Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Picture Frames

Posted by on Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM

There is a very good exhibition at Lawrimore Project this summer, an exhibition about what the hell a photograph actually is, as an object, leaving the pleasurable feeling that a photograph can be almost anything at all, and that there are mysterious operations at work in every one. Like Target Practice at Seattle Art Museum—my new review is out here—this show, curated by Bob Nickas and traveled by Presentation House of Vancouver, B.C., is on the surface an exploration of a medium, which could not sound more tedious, but which turns out to be a liberating reminder that the identity of every medium is defined by a horizon line rather than a hard limit.

If you thought, for instance, that you knew what a contemporary photographer might shoot, and/or what a baby picture might look like, this may change your mind. It's Baby, from 2007, by Torbjorn Rodland. It is not manipulated—just straight photography.

3c1e/1247088328-07rodland-baby.jpg

Judging from Rodland's web site, he has something in common with Seattle artist Anne Mathern.

And Rodland's video at Lawrimore Project, 132 BPM, is sheer joy: everything moves to the beat. Stalks of bamboo groove. Feet step on stairs in time. Sight and sound are united, metronomic. It's a cosmic disco is both absurd and deeply reasssuring. I think you'll love it; there's a minute-long clip on YouTube here. (The whole thing is a 13-minute loop.)

What else is in the show?

Louise Lawler's color-saturated photographs of a work by Warhol, hung at the same height as the now-absent Warhols;
ae2a/1247089159-dsc01974.jpg
One of Rachel Harrison's blobby sculptures that seems like nothing more than an elaborate photo-rest. Roe Ethridge's superimposed-by-bad-scanning photograph from a Harry & David catalog. B. Wurtz's sad little metal container set in front of a photograph of it against the sky that makes it look monumental.
17b2/1247089622-wurtz.jpg
Wolfgang Tillmans's simple knockout, paper drop (New York) I.
5c44/1247089712-artwork_images_138117_508220_wolfgang-tillmans.jpg
Jennifer Bolande's lightbox of images—one image per window, it at first appears—in the shape of a modernist tower. The strips of images are actually haunting, glowing hybrid shots from Lever House and a yawning appliance store.
6ab5/1247090225-buildingcollection2.jpg
And a photograph by Trisha Donnelly, reigning queen of enigma. It's called Untitled II (Peralta). Trying to figure it out could, thankfully, take a lifetime. What else is art for?
0cc9/1247090378-1234455454g.jpg

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Terry Miller 1
could Peralta be a skate wheel, melting and on fire, named after Stacy Peralta?
Posted by Terry Miller on July 8, 2009 at 3:23 PM
blackhook 2
I'm not sure babies should ever be photographed -- they are weird-looking creatures that only their mothers can love.
Posted by blackhook on July 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM
3
Baby reminds me of Serious Cat.
Posted by paulus on July 8, 2009 at 4:06 PM
shauniqua 4
donnelly: a trumpet and a business card laid upon a flatbed scanner
Posted by shauniqua http://www.shaunkardinal.com on July 8, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Bauhaus I 5
I think the baby picture is amazing, but it's also a bit weird. The baby's body doesn't look like a baby's body so much - you know, kinda pudgy and misshaped. That baby looks like it's on its way to buffness.
Posted by Bauhaus I on July 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Eric F 6
@4 has it. The card can be the sound produced by the trumpet--and peralta can be the skater, or "elevate!" in Spanish.
Posted by Eric F on July 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM
smiller555 7
I find it interesting, and even amusing, that once again Jen Graves and I see completely different art shows in the same space. The "Baby" photo? Best thing in the show. The luggage with guns and things printed on it came in second.

"132 BPM" is not a sheer joy - it is vapid, annoying, hipster art: the woman clomping her feet to the beat while muttering "CD DV DVD" made my friend and I groan in unison and leave immediately.

Wolfgang Tillmans does many things well, and "paper drop" looks nice on the slog, but his other pieces, the red and green papers folded and put in a lucite box? pretentious beyond belief!

And what about the tire hanging with pictures of tires bolted to it? Ugh. Ugly, useless crap. Wait, I bet that's in somebody's important collection now...

I realize I'm biased towards photographs with a narrative, as that's what I make myself, but I will argue that just because a show is curated as an "exploration of the medium" doesn't mean it has to suck. And this show sucked big time. There's so much good photography-based art out there and none of it made it into this show. I left dejected.
Posted by smiller555 http://smiller555.com on July 8, 2009 at 5:23 PM
LaRiiiiM0RrrHAwtiiii696969 8
STEVE U SHOULDA BROUGHT A THERMOS OF EVRCLR TO GIT DRUNKIE. THEN U WULD LIKE BEATS.
Posted by LaRiiiiM0RrrHAwtiiii696969 http://balkin.blogspot.com/ on July 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy