Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, July 24, 2009

Faith Healing Works...in Court

Posted by on Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:39 PM

After a long, tense week of deliberations, an Oregon jury found faith-healing Followers of Christ Carl and Raylene Worthington not guilty of the more serious criminal charge of manslaughter in the March 2008 death of their 15-month-old daughter Ava. Only Carl is guilty of the misdemeanor criminal mistreatment. He faces (though it's considered highly unlikely) a maximum of one year in jail for letting his daughter die at home of eminently treatable pneumonia while church members prayed over girl and anointed her with oil.

The case was the meant to be a test of Oregon's newer, stronger statute specifically prohibiting the use of faith healing as a defense, which was passed in 1999 after another child in the Followers of Christ church died of diabetes.

In fact, the new law may have saved the couple from serious jail time. Rather than use a defense claiming that they thought their prayers would save Ava, their defense was that they didn't think she was all that sick, effectively skirting the question "But would you have taken her to a doctor even if you had thought she was in mortal danger?"

Weeks of closely watched testimony depicted two images of Ava—was she a happy, healthy girl with a stuffy nose who appeared to be improving when she suddenly died, or a frail, malnourished child, deformed, disfigured, and debilitated by a softball-sized cyst on her neck, which made it difficult to breathe (among other things)?

We'll never know the truth, but most trial observers were outraged by the verdict.

Shocking.

It's incredible what you can get away with as long as you claim Jesus told you to.

Monsters.

...is typical of the 250-and-counting comments on The Oregonian's website.

But the jury (and most rational observers) believed that the parents really and truly cared about their daughter, while disagreeing with them vehemently about how to best care for children.

It seems obvious that the Followers of Christ people are deluded about the effectiveness of their "treatments"—Ava had a newborn baby brother die a few years ago after (or during) a home birth, and Raylene Worthington's parents are facing a January trial for the death of their 16-year-old son who, prosecuters say, died of an untreated urinary tract infection. (Really, how could God be in favor of that? He could have died simply of the pain. If you've never had an UTI, consider yourself blessed.)

But how do you make law in a case like this? If you're allowed to practice a faith-healing religion at all, at what point does not taking your kid to the hospital go from stupid to sinister? And before you say you'd never do such a thing—what about that growing number of parents who don't believe in vaccinating their kids? If those children die of measles, should their parents go to jail? What about giving your baby honey (some think it could be deadly) or raw milk (possibly diseased)? What about failing to child-proof every nook and cranny?

Unfortunately, for Ava especially, some people are going to be born into families with nutty ideas. And sometimes those nutty ideas can have awful consequences. It's pretty clear that this won't be the last time a child dies because of its parents' poor choices. And, sadly, but rightly, there's not too much the law can do about it.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
giffy 1
what about that growing number of parents who don't believe in vaccinating their kids? If those children die of measles, should their parents go to jail

Of course. At least faith healers are only a risk to themselves and their own children.

And yeah, this shit is hard to stop, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. I mean does anyone think a 20 cent tax on plastic bags is going to solve that problem overnight?
Posted by giffy on July 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM
Baconcat 2
"Clackamas County"

Enough said, unfortunately.
Posted by Baconcat on July 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM
3
If there actions were reasonable then the typical citizen of said county must possess more than his or her full complement of genes.
Posted by kinaidos on July 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Hernandez 4
All of us who grew up with sane parents who took proper care of us and raised us well should feel lucky and priveleged that we didn't end up with parents like Carl and Raylene Worthington. I feel so sorry for their other children, and all the children at the Followers of Christ church.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on July 24, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Urgutha Forka 5
Religious nuts are an endless source of entertainment.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on July 24, 2009 at 3:01 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 6
If that jury is a representative sample of the county, I sure am happy I don't live there.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM
Soupytwist 7
These jurors are fucking retards. I guarantee you if the parents had willfully been denying their children clothing, food, or shelter and the kids died, those parents would be going to prison.
Posted by Soupytwist http://twitter.com/katherinesmith on July 24, 2009 at 3:27 PM
kim in portland 8
I found it fascinating that they wouldn't take their daughter to a doctor, but they allowed a doctor to speak in their defense. I don't get it.

I don't live in Clackamas County either.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 24, 2009 at 4:15 PM
9
"It's pretty clear that this won't be the last time a child dies because of its parents' poor choices. "

for sure.
try 800,000 children aborted this year.
in America.
Posted by Dead is Dead on July 24, 2009 at 4:27 PM
10
The problem is that children don't have any rights in this country. It seems that even basic human rights can take a backseat to parental discretion under the right circumstances. The legislature is doing it wrong. Instead of passing laws that prevent a faith healing defense, they should pass a law stating that all children have a right to quality proven medical care, and anyone who would deny a child access to that care is guilty of a crime.
Posted by Brandon J. on July 24, 2009 at 5:34 PM
11
What are you doing posting about something non-seattle? We might attract comments from people who aren't from seattle!!!!1!!
Posted by Slog for Seattle on July 24, 2009 at 5:56 PM
12
@7: I don't know, denying kids food might be okay if done under the aegis of a faith-feeding religion.

If you are sufficiently pious, Jesus will fill your belly. If not, well then the little sinner had it coming.
Posted by Luke on July 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM
blank12357 13
@9, its more like 1.5 million abortions a year. Planned Parenthood does about 800,000 abortions annually and that's only half of the total.

I assume you oppose abstinence-only sex-ed, since it results in increased numbers of unwanted pregnancies, and support comprehensive sex-ed programs. Right?
Posted by blank12357 on July 25, 2009 at 2:14 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy