Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Friday, July 3, 2009

So How's Your Creepy Christian Pedo-dar?

Posted by Dan Savage on Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:46 AM

Yesterday I tested your creepy Christian pedo-dar. I asked Sloggers if this teacher—arrested for soliciting one of his 12-year-old students for sex—solicited a male student or a female student.

86fd/1246639154-nmwrrhodes.jpg

The results of the vote...

a63b/1246639268-pollresults.jpg

And a majority of Sloggers got it right: It's a girl...

A First Baptist Church School teacher is accused of soliciting a 12-year-old student for sex. Charleston County Sheriff's investigators charged Charles "DJ" Fishburne Rhodes III of Charleston with criminal solicitation of a minor.

An affidavit says the victim told investigators that Rhodes began text messaging her on her cell phone after school let out for the summer. The two talked through texts for about two to three weeks when Rhodes wrote and asked her to "come over." One text asked her to perform oral sex on him, the affidavit says.

Rhodes waived his rights and admitted in a statement that he engaged in the sexual conversation with the student, the affidavit says.

So it turns out that Sloggers' creepy Christian pedo-dar is pretty accurate. Congrats!

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (33) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
beelzebufo 1
hopefully we are that accurate in real life.
Posted by beelzebufo on July 3, 2009 at 9:55 AM
2
So Dan, were the posters yesterday right?
Were the victims all boys??
WERE THEY RIGHT, DAN?!
Posted by Admit it Dan- your ass got smoked on July 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM
3
This guy is a TEACHER?
Dan promised us that teachers are screened and SAFE!


I’m So Confused......
Posted by if we can't trust Dan who can we trust? on July 3, 2009 at 9:57 AM
4
I don't know, @2. Details haven't emerged. But clearly only gay people are a threat to children—this item proves it!
Posted by Dan Savage on July 3, 2009 at 9:59 AM
5
From yesterday's post-
“...even though there was no info about the sex of the victims in one of the cases.”

And why was that Dan?
Oh yeah, because you did not include it.
That would have required exhaustive intensive complicated journalistic research.
Namely googling the guys name.
If you did (did you even do that, Dan?) the first hit is knoxnews.com and you
don’t even have to hit the link because the title is:
“Youth volunteer at Knox church accused of sex acts with BOY ...”

Dan, did you catch that?
B - O - Y.

(btw it turns out our hero is not a Youth Pastor after all, but a VOLUNTEER.
Darn what you might learn with a little research...)

So why are you chapped about it, Dan?
Were you trying to hide the gender of the victim and are peeved you got ratted out?

Journalism is no game for children.
Stick to hate-mongering and rabble rousing.
Work on the Al Sharpton hairdo.
Work on the Perez Hilton lisp.
Leave Journalism to the adults.
Posted by Journalism 101 FAIL on July 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM
6
This guy is a teacher. What does he have to do with the “Youth Pastor Watch”?
Posted by Youth Pastor Watch EPIC FAIL on July 3, 2009 at 10:02 AM
7
It's a boy!

A youth volunteer at a Knox County church allegedly kept photos of children engaged in sexual activities and is accused of sexual acts with a boy younger than 13, according to court records.

Randall Thomas Hollifield, 45, of Powell was taken into custody Tuesday night after deputies executed a search warrant at his house on Little Joe Road, said Knox County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Martha Dooley.


http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jul/02…

That detail was omitted from original YPW post because it wasn't in the first reports. Enjoy your trollgasm!
Posted by Dan Savage on July 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM
Matt from Denver 8
I can't read the troll at 2, 3, 5, or 6 because unregistered comments are turned off.

Why don't you just register? You can still end your comments with zingy one-liners. I know it's not as funny as when it's your "name," but that's all you have to lose. OTOH you have everything to gain by letting EVERYONE in on your wisdom.

So register. I suggest the screen name "butthurt," which is not yet taken.
Posted by Matt from Denver on July 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Matt from Denver 9
@ 7, so everyone was right? Slog rules!
Posted by Matt from Denver on July 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM
10
It wasn't my pedo-dar. It was my Dan-dar. I could tell that the quote "homosexuals preying on teenage boys" got your dander up, and you weren't about to make a post the confirmed that bias. My gut is that the creepy pedos are about 50% lil' girl lovin' and 50% lil' boy lovin'. Which seems a little too gay now that I think about it, considering homosexuality in the general population is about (what are the best numbers on this these days?) 10% of the general population. On third thought, 50% gay for the conservative christian politician, catholic priet, and youth pastor population seem about right.
Posted by ohthetrees on July 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM
11
My husband pointed out that in that picture the guy had "stare-y" eyes. No matter where you stand in the room the guy was looking at you in a creepy manner.
Mind you I based my assumption about this guy on the fact that most pedophiles are heterosexual.
Posted by au_gout on July 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM
12
I based my vote on my assumption that Dan was going out of his way to disprove Fundie preachers comments about gays being pederasts. It would have been too "obvious" if that creep had molestered boys.
Dan, if you really want to test us on this how about stringing about 10 together and seeing how we score in that context.
Posted by Tingleyfeeln on July 3, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 13
Hmm, must have missed that one. Maybe I was too busy thinking about molesting Kim in Portland.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on July 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM
14
7
"That detail was omitted from original YPW post because it wasn't in the first reports."

Not so.
The knoxnews report was available when the YPW was posted.
Admit it Dan- you never even googled the guys name-
too busy enjoying your Youth Pastorgasm?

Posted by you're a sick little puppy, aren't you... on July 3, 2009 at 10:57 AM
15
10
You are right about the high number of incidents involving male-on-male abuse.
Which is why slog needs a separate "Homosexual Youth Pastor" Watch.
Posted by that'll be the day... on July 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Reverse Polarity 16
It isn't so much that we have accurate pedo-dar. Its that some of us understand the odds.

If you accept that roughly 10% of men are attracted to other men, then it only stands to reason that roughly 10% of male pedos would be attracted to boys. I'm sure that other factors come in to play, and it isn't a direct correlation, and so on, but the general principle can't be too far off.

Absent any other info, simple statistics would indicate the pedo was most likely perving on little girls.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on July 3, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Jenny from the Block 17
But was the volunteer at the Knox church "straight-identified" or was he an out-and-about homo?

Five bucks he has a wife and kids.
Posted by Jenny from the Block on July 3, 2009 at 11:15 AM
18
Most pedophiles are straight! I'm an investigator for child protective services who specializes in child sexual abuse, and more than 90% of the cases I have been involved with are heterosexual perpetrators on opposite-sex victims. My colleagues and I joke that to protect kids, instead of trying to criminalize homosexuality, ban step-fathers or mother's boyfriends.
Posted by Nathan on July 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM
kim in portland 19

I thought of it in terms of odds, too.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPpCxY05dqs on July 3, 2009 at 11:30 AM
kim in portland 20
@ 13:

Thanks for the smile. Have a great weekend, and beware of women who have fireworks and duct tape in there possession.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPpCxY05dqs on July 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM
21
@8 - Please do not encourage the unregistered trolls to register. I really enjoy not reading all the Dan bashing, and just reading the comments related to the post.

If you want to read their comments, just turn the unregistered comments back on.
Posted by Charm on July 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM
22

How many SLOG readers brought their toddlers to see the guys at the Fremont Fair riding bicycles with their Crown Jewels swaying in the breeze?

Posted by Hypocrattle, USA on July 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM
23
21
If you faint hearted liberal wussies don't read the unregistered comments then you miss out on....
the Rest of the Story!
Posted by Paul Harvey........good day! on July 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM
24
21
If you don't read them how do you know there is Dan bashing?
You've peeked, haven't you...
Posted by Liar Liar on July 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM
25
8
Did somebody say something?
I have registered comments turned off.....
Posted by Fair and Balanced on July 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Matt from Denver 26
@ 21, I don't want to read his comments. I just like calling him out on his cowardice. He wouldn't have the balls to do this if he registered.
Posted by Matt from Denver on July 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM
kresblamania 27
WTF? There were 2 previous Charles "DJ" Fishburne Rhodes?
Posted by kresblamania http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiI9Uc1uVtc on July 3, 2009 at 12:14 PM
28
This was @18 unregistered, but I'm reposting it because this is so right on. I'm a teacher and it's amazing to me how many kids are abused by boyfriend/stepdad and how many moms don't kick the abusers sorry ass out of their house.

"Most pedophiles are straight! I'm an investigator for child protective services who specializes in child sexual abuse, and more than 90% of the cases I have been involved with are heterosexual perpetrators on opposite-sex victims. My colleagues and I joke that to protect kids, instead of trying to criminalize homosexuality, ban step-fathers or mother's boyfriends."
Posted by tired on July 3, 2009 at 12:35 PM
29
28
Get with the program, tired.
Didn't you hear Dan explain how peachy-keen open relationships are for everyone?

free sex for all!!!
Posted by Peace, Love and Rock&Roll on July 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM
30
26
to do what?
Posted by w on July 3, 2009 at 12:48 PM
31
I /really/ wish there was a SLOG contest where we would have to submit pictures of ourselves, similar to this one. The portraiture is my favorite part about the youth pastor watch.
Posted by The Cap'n on July 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM
32
@18, sad to hear the facts from someone who has to deal with this, but I must admit I appreciate the insight into what comes out of the humor it must take to see repeatedly that aspect of humanity and still find some way, any way, to laugh.
How many single moms are going to be celibate for how long after reading that, though?
Posted by Tingleyfeeln on July 3, 2009 at 10:52 PM
Bonefish 33
B-b-but guys! If Family Guy has taught me anything, it's that only old gay guys with paperboy fixations molest children! How can Family Guy lie to me like this? Damn you people and your established facts contradicting what my "gut" tells me!
Posted by Bonefish on July 5, 2009 at 10:01 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use