So, Savage called for Greg Nickels to concede long before yesterday afternoon's batch of election returns came in, which at the time seemed far-fetched (conceding when he still has a chance is not the stubborn, sure-of-himself Nickels way), but then yesterday afternoon's results came in, and whoa—Nickels's face probably fell: Mallahan and McGinn were leaving him in the dust. It's hard to imagine Nickels's press conference this morning at 10:00 a.m. about the "state of the election" as anything other than a concession speech.
Which sucks. Yes, Nickels has fucked some things up, and been a bully to the nightlife community, and backed business interests over (for example) parks, but he's also got some major accomplishments under his belt (like, for example, light rail). He's proven he can lead. He's not an idiot. And though The Stranger did do this...

...some of the Stranger Election Control Board admitted—privately, drunkenly, to one another—to being impressed by Nickels's showing in our endorsement interview. He wasn't the guy we endorsed, granted, but we all imagined him making it into the top two. Watching Nickels and McGinn debate the tunnel was electrifying. How was the Nickels interview compared to the Mallahan interview? Oh, no contest. Whereas Nickels was articulate, informed, self-effacing, charismatic, blunt, and interested in the questions, Mallahan had the charisma of an inkjet printer, couldn't name a single thing he'd ever done for the environment, couldn't name a single thing he'd done for the arts, and had no idea what Operation Sobering Thought was. (It was the city's notorious, extensively written-about, crazily overzealous crackdown on nightclubs in 2006.) Check out Mallahan's answer to the first two questions The Stranger asked him. In short, Mallahan is an idiot. He's a T-Mobile vice president—a cell phone salesman. He eats money for breakfast, and he thinks the city should be run like a business. He brought two six-packs of PBR tallboys to his Stranger endorsement meeting. That was his way of "connecting" with The Stranger, clearly. He'd have gotten a lot farther with a less superficial approach—like, say, having something informed to say about nightlife or public safety or the environment or the arts—subjects we write about all the time. On every topic we brought up, his answers were irrelevant and ridiculous.
The man is just not ready to be mayor. All this stuff about how no one "likes" Nickels? OK, sure, yes, being "liked" is necessary in a democracy, and it's true that a lot of people are sick of him. But at least Nickels knows the city, knows the job, has accomplishments in public policy, and can talk about what the city's been doing in detail and at length. Plus, just to push a little further: What's wrong with being sort of a bully? The mayor's job is to wield authority. The mayor's job is to face down people who disagree with him. Seattle Times continues to crow about Nickels's handling of the snowstorm, as if the snowstorm wasn't the most fun any of us have had in the last year, and meanwhile they endorse Mallahan for mayor because—seriously, this is their reason—he's loaded. (Did you SEE their endorsement of Mallahan? It said, to paraphrase: He has no relevant experience and he's not ready to be mayor, but he's got a lot of money!)
In a just world, this race would be Nickels vs. McGinn. But a pattern is a pattern, and the numbers aren't having it. In advance of Nickels's probably-concession-speech today, here is the opening statement Nickels made in our endorsement interview. We asked every candidate to name, in the course of their opening statements, their top three priorities for the city, and Nickels, ever the overachiever, had four:
Well I’m Greg Nickels, and I’m running for reelection as mayor, and it’s been my honor to serve for the last eight years, leading a city that has strong progressive values, and to be able to put those values into action. There are actually four priorities I set out as mayor, they will continue to be my priorities. To get Seattle moving, to keep our neighborhoods safe, to create jobs and economic opportunity for all of our people, and to create strong families and healthy communities. And those, I think, are the really fundamental things that I think the city needs to do. Starting with public safety, making sure that our people feel safe, that our youth are safe, and that people perceive that their neighborhoods are safe. Obviously tough times require us to take care of people who are struggling, and we need to do that and we need to be well positioned so that when the recovery comes we can put people back to work and we can have a prosperous future, and I think I’ve demonstrated my ability to do that during the last eight years. I’m really proud of light rail. I’ve worked on that for 21 years. Maybe a couple of you weren’t born when I started working on that. But we finally got it up and running, and it’s going to take that… [The clock runs out.]When did you start working on it?
1988.
Thanks for everything, Greg.
3
7
8
12
15
17
20
24
28
29
31
34
35
37
40
Comments (49) RSS