Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, June 15, 2009

What It's Like at the Press Conference After a Victorious Sounders Match

Posted by on Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:44 AM

a2f0/1245045388-soundersmohawk.jpeg

While the diehards waited around the edge of the field—occasionally rewarded by, like, Tyrone Marshall walking by—the post-match press conference was getting underway in a brightly lit little room under the stands. There were 28 people in the room, 27 of them men. Sounders coach Sigi Schmid sat at a table set up in front of Sounders-logo wallpaper. He has silver hair, flinty eyes, a gap between his front teeth, and tons of intelligence—you could tell he is smart enough to field any question whatsoever, but the reporters weren't asking anything interesting. The reporters were all slumped this way and that, and their questions were dull. How did he think the game went? He thought it went great. How did it feel to win? "It helps us. It certainly helps us." And so on. Then he took his last question and someone said Freddie Ljungberg was taking questions next. Schmid left.

There was a long pause while we waited for Freddie Ljungberg—the highest-paid player on the team ($1.3 million this year), the Calvin Klein underwear model, the Swede with the big brain—to materialize. When he walked in, he sent a ripple of energy through the room. One of his calves was double its size with a translucent ice pack strapped to it. Whereas with Schmid reporters just held their recorders in their hands, now they all approached the table, bent in weird supplication, to place their recorders as close to the former underwear model as possible. Another long pause. No one dared go first. Ljungberg smiled. A handler said, at last, "Someone have a question?"

Someone stammered out a question about his yellow card at the end of the game. "In Europe, the referees see you as more of equals," Ljungberg said. "You can talk to them." He said he was trying to bring the European way of playing to America, but in a they-just-do-things-differently-here-and-I-have-to-get-used-to-it way. (He added, about the team generally, "We don't want any more red cards.") After another pause, someone stammered: How did it feel to score that goal? It was such a blankly stupid question—how do you think it felt?—that Ljungberg struggled for what to say. Then questioner went on: Can you take us through the setup of that goal and how you did it? Ljungberg said, "To be honest I don't remember the setup." Then he figured out a way to deliver what they wanted to hear, and he said, "It worked. So, happy days."

Then someone asked another throwaway question about how people thought of him and Fredy Montero as "the two Freddies," and whether he thought working well together with Montero was important. Then the next question was, essentially, I'm sorry, I didn't hear your answer about how it felt to score that goal, could you repeat your answer about that? Ljungberg just smiled and said the things he was supposed to say. This was a sport in itself, watching these men whose speciality is words and meaning and making sense, get thoroughly beaten by a guy whose chief speciality is kicking something—action, physical space, animal instinct. I had the sense that the reporters thought there was something basic and strong about their questions, something masculine, time-tested, traditional: these are the questions that always get asked, therefore these are the best questions to ask. But nothing was being said.

Last question. Someone cleared his throat and said, in all seriousness, "Was this a must-win tonight, would you say?" The question sat there while Ljungberg pondered what to do with it. I felt bad for him. That's not a question. Ljungberg said, precisely, pricelessly, "I don't think it's a must-win... but it's nice to win at home." And again this was received as if it were something, as if it were news. The press conference ended. "OK, guys. Thank you," Ljungberg said to the reporters with heart-shaped eyes. "Hope you enjoyed it."

Out in the hallway, one of the reporters said to another, giddily, "That's the first time I've ever seen him speak."

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Mahtli69 1
Nothing against Ljungberg, but why is it that we even bother to question athletes after a game? Unless it's Shaq or Dennis Rodman or Terrell Owens, nothing non-formulaic will be said. And, given the questions asked in this press conference, nothing non-formulaic will be asked either.
Posted by Mahtli69 on June 15, 2009 at 7:40 AM
BLUE 2
Sports reporting is rarely news. It's entertainment and PR. And, like the White House press corps, reporters want to retain access -- why they ask those deep and probing questions.
Posted by BLUE on June 15, 2009 at 8:08 AM
3
Damn Lakers won last night. Hey, at least we don't have a rapist on the Sounders...oh wait.
Posted by Max Power on June 15, 2009 at 8:27 AM
rob! 4
Wow. As a traditional sports-hating faggot, I pay so little attention to professional-sports-as-public-spectacle that when I blunder into an account outside of the expected venues like newspapers and TV news, I'm struck all over again by the vapidity and pointlessness of this colossal waste of human effort.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on June 15, 2009 at 8:38 AM
5
Hmmm...
Seattle sports reporters are fawning, child-like douchebags.
DC political reporters are fawning, child-like douchebags.

Therefore, all reporters are credulous, suck-up, stenographer douchebags.

Q.E.D....?
Posted by baaaa moo on June 15, 2009 at 8:40 AM
Fnarf 6
Soccer interviews are only exciting when it's a monotonous, gravel-voiced, non-English speaker being interviewed, in English. The inanities sound so much better when they sound like a succession of long, drawn-out droning farts. Filipe Scolari was the best, when he was with Chelsea. "Ehhh, we, ah, very happy for to win, uh, and, uh, getting the, er, three pointes, uh, in the, uh, table, for to good. We play good, yes, and play well, uh, for to winning game. Thank you."
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on June 15, 2009 at 8:46 AM
7
Christopher: What incisive, thought-provoking question did you ask?
Posted by alwaysamasshole on June 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM
8
Sounds absurd but Ljungberg's referee comment is certainly interesting. Does "you can talk to" European refs mean that he was able to whine and cry about every call and non-call that he didn't like and get respect for doing it? There is a lot about European soccer that we are happy to emulate but don't expect your fancy-boy, whiny attitude to catch on.
Posted by cliche on June 15, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Super Jesse 9
Wait, thew sounders have a logo??? I thought it was Team Adidas XBOX360 Live or some shit.
Posted by Super Jesse on June 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM
Lose-Lose 10
And I thought the commenters and bloggers were stupid! Shit, we get a press conference and THIS is what we ask? Damn, we have a long, long ways to go before we know how to really treat this sport...
Posted by Lose-Lose on June 15, 2009 at 10:20 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy