Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, July 6, 2009

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by on Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:30 PM

I just wanted to say thank you for printing my question, and for your great advice. When I went to the Stranger's website and saw my question it was perfect timing as I had already set up a meeting with the ex the following day, so I just brought a copy of our local alternative paper and handed it to him. "This is what I wanted to ask you." He thought it was so awesome he said he's going to frame the column! He also agreed quite readily to participate. He wants to hang out with my boyfriend and I once or twice so he can get to know him better and feel more comfortable, but it shouldn't be too long of a wait. We're all three really excited about it.

I've always been a big fan of your column and almost always agree with your perspectives. Honesty is important in a relationship and I don't think long-term monogamy is very realistic. So many advice columnists and therapists still think of non-monogamy as this big taboo, and I think a lot of people would have healthier, longer-lived relationships if they could simply embrace the idea that variety can be a good thing.

Anyway, I don't want to prattle on too much because I know you have a lot of emails to read through. I just wanted to thank you on behalf of all three of us, and I'll definitely let you know how it turns out. :)

Need Some Abuse

Thanks for lovely note, NSA, and I'll pass your thoughts about non-monogamy and healthy relationships to a good friend of mine who believes that only men are ever interested in variety. He needs to know that women like you exist.

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Hernandez 1
It will be interesting to see if/how Klinghoffer tries to rationalize this letter into something that vibes with his narrow worldview.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on July 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM
gloomy gus 2
Unalloyed delight. Yay.
Posted by gloomy gus on July 6, 2009 at 3:51 PM
3
Yay!

Almost makes me want to try to distill my whining into letter form.

Only, I'm trivial and boring and foreign.
Posted by Sili on July 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM
Dougsf 4
I believe there was some talk of a finder's fee? Wear something loose.
Posted by Dougsf on July 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM
5
I don't doubt that there are many women that want to open up a relationship. The fact that the guy who is kind of a push over is willing to let the X in ... is just still highly suspect to me.

I don't think he really WANTS to open the relationship up, but maybe he is just being GGG.
Posted by former tri-state on July 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM
Carollani 6
Dan Savage, FTW.
Posted by Carollani http://twitter.com/carollani on July 6, 2009 at 4:23 PM
7
Stevie McNair's chick-on-the-side was very interested in non-monogamous variety in Healthy Relationships.
Hey Dan, I think she was even a gun owner, too!
Your kind of gal!!
Posted by Variety is the Spice of Life. Or Death. whatever... on July 6, 2009 at 4:25 PM
8
Because no one has ever been murdered by their presumed-to-be-mongamous spouse. Just task Laci Peterson.
Posted by Dan Savage on July 6, 2009 at 4:37 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 9
Dan, you're drunk. Go home.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 6, 2009 at 4:41 PM
10
Laci's husband was firmly in the "non-monogamous, looking for some variety" camp, Dan; he's one of yours...
Posted by Whatever it takes to keep your man, eh? on July 6, 2009 at 4:42 PM
kim in portland 11
I don't know if this will help, David. He'd just say that she will change her mind when she wants to have kids, and regret her past. At least, that's what he told the other(s) that wrote in.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 6, 2009 at 4:46 PM
12
No, he was in the dishonest-piece-of-shit-pretending-to-be-monogamous-when-he-was-not camp, which makes him one of yours. The "monogamous" camp is crawling with those guys.
Posted by Dan Savage on July 6, 2009 at 4:50 PM
13
Those guys are not "monogamous".

The "dishonest-piece-of-shit-pretending-to-be-monogamous-when-he-was-not" guys are just "open relationship" guys whose wife won't go along with it.
Posted by The many hues of decadence- it's a Rainbow! on July 6, 2009 at 4:55 PM
kim in portland 14
@9,

He has a point.

I spent many years counseling women in Domestic Violence situations, though an evangelical Christian program. I met too many women, who suffered at the hands of their monogamous spouse, thrown down stairs, heads held in the toilet, guns put to their heads while they were sodomized, arms broken, etc.. There are sick people who are monogamous and sick people who are not. It's a reality in this world.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM
Vince 15
You've made an old man very happy.
Posted by Vince on July 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM
16
14
And those guys were violent abusers because they were monogamous?
What exactly is the point?
Posted by disconnect on July 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM
slaggy 17
It is to the detriment of message boards everywhere that we must debate such things. How some people can be so certain in regards to things they know nothing about apart only from what their gut and reptilian brain tells them, it depresses me.
Posted by slaggy http://www.videowatchdog.com on July 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM
kim in portland 18
16:

The point is their are abusive people who are monogamous and some abusive people that are not monogamous.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 6, 2009 at 5:05 PM
Theo Magyar 19
Hey KiM:

But the statistics on abuse show that most abuse is committed by men against others - mostly women. Please see http://www.aidv-usa.com/statistics.htm . In my opinion, most of the people who are abusive have internalized a patriarchical world view. Not that domestic violence has any relationship to BDSM ... I'm jsut commenting ....
Posted by Theo Magyar http://connexionsandcontradictions.blogspot.com/ on July 6, 2009 at 5:15 PM
20
He's made a lot of people happy, #15.
Posted by jade on July 6, 2009 at 5:19 PM
kim in portland 21
Hey Theo,

I don't personally know of any correlation between abuse or BDSM. I was only refering to the lack of correlation between non-monogamy and abuse, from my actual experience. I don't doubt the statistic on abuse showing that most abuse is committed by men against others- mostly women. All though, again from my personal experience, there are abusive women, too. I worked with some as well.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on July 6, 2009 at 5:26 PM
rara avis 22
mature, secure, and honest people doing something that only affects them and will probably make them happy.

I can certainly see why people are up in arms about this.
Posted by rara avis on July 6, 2009 at 5:41 PM
23
I dunno... Something about it sets my spider senses tingling... I have a feeling her boyfriend will not enjoy it as much as he says he will. But maybe I'm just projecting.
Posted by matt! on July 6, 2009 at 5:48 PM
24
Don't forget: NSA has promised Dan (and, I hope, the rest of us who clearly aren't having nearly as much fun in our OWN bedrooms, otherwise why would we obsess about HER situation so much?) that she will let him know how it turns out. So presumably the GGG boyfriend will tell her how it was for him, too. And the ex. And NSA herself! Can't wait!
Posted by Sarah in Olympia on July 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM
25
This has got to be some of the worst advice you've ever given, Dan. Telling her to go for it, fuck the old boyfriend who did it for her in front of/with the new boyfriend who doesn't do it for her, so he can pick up pointers? I see him weeping in the corner, or hating her and himself after. Maybe a 3-way, sure, but with the most recent ex? You kinda surprise me here, pal.
Posted by and he's probably better hung, too on July 6, 2009 at 10:12 PM
Grist 26
35: It WAS a threesome she had planned, one which apparently both dudes are excited about. Read the original letter.
Posted by Grist on July 7, 2009 at 12:00 AM
27
@19 The violence and aggression, like the patriarchy, come from the testosterone. This isn't some political problem that we will be rid of someday. It's an ugly part of the human condition that we will always be struggling against.
Posted by Baltimoron on July 7, 2009 at 4:31 AM
28
#23. All he has to do is watch and learn. They're not inviting this guy into their lives (NSA doesn't want polyamory). Just one night to show him how it's done. And I like the fact that the ex wants to meet with him first. That shows a level of maturity and respect that even I wasn't expecting.
Posted by jade on July 7, 2009 at 4:46 AM
29
Hey Dan you dropped the ball: They should not just do it, but film it for HUMP!
Posted by Fe Man on July 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy