Ben Smith at Politico makes this point:
The Iranian turmoil has exposed a central conflict in Obama’s foreign policy.But it is precisely this, "tone down America’s moralizing rhetoric," that has made these demonstrations possible. The absence of a direct or real enemy in America has weakened Ahmadinejad. The departure of Bush instigated his decline and desperate effort to maintain power. A moralizing tone would only have give him muscles. Obama's flaws with gay issues must not eclipses his virtues in foreign policy—and the same the other way around.Obama’s core message of democracy and change dovetails with the hopes of Iranian reformers, and even the tech-friendly, youth-driven style of the uprising in Tehran echoes the American president’s own campaign.
But Obama also was elected on a promise to tone down America’s moralizing rhetoric, and his foreign policy may owe as much to unromantic old realists such as Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski as it does to the hopes of a new generation in Iran.
Lastly, one of my fav lines from all of Nietzsche: "To speak the truth and to shoot well with arrows, that is Persian virtue."
3
5
15
19
20
Comments (20) RSS