Slog
News & ArtsMonday, September 14, 2009
Sex Teh Gays And Their Buttsecks Are Soooo Icksy!
Posted by Dan Savage on Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:39 PM
Santorum—the slick, the Rick—washed over Slog earlier today. The point was made—yet again—that the gays and teh buttsecks is so icky. How can we expect mainstream Americans to accept us if we're having teh buttsecks and getting santorum all over absolutely everything?
Two points:
1. If you're doing anal sex right, America, there's shouldn't be any santorum. (And if you're doing politics right there shouldn't be any Santorum.) That's why santorum is defined as the "frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex." If you're clean, if you're only engaging in anal sex when your bowels are good 'n empty, if you're using condoms—in short, if you're doing it right—you're only going to have some frothy lube to show for your efforts, not a frothy mix of lube, fecal matter, and semen. Santorum sometimes happens, of course. Let's not kid ourselves: it's ass fucking, and accidents sometimes happen. But it's always an unwelcome and unexpected occurrence, a mood-killer and a sex-ender ("Let's hit the shower!").
2. Most of the santorum produced in America—or frothed in America—is produced by... STRAIGHT PEOPLE. According to a 2005 study by CDC, "40% of men and 35% of women between 25 and 44 had engaged in heterosexual anal sex." And then there's this: "Another survey in 2008 focused on a much younger demographic of teens and young adults aged 15-21. It found that 16% of 1350 surveyed had had anal sex in the previous 3 months, with condoms being used 29% of the time. However, given the subject matter, the survey hypothesized the prevalence was probably underestimated."
Gay people are a tiny percentage of the population—roughly 3-5%—and even if every gay couple in America had anal sex every time they had sex (and something like a 30% of gay men never have anal sex), we would still be way, way, way outnumbered by the numbers of straight couples having anal sex.
So who's responsible for most of the santorum being pumped out in America? Straight people are.
2
never done it, but you can't tell me that your rectum isn't normally always smeared with feces. bury your nose in someone's ass and take a whiff. where do you think the smell comes from?
again, i wouldn't know, and don't wanna know, but it's common sense that gay sex is dirty. where do you think the derogatory "fudge-packing" comes from?
i suppose you could enema it all out. nothing sexier than a douche for a homosexual i guess. swell.
again, i wouldn't know, and don't wanna know, but it's common sense that gay sex is dirty. where do you think the derogatory "fudge-packing" comes from?
i suppose you could enema it all out. nothing sexier than a douche for a homosexual i guess. swell.
5
REWRITE DESK!
"But it's always and unwelcome and unexpected occurrence, a mood-killer and a sex-endeR ("Let's hit the shower!")."
"But it's always and unwelcome and unexpected occurrence, a mood-killer and a sex-endeR ("Let's hit the shower!")."
7
Considering she's popped out 3 lil' loveschilds @3, I'd have to say that assertion is probably slightly exaggerated.
Unless someone can come up with a proper analogue relating to "verbal Santorum"...
Unless someone can come up with a proper analogue relating to "verbal Santorum"...
9
So in order to do it "right" one must enema and use a lubricant and use a condom.
Otherwise you get shit (full of e-coli and other bacteria) all over yourself.
So did cavemen homos get santorum on themselves?
Were they doing it "right"?
If homosexuals innately ARE homosexual because nature made them that way why didn't nature also give them a self-lubricating shit-free orifice to fuck like she was kind enough to give heterosexuals?
Does Mother Nature hate faggots?
Or maybe, Dan;
just maybe,
you aren't doing it "right" after all....
Otherwise you get shit (full of e-coli and other bacteria) all over yourself.
So did cavemen homos get santorum on themselves?
Were they doing it "right"?
If homosexuals innately ARE homosexual because nature made them that way why didn't nature also give them a self-lubricating shit-free orifice to fuck like she was kind enough to give heterosexuals?
Does Mother Nature hate faggots?
Or maybe, Dan;
just maybe,
you aren't doing it "right" after all....
10
@2 What you say is not true. Just because you have a stinky unclean ass does not mean everyone else does. I have heard the exact same concern from another straight guy I knew so it must be a common misperception. And when you "bury your nose in someone's ass" it should not smell like...you know, unless you are into that and SOME people are.
"But it's always an unwelcome and unexpected occurrence, a mood-killer and a sex-ended."
Thanks for making that clear Dan. I have always had a problem with that word. It really discribes when straight people have anal sex. Let's just make the record clear. If everything goes right there should be no fecal matter and the only smell should be lube, sweat and maybe roses.
Many straights don't understand that because they think it's "gay" even to clean between their butt cheeks.
"But it's always an unwelcome and unexpected occurrence, a mood-killer and a sex-ended."
Thanks for making that clear Dan. I have always had a problem with that word. It really discribes when straight people have anal sex. Let's just make the record clear. If everything goes right there should be no fecal matter and the only smell should be lube, sweat and maybe roses.
Many straights don't understand that because they think it's "gay" even to clean between their butt cheeks.
12
Dan, did you READ the article about evolution you posted today?
"It is clear that lifelong same-sex orientation is unlikely to evolve"
"It is clear that lifelong same-sex orientation is unlikely to evolve"
15
@9
it's obviously unnatural. more power to y'all, though. smear yourselves with whatever floats your boat. -shudder- just don't claim that the butt was meant for insertion.
it's obviously unnatural. more power to y'all, though. smear yourselves with whatever floats your boat. -shudder- just don't claim that the butt was meant for insertion.
17
Pushing santorum up the search engine hit list is the only reason for this article. I'm surprised you geniuses didn't get that.
18
We should only use the anus for what it was "meant" for, just like how we should only use sex for what it was "meant" for, i.e. procreation. All recreational sex is a sin! A sin! A sin! It's not what it was meant for!
19
@2 (hee hee "number two" hee hee)
Actually this one time I went to the doctor because I had blood in my stool and was worried about, you know, colon cancer or something. He tried to get a "smear" by sticking his [gloved] finger up my ass, but... he couldn't find anything. There was nothing in there. So instead, I had to do this disgusting procedure with a home "smear-collection" kit. (I can give you the details of that, *if* you really want them.) Why did I have to do this? Because there was NO SHIT IN MY RECTUM. (Yes, I wiped my ass. I always do. I'm pretty sure I even washed it when I showered that morning, again because I always do. But that's all. I mean, the whole point of the doctor visit was so he could poke around up there and find something.)
So um, if you're going from your own personal experience that rectums are "normally always smeared with feces," then you might want to rethink your personal hygiene practices. Just sayin'.
Actually this one time I went to the doctor because I had blood in my stool and was worried about, you know, colon cancer or something. He tried to get a "smear" by sticking his [gloved] finger up my ass, but... he couldn't find anything. There was nothing in there. So instead, I had to do this disgusting procedure with a home "smear-collection" kit. (I can give you the details of that, *if* you really want them.) Why did I have to do this? Because there was NO SHIT IN MY RECTUM. (Yes, I wiped my ass. I always do. I'm pretty sure I even washed it when I showered that morning, again because I always do. But that's all. I mean, the whole point of the doctor visit was so he could poke around up there and find something.)
So um, if you're going from your own personal experience that rectums are "normally always smeared with feces," then you might want to rethink your personal hygiene practices. Just sayin'.
22
Okay, @8, technically I should have said "...considering she's allegedly popped out three lil Loveschilds..."
And really, if porn has taught us anything Dan it's that the alimentary canals of straight women are as clean as a NASA white room and smell like lilacs year-round, so obviously there's no basis whatsoever in comparing teh icksy gay Santorum-soaked buttsecks to the squeaky-clean, laundry-fresh smelling straight buttsecks.
And really, if porn has taught us anything Dan it's that the alimentary canals of straight women are as clean as a NASA white room and smell like lilacs year-round, so obviously there's no basis whatsoever in comparing teh icksy gay Santorum-soaked buttsecks to the squeaky-clean, laundry-fresh smelling straight buttsecks.
23
12: did you UNDERSTAND what you read of that paper that Dan posted today? The sentence you quoted was pretty unexceptional in context.
24
Hey - I have been fucking and getting fucked for many years, and love it.... both sides of the coin. Thanks to the goddesses, many gay men are in exactly the same boat.
This article made me feel creepy.
Someone has a hang up on the whole topic.Have fun, go animal, little muss is no big deal, take a shower together before and after.
Remember Dan is rather compulsive about getting touched, germs, and many other things in life. Talking about good fucks would not be his thing. Sucking twinks most likely is, and, having them suck him.
I bet he, Dan, thinks cum is icky messy, too.
Signed: Young Bear, having a lot of fun
This article made me feel creepy.
Someone has a hang up on the whole topic.Have fun, go animal, little muss is no big deal, take a shower together before and after.
Remember Dan is rather compulsive about getting touched, germs, and many other things in life. Talking about good fucks would not be his thing. Sucking twinks most likely is, and, having them suck him.
I bet he, Dan, thinks cum is icky messy, too.
Signed: Young Bear, having a lot of fun
25
And I suppose, since sticking your dick in someone's mouth doesn't lead to procreation, you fucksticks who are against anal sex have never had a blowjob either.
Hmm. That would explain a lot.
Hmm. That would explain a lot.
26
Santorum is straight. He ran is entire campaign on how straight he is. Rick "The Slick" Santorum's entire platform is "I'm a good heterosexual, married-with-children Catholic and gays are bad". Therefore it is impossible for gay butt-secks to produce Santorum. I assure you all Santorums were produced with heterosexual, baby-making fucking.
29
@27
if your cooking and shaving is smeared with e-coli, i'd recommend you refrain. that's just me.
if your cooking and shaving is smeared with e-coli, i'd recommend you refrain. that's just me.
32
24
you're not being fair to Dan.
He's trying to be more adventuresome in his late middle age years.
He has graduated from licking doorknobs to actually french kissing them. With deep tongue action.
And his latest trick is buttfucking doorknobs.
Be sure to lube them up good first.
And you probably want to hang a 'do not disturb' sign on the other side.
(...unless you like surprising and being surprised by the hotel maid...)
you're not being fair to Dan.
He's trying to be more adventuresome in his late middle age years.
He has graduated from licking doorknobs to actually french kissing them. With deep tongue action.
And his latest trick is buttfucking doorknobs.
Be sure to lube them up good first.
And you probably want to hang a 'do not disturb' sign on the other side.
(...unless you like surprising and being surprised by the hotel maid...)
34
The mouth wasn't "meant" for insertion, either, MikeC. Putting a penis where it doesn't belong is clearly unnatural and gross. So, I guess you're never getting another blowjob again, ever, eh?
37
Excellent comeback to these assholes, Dan. Straights are responsible for santorum. You're absolutely right - the numbers are on your side. I just don't get why butt sex between men bothers them so much. Honestly, why do they care if it has nothing to do with them? I'll never get these people.
38
scene: Saturday night at the Savage house...
Dan- "oooh, gross! poop!"
Terry- "Let's hit the shower!"
So we're guessing your shower is as nasty as the floor at the Atlanta Eagle...
Dan- "oooh, gross! poop!"
Terry- "Let's hit the shower!"
So we're guessing your shower is as nasty as the floor at the Atlanta Eagle...
39
@36 MikeC--
Based on your unoriginal ignorant rants, only someone psychotic would get near your dick or even you for that matter. Although I suspect a healthy splash of sulfuric acid on your dick might be more to your liking.
Based on your unoriginal ignorant rants, only someone psychotic would get near your dick or even you for that matter. Although I suspect a healthy splash of sulfuric acid on your dick might be more to your liking.
41
I think I'll have to pass, MikeC. If there's anything I've learned from you homophobic half-wits, it's that one should never have sex with an asshole.
42
You know what's highly unnatural? Prayer. No occurence of it in the animal kingdom. Clearly a sign of human depravity.
43
@ fnarf, julie, mark, et. al.
doesn't it strike you as funny how your insults are not backed up by any facts? i'd be happy to take back anything if you could explain to me what was wrong in what i've said. and how am i homophobic? i've said i support your right to do what you want. pack-away!
doesn't it strike you as funny how your insults are not backed up by any facts? i'd be happy to take back anything if you could explain to me what was wrong in what i've said. and how am i homophobic? i've said i support your right to do what you want. pack-away!
47
wow, you gays sure do have a low tolerance for people challenging your talking points. well, you're young. i certainly didn't mean to offend.
i do think i get where you may have misunderstood. you assumed that calling something "unnatural" implies that it's "immoral". on the contrary, christianity itself strives to elevate people above "nature". civilisation wouldn't be possible without that. and sorry, fnarf, i don't swing that way. thanks for the offer though.
have a nice evening!
i do think i get where you may have misunderstood. you assumed that calling something "unnatural" implies that it's "immoral". on the contrary, christianity itself strives to elevate people above "nature". civilisation wouldn't be possible without that. and sorry, fnarf, i don't swing that way. thanks for the offer though.
have a nice evening!
48
If Christianity strives to elevate people above nature, Then I think it's safe to say that Christianity is the "War On Drugs" of religions.
51
There are innumerable infections and various diseases associated with the infectious nature of fecal matter that can be contracted from engaging in sodomy because of the many microorganisms found in the anus and because of the delicate nature of the rectum, (ruptures and lacerations).
Human papilloma virus.
Anal cancer.
Hemorrhoids.
Anal fissures.
Chlamydia.
Gonorrhea.
Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C.
Herpes virus.
Rectal prolapse.
Loss of control over the bowels.
HIV/AIDS.
Nature is very clear on what's the purpose for the anus and that purpose is not sodomy. As such when one engages in such acts one must take into account as for example a smoker has to, that such behavior will ultimately lead to death. It also needs to be taken into account that just as we keep children away from tobacco advertisements and other media and corporate tactics to addict them on a habit (smoking) that will send them to an early grave, if we are truly honest and want our children to take on healthy habits we must also keep from them any promotion of sodomy and any other messages that condone and entice them into engaging in abuse of their anal area. In that sense some gay lobby groups have lots of culpability because they (due to their ideology and practices) have been at the forefront of culturally normalizing and promoting sodomy unto the larger population which includes our children.
Human papilloma virus.
Anal cancer.
Hemorrhoids.
Anal fissures.
Chlamydia.
Gonorrhea.
Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C.
Herpes virus.
Rectal prolapse.
Loss of control over the bowels.
HIV/AIDS.
Nature is very clear on what's the purpose for the anus and that purpose is not sodomy. As such when one engages in such acts one must take into account as for example a smoker has to, that such behavior will ultimately lead to death. It also needs to be taken into account that just as we keep children away from tobacco advertisements and other media and corporate tactics to addict them on a habit (smoking) that will send them to an early grave, if we are truly honest and want our children to take on healthy habits we must also keep from them any promotion of sodomy and any other messages that condone and entice them into engaging in abuse of their anal area. In that sense some gay lobby groups have lots of culpability because they (due to their ideology and practices) have been at the forefront of culturally normalizing and promoting sodomy unto the larger population which includes our children.
52
@5, ignoring Loveschild:
Ummm. Maybe fix the "and" to be "an" and then you'll have a point. Catching one error and not the other? Priceless. And very witty choice of name! Trolls are funny!
Ummm. Maybe fix the "and" to be "an" and then you'll have a point. Catching one error and not the other? Priceless. And very witty choice of name! Trolls are funny!
53
@51, I know it's hard for you to concentrate for long periods of time, but the WHOLE POINT OF THIS POST in the first place was to point out that "gay" is not a synonym for "anal sex", and that most of the people having anal sex are straight, not gay, and many gay people don't have anal sex, and -- have I mentioned this already? You're a stone cold moron and the most deeply-entrenched bigot I've ever run across.
54
51, Loveschild, far more people die or get maimed in car crashes than they do with anal sex. Does that make cars immoral? Do you ever think though any of the crap you spout before you type it? I love totally discrediting your arguments at every turn.
55
@2, 15: The only reason you think that there's always santorum up your ass is because you're so full of shit, Mike. And maybe we'd try to counter your argument if you HAD one, but you only have bigotry and ignorance, so, um, this is my last response. From here on I'm adding you to the list of people I ignore completely.
@41: Applause.
@41: Applause.
56
53
thank you for clarifying it, Fbarf.
really.
read it again.
no one is saying only homosexual anal sex is unsafe.
no one is saying heterosexual anal sex is safer than homosexual anal sex.
you're being a little defensive.
Loveschild is correct in noting that the homosexual culture is active in promoting acceptance of anal sex as normal.
our own dear Danny would teach kids that anal sex is a 100% foolproof safe alternative to risky vaginal sex.
that's perverse.
thank you for clarifying it, Fbarf.
really.
read it again.
no one is saying only homosexual anal sex is unsafe.
no one is saying heterosexual anal sex is safer than homosexual anal sex.
you're being a little defensive.
Loveschild is correct in noting that the homosexual culture is active in promoting acceptance of anal sex as normal.
our own dear Danny would teach kids that anal sex is a 100% foolproof safe alternative to risky vaginal sex.
that's perverse.
57
54
if one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone it is immoral.
if one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills oe maims someone as a result it is immoral.
deceiving kids about the health risks of anal sex is immoral.
trying to convince our kids that anal sex is a 100% foolproof safe superior alternative to vaginal sex is immoral.
if one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone it is immoral.
if one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills oe maims someone as a result it is immoral.
deceiving kids about the health risks of anal sex is immoral.
trying to convince our kids that anal sex is a 100% foolproof safe superior alternative to vaginal sex is immoral.
58
57, Most car accidents happen to sober people, so really your argument is invalid.
Everything we do comes with risks, and nobody is arguing that kids should be taught that anal sex is 100% fool proof superior alternative. That is you trying to divert the debate because you can't make an argument based on the facts.
Driving a car is far more dangerous to one's life and health than anal sex, yet people don't get hysterical about automobiles.
Everything we do comes with risks, and nobody is arguing that kids should be taught that anal sex is 100% fool proof superior alternative. That is you trying to divert the debate because you can't make an argument based on the facts.
Driving a car is far more dangerous to one's life and health than anal sex, yet people don't get hysterical about automobiles.
59
51 - and there are no diseases spread during heterosexual, vaginal, penetrative, whatever-the-hell-you-want-to-call-it sex? Are you saying we should encourage kids to never have any kind of sex every because of diseases, then?
61
59
if a man and woman are uninfected with STDs and remain monogamous they can have unprotected vaginal sex and never give each other disease.
two uninfected people having unprotected anal sex will, each and every time they have anal sex, be exposing themselves to disease causing bacteria and introducing those bacteria into places in the body where they will do great harm. anal sex is inherently unhealthy behavior.
we should encourage kids to postpone sex until they are married and to be monogamous thereafter.
if a man and woman are uninfected with STDs and remain monogamous they can have unprotected vaginal sex and never give each other disease.
two uninfected people having unprotected anal sex will, each and every time they have anal sex, be exposing themselves to disease causing bacteria and introducing those bacteria into places in the body where they will do great harm. anal sex is inherently unhealthy behavior.
we should encourage kids to postpone sex until they are married and to be monogamous thereafter.
62
58
If one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone do you think their behavior is immoral?
If one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills or maims someone as a result do you think their behavior is immoral?
If one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone do you think their behavior is immoral?
If one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills or maims someone as a result do you think their behavior is immoral?
63
60, In what context? Anal sex is 100% foolproof in that no one will get pregnant having anal sex. Do you not understand what you read, or do you deliberately misinterpret it?
64
62, No matter how much you want to divert the debate because you can't argue on rational grounds, if you spend time in a car, you are much more likely to be harmed or killed than if you have anal sex for that same time period.
Everything has risk. You choose to be hysterical over gay sex, but cars, which are inherently much more dangerous, don't phase you.
Why do you need to make stuff up, rather than arguing on the facts?
Everything has risk. You choose to be hysterical over gay sex, but cars, which are inherently much more dangerous, don't phase you.
Why do you need to make stuff up, rather than arguing on the facts?
65
64
Bob,
If one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone do you think their behavior is immoral?
If one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills or maims someone as a result do you think their behavior is immoral?
Bob,
If one operates a car while drunk or stoned and kills or maims someone do you think their behavior is immoral?
If one knowingly operates a car unsafely and kills or maims someone as a result do you think their behavior is immoral?
66
58
Bob,
Dan IS arguing that kids should be taught that anal sex is 100% fool proof superior alternative.
Bob,
Dan IS arguing that kids should be taught that anal sex is 100% fool proof superior alternative.
68
65) Yes, they are operating an vehicle, and already dangerous thing, making it even more dangerous. Having anal sex is much safer, especially when one takes the proper precautions. But again you only bring this up to divert from the fact that you are much more likely to be harmed or killed in a car than you are having anal sex. Yet for some reason you don't rant against the evils of cars. I wonder why?
69
66, Again, do you not understand what you read, or are you deliberately misinterpreting it? Maybe a reading comprehension class for you?
70
I love this thread. Simple post: More straights than gays have butt sex. That's probably true, too. And yet every fucking wingding in the world seems to think it's some kind of invitation to rant about queers.
You guys are all fucking losers.
You guys are all fucking losers.
72
68
Bob, try to focus.
this post isn't about evil cars.
besides, none of those cars have been convicted of anything.
Bob, try to focus.
this post isn't about evil cars.
besides, none of those cars have been convicted of anything.
73
Most of those diseases/problems helpfully listed by #51 are also transmissible by penis-vagina sex. Except for the anal ones, obviously. But with penis-vagina sex you can add fun extras like cervical cancer, so it sort of equals out.
74
Jesus, you guys just can't resist trying to teach the pigs to sing, can you? For myself, I love love love that I can killfile anyone who irritates the fuck out of me and make them *poof* disappear! Yay, no more asshole trolls!
77
Quite a bit of misinformation being spewed around here, but not all of what the haters (yes, they're still haters) are saying is untrue. I personally know two guys who had to have their buttholes "fixed" because of, um, what they took up their butts being too large of a "calibre", shall we say. One of them damn near died.
So, instead of going about screeching "NO BUTTSEX! NO! NO! NONE AT ALL! NOT EVEN STRAIGHT BUTTSEX!" how about if we promote a very antiquated and "quaint" (to use Wolfowitz's word for the Geneva Conventions) concept called moderation.
In the case of gay guys, I'd like to see, amidst the avalanche of safe sex information available in most gay or even kinda-gay areas or, of course, on the interthang, a message of, "Hey guy, think about it, do you really need to have that dude's 12 inch dick inside you? Couldn't you settle for a great looking 7 incher? And do you really need to get fucked NOWNOWNOW?" It all comes down to practicing moderation, which is something Dan's been preaching for years.
So, instead of going about screeching "NO BUTTSEX! NO! NO! NONE AT ALL! NOT EVEN STRAIGHT BUTTSEX!" how about if we promote a very antiquated and "quaint" (to use Wolfowitz's word for the Geneva Conventions) concept called moderation.
In the case of gay guys, I'd like to see, amidst the avalanche of safe sex information available in most gay or even kinda-gay areas or, of course, on the interthang, a message of, "Hey guy, think about it, do you really need to have that dude's 12 inch dick inside you? Couldn't you settle for a great looking 7 incher? And do you really need to get fucked NOWNOWNOW?" It all comes down to practicing moderation, which is something Dan's been preaching for years.
78
the real thrust (pardon the pun) of this discussion is that the people who are offended at the risks of anal sex aren't offended because it's risky. As others have pointed out, 'most everything fun is risky. Driving, vag sex, sky diving, oral sex, deep sea fishing, &c. The people who are offended by this particular risk are offended because the participants find it to be fun. Shame on you.
79
@77, I've known women whose cervices were injured from taking in things of 'too large of a calibre' also. Usually things attached to rather insensitive incompetent straight men. And god knows everyone thinks its 'natural' to stick dicks into pussies, you know as long as you're married and trying to get pregnant and not trying to have a good time or anything... A man with a 12" cock ought to know how to use it no matter where he's sticking it.
No arguments with the moderation thing though, definitely a good idea in any context.
Also, Fnarf, I just never ever get tired of your comments. you kick so much ass.
No arguments with the moderation thing though, definitely a good idea in any context.
Also, Fnarf, I just never ever get tired of your comments. you kick so much ass.
81
@loveschild: " As such when one engages in such acts one must take into account as for example a smoker has to, that such behavior will ultimately lead to death."
All behaviors lead to death.
But more to the point, nothing you list is an inevitable outcome of anal sex. And the mouth is for putting food in and breathing, but I bet you kiss with it. And you get lots of germs that way.
All behaviors lead to death.
But more to the point, nothing you list is an inevitable outcome of anal sex. And the mouth is for putting food in and breathing, but I bet you kiss with it. And you get lots of germs that way.
83
To each his own. But maybe this incredibly boring straight vanilla guy thinks anal sex is not worth the effort.
First you have to convince the girl it's a GREAT idea, and it's usually more for your curiosity than anything ... it's just that it's right there ... and you think wow ... I've seen it on the TV, people put there dick in there all the time.
Then you have to lube it, and stretch, go really really slowly ...
And even then even if there is no shit, your dick most likely will still smell like ass and be contaminated with disease ... so no vaginal or blow job for you if you fuck up.
Not to mention if you go in to quick you end up hurting your partner and feel like shit for just doing something for the hell of it.
For me personally, can't say it's worth it. But to each his or her own.
First you have to convince the girl it's a GREAT idea, and it's usually more for your curiosity than anything ... it's just that it's right there ... and you think wow ... I've seen it on the TV, people put there dick in there all the time.
Then you have to lube it, and stretch, go really really slowly ...
And even then even if there is no shit, your dick most likely will still smell like ass and be contaminated with disease ... so no vaginal or blow job for you if you fuck up.
Not to mention if you go in to quick you end up hurting your partner and feel like shit for just doing something for the hell of it.
For me personally, can't say it's worth it. But to each his or her own.
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Hating People Doesn't Make Them Thinner by Jen Graves
-
Los Angeles Gay Bar Bans Bachelorette Parties Until Marriage Equality Is Attained by David Schmader
-
Fill in the Blank by Grant Brissey
-
This Reminds Me of the Great Calculator Scare of the Late '70s/Early '80s by David Schmader
-
Idiot Tries to Defend Bigoted Anti-Gay-Marriage Preacher on Anderson Cooper by Paul Constant
-
Six Moms with Too Much Time on Their Hands and a Shitty Website Decide to Fight Gay Superheroes by Paul Constant
-
Why Mayor McGinn's Wife Canceled Her Family's Seattle Times Subscription by Eli Sanders
-
What the Hell Is Wrong With Seattle's Pride Parade? by Dominic Holden
-
The Saturday Morning News by Unpaid Intern
-
NYC Man Ticketed for Not Riding in the Bike Lane by Jonathan Golob
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (84) RSS