Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Re: Today's Kalebu Tape

Posted by on Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:47 PM

On the radio this morning, I was asked whether Judge Brian Gain knew, during this July 23 hearing, that Isaiah M. Kalebu was a suspect in murder of Teresa Butz.

No.

Judge Gain couldn't have known that because Kalebu wasn't even known to Seattle Police, much less named as a suspect in the case, until the next day.

But there's a related question that's more difficult to answer: Did Judge Gain have a hunch that Kalebu might be the South Park killer?

The judge is not talking to reporters about the case, but listen to what he said during the July 23 hearing:

I need to see [the mental health update]... I need to be assured that he is in mental health treatment and is taking medication or I can't take the risk of having him out of custody... I need to have that. I need to have that. There are some other problems, and when I did not [hold him in custody] last time I indicated I needed that.

What "other problems" is Judge Gain talking about here?

Impossible to know for sure, but consider what had happened between July 13, when Judge Gain declined to hold Kalebu in custody, and July 23, when this hearing occurred:

southpark-208x300.jpg
On July 19, Butz was raped and murdered in South Park. The crime generated a huge amount of media attention and by the next day, July 20, a sketch of the suspect had been released. It was flashed repeatedly on television, printed in newspapers, posted on blogs. Now here was Judge Gain, on July 23, staring down from the bench at Isaiah Kalebu. Had the judge seen the police sketch? Did he wonder whether Kalebu was the man in the police sketch? Had he wondered whether Kalebu might have been involved in the South Park murder?

Again, impossible to know.

It's worth pointing out that no one else who was in that courtroom on that day seems to have connected Kalebu to the widely-circulated police sketch. It's also worth pointing out that something else happened between July 13 and July 23: Theresa Griffin, Kalebu's defense attorney, told Judge Gain privately that she wanted to withdraw from the case and he agreed that should be done. We don't know why Griffin wanted out, though it's been reported that it wasn't because she was threatened or intimidated by Kalebu. Was it nothing big? Or was it something very big, like Kalebu telling her he'd committed a new crime? Could that be why she wanted to withdraw? Did she tell that to Judge Gain when she said she wanted out?

Impossible to know.

What's clear is that Judge Gain had Kalebu's "other problems" on his mind on July 23, and he wanted an update on Kalebu's mental health as soon as possible.

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
DOUG. 1
Jesus Christ, Eli, it's one thing to talk out of your ass on issues relating to bicycles and election results, but when you're dealing with a murder case you need to learn to THINK AND INVESTIGATE before you post this kind of conjecture.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on August 19, 2009 at 2:35 PM
2
As I recall, he didn't show up at a July 10th hearing.
This is probably the "other problems".
Posted by Lack Thereof on August 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM
3
@1 - Agreed. You're not exactly arm-chair quarterbacking (or whatever the expression is) an elected member of the judiciary, but you're coming damn close. Having spent a few months watching a Superior Court judge up close, what you're doing makes me very queasy. The best way to know what a judge is thinking is ask, and then listen carefully. Here, the judge understandably isn't going to defend himself to you, but he may tell you what he thought at the time anyway.

Also -- didn't Dan post a bunch of stories talking shit about reporters that report "sources say that someone may or may not be using a big rubber dildo" to criticize the idea that reporting something and then adding caveats like "impossible to know" is just useless, empty reporting. How is this different?
Posted by aff on August 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM
seandr 4
Was that the meat of a slaughtered baby in Judge Gain's sandwich, or just plain bologna? Impossible to know.
Posted by seandr on August 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy