Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Secret Kept, Mystery Unsolved

Posted by Jen Graves on Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM

f5fb/1245684879-duchamp23.jpgThe legend goes like this.

On Easter Day in 1916, the artist Marcel Duchamp—the man who invented the readymade (or is "invented" the right word?)—gave his friend Walter Arensberg a ball of nautical twine and asked Arensberg to insert an object into the center of the ball. Duchamp asked Arensberg not to tell him what was in the center of his own artwork. He sandwiched the ball between two brass plates held together by four screws, and titled the sculpture With Hidden Noise because when you shake it, the secret contents make a rattling sound.

Duchamp's sculpture is a surrealist exercise in collaboration and symbolism, but it's also a critique of the author's role in creating art. There is always something at the heart of the work, Duchamp insists, that even the artist doesn't know and certainly doesn't control.

According to lore, Arensberg didn't die with the secret. He passed it on to another one of Duchamp's friends, Walter Hopps.

But Hopps died in 2005, and (because I am a total nerd) I've been dying to know: Did Hopps spill the beans before his death? Is there somebody out there now who knows what's inside that ball of twine?

The other day I asked Adelina Vlas, assistant curator of modern and contemporary art at Philadelphia Museum of Art, which owns With Hidden Noise. (An artist's proof is at LACMA, made in 1964, 10 years after Arensberg died, presumably with the collaboration of Hopps.)

"Hopps didn't tell anyone," Vlas told me, "or if he did, that person didn't come forward. Conservators go into the work, and they do know. But curators aren't told the secret. We can't know."

The legend lives.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Gurldoggie 1
Cool. I love that we're having yet another collective Duchamp moment. Have you seen this project?
Posted by Gurldoggie http://gurldogg.blogspot.com on June 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM
Greg 2
It's probably some friggin' thimbles and buttons. There are more exciting unsolved mysteries in the world, like the Dorabella cipher or the Phaistos disk.
Posted by Greg on June 23, 2009 at 10:23 AM
pissy mcslogbot 3
it's a wrapped up Lilliputian Urinal.
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on June 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM
4
You gave it away...it's beans!
Posted by Vince on June 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM
5
oh common'! it's just four little screws. Nobody over there has a screwdriver? Seriously?
Posted by m@tt on June 23, 2009 at 11:10 AM
GlennFleishman 6
Let me trot out my curator/Duchamp story. Yale art history prof recalled (in 1987) asking Duchamp on the 50th anniversary of the Armory Show about Why Not Sneeze Rrose Celavy?, which is a bunch of marble ice cubes in a cage with a thermometer sticking out--the thermometer constantly goes missing. What should we do? Marcel: They are readily available at any drugstore.

(BTW, there's some research to show his readymades were actually one of a kind. I've seen a bunch of them close-up, and if you look at them with that in mind, it seems possible. In Advance of the Broken Arm--a snow shovel--looks totally improbably as a mass-produced object intended to work. His famous Fountain--a urinal--doesn't appear to have the plumbing fixtures in the right spot.)
Posted by GlennFleishman http://blog.glennf.com/ on June 23, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Fnarf 7
The real answer: it's Duchamp's car keys. Christ, was he pissed.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 23, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Jeremy from Seattle 8
We made a Duchamp book earlier this year.
http://tinyurl.com/lcssna
Posted by Jeremy from Seattle http://www.x-dezyn.com on June 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM
The Amazing Jim 9
It's Kevin Spacey.
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on June 23, 2009 at 11:36 AM
10
Jen, I think to open it and find out what was inside would be to destroy the maddening curiousity of the piece. This is the point of course -- Duchamp has produced here an unscratchable itch.
Posted by arts&letters on June 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM
11
Jen Graves: Oh, I agree.
(arts&letters HURLS Jen onto a car hood, PUNCHES Jen in the face several times)
arts&Letters: Wake up, time to die!
(arts&letters is CLUBBED in the back of the head with a ceramic AK47)
(Cut to RL, in updo and red lipstick, lips quivering, holding the AK47 in shaking hands)
...
Later, "love scene" ;_;
Posted by R "everything is Blade Runner" L on June 23, 2009 at 1:15 PM
12
I envy you all this Duchamp you are getting to see Jen, I must get out to the east coast on an art jaunt.

The so called research into Ducamps readymade's being hand crafted really doesn't hold up to actually scrutiny. It's an example of what they call "confirmation bias". Almost all of the so called evidence revolves around the items not holding up to mass market production standards, but that was not at all the case at Duchamp's time. There are plenty of weird porcelain objects from turn of the century France that you could only find one or two examples of. Back then things were just barely above the level of custom with individual manufacturers all making unique versions of things. Part of Duchamps "art" here was his selection of these objects.
Posted by Big Unshaven Man on June 24, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use