teabaggers... except I think you have a resentment against WHITE people in general. THERES MORE TO LIFE THAN SKIN COLOR and your attempts at making EVERYTHING about race is just PATHETIC!!
Posted by aaryn on September 24, 2009 at 2:55 AM
Will in Seattle 59
Dude, capital letters are like shouting.

Invest in some duct tape and use it, aaryn.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 25, 2009 at 11:26 AM
elena 60
I heart Charles.
Posted by elena on September 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM
Michael from Washington 61
Did you really just highlight the race of a kid in a photograph for a reason I can't even begin to comprehend? Really? :|

How... unnecessary. I never even considered it I found this article. Until then it was just a child, like all the other children with him on the trip, each of them simply a person with various characteristics that make them the sum of something greater than their individual parts. Or something poetic like that.

Whatever, it's midnight, I'm tired.
Posted by Michael from Washington on September 27, 2009 at 12:01 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy