Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, August 17, 2009

Kiss Off, Mormons

Posted by on Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:39 AM

In case you missed the reports, there was a national kiss-in this weekend in about 50 cities to send a loving message to the Mormon Church, which penalized two men last month for kissing on their sacred temple grounds. (Folks were also pissed about municipalities that have cracked down on a gay kiss.) The 'mos were out, of course, but also lots of non-'mos:

Atali Staffler, a Brigham Young University graduate student from Geneva, Switzerland, said she joined the 200 or so people who filled a downtown amphitheater for the event because she has watched her gay father and many gay friends struggle to find their place.

The 31-year-old, who was raised Mormon but is not active in the church, said the church shouldn't be involved in Prop. 8.

"I encourage them to promote the values they believe in and to defend their religious principles in advertisements, but civil rights have nothing to do with religious principles," she said.

Twenty-two people, many of them strangers to one another, gathered under the scorching sun on Washington's National Mall to participate in the national smooch. They were gay and straight, couples and singles of all ages, with placards that read "Equal Opportunity Kisser" and "A Kiss is a Not a Crime."

Right on, kissers. And right on, Swiss Mormon daughter of a gay father.

Video and more at Towleroad.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
So how was turnout nationwide?
In Seattle?
Admit it- most people (even homos) think those loudmouthed smart ass obnoxious punks in Salt Lake deserved a Rodney King beatdown.
Posted by America on August 17, 2009 at 8:57 AM
2
Semi-related:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/17…

Does this mean we get to vote on whether Obama should be made a Friend of Slog again?
Posted by matt on August 17, 2009 at 9:04 AM
3
This issue has never been about civil rights. The homosexuals have in desperation tried to draw correlations to the civil rights movement of decades ago but it's a feeble attempt. Homosexuals are the only ones who believe the argument. The rest of the country knows its about manipulating the government to impose what homosexuals have never been able to achieve on their own merits: acceptance. So now they pursue government enforced legitimacy that society has never seen fit to give. And why is this not about civil rights? simple, because this issue is about behavior, and humanity has the wisdom to see that homosexual behavior is not equal to marriage, not on an individual level, not on a societal level, not on a governmental level.

So while someone is free in this country to live as they want without infringing on the freedoms of others (in other words, homosexuality isn't against the law), homosexuality doesn't merit the same benefits as marriage. Social research proves this over and over again.
Posted by forgiving on August 17, 2009 at 9:17 AM
4
from Towleroad

"In Denver: About a dozen people on Denver's 16th Street Mall participated in a nationwide "kiss-in" Saturday to underscore their support for gay rights. The event drew a tepid response from onlookers."
Posted by a whole Dozen! on August 17, 2009 at 9:31 AM
5
@3 Loveschild is that you?

"Homosexuals are the only ones who believe the argument."

Um, totally straight here and *I* believe the argument. All people - gay, straight, black, white, asian, left-handed or right - deserve the same human rights. The right to love whom you choose, the right to not be beaten by some stranger for how you were born, even the right to marry [or have a civil union] so you can visit your loved one in the hospital when they are sick, or inherit their goods when they should die.

Homosexuality is all about behavior? Social research proves this? Link please!
Posted by Schweighsr on August 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM
6
5
All people have the same human rights.

And homosexuality IS behavior.
Are homosexuals biologically or genetically any different from heterosexuals?
Link please!
Posted by Welcome on August 17, 2009 at 9:42 AM
7
Dom,Dom,Dom-
Your buddy in Salt Lake was not arrested for kissing.
He was arrested for assaulting a security guard.
Go back and watch the video.
Posted by a Kiss is just a Kiss, a Dickwad is just a Dickwad on August 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM
8
Forever and Welcome.

Is choice of Religion a behavior? Do you have the Civil Right to choose and practice the religion of your choice?

I find it fascinating when the Right claim that Government should not be trusted to do anything, but they'll allow government to dictate the most sacred of all relationships we can have.

...and, I'm another "straight" who believes this is about civil rights. As are likely about 45% of this Country.
Posted by Timothy on August 17, 2009 at 10:15 AM
9
BUT...really, 22 people in our Nation's Capitol? This is an embarrassing turn-out. There's no center to the movement, nobody capable, it seems, of rallying the troops.
Posted by Timothy on August 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM
10
22 strangers meet in DC and swap oral fluids.
Great way to catch herpes.
Or worse.
(have you ever seen anal warts in the mouth?
not pretty)

and we are proving just what, again?

I guess we are lucky homosexuals only account for 53% of new AIDS cases...
Posted by ick on August 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM
11
8
Choice of Religion IS a Constitutional Right.
Somehow the Founding Fathers left ButtSex out of the Constitution :(
Posted by Madison on August 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM
12
Did Seattle;
home of Dan Savage (America's Gay SpokesModel), Slog
and America's 4th largest GLTB community
have a Kiss-In?
Posted by Kissless in Seattle on August 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM
13
Re the Salt Lake picture. I was in SLC this weekend attending a high school reunion. A college friend from Las Vegas was also in town, so we decided to go to the Kiss In. We got there just in time for the Kiss Off. The two older guys front and center are me and my buddy.
Posted by DaiBando on August 17, 2009 at 11:23 AM
14
Atalli Staffer claims to be a mormon. However if you know mormon doctrine you know that there is no possible way that the church will ever condone gay behavior.

Just as most people would be against visitors desecrating a catholic church or islamic moss so people should be outraged about anyone desecrating the mormons holy grounds.
Posted by posh on August 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM
15
He name is not Atalli Staffer. They printed it incorrectly. It is Natalli Staffler, and I know her and her family very well. She is a returned missionary and her father was one of the most kind bishops I ever met. He worked and was employed by the church. He did everything he could to fight his homosexuality and to have therapy. As far as I know he was a faithful husband, or certainly tried to be. When I lived in Geneva I was sent to him so that he could help me with my homosexuality. He connected me with a group called Homosexuals Annonimous, which was started by a man who was a faithful seventh day adventist. Both myself and my good friend used this organization to try to stop being gay. We are still gay, but Natalie father claimed he was cured.

Like Natalie's father, I also have daughters. It has been most difficult for them having a gay father. Natalie did not know of her father's affliction until she was either on her mission or right around that time. It devistated her physically, emotionaly and spiritually.

The church has not made a consistant stand on gays. When I was young it was concidered an abomination that could be cured by getting married, which is what Natalie's father and i did. Today it teaches celibacy. When I discovered the change that the church made, which is a 180% turn in teaching........ i could no longer support them. I had taken them at their word............ that I could change if I got married and remained faithful. I could not. I do not believe that natalie's father ever completely changed either although he told me that he felt he had... he also revealed to me that he always had to be careful.

I am excommunicated from the church and happily married to my same sex spouse. We recently celibrted our fifth aniversary......... one of the oldest same sex marriages in the country of Canada where I now live. Although I am not a member any longer I still attend church each week. i want people to know that I exist.........that i am still here along with thousands of others as myself who have no place in the church. My stake president wrote a letter for me to see if i could be rebaptized since i am married and the church said that they would not be against civil unions. He pleaded my case and wrote a beautiful letter in my behalf. The church response was that they had "Not Yet" received a revelation for people such as me. Since then my branch president has given me a blesssing to be patient and the stake president was released. I thought the new stake president would be less accomidating but it turns out that his brother has been with the same sex partner for the past fourty years.

After raising my daughters in Switzerland, one of my daughters has supported her husband in the stake presidency of one of the Swiss French Stakes. I am proud that I raised my daughters as a gay man in the church and that they are both faithful members. There will have to be, one day a place for all of Heavenly Father's Children in the church. Leaving it will not help make those changes. I quietly attend church each week...... and members have told me that they, who were once homophobic before, are no longer homophobic because of me.

I wish Natalie and her family all the best. They are wonderful people. It is terrible what they and others such as the rest of us have had to endure with in the church.... but one day we shall have a place. I believe that with all my heart. Nothing will change that belief.
More...
Posted by Former LDS on August 17, 2009 at 1:30 PM
erin 16
@14 uh, article clearly states " is not active in the church". i was considered a member of the mormon church until last year when i sent in my resignation in the wake of prop 8. you can be a member of the mormon church and not agree with its doctrine, in fact, the church depends on just that to fluff its numbers. also, who in their right mind would claim to be a mormon and not reeely be a member?
the mormon church will have a "revelation" about gay people being ok in about 60 years when no one cares if you are or aren't a big gay homo anymore.
Posted by erin on August 17, 2009 at 2:01 PM
17
Seattle didn't have a kiss-in because Joe Mirabella of Join the Impact first personally decided that Washington's political climate was "too volatile" to handle a dozen or so gay people kissing in public. Then, he began a smear campaign against the organizers claiming instead of kissing, we would be violent against churches. He said the same thing to try to dissuade people from going to the Westboro Baptist Church protest. With leaders like Joe Mirabella, who needs Larry Stickney?

=================

Gay marriage fight, `kiss-ins' smack Mormon image
By JENNIFER DOBNER, Associated Press Writer Jennifer Dobner, Associated Press Writer Sat Aug 15, 5:18 pm ET

SALT LAKE CITY – The Mormon church's vigorous, well-heeled support for Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in California last year, has turned the Utah-based faith into a lightning rod for gay rights activism, including a nationwide "kiss-in" Saturday.

The event comes after gay couples here and in San Antonio and El Paso, Texas, were arrested, cited for trespassing or harassed by police for publicly kissing. In Utah, the July 9 trespassing incident occurred after a couple were observed by security guards on a downtown park-like plaza owned by the 13 million-member Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

The court case was dismissed, but the kiss sparked a community backlash and criticism of the church.

"I don't think that kiss would have turned out to be the kiss heard round the world if it were not for Proposition 8," said Ash Johnsdottir, organizer of the Salt Lake City Kiss-In.

Atali Staffler, a Brigham Young University graduate student from Geneva, Switzerland, said she joined the 200 or so people who filled a downtown amphitheater for the event because she has watched her gay father and many gay friends struggle to find their place.

The 31-year-old, who was raised Mormon but is not active in the church, said the church shouldn't be involved in Prop. 8.

"I encourage them to promote the values they believe in and to defend their religious principles in advertisements, but civil rights have nothing to do with religious principles," she said.

Twenty-two people, many of them strangers to one another, gathered under the scorching sun on Washington's National Mall to participate in the national smooch. They were gay and straight, couples and singles of all ages, with placards that read "Equal Opportunity Kisser" and "A Kiss is a Not a Crime."

"This is America. A kiss on the cheek is OK," said Ian Thomas, 26, of Leesburg, Va., who organized the Washington Kiss-In. "It's got to be OK. If not, we're in serious trouble."

About 50 people, mostly gay and lesbian couples, gathered at Piedmont Park in downtown Atlanta and kissed for about five minutes.

"You think that America is evolving into a gay-friendly nation," said Randal Smith, 42, "but what happened in Texas and Utah show us it's still a long way off."

National organizers say Saturday's broadly held gay rights demonstrations were not aimed specifically at the Mormon church. But observers say the church's heavy-handed intervention into California politics will linger and has left the faith's image tarnished.

"What I hear from my community and from straight progressive individuals is that they now see the church as a force for evil and as an enemy of fairness and equality," said Kate Kendell, executive director of the San Francisco-based National Center for Lesbian Rights. Kendell grew up Mormon in Utah. "To have the church's very deep and noble history telescoped down into this very nasty little image is as painful for me as for any faithful Mormon."

Troy Williams, who is gay and grew up Mormon, said ending the tension between gays and the church requires mutual acceptance and understanding.

"For both sides to peaceably coexist, we're all going to have to engage in some very deep soul searching," said Williams, a Salt Lake City-area activist and host of a liberal radio talk show.

Church insiders say Prop. 8 has bred dissent among members and left families divided. Some members have quit or stopped attending services, while others have appealed to leadership to stay out of the same-sex marriage fight.

But church spokeswoman Kim Farah said Friday that Mormon support for traditional marriage has nothing to do with public relations.

"It's too easy for those whose agenda is to change societal standards to claim there are great difficulties inside the Church because of its decision to support traditional marriage," Kim Farah said. "In reality the Church has received enormous support for its defense of marriage."

Mormonism teaches that homosexual sex is considered a sin, but gays are welcome in church and can maintain church callings and membership if they remain celibate.

The church has actively fought marriage equality legislation across the U.S. since the early 1990s and joined other faiths in asking Congress for a marriage amendment to the Constitution in 2006.

Last year at the urging of church leaders, Mormons donated tens of millions of dollars to the "Yes on 8" campaign and were among the most vigorous volunteers. The institutional church gave nearly $190,000 to the campaign — contributions now being investigated by California's Fair Political Practices Commission.

After the vote, many gay rights advocates turned their anger toward the church in protests and marches outside temples that singled out Mormons as the key culprits in restricting the rights of gay couples.

That constituted a setback for the faith, argued Jan Shipps, a professor of religious history and a Mormon expert from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

Mormonism, Shipps said, has struggled with its image since its western New York founding in 1830 for a host of reasons, including polygamy.

Leading up to Salt Lake City's 2002 Olympic Winter Games, the faith worked hard to craft a modern, mainstream image, touting its unique American history, culture and worldwide humanitarian work to thousands of reporters.

"This really undercut the Mormon image that had been so carefully nurtured during the Olympics," Shipps said.

Church representatives don't discuss public relations strategies or challenges publicly, but at a semiannual conference in April, church President Thomas S. Monson seemed to be clearly feeling a post-Prop. 8 sting.

In an era of "shifting moral footings," Monson said, "those who attempt to safeguard those footings are often ridiculed, picketed and persecuted."

That argument doesn't wash for Linda Stay, whose ancestors were early Mormon converts. Stay said she was doubly transformed by Prop. 8. She and her husband, Steve, finally quit the church — along with 18 other family members and a few close friends — and became gay right activists.

The St. George woman's family, which includes two gay children, will play a central role in a documentary film, "8: The Mormon Proposition" currently in production. Stay's son, Tyler Barrick, married his boyfriend in San Francisco on June 17, 2008, the first day gay marriage was legal in California.

Miami-area filmmaker Reed Cowan said the Stays' story is a painful representative of many Latter-day Saint families, including his own, that needed to be told.

"It used to be that I could defend my church and my heritage, but what they did here, they crossed the line and they made it very hard to defend their actions," said Cowan, whose family has cut him off since he began work on the film.

With the gay rights fight far from over, some believe Prop. 8 could continue to frustrate the church's image for years to come, much like polygamy — the church's own one-time alternative form of marriage — and a policy on keeping black men out of the priesthood, issues that have lingered years after the practices were abandoned.

"The church is certainly going to survive and thrive, there's no question about that," said the National Center for Lesbian Rights' Kendell, who is raising three kids in California with her partner of 16 years. "The issue is, what will be its image in the average American mindset."

To see the church characterized, because of its own actions, as one in a group of anti-gay religions and as a religion that forces members to choose faith over family is "a tragedy of generational proportion," she said. "And it seems to me, that it was entirely unnecessary."

___

Associated Press writers Gillian Gaynair in Washington, D.C., and Peter Prengaman in Atlanta contributed to this report.
More...
Posted by Join What Impact? on August 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM
18
6. To Scweighsr...the link you need is as follows: -

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14…

It gives you the scientific and biological information you appear to intimate does not exist.
Posted by Prana on August 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM
19
Nature discriminated against gays first. Every child deserves a mother and a father. To do otherwise is arrogant and mocks God. The fight is not about hate. It is about what has been between a man and a woman for 4,000 years. Given the statistics by the Kinsey study, I hope Gays never achieve the status of marriage. It is not meant to be.

1. A major study by the Kinsey Institute revealed that 78% of male homo-sexual "affairs" (relationships entered into with an intent of commitment) lasted less than three years. Only 12% lasted five years or longer.
2. Homosexual men are six times more likely to have attempted suicide than are heterosexual men.
3. Studies indicate that between 25 and 33% of homosexual men and women are alcoholics.
4. Statistics give evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. The Kinsey study cited above revealed that 43% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated that they had "been intimate" with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners.
Posted by ShellyGirl on August 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM
20
Well, at least a year before her death, Coretta King, made a statement that the plight of gay people is truly the human rights issue of the 21 century. She went further to say that her husband, Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior would be right up front marching for the rights of all people. Dr. and Mrs. King, may you rest in peace. Also. thank you for being.
Posted by eheard1874 on August 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM
21
"islamic moss"

What is Islamic Moss? I've never heard of it until reading these comments, Google doesn't turn up anything useful, and it isn't a reasonable misspelling or typo of anything.
Posted by hyhybt on August 18, 2009 at 9:04 PM
22
Civil rights was about equality in opportunity. Gay rights is about imposing acceptance of one set of sexual conduct on society. Even worse it is a set of conduct that comes with documented social costs...increased liklihood of multiple partners-- thus disease, increase suicide rate ---you can't go against nature without some long term consequences, and increased division anger ---my religion verses your debauchery...

Yea lets call what we want a civil right. The reality is all rights have personal and social responsiblity that are equal to the right. Gay rights does not even consider responsibility!!! It is a purly self-centered argument. Get over yourself and let's live in peace. I will always have a right to look at you in disgust, when what you do disgusts me.
Posted by dan in missouri on August 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM
23
People need to realize what Prop. 8 was. It simply said that marriage is between one man and one woman. The majority of the people in the US and apparently the majority of the people in CA (at least those who voted) agree with that. You can agree with that statement and not hate gay people. I'm not a homophobe, but I do believe that the true definition of marriage should be preserved. Two people of the same sex cannot biologically create a new life together. Marriage is more than just love between two people. Again, I don't believe that rights are being taken away from or withheld from gays. I know that there is debate about whether or not it is a choice, but I believe that it is. With certain choices come consequences. All of the gay people can still be legally married in this country, but at some point their lifestyle changed to prevent that. Anyway, my two cents.
Posted by El Cazador on August 19, 2009 at 6:47 PM
24
If Marriage should be just between a man and a woman, then why did Joseph Smith have over 33 wives (some estimate more than 50) ranging is ages 14 to 50 something?

Kids need a father and a mother argument is ridiculous when a mormon is arguing for such. The proverbial talking out of both sides of the mouth comes to mind. How about every kid needs one father and 40 mothers. Talk about confusion, but this is what the celestial kingdom is going to look like according to the lds. (God the author of confusion?)

Okay too, if every kid needs a father and mother, therefore ban gays from having kids, because it's obviously going to be 2 dads or just 2 moms for the poor kid, then single parenthood should be banned. Take the kid away and give him/her to a family with a father and mother, or a father and multiple mothers (Just thinking like a mormon).

By the way I am a returned missionary, married in the temple, but now resigned from the madness called the mormon church.
Posted by openeyes on August 20, 2009 at 9:03 PM
25
openeyes I feel sorry for you. Whatever you believe today Joseph Smith was right when he said, that once you make covenants with God you leave nutral ground forever. Despite what you think you will never be able to leave the church alone. It will grade your soul, because that is the value set you were taught and you understood. Your path is well traveled, I saw my father go through it.
Posted by dan in missouri on August 21, 2009 at 5:38 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy