Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

From the Transcripts: The Mayoral Endorsement Meetings, Part 6

Posted by on Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 6:18 AM

Jan Drago and Joe Mallahan are asked what they think of the job Tom Carr's been doing as city attorney (Dom's take on that subject is required reading). Also discussed: the nightclub sting Operation Sobering Thought and police presence in Belltown and Pioneer Square.

What do you think of Tom Carr and the job he's doing as city attorney?
DRAGO: He is too political as a city attorney. He is…well, he's Greg Nickels’ personal attorney, and Nickels and Carr have politicized the city attorney's office.

So you’re supporting Pete Holmes?
DRAGO: I don't know what I'm doing in that race. I'm not happy with either choice, frankly.

What’s your opinion in this, Joe?
MALLAHAN: I have chosen not to...

Answer difficult questions? Characterize Tom Carr’s tenure as city attorney.
MALLAHAN: I think Tom Carr has been somewhat heavy-handed, and—again, he holds an elected position, so it's really not very germaine to…

He's part of the administration…
MALLAHAN: Sure, sure, again, but I have made a decision not to comment…

Well let's ask this then, because it's directly related to Tom Carr and the mayor. Operation Sobering Thought, what were your thoughts on that?
MALLAHAN: I don't know what Operation Sobering Thought is.
DRAGO: I'm not sure that I do either.

That's the nightlife sting…
DRAGO: Oh, the nightlife…oh, that was way over the top. I mean, absolutely. And let's go back to the whole nightclub thing. That was the mayor's proposal, they were heavy-handed, it was politicized, and it was the council, and it was really Sally [Clark] and I, because I had a lot more experience than she did, that put together the package that the council then passed, so clearly I was not happy with that. Now, politically the mayor's come back, and he's done all this other stuff trying to repair the damage that he did on the nightlife stand.
MALLAHAN: You know I think with regard to nightlife, and certain other art forms that people like to peg as sort of inducing bad behavior, the key is just simply to make sure there's appropriate security personnel and on the streets. That means police officers. I'm on the record and I'll restate that I believe we need to move as quickly as possible to 605 uniformed police patrol officers on the streets. We’re at about 500 right now, and neighborhood policing, strategic planning calls for 605. That would cost us about $10 million, and I'm quite confident that those $10 million can be found in efficiencies in city government. We have $125 million in consulting contracts in city government, and my experience with consultants is that they run roughly 4-5 times as much money as internal expertise. We need to have internal expertise in the city and not be relying on unaccountable consultants who, uh—so anyway…

Do you know what we’re talking about though, this Operation Sobering Thought?
MALLAHAN: Well we…

There were raids on 15 different nightclubs…
Mallahan: And we also changed operating hours, right?

No. Nothing to do with operating hours.
MALLAHAN: Oh, I thought we did.

No, there were undercover stings at 15 different bars, arrested a bunch of bouncers, club employees—
DRAGO: Jailed them.

Jailed them. And then zero convictions that came out of it. It was just overzealous things—like, they took a bouncer who hadn't been working that night, and jailed him for something he wasn’t even there for.
MALLAHAN: What I'm more referring to, there's a bunch of movement toward, you know, anti-hip-hop, and zoning codes around what kind of entertainment can happen when and where. And my, so I guess I'm off-topic, but to me again, if Belltown, Pioneer Square, and the like had adequate police personnel, it wouldn't be an issue. I mean, other big cities…

Do you think that that precinct is understaffed right now?
MALLAHAN: I do, yeah. I said I think the worst-staffed precinct is the South Precinct. Its geography grew and the head count didn’t change. I think Downtown and Belltown are poorly staffed. And I also think the University District seems to have completely inadequate staffing.

What is it about the South Precinct that makes you think it's understaffed right now?
MALLAHAN: Well, again, gang violence and crime generally is more of a problem in the South Precinct than the East Precinct, and specifically, the data are very clear that the geography grew dramatically and the head count didn't change. Also, when I talk to police officers and ask them, you know, "Hey, is there overstaffing somewhere?," they’re pretty universally "No, we’re not overstaffed anywhere, but South Precinct is a problem."

Previously: Part 1 (Nickels and McGinn debate the tunnel); part 2 (Nickels is asked about his unpopularity); part 3 (Mallahan names the one thing he's done for the environment: he's eaten it); part 4 (Jan Drago is asked about charisma and whether she really has more of it than Nickels); part 5 (Donaldson, Nickels, and McGinn on nightlife and their favorite places to drink).

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
No wonder 'reporters' are the only trade less respected and trusted than politicians, used car salesmen and pedophiles...
Posted by America on August 5, 2009 at 6:40 AM
Joh 2
You totally jumped down Mallahan's neck. I can see why, but it looks unprofessional.

You're right in general though, he's not qualified. Better than Nickels? Maybe. That's not saying much though.
Posted by Joh on August 5, 2009 at 6:57 AM
3
CAN YOU GUESS WHAT I'M THINKING?

Well, that would be kind of ...

COME ON! AFRAID TO ANSWER TOUGH QUESTIONS?!

Well, I could try to guess...

DON"T BE A BABY!
TELL ME WHAT COLOR I'M THINKING OF!

Um, maybe ...

YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW MY FAVORITE COLOR- DO YOU?
ADMIT IT!

Lavender! Is it lavender?

NO DOUCHEWIPE, IT'S MAUVE.
YOU'RE WORTHLESS...

Posted by Ace on August 5, 2009 at 6:58 AM
4
"It was just, like, overzealous things, man—
like, they took a bouncer- you know-
who hadn't even been working that night, man-
and jailed him for something he totally wasn’t even there for!
It's bogus, man- totally bogus!!"

I hope the new Mayor gets to the bottom of this, for sure.
Posted by the Ghost of Teresa Butz on August 5, 2009 at 7:04 AM
5
I don't disagree that the South Precinct is struggling, but I think that Mallahan is going off of anectdotal evidence when he says it's the most understaffed. But there are also some factual errors in his discussion of the precincts. Belltown and Pioneer Square are in the West Precinct. The East Precint includes Cap Hill and parts of what we refer to as the Central District (everybody has different boundaries for that area, though). I'm not sure that the South Precinct has actually experienced *more* gang violence than the East Precinct--they're certainly the two precincts most affected by it.

This is another example of Mallahan picking up talking points from some south end activists. I wonder if he can cite numbers to support his argument. I'd love to see the south precinct fully staffed, but I don't the mayor can simply say that "the south precinct will get more officers because Ray Akers (or anyone else) told me it's necessary."
Posted by Gidge on August 5, 2009 at 8:56 AM
6
Mallahan lost my support after I read this. Perhaps he should be running for mayor of Factoria, where he's likely more in tune with what goes on there.
Posted by Jakey on August 5, 2009 at 9:09 AM
7
This interview further illustrates the obvious fact that Mallahan has NO idea what he's talking about. "Wurst" candidate ever.
Posted by CMB on August 5, 2009 at 9:33 AM
8
I skeptical of Mallahan's use of anecdotal evidence.

I haven't really talked to cops about staffing in 5 or 7 years. But any time I've talked with police about the issue, they are often opposed to having staffing levels set by neighborhood, or letting politicians over-dictate their deployment. They don't want walking patrols to favor one neighborhood at the expense of others. They want more cops to be able to respond to emergencies throughout the city. They don't want to focus on the crime in one part of town. They want to be an effective law enforcement agency for the whole city.

Today the problem might be holdups in Belltown. Tomorrow there might be some jackasses roaming through Cal Anderson Park attacking people for no reason. The south-end might be a problem for a little while, but that doesn't mean that more staffing will change that. If you dedicate specific cops to that neighborhood or some specific problem, you it might look good politically, but it's not good policy for overseeing a complex police department in a large city.
Posted by Trevor on August 5, 2009 at 9:40 AM
9
I'm confused by all the elipses, the ... after most every thing Mallahan starts to say. ARe you editing out the rest of his response? Is he trailing off into nothingness? Is this the point where he was interrupted? I just don't know what to make of some of his responses as you present them.
Posted by Citizen R on August 5, 2009 at 10:03 AM
10
I can completely understands Mallahan's reticent to fully discuss Carr's performance. Drago pegs it, though. However, it's quite stunning that Mallahan isn't even marginally aware the these important issues surrounding Carr, Nickels and the use of police for political photo ops.

The bit about police staffing is off-base, too. The police staffing issues are complicated and shouldn't be driven by loud neighborhood voice, but by facts. The police are pretty darn good about deploying the resources they have correctly on neighborhood issues. Supporting them with funding and staying out their way (sucking up resources for Tom and Greg's policical agendas) should be the goal.
Posted by bikechick on August 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM
11
I can completely understands Mallahan's reticent to fully discuss Carr's performance. Drago pegs it, though. However, it's quite stunning that Mallahan isn't even marginally aware the these important issues surrounding Carr, Nickels and the use of police for political photo ops.

The bit about police staffing is off-base, too. The police staffing issues are complicated and shouldn't be driven by loud neighborhood voice, but by facts. The police are pretty darn good about deploying the resources they have correctly on neighborhood issues. Supporting them with funding and staying out their way (sucking up resources for Tom and Greg's policical agendas) should be the goal.
Posted by bikechick on August 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM
12
I can completely understand Mallahan's reticent to fully discuss Carr's performance. If by some miracle Carr is re-elected, the new mayor is going to have to work with him. Drago pegs it, though. However, it's quite stunning that Mallahan isn't even marginally aware the these important issues surrounding Carr, Nickels and the use of police for political photo ops.

That also tells me that he's not been paying any attention to city issues and also doesn't have a tuned-in and savvy team to get him prepped for these interviews. Does anyone really think they are going to get through an interview with the Stranger and NOT be asked about nighlife issues and Operation Sobering Thought?

The bit about police staffing is off-base, too. The police staffing issues are complicated and shouldn't be driven by loud neighborhood voice, but by facts. The police are pretty darn good about deploying the resources they have correctly on neighborhood issues. Supporting them with funding and staying out their way (sucking up resources for Tom and Greg's policical agendas) should be the goal.
Posted by bikechick on August 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM
13
Aw hell. Sorry about that. Dam thing kept freezing up. Should have known better.
Posted by bikechick on August 5, 2009 at 12:17 PM
14
@ 9 -- We're not editing anything out. His voice is trailing off. Or, alternately, he's saying something and we're cutting him off. But we're not omitting any parts of the answers. I realize that's not exactly what elipses mean; thanks for the question...

(See what I did just there?)
Posted by Christopher Frizzelle on August 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM
15
14
Why do you keep cutting him off, asshole?
Can't wait to hear the sound of your own voice again?
Posted by A S S W I P E S on August 5, 2009 at 2:12 PM
julie russell 16
At least this interview isn't as bad as the last one..Mallahan should at least know what's happening in the city he wants to be Mayor of..
VOTE FOR DRAGO
Posted by julie russell http:// on August 5, 2009 at 4:39 PM
17
GOD DAMNED!!!!

Does that stupid fucking Joe Mallahan know ANYTHING about what he is talking about?

I am insulted this guy thinks he is smart enough to run for a trash collector's position!
Posted by Place Name Here on August 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy