Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Apparently, They Do Have Limits

Posted by on Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM

AArefusedbyVice.png
According to Mediaite, Vice Magazine has refused to run an American Apparel ad. (A detail from the ad is at left, and the full ((mildly NSFW)) ad can be found here.) And further, a board in Britain has examined the ad and determined that the 23-year-old model looks younger than 16 years old.

I can't tell if this means that American Apparel is getting old (Calvin Klein, of course, is the creepy old uncle of inappropriate-looking ads) or that Vice is getting tamer.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Lol, check out the sagging boob on image #6 of the original ad!

That girl is way past spring.
Posted by Coupe De Ville on September 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM
douchus 2
So appearance matters, not actual age? That's just some creepy shit.
Posted by douchus on September 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM
3
I've seen WAY more suggestive AA ads. And remember the CK Kate Moss ads in the 90s? That shit was way more crazy. This is nothing.
Posted by here we go again on September 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Growing up in a mostly Italian town, it was fairly common to have young men whistle at girls who were maybe 12, but looked 18. I remember one of my son's friends, when she was 16 was complaining about being hit on when she worked downtown.

Kate Moss - isn't she still on heroin?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on September 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Fnarf 5
Ah, now Will believes he grew up in Italy. The dementia settles in even further.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on September 2, 2009 at 3:54 PM
Beetlecat 6
fnarf@ mostly italian. So I'm guessing somewhere in the alps.
Posted by Beetlecat on September 2, 2009 at 4:06 PM
7
be careful after you find a stranger in the alps
Posted by Reader1 on September 2, 2009 at 4:14 PM
8
Here's another American Apparel ad with the same girl that appeared in People.
http://femaletalk.com/news/american-appa…
Posted by becksta on September 2, 2009 at 4:16 PM
rara avis 9
the ad on the back of the current issue of vice of an even younger looking model showing off her crotch on a glass coffee table is much racier than this.
Posted by rara avis on September 2, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Dougsf 10
That ad is pretty tame, and the model doesn't strike me as being particularly young. How old do people think those models in the big fashion magazine editorials are? Unless they're famous, they're a hell of a lot younger than 23, or 18, or 14.

One of the founders of Vice is a pretty well known conservative, so don't expect any more moral consistency from the magazine than you would from the Fox network. I'm surprised they rejected the ad, but it's got to be about money, nothing else.
Posted by Dougsf on September 2, 2009 at 4:22 PM
Max Solomon 11
vice editors must have got a jailbait boner. AA ads are trying to make you feel that way.
Posted by Max Solomon on September 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM
in-frequent 12
this is strange.... of all the AA ads to lodge an actual (well, sort of actual) complaint over, this is the one?

the ads walk the line, sure.... but a 23 year old? i think the over-the-top nature of the AA ads surprises older people who are not used to what 20 years look like in the year 2009, because most of their models do not look like 15 year olds to me.

i don't like the nature of many AA ads for personal moral reasons, but i'm not sure they are the sort of reasons i'd want to translate into legislation. were i to, i'm not sure this ad would be the poster child.
Posted by in-frequent on September 2, 2009 at 4:53 PM
Andy_Squirrel 13
boner.at.work
Posted by Andy_Squirrel on September 2, 2009 at 6:05 PM
14
This chick look like one of those middle school teachers who "dresses young" and dates her 8th grade students.

Posted by Steve Letourneau on September 2, 2009 at 7:05 PM
15
You've fundamentally read the story wrong. The ad standards board asked that the ad not run and American Apparel complied. Vice did not ban the ad. Please correct these basic facts.
Posted by RobertFLS on September 2, 2009 at 9:46 PM
Gin Gin Bon Bon 16
I don't hate this aa ad as much as some of their other ones. Usually what bothers me about them is the extent to which the girls look like they've been drugged and raped or drugged and about to be raped. From what I've heard about some of the people involved this might not even be that far off from what actually goes on. And really, exploitation makes me feel icky no matter what the age of the "model". Anyway. I'm not outraged at aa in particular, I just don't give the company any of my money because their ads disgust me. This model doesn't look that drugged or rape-y, but I am still getting my stupid leggings somewhere else.
Posted by Gin Gin Bon Bon http://uneviedechien.wordpress.com on September 3, 2009 at 6:26 AM
17
Yeah, I'm with Gin Gin.

Then again, I am 28 and look about 15, so I know the routine. I'm just a size 10 and thus way too meaty for an American Apparel ad.
Posted by harridan harriet on September 3, 2009 at 7:30 AM
undead ayn rand 18
"Usually what bothers me about them is the extent to which the girls look like they've been drugged and raped or drugged and about to be raped"

You never had a myspace account, did you?

"From what I've heard about some of the people involved this might not even be that far off from what actually goes on."

Oh give me a fucking break. AA has terrible record with sexual harassment, but that is not rape, and it is not drugging their models. It IS far off from what actually goes on, even if the actuality is still skeezy. I still haven't heard anything non-consensual going on with the models, so please give an update if you have any actual proof of this.
Posted by undead ayn rand on September 3, 2009 at 8:44 AM
19
Vice didn't ban the ad you jackass. The ASA did. It ran in the back cover of the magazine. Please do your research.
Posted by correction on September 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy