Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

He's Not Saying "Sorry"

Posted by Dominic Holden on Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:22 PM

Ian Barry, 17, spoke eloquently to his class last week about why we should fix our country's backward pot laws. Then he lit up a joint, and swiftly got hauled off by cops. So... now is normally about the time when a person busted for pot resurfaces in the newspapers, decrying the harms of druuuugz and groveling for salvation. Not Barry:

Ian Barry says he wasn’t trying to be martyr when he lit a marijuana joint this week at Peninsula High School, nor was he trying to pull a stunt.

Simply put, the 17-year-old junior wanted to drive home the message of his persuasive essay: Marijuana doesn’t deserve its negative stigma from society and should be legalized. [...]

He fully accepts his punishment. He faces misdemeanor charges of unlawful drug possession, as police found the container that he carried the joint in and that contained marijuana residue. He also understands this will go on his record.

“I see myself as someone who holds himself to a high moral value,” Barry said via cell phone. “I stand up for what I believe in.”

It's refreshing that this kid isn't a sniveling apologist like bong-ripping Michael Phelps—who, after being outed, begged for forgiveness. "I acted in a youthful and inappropriate way," the Olympic-swimmer-turned-spineless-puppet said a few days later. That gigantic bong toke, the US Olympic Committee had warned, would set a bad "example for others, particularly young people." Young people—like Barry, of course—would get the wrong impression. But Barry got the right impression: Apologizing for smoking pot is reserved for craven simps. Of course, it helps that Barry doesn't have millions in endorsements on the line like Phelps, but he does have his education to pursue. He's starting the SATs today, and pot isn't likely to have hindered his chances of doing well on the test. Barry has a 3.7 grade point average.

Here's video of him lighting up in front of the school:

Video via Sullivan.

And here's the transcript of Barry's speech. This is the beginning:

Can I see a show of hands how many people here have ever smoked Cannabis sativa, commonly known as marijuana? I see none of you raised your hand. Well obviously no one would want to admit to a criminal activity in front of their teacher.

Young folks shouldn't smoke pot. Technically speaking, nobody should smoke pot. But lots of people do because it can be really fun. And some teenagers are going to smoke pot and some will drink. And if they smoke pot—without hurting someone else, dropping out of school, becoming a drain on folks around them, or driving under the influence—then they have nothing to apologize for.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (33) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
a high GPA doesn't mean that weed won't affect his performance on the SATs. after all, he knows better than to go in high, right?

anecdotal or not, weed has a cumulative effect on memory.

i think. but i can't remember where i heard that. TV or somewhere. maybe a party.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM
DOUG. 2
He should've said: "Well obviously no one would want to admit to a criminal activity in front of their students."
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on June 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM
3
SOOO WRONG NUMBA WON. I WATCHED 'SUPER HIGH ME' HIGH AND REMEMBER VERY SPECIFICALLY THAT DOUG BENSON DID BETTER ON THE SAT (BY LIKE 100-200 PTS) WHEN HE SMOOOKERED EVRY DAY AS OPPOSED TO BEING SOBER. HIS BREAKDOWN ON POT-US WAS BETTER ON VERBAL, WORSE ON MATH, BUT THE IMPROVEMENT ON VERBAL STILL MADE HIZ SCORE BETTAH. I TINK. LOL, FUNNY IF I'M SO TOTALLY WRONG N STUFF. HE WAS ALSO SLIGHTLY MORE PSYCHIC.
Posted by LaRiiiiM0RrrHAwtiiii696969 on June 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Wow.

I think you left your caps lock on for your brain.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM
Andrew Cole 5
It's... it's not a very good speech. I mean, good to him for sticking to his guns and all, but it's still pretty poorly written.

"To study 182 of 5 ¼ million accidents, .0034%, and make apocryphal claims based on that research shows ineptitude beyond that of any man disposed to devout his life to a hierarchy of pious infidels who understand nothing of the nature and complexity of life."

Um. What?
Posted by Andrew Cole http://www.poetrynight.org on June 9, 2009 at 12:34 PM
6
Talking about justice= ok
Following through on your words= illegal

Kids tend to take this whole freedom thing to literally, obviously. A little time in jail will learn them to become better hypocrites.
Posted by Trevor on June 9, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Mr. Poe 7
He should apologize for being a fucking idiot. Why are you comparing a dipshit who knew very well he would get arrested and score some PR to Michael Phelps getting busted via a picture from a party? The only thing he's proven is he's young and stupid as fuck.

An extreme example of the "point" this moron was "proving" would work well with an abortion model: I don't think abortion is wrong, so, here's an eloquent speech as to why, and now check out what I'm going to do with this coat hanger, riiiiight in front of my class!
Posted by Mr. Poe on June 9, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Hernandez 8
@5 It also seems to be poorly transcribed.

"For it to illegal..." Somehow I doubt that's how it actually came out of the kid's mouth.
Posted by Hernandez on June 9, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Mr. Poe 9
Sooooooooo coooooool, maaaan! Riiiiighteous!
Posted by Mr. Poe on June 9, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Mahtli69 10
This kid has got balls. More power to him.

However, this quote reminded me of the Hempfest image problem:
"Then, before he turned to the eighth page, he pulled out the joint that was hidden in his dreadlocks."

Sheesh. What a stereotype. I wish there were more stunt-pulling pot smokers who looked like this guy:
Posted by Mahtli69 on June 9, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Hernandez 11
And can we put the Phelps thing to rest? You're right, Ian Barry doesn't face the risk of losing millions of dollars and sacrificing the one thing he's worked for his entire life as a result of this "statement". It's a pretty spurious comparison.
Posted by Hernandez on June 9, 2009 at 12:55 PM
Mr. Poe 12
And what the fuck, Dom. Can you honestly blame Phelps for his actions? Phelps didn't need to "stick to his guns," and he didn't make any promises to NORML when he casually smoked up at a party. He worked his fucking ass off to win those medals, and you expect him to throw his endorsements down the drain because he got caught smoking a bowl? Since he smoked a bowl, and got caught, he suddenly has to turn into an advocate for marijuana legalization? The media would've eaten it up like crazy, to the point where he would have to make pro-legalization a big part of his life. I'm sure he doesn't want that, didn't want that, and no, he shouldn't be expected to cross over to that.
Posted by Mr. Poe on June 9, 2009 at 12:58 PM
13
More people should do this. Because it makes them look stupid, and they get disqualified for financial aid for college. That means more for me.
Posted by Too Broke for Stupid Principles on June 9, 2009 at 1:07 PM
14
"Technically speaking, nobody should smoke pot."

People that have medical issues alleviated by it that don't want to pay large amounts for the privilege?
Posted by exceptions to any rule on June 9, 2009 at 1:12 PM
Mahtli69 15
@11,12 - I agree. Dominic, Phelps is a swimmer, not fucking Jesus.
Posted by Mahtli69 on June 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM
Dominic Holden 16
@ 14) True, some folks benefit greatly from using marijuana. But the decision is up to them. Like any medication, whether pot or prozac, people stand on hollow ground in saying that someone else *should* use pot. It's the patient's choice.
Posted by Dominic Holden on June 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM
17
@10. Haha! I pull pot shenanigans all the time, and I look like a 12-year-old girl.
Posted by Miley Highly on June 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM
The BTB 18
That kid is a hero. Somebody get him into Wesleyan!
Posted by The BTB http://bryanbissell.blogspot.com on June 9, 2009 at 1:25 PM
19
@12, "Can you honestly blame Phelps for his actions?"

Look, I don't think Phelps is a bad person. But he did SELL OUT. He does not believe that marijuana is harmful; but for a lot of money, he said that he thought marijuana was harmful.

For the amount of money that was at stake, I too would have compromised my principles - everyone on this thread would have, including Dominic.

But let's not pretend that Phelps did anything but sell out.
Posted by Ancient Sumerian on June 9, 2009 at 1:34 PM
20
Phelps did not build his life around the "principle" of the right to smoke pot. He built his life around being an Olympic athlete. He did not "sell out", because he didn't have anything invested in the right to get high. If any principles were compromised, they were his principles as a professional athlete, not as an occasional pot smoker.
Posted by Irena on June 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM
Mr. Poe 21
It isn't "selling out," ancient retard. He wasn't compromising his integrity, he was protecting it. I guarantee you he had zero marijuana in his system while he was busting his ass off for those medals. His career is based on the ladder he climbed, not the party he had at the top. No kid is going to be inspired to be the next Michael Phelps by hanging a picture of him smokin' up or standing at a NORML podium on their wall.

In a way, dedicated exponents of marijuana legalization behave like PETA when it comes to circulating their agenda. Reason, meet trash can.
Posted by Mr. Poe on June 9, 2009 at 2:07 PM
22
@13 FTW. This kid's righteous act of civil disobedience wasn't worth being disqualified for financial aid under the Higher Education Act. After researching our nation's drug laws, he must have understood that that would be a consequence of his action. Which leaves me wondering, does he have a trust fund, or just not want to go to college?
Posted by High in Higher Ed. on June 9, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Grist 23
This article has a picture of young Mr. Barry. He looks pretty much exactly how I was afraid he would look.
Posted by Grist http://sendbombs.blogspot.com on June 9, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Max Solomon 24
phelps chose the path his lawyer and publicist recommended. it was rational, but that doesn't mean it wasn't compromising his beliefs for money.

which is the definition of selling out.
Posted by Max Solomon on June 9, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Mr. Poe 25
He isn't compromising his beliefs, either. I bet Phelps does believe that young people trying to achieve great goals shouldn't be toking up along the way.
Posted by Mr. Poe on June 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Jason74 26
"He's starting the SATs today, and pot isn't likely to have hindered his chances of doing well on the test."

@22 nails it. He hasn't hindered himself scholastically, but he just torpedoed any kind of federal financial aid. And thanks to the last congress, that guarantees a young adulthood full of institutional financial abuse.
Posted by Jason74 on June 9, 2009 at 2:43 PM
27
There is evidence of people using all manner of drugs for thousands of years. So ask yourself, why has America, in this day and age, decided we needed to war on people who use drugs? What do countries get out of making them illegal? Better work force? Use of religion to blot out reality? A giant police employment opportunity? Sometimes I get really tired of how easily American's obey what they're told to obey.
Posted by Vince on June 9, 2009 at 3:27 PM
Mahtli69 28
@26 - He wants to go to Humboldt State. That's not exactly Princeton as far as tuition costs.

Also, the kid lives in Gig Harbor. That's upper middle-class suburbs for miles. I'm guessing he wouldn't qualify for financial aid anyway.
Posted by Mahtli69 on June 9, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Andy_Squirrel 29
Poe, seriously, when are you going to suck my dick?
i'm waiting
Posted by Andy_Squirrel on June 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM
30
Legalization activist, wants to go to Humboldt, is not worried about getting arrested and becoming ineligible for financial aid...

Sounds like a classic trustafarian to me.

He forgets that if legalization were to happen, then he would still be under age.

Everybody knows that smokin' ain't allowed at school.
Posted by Reg on June 9, 2009 at 4:11 PM
31
Technically speaking, nobody should smoke pot....


really? so who determines what people "should" do?

technically, nobody should eat ice cream.
technically, nobody should watch TV.
technically, nobody should drink alcohol.
technically, a lot of people in this world should NOT have children.... ask dan.

Posted by pffft on June 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM
32
@31 I think he means people should use vaporizers.
Posted by drewl on June 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM
Bauhaus I 33
brave act - but at such a young age he's now barred himself from federal loans and grants for school and international travel will now be difficult for him
Posted by Bauhaus I on June 9, 2009 at 9:47 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use