Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Sanford on Gay Marriage

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:37 PM

Here's an interview with Sanford that opens with a question about gay marriage:

Sanford was more than five months into his affair when he gave this interview—and you gotta love Joe shoving his tongue up Sanford's ass at the end of the interview: "We all love you, Mark." Get in line, Joe.
And Sanford—who ditched his four young kids on Father's Day in favor of his mistress—opposes civil unions for gay couples and adoptions by gay couples. Because every child deserves a mother and a father...

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
SecretBYUBottomBoy 1
I started the afternoon feeling a little bit sorry for this guy...

Should have known he was really a douche.
Posted by SecretBYUBottomBoy on June 24, 2009 at 3:50 PM
2
Ah the sanctity of marriage. Another homophobe caught spitting in the wind.
Posted by Oliver Speed on June 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Likemtall 3
Superfantastical-Douche!!! I love how he infers that gay rights don't matter because, "at the end of the day it is not core to most people's lives and most peoples life experience". so by all means screw the minority because it is not tied to an economic issue.
Then in practically the next breath blurts out there is a lot of "taxation without representation" going on right now.

I'm not the least bit surprised this hypocritical fool thought he could steal away to Argentina for a dirty weekend without anyone finding out.

The only true pressing question that MSNBC left out in this interview is, "Mark, what colour is the sky in your world?"

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Posted by Likemtall on June 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Joh 4
NEWS FLASH: Old white male (R) hates gays, cheats on wife, supports lowering taxes, loves Jesus. Story at 11.
Posted by Joh http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504158215&ref=profile on June 24, 2009 at 4:16 PM
jnmend 5
See, the problem is, if had this stance the day before his affair started, it wouldn't have been any less wrong, just more hypocritical.

But I don't give a fuck if a Republican disproves his/her own stupid argument with their actions because it is a STUPID ARGUMENT. Of course gay marriage doesn't ruin traditional marriage - it's a STUPID ARGUMENT. This man isn't more proof of it because there is nothing to prove.

He is, however, proof of the argument "selfish assholes make bad husbands and dads".
Posted by jnmend on June 24, 2009 at 4:21 PM
Bonefish 6
5: it is a stupid argument, but it's also an image-based argument. Point out that they're not living up to their own image, and fewer (though still too many) people will be suckered by it.
Posted by Bonefish on June 24, 2009 at 4:25 PM
7
Core to most people's lives? He's a typical mouthful of bullshit that the Republican's think plays well. It only plays well in the ignorant south. That's why they are cornered in places like South Carolina where people are dumb enough to believe them.
Posted by Vince on June 24, 2009 at 4:25 PM
Carollani 8
It's just so delicious when the GOPs hypocrisy becomes so visible. Yummmm!
Posted by Carollani http://www.carollani.com/wordpress on June 24, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Will in Seattle 9
Turns out she has two sons as well - so last count has 6 CHILDREN impacted by this.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 24, 2009 at 4:49 PM
10

For all the blather about straights and gays in these pages, the real problem in seattle is all the bisexual guys.

These dudes usually have wives and maybe children, but they come into the office and harass all the straight single dudes.

Places like Microsoft are rife with these cologne drenched, jeans wearing she-men who want it both ways.
Posted by No Bi 4 Me on June 24, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Andy_Squirrel 11
@10
Jeans-wearing? wtf?
Posted by Andy_Squirrel on June 24, 2009 at 5:35 PM
12
Mark clearly has had his own stimulous package going for quite some time!
Posted by onanov on June 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM
13
I have to admit that, when I first heard about Sanford's disappearence on the news, I immediately thought he was having an affair with a man. He's a conservative Republican, married with kids, and he disappeared (on Father's Day, no less!) without a trace. I guess I was only partially correct, although my mom pointed out that we still haven't seen a picture of this "woman" he's having an affair with, so who knows? If you look at the news, the majority of conservative Republicans on the news who get caught having an affair are doing so with another man.
Posted by Anna from Orlando on June 24, 2009 at 7:41 PM
Max Solomon 14
when he started talking about moral absolutes and consequences i started to see his suffering. i hope that he learns from this. the lesson is: people who live in glass houses...
Posted by Max Solomon on June 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM
15
a mother and a father and a little mistress on the side....
Posted by fag on June 24, 2009 at 11:08 PM
16
A middle-aged, white, "good Christian" male Republican. The last of the entitled class in the old south. Entitled that is until your wife, mistress and SC voters hand you your balls on a plate.
Posted by David in Arizona on June 25, 2009 at 8:48 AM
17
Sanford, Ensign, Craig, Vitter, Swaggart, Haggard, Livingston....

Who's next on the repukelican douchebag hypocrite
list???

lol
Posted by Macmande on June 25, 2009 at 7:59 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use