Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Meanwhile In India

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM

ab71/1246509800-del1.jpg

Gays and lesbians in India are about a half an hour away from hearing the results of their Lawrence v. Texas: the Delhi High Court is about to rule on a constitutional challenge to a law imposed by the British during colonial rule that made gay sex a crime punishable by 10 years in prison. India is the world's most populous nation after China, home to more than 17% of humanity. This morning Rex Wockner—who has been writing a weekly roundup of international gay news for more than twenty years—asked: Will 17% of the world's gays be decriminalized tomorrow? We're about to find out.

UPDATE: And here we have a familiar and unholy and non-sensical coupling of two anti-gay arguments popular with religious bigots:

Muslim organisations in India have said that making homosexuality legal in the country would be anti-Islamic. “Homosexuality is an offence under Sharia Law and haram (prohibited) in Islam,” deputy vice chancellor Abdul Khalik Madrasi from the Darul Uloom Deoband Maulana group said.... They appealed to the government to avoid the “decadent trends of the Western culture” and not to give in to the demands of a “minuscule minority.”

“The section should stay as its repealing would result in sexual anarchy in the society. Those opposing the section are influenced by Western culture. Those who argue for independence do not realise that independence should have its limits,” a spokesman for one of the groups, the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, told the Times of India.

Gays and lesbians are at tiny minority and the law shouldn't be changed to appease such a small group of people... and if the law is changed then there's gonna be sexual anarchy because everyone in India is going to be having gay sex once its legal.... which means that gays weren't really a tiny minority at all. In actual fact everyone in India—and everywhere else—is either gay or wants to be gay and it's just that some folks—we call them "straights"—are reluctant to have all the gay sex they really want because they're afraid of running afoul of the law.

See how that works?

UPDATE 2:

b23a/1246513014-800px-kajuraho_homoerotic_sculpture_-_india_-_danielou_-_auparashtika.jpg

That's legal now. (Suck it, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind.) Writes Rex in an email...

Just off the phone with Delhi.

The Delhi High Court has "read down" Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code so that it no longer applies to adult consensual gay sex.

Much more to come, including what all it means right away and what happens now.

Check Rex's blog, WocknerWire, for updates.

UPDATE 3: The full text of the press release issued by India's Queer Media Collective after the jump.

Queer Media Collective (India)
2 July 2009

Press Release

QMC Welcomes Delhi High Court Verdict on Section 377 IPC

The Queer Media Collective welcomes the Delhi High Court's decision, in the Public Interest Litigation filed by Naz India and Voices Against 377, to read down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code so that it no longer applies to consenting adults.

Section 377 has been used to criminalise homosexuals in India, and by removing consenting adults from its purview the Delhi High Court has made a powerful statement on the importance of respecting basic human rights of queer people in India.

By making this decision the Delhi High Court has also acted to correct a historical injustice. Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was imposed by the British on the historically tolerant attitudes to sexuality that have always existed in India. The law has continued to exist in India long after the British changed their laws in the UK.

Because this law continued to exist in India thousands of people have suffered harassment, discrimination and blackmail simply because they chose to love someone of their same sex. Lesbian couples have been forced to commit suicide, gay men have been blackmailed and forced into marriages that damage both themselves and their wives, and transgendered people have suffered continual violence - for none of which they have had recourse because under Section 377 they all were criminals just for being who they were.

Across the world countries that value tolerance, diversity and the importance of the freedom to lead one's life without harming others have stopped treating homosexuals as criminals. In India people from all walks of life, including legal scholars, intellectuals like Amartya Sen, Vikram Seth and Swami Agnivesh (who signed a letter supporting this case), media and Bollywood personalities and politicians like Health Minister Ambumani Ramadoss have all affirmed the need to change this law.

Now with this decision of the Delhi High Court India has taken the first step towards this much needed change. We call on the Indian government to support this decision. We call on other courts to take note of this judgement. We call on the police to stop any harassment of queer people. And we call on all people, in India and abroad, to welcome this verdict as a victory for basic common sense and basic human rights.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (23) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
They decriminalized homosexuality! This is overdue, yes, but an incredible step.
Posted by Zeb on July 1, 2009 at 10:24 PM
2
Gotta love those religious fundamentalists, claiming that repealing a British-imposed colonial law is giving in to the "decadent trends of the Western culture." Then again, I suppose if they understood history or logic they couldn't be fundamentalists anymore.
Posted by Reverend Tap on July 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM
3
13% of indians are muslim...not exactly a crushing majority...
Posted by econoline on July 1, 2009 at 10:34 PM
4
Yep, the High Court rule in our favor!
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi…
(article needs updating, should happen soon)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/speci…

This is great news!
Posted by tjc on July 1, 2009 at 10:48 PM
Julie in Eugene 5
That carving is hot.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on July 1, 2009 at 10:57 PM
6
Happy anniversary, by the way.
(45 years ago today, LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act, which outlawed segregation by circumventing limitations imposed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Civil Rights Cases – according to Wikipedia anyway.)
A good day for civil rights, I'd say.
Posted by YTAH http://ytah.wordpress.com/ on July 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM
kim in portland 7
This is great news. I'm glad to hear it.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPpCxY05dqs on July 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM
Uriel-238 8
econoline @3, yeah, but it's funny how the fundies speak the same language no matter what their faith.
Posted by Uriel-238 on July 1, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Reverse Polarity 9
A large majority of the Indian population is Hindu, not muslim. And Hindu's are generally more laid back about the subject of gays. That engraving (pictured) is from the side of a Hindu temple in Khajuraho, if I'm not mistaken (or maybe a Jain temple).
Posted by Reverse Polarity on July 1, 2009 at 11:57 PM
rob! 10
Across the world countries that value tolerance, diversity and the importance of the freedom to lead one's life without harming others have stopped treating homosexuals as criminals.


If only this celebratory statement were true. But yay, India.
Posted by rob! on July 1, 2009 at 11:58 PM
11
This is awesome! ...but "The court's verdict can be challenged in India's Supreme Court." Plus, it's been totally legal in Russia, where I live, for years and look how much good it did us.
Posted by sadini on July 2, 2009 at 12:04 AM
12
Hey, fuck you, Dan.

And fuck every other western media outlet that got this story wrong.

Chapter XVI, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code applied only to MALE "gay sex", i.e. sex involving "penile insertion".

Dude-on-dude rim jobs were totally legal, under this law, as was ALL LESBIAN SEX.

And with this ruling, MALE homosexuality in India gets a legal and societal boost, while FEMALE homosexuality in India goes from being a stigmatized activity not even acknowledged by law to being... a stigmatized activity not even acknowledged by law.

HOORAY FOR (MALE) GAY PROGRESS!
Posted by robotslave on July 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM
13
@9 -- the sucker in the carving is wearing a rather cunning hat, so that would support your theory of a Jayne temple.

II'll be in my bunk.
Posted by tjc on July 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM
14
@12 -- Actually, you've got it wrong. The section reads, in part, "carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal." It says later that "penetration is sufficient to constitute" this intercourse, but it does not require penile insertion anywhere in the text and the inclusion of the word "woman" invalidates your claim.
Posted by Reverend Tap on July 2, 2009 at 1:17 AM
15
Hey reverend:

It sure would be cool if you were bright enough to realize that that particular interpretation of "carnal intercourse" was raised long after the law was written, and was not universally accepted precedent even when this most recent high-profile case was decided.

Don't worry, you get to sit with the famous Dan Savage at the "unwitting apologists for male-only gay liberation who are later totally contrite about it" table. It's a pretty rad group of gay men, I'm told.
Posted by robotslave on July 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM
16
Yay maybe this will mean we'll see more indian gay porn sites!
Posted by More Indian porn please! on July 2, 2009 at 3:14 AM
17
Only applies in Delhi though.
Posted by duckgirlie on July 2, 2009 at 3:47 AM
Hyzenthlayk9 18
@8: Fundies of all stripes have more in common with each other than they do with the mainstream members of the faiths that they claim to be the champions of.

This is great news.
1st step: Decriminalization
2nd step: Recognizing the right of individuals within minority group to exist.
3rd step: Granting full rights as citizens to members of the minority group.

Sadly, in this country we're still fighting to see the 3rd step come to pass.
Posted by Hyzenthlayk9 http://oystermind.blogspot.com/ on July 2, 2009 at 8:07 AM
The Gay Curmudgeon 19
@12 @15

What should have happened differently? I suggest that you write the story correctly pointing out what the Western media got wrong. Educate and convince us of your arguments. Reading ignorance as malice and doing nothing to fix it is intellectually lazy. So step up.

I'm as ignorant of Indian law as anyone but it seems like the ruling language says that 377 had a "disproportionate impact" on "men who have sex with men":

The impugned provision in Section 377 IPC criminalises the acts of sexual minorities particularly men who have sex with men and gay men. It disproportionately impacts them solely on the basis of their sexual orientation. The provision runs counter to the constitutional values and the notion of human dignity which is considered to be the cornerstone of our Constitution. Section 377 IPC in its application to sexual acts of consenting adults in privacy discriminates a section of people solely on the ground of their sexual orientation which is analogous to prohibited ground of sex. A provision of law branding one section of people as criminal based wholly on the State's moral disapproval of that class goes counter to the equality guaranteed under Articles 14 and 15 under any standard of review.

Do you really think that this ruling only helps "men who have sex with men"? It looks like this is a specific example of a new principle - that rejecting "disproportionate impact on the basis of sexual orientation" works for everyone whether their sexual orientation or behavior was visible or not, specifically criminalized or not.
Posted by The Gay Curmudgeon http://www.thegaycurmudgeon.com on July 2, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Confluence 20
I've heard that Indians have the smallest penises in the world. Just curious: truth or fiction?
Posted by Confluence on July 2, 2009 at 8:55 AM
Philly 21
@13
Shiny!
Posted by Philly on July 2, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Carollani 22
So many people so angry before noon. Sheesh.

@20: The story goes... that standard condom sizes are too large for Indian men. However,
It's not size, it's what you do with it that matters
- Sunil Mehra
Posted by Carollani http://www.carollani.com/wordpress on July 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM
Bonefish 23
20: you're thinking of texans
Posted by Bonefish on July 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM

Add a comment

Most Commented on Slog

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use