Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Daily Bread

Posted by on Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:59 AM

Marx on the adulteration of bread:

Englishmen, always well up in the Bible, knew well enough that man, unless by elective grace a capitalist, or landlord, or sinecurist, is commanded to eat his bread in the sweat of his brow, but they did not know that he had to eat daily in his bread a certain quantity of human perspiration mixed with the discharge of abcesses, cobwebs, dead black-beetles, and putrid German yeast, without counting alum, sand, and other agreeable mineral ingredients.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
giffy 1
I feel like a sandwich, though I think ham, mayo, cheese, and salami might make better contents then bodily fluids and bugs.
Posted by giffy on June 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Nora 2
Oh please. There's a certain allowable content of bug parts, rat hairs, etc. in flour. If you want to guarantee none of that is in your bread, grow your own wheat.
Posted by Nora on June 10, 2009 at 10:14 AM
3
Putrid German yeast? The irony here is that it hadn't been for the huge material gains made possible by Capitalism over the past couple of centuries, we'd probably be ingesting a whole lot more cobwebs and sand in the shitty bread provided us by our comrades.
Posted by David from Chicago on June 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Simac 4
What translation are you using? It's more or less fine, but Marx's wording is closer to this:

The Englishman well-versed in the Bible certainly knew that the human being, if not by election capitalist or landlord or sinecurist, is called to eat his bread in the sweat of his brow; however, he did not know that he must also eat a certain amount of human sweat in his bread every day, soaked with the drainage from abscesses, cobwebs, dead cockroaches, and putrid German yeast, except for alum, sandstone, and other pleasant mineral ingredients.
Posted by Simac on June 10, 2009 at 10:37 AM
lark 5
Good Morning Charles,
I don't believe Marx's comment (like much of Marx) is relevant today. We have far better hygienic standards for baking in the 21st century than in the 19th. In principle, humans toil for profit. A capitalist system aids that end.
If they put out a better product (in this case bread), they will be rewarded with a better profit (cash or kind).
Posted by lark on June 10, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Jenny from the Block 6
Is this a response to the mouse-found-in-bread story?
Posted by Jenny from the Block on June 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
7
#5 - You need to get out more...or at least pick up a fucking newspaper. Are you honestly saying that Capitalism is good for food quality?
Posted by slaggy on June 10, 2009 at 12:11 PM
The Amazing Jim 8
You and Marx are completely irrelevent to todays world. Congratulations, Chuckles!
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on June 10, 2009 at 4:42 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy