Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Monday, July 6, 2009

Schumer Guarantees Public Option

Posted by Eli Sanders on Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:39 AM

Over the weekend, Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York said this about Congress, the public option, and health care reform:

Make no mistake about it, the president is for this strongly. There will be a public option in the final bill.

Which is more than Washington's Democratic junior Senator, Maria Cantwell, has said. (Though it's always possible that Schumer, like Cantwell, may be redefining the term "public option.")

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
By "public option"
does Schumer mean
"government run taxpayer subsidized"?
Posted by Cause that's what it is... on July 6, 2009 at 9:59 AM
Carollani 2
Oh thank god. Of course, if it's going to work just like Medicare then I'm effed anyway.
Posted by Carollani http://www.carollani.com/wordpress on July 6, 2009 at 10:01 AM
Urgutha Forka 3
I'll believe it when I see it.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on July 6, 2009 at 10:16 AM
4
I have one word for you, a word that has the power to shape this debate, a word that the big health-insurance companies don't want you to hear...

Self-sustaining.

The foes of the public option keep harping on how it's going to be taxpayer-subsidized. But the economic reality is, it doesn't have to be. The foes of the public option keep harping on how it's a backdoor to single payer, that it will use the unfair advantage of taxpayer subsidies to drive the insurers out of business. But the economic reality is, it doesn't have to.

A federal public option is perfectly capable of competing with the private insurers without becoming a drain on the federal budget simply by pooling its resources, applying leverage, and operating in a regulated environment. Fair and square. The numbers add up for the public option to be self-sustaining, so why not craft the legislation to make it operate that way?

Actually, that's just what Chuck Schumer has in mind:
But Schumer argues neither the trigger nor the co-op would be immediately available to Americans. His plan would be ready on day one and adhere to the same rules as private plans and be self-sustaining.
Posted by cressona on July 6, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Will in Seattle 5
So, by public option, do they mean a single payer national health care plan that receives as much of a taxpayer subsidy as the corporate welfare we give companies (not the job creating small firms) to provide health care?

(just thought I'd correct what you said)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 6, 2009 at 10:22 AM
6
Hi, I'm Maria Cantwell.

That Chuck Schumer is so big and fat and nasty. He's not a cute Senator like me. I'm so cute and dumb. Look, I'm going to make my dumb face while I listen to you old people talk about Social Security.

...

See? See how I stretch my neck out and put on a puzzled dumb look like a cute Senator should. Then I make a little frown to make you think I care...but I really want to leave this ichy nursing home and get back to my super cute house.

By the way, the whole Senate is really yucky except for me.
Posted by Really Cute Friends of Maria Cantwell on July 6, 2009 at 10:28 AM
7
I'd love to run in a race where I set the rules, enforce the rules, plan the course and don't have to tell the other runners where the race starts or ends.

Bet I could win.

Yeah, this "single payer" government option should be very competetive.
Posted by Bitter Clinger on July 6, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Doctor Memory 8
Allow me to translate this from the senatorial-speak:

"We will make a big show of having a public option in the 'final' bill. We will then make an equally big show of shrugging our shoulders and passing the buck when the public option is mysteriously gutted when it goes to the reconciliation committee."
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on July 6, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Will in Seattle 9
@8 - probably.

But never underestimate President Obama. He's playing poker and the MSM is still stuck in checkers mode.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on July 6, 2009 at 12:06 PM
10
Will @ 9:

Never underestimate Obama to do WHAT? Do you just assume that Obama is going to do what YOU want? Because he's OBAMA?
Posted by ivan on July 6, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Greg 11
I'll believe it when it's on Obama's desk. Not before.
Posted by Greg on July 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM
12
what has obama done in seven months?
Posted by I'll tell you; nuthin on July 6, 2009 at 1:29 PM
Gomez 13
They can state their support all they want. If the money and the pull isn't there for the bill to get to Obama intact, it's not much better than Medicare.

What we need to do is attack the health care issue not just from the insurance side, but from the practice side. The biggest drain is by charging people to medicate problems instead of treating them up front and preventing chronic, insurance-and-wallet sapping visits in the future. And this never minds the growing rate of medical malpractice across the board nationwide.
Posted by Gomez http://gomezticator.livejournal.com on July 6, 2009 at 9:34 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use