Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, July 9, 2009

West Seattle Dem Endorsements

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:22 AM

In the southwestern corner of Seattle tonight, over 200 liberals stuffed into a brick-walled, stuffy auditorium to hash out candidate endorsements for the 34th District Democrats. The group’s decisions could carry more citywide gravity than the district’s small turf in West Seattle would suggest. Already this year, three district Democratic organizations didn't endorse two incumbents who live in the 34th—Mayor Greg Nickels and City Attorney Tom Carr. The King County Democrats also snubbed Nickels and Carr (giving no endorsement to any mayoral candidate, and handing Carr’s opponent, Pete Holmes, an unbroken string of sole endorsements from Democratic groups). An endorsement from the 34th for Carr would suggest he’s not loathed by everyone, and Nickels desperately needed to win his home district to prove he has a base.

But Nickels may have tried to stack votes in his favor. A buzz among attendees suggested some last-minute maneuvering: On the cutoff day for new members to join the group (and be eligible to vote tonight), about 20 new members signed up. “I think [the new members] were largely supporters of the mayor,” said Jeff Upthegrove, the group’s membership director. “Many I recognized as members of his staff and others self-identified as city employees.”

5638/1247124827-signs_at_34th.jpgOutside the Hall at Fauntleroy, dozens of candidate signs flanked the entrance and Nickels signs covered most of the front windows. Inside, the onslaught didn't relent; Joe Mallahan's crew had covered the walls in his green and black signs for mayor and even posted two in each bathroom. Speakers gave two-minute pleas in favor and against candidates to a packed hall, and white-haired men in slacks and sneakers drank Corona from the bar and listened. “This is the fullest I’ve seen the room,” said say 34th District Democrats Chair Tim Nuse. He said 209 voting members were present. “That is huge.” After much speechifying, ballot counting, recounting, and more Corona—the meeting ran from 7 p.m. until midnight—Nuse announced the endorsements as the vote counters released the tallies. The first were fairly tame:

Unanimous endorsement: Against Tim Eyman’s latest turd, I-1033, Rob Holland for Port Position 3, and Max Vekich for Port Position 4

City Council Position 8: Dual endorsement of David Miller and Robert Rosencrantz

City Council Position 6: Dual Endorsmenet for Jessie Israel and Nick Licata

City Council Position 4: Dual endorsement Dorsol Plants and Sally Bagshaw

City Council Position 2: Dual endorsement of David Ginsberg and Richard Conlin

But in a surprise move, City Council Member Tom Rasmussen spoke in favor of Carr, noting Carr's advocacy for victims of domestic violence and violent crimes. I’m sorry but WHAT? Any city attorney is going to fight for victims of violent crime. The question in this race is how the city attorney manages low-level offenses so they have more time forthose violent crimes. Challenger Holmes, who got an endorsement today form Peter Steinbrueck, has vowed to reform Carr's skewed priorities. Carr increased the rate of pot prosecutions after voters made it the lowest law-enforcement priority (pot prosecutions dropped but only because the SPD arrested fewer people). Rasmussen sat on the city council’s Marijuana Policy Review Panel with Carr, who repeatedly lost his cool. Rasmussen—shortly after giving his endorsement to Carr—said to me that Carr’s behavior on the panel was “shocking,” “inappropriate,” and “very rude.” He added that Carr charging defendants in bar stings with one-year jail terms was a “bad decision.”

But with Rasmussen's support and a home-field advantage, Carr won the 34th District Democrat's sole endorsement, with 68 percent of the vote—just barely over the two-thirds needed to get the endorsement.

Nickels came close to winning the sole endorsement, but the vote shook out with only 64 percent for Nickels and Mike McGinn winning 35 percent. A third vote resulted in a dual endorsement for Nickels and McGinn.

Overall, a mostly unremarkable night for council candidates, none of whom got a sole endorsement (but it's notable that Israel got a dual endorsement with Licata, a 12-year incumbent). But it was a good night for Carr and Nickels. McGinn also came out in fine shape—taking home half the endorsement on Nickels’s home turf. But Rasmussen, a generally good guy, ended up looking like an ass.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Let's get this straight:

Greg Nickels and Tom Carr failed to get the endorsement vote in five democratic groups all over Seattle, then in the 34th in West Seattle, their home group, suddenly there's twenty new City employees who just magically show up in time to vote on endorsing Nickels and Carr?

And they just barely get endorsed ?

Well someone did a nice job packing that meting.
Obviously, it wasn't the guy who was in charge of routing snowplows last winter.

Maybe we ought to find out who was in charge of dispatching and getting the 20 employees to join and show up on time -- perhaps Nickels could promote that guy to be in charge of organizing snow plows!



Posted by They got snow removed from the mayor's street, too.... on July 9, 2009 at 6:07 AM
2
All the day by day stuff changes nothing - Drago has no traction, and Nickels is storming ahead.

Carr is an ass.

Right now, my money is on Greg ... for the win ... by 2 points.
Posted by Gary Betsome on July 9, 2009 at 6:30 AM
giffy 3
I cannot imagine giving a shit who 200 or so people with nothing better to on a wendesday night think I should vote for.
Posted by giffy on July 9, 2009 at 7:40 AM
4
Carr "looking like an ass"?
Dominic,
Be sure to include this post in the Stranger's entry for a journalism prize -- so somebody else can win.
Good for you for staying up and letting readers know how the event went. Not bad to question Rasmussen -- but the underlying theme is that anyone's support for Carr cannot possibly have merit is just absurd. You're criticism of Rasmusen is thin and, in typical Stranger style, you just drop to the level of name calling. I guess "ass" was the deepest thought you had.

A high school paper could do better than this.

Grow up.
Posted by Name calling as journalism on July 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM
5
I'm not sure how sharing a dual endorsement with McGinn is a good night for Nickels. If the Mayor can't win on his home turf when he's clearly organized for the event, then he's clearly in a lot of trouble. McGinn now has more Dem endorsements than any other Mayoral candidate (and will likely pick up at least another dual tonight in the 36th), hundreds of volunteers and a message and platform that actually resonates with voters; looks like we're in for an interesting primary.
Posted by CMB on July 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Mickymse 6
Dominic, how could you sit through that long challenge in the middle and FAIL to mention that David Ginsberg would have had the sole endorsement if not for one vote or a possibly incorrect parliamentary ruling?

I know that it's Ginsberg's home district... but you don't think that's a statement against an incumbent?
Posted by Mickymse on July 9, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Will in Seattle 7
I ran into a certain former Sonics player and Mayoral candidate racking up actual votes in SE Seattle last night - he probably got 40 votes just by asking for them one on one.

As to Greg, he'll make a fine sub-cabinet officer in DC.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 9, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Dominic Holden 8
@ 6) Because detailing district Democratic parliamentary rules is the most boring thing ever.
Posted by Dominic Holden on July 9, 2009 at 12:30 PM
9
@5: Mallahan and McGinn are nearly tied for endorsements.
37th: dual, Mallahan / McGinn
43rd: no endorsement (McGinn most votes)
46th: no endorsement (Mallahan most votes, close to sole but membership refused to give a dual to Nickels)
KCDCC: no endorsement (Mallahan most votes)
34th: dual Nickels / McGinn (Nickels most votes)
MDC: dual Mallahan/McGinn (Mallahan most votes)
36th: e-board recommended dual Mallahan / McGinn (Mallahan one vote shy of sole recommendation)
Posted by More Pie on July 9, 2009 at 2:41 PM
10
It should be said that Dorsol Plants had a good showing as well - really odd how the vote was split in the first vote. Dorsol doesn't get nearly enough attention in this race. He's going to do well in the August primary, and he'll be in the thick of Seattle politics for a while whether or not he's in the November general election. And that's a really good thing, too. We need more people like him in politics.
Posted by I can't believe I wore a sweater in that meeting on July 9, 2009 at 8:02 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use