Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Monday, June 15, 2009

Arrows of Truth

Posted by Charles Mudede on Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:25 PM

Ben Smith at Politico makes this point:

The Iranian turmoil has exposed a central conflict in Obama’s foreign policy.

Obama’s core message of democracy and change dovetails with the hopes of Iranian reformers, and even the tech-friendly, youth-driven style of the uprising in Tehran echoes the American president’s own campaign.

But Obama also was elected on a promise to tone down America’s moralizing rhetoric, and his foreign policy may owe as much to unromantic old realists such as Brent Scowcroft and Zbigniew Brzezinski as it does to the hopes of a new generation in Iran.

But it is precisely this, "tone down America’s moralizing rhetoric," that has made these demonstrations possible. The absence of a direct or real enemy in America has weakened Ahmadinejad. The departure of Bush instigated his decline and desperate effort to maintain power. A moralizing tone would only have give him muscles. Obama's flaws with gay issues must not eclipses his virtues in foreign policy—and the same the other way around.


Lastly, one of my fav lines from all of Nietzsche: "To speak the truth and to shoot well with arrows, that is Persian virtue."

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Well said Charles.
Posted by gnossos on June 15, 2009 at 9:03 PM
Joh 2
Wow, for once, I agree with everything you just said.
Posted by Joh http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504158215&ref=profile on June 15, 2009 at 9:12 PM
Heather 3
As President Obama acknowledged the CIA put the Shah in power 56 years ago by a coup against the elected government of Iran. Democrats and Republicans supported the bloody dictatorship of the Shah until he was thrown out by the people in 1979. The U.S. government was none too happy to have their boy removed from power.
The current uprising by the people of Iran is out of the control of the U.S. and nobody can predict where it will end. I think Obama's tepid statement about the current popular uprising reflects our government's uneasiness with the unpredictability of the situation. Having hundreds of thousands of people involved makes it difficult for anybody to get control of the situation. Happily it also makes a military attack by Israel or the U.S. that much more difficult to justify
Posted by Heather on June 15, 2009 at 9:14 PM
4
Well as long as anything Persian can be name dropped into the analysis, how about this:

gee, just 2500 years later the Persians adopt democracy. Bet those Greeks are saying "I told you so" now! hyuk hyuk.
Posted by PC on June 15, 2009 at 9:37 PM
pissy mcslogbot 5
"Bet those Greeks are saying "I told you so" now! hyuk hyuk.

that or "taste my Tzatziki, now! bitchez"

could go either way.
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on June 15, 2009 at 9:46 PM
6
@4 see @3: Iran HAD a democratically elected government once and we overthrew it because we didn't like it.

Heather, I think your points are good. But I'm also guessing that there's a bunch of nervous nellies inside the CIA right now. Had the US played its cards right back in 1978-79, it is quite likely that instead of Khomeini and his gang of Islamic thugs the Shah would have been replaced by a liberal, semi-left democracy. But we really bet on the wrong horse.
Posted by gnossos on June 15, 2009 at 9:54 PM
7
@6
oh thanks for your insightful correction. Let me rephrase.

gee, just 2045 years later the Persians adopt democracy. Bet those Greeks are saying "I told you so" now! hyuk hyuk. AND WE INTERRUPT THIS JOKE TO EXPLAIN THAT THE BIG BAD USA SNUFFED OUT THAT DEMOCRACY VIA CIA ORGANZIED COUP INSTALLING THE SHAH REGIME IN 1954 AND THAT WAS REALLY REALLY BAD!!!!!!

PLS. MAKE A NOTE OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, is that enough of a reminder?
Posted by PC on June 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM
8
Well said! I completely agree with Charles' post, which is odd. Is the moon full or something?
Posted by ohthetrees on June 15, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 9
Geeze!

You just made me appreciate political commentary at SLOG!

We're on the same page...
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on June 15, 2009 at 10:34 PM
10
Apologies PC, it didn't occur to me that you were joking until after I posted and then saw Pissy's post (which had slipped in while I was reading and posting). I just assumed that you were like the 99% of our fellow citizens who cannot draw a direct line between Mossadegh and Ahmidinejad.
Posted by gnossos on June 15, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 11
#9.

Scratch that.

I was agreeing with the Politico guy.

Not SLOG.

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on June 15, 2009 at 10:38 PM
12
Agreed, Charles.
Posted by STJA on June 15, 2009 at 10:43 PM
13
Charles,
How come you make so much sense when you don't talk about architecture and urban design-stuff?
Posted by David Sucher http://citycomfortsblog.typepad.com/ on June 15, 2009 at 11:20 PM
switzerblog 14
Credit where credit's due - great post, Charles!
Posted by switzerblog on June 15, 2009 at 11:40 PM
gloomy gus 15
@13, compared to Charles most writers rely for confidence on some topical niche or other, a place readers can easily find from the writer what they expect. I've never had the impression that Charles needs easy praise to keep him writing.
Posted by gloomy gus on June 16, 2009 at 6:20 AM
16
Love the appropriate Nietzsche quote. You smoked it, Charles.
Posted by David from Chicago on June 16, 2009 at 6:30 AM
Lola, Now in Iowa City 17
Whoa...a profound insight and one that I agree with, and it was written by....Charles?
Posted by Lola, Now in Iowa City on June 16, 2009 at 7:46 AM
The Amazing Jim 18
Oddly coherent and salient point Charles. Have you been drinking?
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on June 16, 2009 at 8:11 AM
lark 19
Charles,
That last quote reminds me of something Theodore Roosevelt said "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far"

I wonder if he read Nietzsche?
Posted by lark on June 16, 2009 at 9:23 AM
lark 20
Charles,
Wanted to send this earlier as I know you read Hegel. Check this out:

http://chronicle.com/free/v55/i39/39woli…

It is an interesting retort to secularism. BTW, I am currently reading "The Decline of the West" by Spengler. Good stuff.
Posted by lark on June 16, 2009 at 12:56 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use