Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Live With This

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:34 PM

In a letter Amanda Knox sent to "her former boyfriend [Raffaele Sollecito] about her ongoing trial for the murder of Meredith Kercher":
3e1e/1245277785-picture_6.png


The thing about women's prison is there about 70 of us altogether at the maximum and we all live on the same floor, so all of us are mixed together regardless of the length or type of conviction.

For instance in my very own cell I'm living with a drug addict, a thief and an accomplice to murder... if I have to get down to their crimes they are here for.

The philosopher Hannah Arendt once pointed out that to kill a person is to permanently move in with a killer. You must live with you, a killer. If (and this is a real if) Amanda did what many think she did, then that list of criminals she is confined with should have included a murderer.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
douchus 1
Unless she didn't do it.

Why do you hate her so?
Posted by douchus on June 17, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Charles Mudede 2
i very much doubt she is innocent.
Posted by Charles Mudede on June 17, 2009 at 3:50 PM
douchus 3
Charles, I don't want to not like you. My problem stems from not/barely understanding anything you ever say. My apologies.
Posted by douchus on June 17, 2009 at 3:53 PM
4
Hey Charles,
You think she's guilty. WE GET IT.
Now shut up about it!

Thanks.
Posted by ebon on June 17, 2009 at 3:55 PM
5
@2 - Maybe we would all be as informed if you clearly reported the facts in this case rather than the faux-philisophical editorializing that you like to do.
Posted by Collin on June 17, 2009 at 3:57 PM
Confluence 6
The girl is guilty as sin.

Um, #3, what the hell are you talking about?? Charles is perfectly comprehensible to me.
Posted by Confluence on June 17, 2009 at 3:58 PM
Mittens Schrodinger 7
Actually Charles, whether or not she is convicted has nothing to do with it. She either is or isn't already living with a murderer. The verdict is immaterial.
Posted by Mittens Schrodinger on June 17, 2009 at 4:12 PM
The Amazing Jim 8
A sociopath wouldn't care.
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on June 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 9
Charles, 'fess up: Even though you think she's guilty, you'd still do her in a heartbeat, wouldn't you?
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on June 17, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Charles Mudede 10
@7, i agree. i will change the wording. as for 9, no. nothing can make me desire a convicted murder. nothing.
Posted by Charles Mudede on June 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM
douchus 11
@6

See 5 and look at all his other slog posts (and even his regular Stranger articles). I just don't understand all the philosophical nonsense.
Posted by douchus on June 17, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Will in Seattle 12
In Italian "Justice" you're presumed Guilty until proven Innocent.

Kind of like how they treat their wives.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM
Will in Seattle 13
um, i meant they do the reverse aspect with wives. Husbands, however, conform to the Guilty until proven Innocent rule.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM
g 14
Why do you repeatedly take life-and-death situations and behave as if they exist to test your various philosophical ideas, which are usually pretty shallow? If she killed someone she should be confined with a murderer, because, like, if you become a murderer you're living with yourself as a murderer, so, like, being in a cell with another murderer is kind of like the same thing. Wow, man.
Posted by g on June 17, 2009 at 4:56 PM
Urgutha Forka 15
@10, but Charles, she isn't convicted yet.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on June 17, 2009 at 5:29 PM
16
Muh Dik.
Posted by I beez raciss, sparkling wiggle! TNB!!! on June 17, 2009 at 5:33 PM
17
Shame 16:

It's now "Chuck Dick".
Posted by Forever your girl on June 17, 2009 at 5:46 PM
18
Charles hasn't ever explained why he thinks she's guilty. He never discusses the facts, the evidence, the theory of the case.

That's below Charles.

He does often use her pretty face to get hits and spout his nonsense.

It's basically chickenshit.
Posted by PC on June 17, 2009 at 7:16 PM
19
Charles,
You really need to move on to new topic.

Now this a big if, but move on, junior G-Man.

Posted by Does Charles Mud-Man have a Private Eye Licese? on June 17, 2009 at 9:57 PM
20
What I think is amazing is that she is an American "University Student" and she can't construct a sentence or use proper punctuation.
Posted by tacomagirl on June 17, 2009 at 10:15 PM
21
Chuck Dick.
Posted by Dick Chucker on June 18, 2009 at 7:41 AM
22
my verdict is still out, but seriously it'd be a cool journalistic move to share with us all the reasons or dare i say facts...about why you think she is without a doubt guilty
Posted by grace on June 18, 2009 at 1:39 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use