Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, September 10, 2009

There Is No Morality Without Religion

Posted by on Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM

This one's for you, Joel...

One in every 33 women who attend worship services regularly has been the target of sexual advances by a religious leader, a survey released Wednesday says. The study, by Baylor University researchers, found that the problem is so pervasive that it almost certainly involves a wide range of denominations, religious traditions and leaders. "It certainly is prevalent, and clearly the problem is more than simply a few charismatic leaders preying on vulnerable followers," said Diana Garland, dean of Baylor's School of Social Work, who co-authored the study.

It found that more than two-thirds of the offenders were married to someone else at the time of the advance.

I think incidents of "clergy sexual misconduct" are higher than this study found. According to the study's executive summary, that 3% figure only accounts for "women who had attended a congregation in the past month." Three percent of churchgoing women reported that they had been hit on or had had sexual relationships with religious leaders. The study doesn't seem to account for women might have been hit on or had sexual relationships with religious leaders and then stopped going to church.

Another fun fact: while two-thirds of the offenders were married to someone else when they lunged at the lucky 3%, nearly all of the passes—92%—were "made in secret." So even single pastors and priests—men who, if they're not Catholic, might have been able to date these women—were trying to score a little parishioner pussy on the down low.

And if you're looking for a reason to keep your kids out of church: the authors of the study list six reasons why people are vulnerable to sexual predators in church settings. Number six...

Trust in the sanctuary: Congregations are considered sanctuaries—safe places—where normal attentiveness to self-protection is not considered necessary.

Only by people who aren't paying attention.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
sorry, but did joel say something to contradict this? i don't read his column, so i don't know what you are reacting to.
Posted by ellarosa on September 10, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 2
Maybe I'm missing something here, but 1/33 seems to correspond pretty closely to the percentage of women I wouldn't kick out of bed. Seems to me that it has nothing to do with religion; that's just the odds you have do deal with out there.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on September 10, 2009 at 10:52 AM
rob! 3
Plenty of ministers take advantage of congregants through the power, real or imaginary, that they have over them. But if you're a single nice, ethical guy/gal minister in a denomination that allows marriage, you're still in a pickle when it comes to dating. The congregation is your obvious fishing pond, but people still unrealistically expect you to be above "the desires of the flesh." The normal, healthy dating progression to sex creates all kinds of pitfalls--perceptions of hypocrisy, jealousies, worries about gossip esp. if the relationship ends, etc. You would need to be extremely discrete, or try to do your dating in a whole different social sphere. Either way, nosy people will judge you even if you're the world's best boy scout.

Far better to be an articulate, out, gay, advice columnist. Good choice, Dan.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on September 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Urgutha Forka 4
The energy that radiates from the combined sexual repression of the ultra-conservative can be seen from Mars.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on September 10, 2009 at 11:05 AM
5
how many girls are hit on and harrassed at high school?
keep'em out of school!
how many women are hit on at work?
keep'em in the home!
Posted by how far up your ass can you shove your head? on September 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM
6
You can count me as one. I'm now an agnostic, but while I was going through marriage problems, the fundamentalist preacher at my mother's church gave me "counseling." Within the first minute of sitting down he steered the conversation to whether or not I had had orgasms with my husband...pervert!!!! I did ream him out though...lol!
Posted by Robin in PA on September 10, 2009 at 11:19 AM
7
Um...Dan? Do some math, please.

1 in 33. In other words, about 3%. What do you suppose would happen if we compared that number to the percentage of women who have experienced sexual advances from male authority figures in other settings? Work supervisors, doctors and therapists, military superios, etc.?

Yes, it's good to point out that churches aren't the safe havens we think they are (unless you're a child molestor who wants relative impunity), but this number doesn't really prove anything. I respect criticizing the church, but we don't need intellectual dishonesty to do it.
Posted by laurelgardner http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=5877570 on September 10, 2009 at 11:21 AM
8
2 & 4 have good points & so does Dan. But women and girls are also preyed upon by cocky jack asses with an overblown sense of entitlement everywhere. This is a predatory society.

The hypocrisy in these church going instances is duly noted. It’s sick because these charismatic jack holes think they are rock stars but they deceive and lie to manipulate vulnerable men & women. But then again, it’s disturbing to me that a lot of men behave that way and society is pretty okay with their objectification of mostly women and girls.
Posted by sall on September 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM
9
Only 3% have been getting hit on by largely married pastors? Gotta say that sounds like somewhat better behavior than the rest of society.
Posted by Karey on September 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM
10
@9 and everyone else who brought up the fact that 1 in 33 is pretty average: I gotta agree with you. Church is a very personal setting, and people hit on each other. Sheesh.

It's not like churches are festering cesspools of sexual harassment; it's just that people who pretend that church is somehow apart from the normal scumminess of everyday society and the natural behavioral tendencies of humans are wrong.

Kudos @ 7, though. It's good of Dan to raise awareness of the fact that church isn't always a safe haven. But no where is.
Posted by Snickerdoodly on September 10, 2009 at 12:08 PM
11
Some people can't appreciate the difference between being hit on by your boss, who's just your boss, and hit on by our pastor or priest.
Posted by Dan Savage on September 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM
12
Another few things:

1. way to sensationalize the fact that the advances were made "in secret" - exactly how often do sane people make the majority of their sexual advances for the whole world to see?

2. Women who stopped going to church? Um, I hate to break it to you, Dan, but most people who care enough about church to go are going to choose a different church rather than stop going altogether.

3. "two thirds of the offenders were married to someone else..." No, two thirds of the OFFENSES were committed by someone who was married. Unless the study names them all individually, there's no way to know if each "offender" committed only one "offense" (highly unlikely) or if those making adulterous advances were doing more than their share (highly likely).

Posted by laurelgardner http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=5877570 on September 10, 2009 at 1:28 PM
13
Yes, Dan, I do know the difference between being hit on by your boss and being hit on my your pastor or priest: when it's your boss, you can lose your income, the roof over your head, the food on your table and your health insurance.

When it's your pastor, you lose a weekend activity. Whoop de doo.

And I say this as a woman of faith. C'mon, Dan.
Posted by laurelgardner http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=5877570 on September 10, 2009 at 1:31 PM
14
One of the defining hallmarks of gurus (or any charismatic religious or social leader) is their sexual license among their followers. Their followers reinforce the guru's perceptions of his own standing amongst the group, and sooner or later --and ALWAYS-- that translates to using the followers to fulfill whatever sexual need he has or wishes to explore.

It's almost a tautology, it's so common. For people who study this kind of thing, it'd be surprising if this stuff didn't go on.
Posted by benvolio on September 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM
JunieGirl 15
Men pursue positions of power in order to use it to their advantage, predominantly for sexual activity. Duh! Women in every institution have to be aware of that, and parents need to be very careful with their children. Although today's YPW included one woman who hit on a kid, the vast majority of abuses are perpetrated by men.

So since testosterone seems to be the driving factor in sexual power abuses, is the solution chemical castration? That's a drastic solution to a pervasive problem, and not one that I advocate. But name another factor that has more influence on the abuse of power than the drive that testosterone gives to abusers, and we'll see what solutions can be found for that.
Posted by JunieGirl on September 10, 2009 at 2:24 PM
16
My aunt fucked our parish priest. He later left the Church because he was in love with another woman in the congregation.

My mother was hit on by her priest (Episcopal). She turned him down, but he also had an affair with her best friend, who played the piano for the choir. She'd gone to him for counseling about her marriage problems.

When these things happen, the congregation usually blames the women and gives the priests a pass.
Posted by jade on September 10, 2009 at 3:01 PM
17
@ 14, one of my points as #8 was that sexuality/sexual desires are normal human features. That will never go away nor should it. You are right though that most sexual perpetrators are men, men in all walks of life want sex. Our society, in general has a tendency to raise boys with an overblown sense of entitlement to girls. From a young age girls are heavily socialized to be objects of beauty. I’m happy to have a lot of testosterone. But I think people need to be enculturated so that they treat others with respect and humanity – not something that’s there just for the taking.
Posted by sall on September 10, 2009 at 3:42 PM
18
I meant to @ 15 ... not 14.

and in case I didn't make it clear, sexuality is normal but these abuses of trust and power are not normal or healthy expressions of sexuality... which everyone here agrees with anyway -
Posted by sall on September 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM
19
Hmmmm.....1 in 33 women worship-service-attenders has suffered a sexual advance by a religious leader, a typical small congregation has one minister and at least 33 adult women in it....
EVERY religious leader is a sex offender!
Posted by Bad Math on September 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM
Loveschild 20
The church is not exempt from being exposed to the same depraved individuals that other institutions are also exposed to. But i'm glad the light has been shed on this problem even if it was 1%, one person being subjected to this sort inappropriate behavior in what's supposed to be the body of Christ is intolerable and in the end it only serves to empower those who despise the church. As the Living word says in Mark 9;42-47

"If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out."

"And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than to have two feet and be thrown into hell."

"And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell"

So the church is always better served by casting out these individuals and bringing them to justice, so that the good name of our Lord is not easily taken in vain by those who seek to.
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on September 10, 2009 at 4:47 PM
21
My foot can cause me to sin? Where, at the bowling alley? In the long jump?
Posted by CP on September 10, 2009 at 5:55 PM
22
Joe.my.god: Father Wigglesworth! huh-huh.

black box word: fishy!
Posted by Libby on September 10, 2009 at 8:40 PM
23
@Dan - there's a good reason that the ones who aren't married are doing this in secret anyway - it's wrong. It may not be against the rules for them to date and marry, but you can bet that it's against the rules for them to take advantage of their parishioners. It's sexual misconduct and if it comes out they lose not just that job, but their career, and properly so.
Posted by Nomti on September 11, 2009 at 7:14 AM
24
@16 - When did all this happen? My understanding is that the rules are pretty strict nowadays, and if someone turned that guy in he should have been deposed.
Posted by Nomti on September 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM
25
The way in which some of these so-called ministers take advantage of their parishoners has to stop. It hurts me to my heart, and I am speaking from personal experience. I was one of those parishoners. Believe me, I tried to tell my story to the media, but no one wants to print it. If anyone can offer any advice as how to expose this minister, I will appreciate it very much. I have been carrying this burden for too many years, and it has destroyed my health. The hurtful part is this minister thinks it is ok. What is worst, I am not the only parishoner that he took advantage of. I really do have to speak out on this, and maybe other ministers would think twice before using their parishoners to satisfy their sexual desires. Hope someone would help me .

Posted by Dije on August 26, 2010 at 11:27 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy