Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

The End of Internalism

Posted by on Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:58 PM

I'm quietly building a case for the importance of Hegel in an age that cares neither for him or his direct descendant, Marx. A part of the case will, one, link Hegel's concept of geist and its movement in time (world history) with the idea of the evolution of noosphere in Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's Phenomenon of Man; and, two, link Hegel's idea of absolute spirit with the ideas expressed in Alva Noë's new book Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness—some of these ideas can be heard on the Brain Science Podcast.

Noë's project basically boils down to a liberation of the brain from the prison of Cartesian internalism. For him, the brain is seen not only as a part of the body but also a part of the outside world. The two, internal and external, can not separated. The mind is not a static container of impressions but a constant engagement with what is outside. The mind is you, your body, and world around your body.

I will go even further and say (or theorize) that any point or object outside of you is spatially oriented by mental self-projection and self-replication. A thing is out there because you are out there. You see this thing because you are where that this is. Your mind, which is the idea of your body, fills all of the space around you with copies of yourself. You are the measure of all things. What is called an out-of-body experience is in reality a malfunctioning of the normal way of seeing things in space and through experience. The inside of yourself is always outside of yourself. Hegel's absolute is this understanding.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
But why stop there?

I will retreat and deny (or hyperthesize) that any formlessness or nonobject inside of me is temporally disoriented by physical out-subeversion and other-identity. A formlessness is inside because I am inside. I hear this formelssness because I am where this that is not. My body, which is the form of my mind, expunges none of the void inside me with identities of mynonself. I am immeasurable from no thing. What is reponded as an inner mind experience is in illusory a functioning of the abnormal way of hearing formlessness in the void and in thought. The outside of myself is always inside of myself. Hegel's relativity is this incomprehension.
Posted by PC on June 9, 2009 at 2:47 PM
Will in Seattle 2
Personally, I think that discussing this should be restricted to Hegel being undressed while we snuggle under the covers and ignore the other cast members of Grey's Anatomy.

Oh, ok, the actress who plays Meredith can get under the covers but only if she doesn't pout.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM
gfish 3
I think Mudede is really the timecube guy.
Posted by gfish http://www.attoparsec.com on June 9, 2009 at 3:07 PM
veo_ 4
I understand your theory, Charles. It's similar to what I rooted out for myself down in the Amazon jungle with an Ayahuasquero Shaman. :)

Your reality (the "I" or eternal now) is constituted of three coordinates: location, time, action. Everything outside of your current coordinate-location is mental abstraction of the self aka a thought projection. This includes people, locations, experiences. Anything and everything that isn't happening to you *now* is just a projection of yourself and your thoughts, expectations, and opinions about that thing.

This is true for everything physically or temporally separate from you. With will, you can move your experience along any of those three axis (time, space, action) to see what exists there but your 'home coordinates' is always your current physical location, current physical time, and current action.

These thought projections take several forms including 'memory' (revisiting coordinates that you've actually experienced), 'imagination' (visiting coordinates that you have not actually experienced) and of course 'now' (your current coordinates).

Using this paradigm, there really is no division between internal and external.
Posted by veo_ on June 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM
5
"A thing is out there because you are out there. You see this thing because you are where that this is." Very like 'A Course In Miracles.' Or as my friend Tall Fellow likes to say, 'That which appears to be coming at you, is really coming from you.
Posted by MyDogBen on June 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM
6
You know, Bergson was very emphatic about this point throughout his whole career. In Creative Evolution he writes:

"A priori and apart from any hypothesis on the nature of matter, it is evident that the materiality of a body does not stop at the point at which we touch it: a body is present wherever its influence is felt... The outlines we find in objects simply mark what we can attain and modify in them. The lines we see traced through matter are just the paths on which we are called to move."

I really love Bergson and hope you include him in your mix.
Posted by James L on June 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM
Vince 7
Mankind lacks imagination.
Posted by Vince on June 9, 2009 at 5:20 PM
8
I sure hope internalism isn't over. I hate pornos what where they use the condoms or squirt on the faces.
Posted by jelmon on June 9, 2009 at 9:44 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy