Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

The Fine Print

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:04 PM

As of yesterday, none of the Slog commenters reported seeing a copy of the Referendum 71 petition, which is required to include a 114 page domestic-partnership bill on one piece of paper. But the Secretary of State's office has seen a copy. Here's what office spokesman David Ammons wrote about the petition this morning:

Referendum 71 petitions are required to cram all 114 pages of the “everything but marriage” domestic partnership bill (SB5688) in the text that circulates so that each potential signer could conceivably read every word before deciding whether to sign. State law also requires the whole shebang to be on “one sheet” and “readable.” Sponsors, who are now in the field looking for over 120,000 valid voter signatures during the next six weeks, have designed a layout that uses small font and printing the text on a fold-out that has eight “pages.” The whole petition, when unfolded, is map-sized, nearly 2 feet by 3 feet, front and back.

And here's the photo:

ba79/1244663872-referendum71.jpg

Has anyone actually spotted one of these things?

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (42) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1

Can you remind me, am I supposed to be for this or against it.

I lost track of which is a referendum against a decision and vice versa.

Or it you don't like Domestic Partnership because it's not Gay Marriage.

WWAGD ??
Posted by What Would Al Gore Do? on June 10, 2009 at 1:18 PM
General Jack Ripper 2
Do we get slog points for "accidentally" tearing the mother fucker in half? If one were to have such an accident would it affect the validity of said motherfucking petition?
Posted by General Jack Ripper on June 10, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Simac 3
"Protect Children." How does this referendum protect children? I'm a gay parent. Whether or not I'm married, how does my child get more or less protection from this?
Posted by Simac on June 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM
w7ngman 4
That kind of looks like four sheets.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on June 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM
elenchos 5
Want.

Those things have got to be worth money some day.
Posted by elenchos on June 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Will in Seattle 6
Seems to me this is contrary to ADA requirements - people older than 40 can't read the text.

Which makes it illegal.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Enigma 7
If someone sees this thing, and has some time to kill, maybe you can start reading the thing and then ask the petition gatherer questions about the referendum. Keep the petition and gatherer busy in the hands of a non-signer while a potential signer walks on by.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on June 10, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Urgutha Forka 8
@7
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Go track one of those petitioners down when you have a few spare hours to kill and read the whole fucking thing beginning to end. Better yet, tell them your vision's bad and could they please read it to you. Ask lots of questions. Finally, of course, walk away without signing it.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on June 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM
Greg 9
I feel like I should order up a whole bunch of these and then sit on them. Is there a number I can call?
Posted by Greg on June 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM
10
honestly ... I give them credit for their passionate stance on the subject.

So do they hate gay marriage or just trees?
Posted by former tri-state on June 10, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Geni 11
That's a metric buttload of text to just overturn another bill. Jesus, prolix much?
Posted by Geni on June 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM
Baconcat 12
@10: They are avowed Homodendrophobes
Posted by Baconcat on June 10, 2009 at 1:52 PM
Andy 13
The referendum neither "preserves marriage" nor "protects children."
Posted by Andy on June 10, 2009 at 1:53 PM
Enigma 14
I want one! How can I get one? The bigots website doesn't have any info about it yet.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on June 10, 2009 at 1:58 PM
15
I also wonder how many times they crashed quirk?
Posted by former tri-state on June 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM
16
A problem: Government-phobic populists -- who are legion in WA -- even otherwise left-leaning ones -- will sign the referendum solely in response to the size of the bill being referred. (Referended? Whatever.)
Posted by K on June 10, 2009 at 2:09 PM
wench 17
@4 - It's folded in half.
Posted by wench on June 10, 2009 at 2:11 PM
18
I ordered my very own to shit on, but have not received them yet. You can get yours too here!

http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey…
Posted by Fuck Gary Randall on June 10, 2009 at 2:11 PM
19
@18 www.faithandfreedom.us
Posted by oops on June 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM
Steven Bradford 20
I don't get it. How can they title it Preserve Marriage, Protect Children? That's not the title of the referendum.
Posted by Steven Bradford http://www.seanet.com/~bradford/ on June 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM
21
@20 --Good question. Maybe that could be grounds for a challenge to the petition?
Posted by carrma on June 10, 2009 at 2:30 PM
LogopolisMike 22
If I was a local, I would so want to get one of these just so I could pass it amongst my friends and we could all sign it with such clever pseudonyms like "Seymour Butts" and "Ivana Mann" and then I'd frame it in our living room.

But I'm sort of a dork.
Posted by LogopolisMike http://logopolis.typepad.com on June 10, 2009 at 2:30 PM
23
hum... is that legal...

The petition sheets must measure not less than 11 inches in
width and not less than 14 inches in length.
p.9

and

The full text of the measure must appear on the petitionp.9

http://www.secstate.wa.gov/_assets/elect…
Posted by Phenic on June 10, 2009 at 2:32 PM
Enigma 24
I'm torn between ordering some to bring down their coffers, and not wanting to give them my addy and phone number. I wonder how much they're checking on validity of numbers, cause I could have it sent to my work...
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on June 10, 2009 at 2:35 PM
25
@23: "...NOT less than..."
Posted by happy renter on June 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Enigma 26
@23 it says "not less than", so I'm pretty sure it can be bigger than.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on June 10, 2009 at 2:37 PM
w7ngman 27
#17, the edges don't line up. The photo is the full, unfolded sheet, right?

It totally looks like four sheets taped together.
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on June 10, 2009 at 2:48 PM
kim in portland 28
I'm agreeing with W7ngman, the edges don't line up.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPpCxY05dqs on June 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM
29
@ 4, 17,27,28. What you think is one page is two sideways pages. Note that the ruler on the right is 18 inches long. So it is two pages across and 4 pages down. Or 22inches across and 34 inches down.
Posted by bored on June 10, 2009 at 2:59 PM
elenchos 30
I bet the defective ones with the sheets that don't line up will be worth even more.
Posted by elenchos on June 10, 2009 at 3:15 PM
31
@29: it's four 11x17 sheets
Posted by happy renter on June 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM
32
@ everyone. 1 Sheet = 2 pages. Each side of a sheet of paper is called a page. This is an 8-page signature, 4 sheets x 2 sides each = 8-pages.
Posted by printer on June 10, 2009 at 3:38 PM
33
regardless of terminology, whatever is in that photo looks taped to me.
Posted by happy renter on June 10, 2009 at 3:50 PM
34
It looks like each of those hold about 20 signatures. Needing 120k signatures = 6000 of those things to fill out. Ha!
Posted by doug on June 10, 2009 at 4:27 PM
Baconcat 35
I wonder if the fact that it's covered in fine print will turn some people off?
Posted by Baconcat on June 10, 2009 at 4:45 PM
36
If they are taped together, I wonder if they will actually assemble them before getting the signatures or not bother until afterward...
Posted by carrma on June 10, 2009 at 4:52 PM
mackro 37
So, let's assume Stickney gets his signatures. Whom do we contact?
Posted by mackro http://mackro.blogspot.com on June 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM
Original Andrew 38
I know these fuckahs are inherently sleazy and dishonest, but doesn't the Referendum itself specifically state that domestic partnership is not marriage? And how does it protect children, exactly? And how come they get to use those two false claims to begin with??
Posted by Original Andrew on June 10, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Will in Seattle 39
Because they're lying liars, OA.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 10, 2009 at 5:53 PM
mackro 40
Could they have put "Sign This and Get $1,000,000!" as the caption, too? Can any signature petition for a referendum put any title they want?
Posted by mackro http://mackro.blogspot.com on June 10, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Gus 41
Would it be wrong for everyone to sign these petitions as Dan Savage, so they think they have a lot more signatures than they do?
Posted by Gus on June 10, 2009 at 11:44 PM
42
i plan on reading the entire thing if someone asks me to sign...if enough people did that, I bet they'd have an even harder time getting all of the signatures!
Posted by breetfu on June 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM

Add a comment

Most Commented on Slog

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use