Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by on Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM

David Carradine? Erotic asphyxiation? Am I the only one thinking this, Dan?

Jill G.

Nope.

 

Comments (40) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Suz 1
That was my first thought too!
Posted by Suz on June 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM
2
Even if we're thinking it, let's not say it. He was 72 years old; it's just mean and disrespectful to titter and giggle about the means of his death.
Posted by Luckier on June 4, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Hyzenthlayk9 3
Yep, same here @1.
Posted by Hyzenthlayk9 http://oystermind.blogspot.com/ on June 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM
meowmeowkitty 4
I hope so, because erotic asphyxiation is a lot happier than suicide.
Posted by meowmeowkitty on June 4, 2009 at 2:37 PM
5
My money's on the five finger death punch.
Posted by pragmatic on June 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM
6
More than one rope in a hanging. I think we're all agreed. Sad though. Farewell, Grasshopper.
Posted by Walks on Rice Paper on June 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM
kim in portland 7
Very sad.
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on June 4, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Sad.

Or maybe a hit by the Bondage Death Squad made to look like an accident ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on June 4, 2009 at 2:50 PM
very bad homo 9
He INXSed himself.
Posted by very bad homo on June 4, 2009 at 2:50 PM
kitschnsync 10
@9 In retrospect, "Kick" was a poor choice for an album name.
Posted by kitschnsync on June 4, 2009 at 2:54 PM
SchmuckyTheCat 11

The maid who found him said the other end of the curtain lines were tied around his penis, this was reported in some UK tabs, but not repeated in the "respectable" media in the US.
Posted by SchmuckyTheCat on June 4, 2009 at 2:59 PM
12
That was my first thought, as well. Just like Katherine Hepburn's brother.
Posted by mdurango on June 4, 2009 at 3:00 PM
Arsenic7 13
When NPR mentioned that cords were wound around his neck and, quote, "other" body parts, I cocked my eye a little.
Posted by Arsenic7 on June 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM
14
Yeah. I think a lot of people heard "found dead in a hotel room in Thailand" and came to the non-suicidal conclusion. Seems likely, and somehow less sad.
Posted by Manos on June 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM
The Max 15
Yup yup yup definitely death by unsupervised narnia-inspired autosexualadventurization. Definitely.

And @2, I fully agree with @4. I prefer to think Bill offed himself by mistake rather than by deliberate design.
Posted by The Max on June 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM
Eric Arrr 16
I think this about settles it:

Chuck Binder, his personal spokesperson, described his death as 'accidental'.

...

He said Carradine's body was naked when it was found and there were no signs of any other people in the room. The rope was around his neck and parts of his body, police were quoted as saying.

Posted by Eric Arrr on June 4, 2009 at 3:05 PM
Arsenic7 17
What I really want to know is why people feel they can insinuate but not SAY penis.
Posted by Arsenic7 on June 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM
Matt from Denver 18
I'll never understand the appeal of autoerotic asphyxiation.
Posted by Matt from Denver on June 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM
19
ouch.

makes sense, but ouch.
Posted by MT3 on June 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM
biju 20
If you haven't watched "The Long Riders", do it.
Posted by biju on June 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM
21
I wonder if a mandrake will grow in the wardrobe where his semen fell. Then the wardrobe will open up as a magic gate to the land of Narnia. Well done Grasshopper.

In all seriousness, RIP David Carradine.
Posted by Reg on June 4, 2009 at 3:30 PM
Sarah 22
@2 When I'm 72 I hope I have all the same robust sexual desires that I've had my whole life... and it's not mean to think of an older person as sexual... perhaps he survived decades of this practice without slipping up, until now...
Posted by Sarah on June 4, 2009 at 3:34 PM
Jaymz 23
Solitary autoerotic sex can be dangerous - I'm concerned that some impressionable types could get into trouble when the truth finally circulates and they try to emulate someone as well known as David Carradine - without the proper failsafes. But I agree about the sexuality of our older citizens - yowza.
Posted by Jaymz on June 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM
Serial Monogamist 24
Dangerous masturbation. And why, when he had such easy access to cheap whores who could ease off once his eyes rolled back in his head?

Sad.
Posted by Serial Monogamist http://datingisweird.blogspot.com/ on June 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM
Glossolalia Black 25
Damn, you'd think he could find a willing prostitute in Bangkok to choke him if he wanted.

*sigh* Joking aside, he was a pretty cool guy. RIP, "Bill".
Posted by Glossolalia Black on June 4, 2009 at 3:50 PM
26
'Cause the Daily Fail is a really credible source.
Posted by Miss M on June 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM
wench 27
Um, @26, I got it off the BBC. Their early article didn't mention "body parts" or "other areas". It said "genitals" this morning.
Posted by wench on June 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM
Loveschild 28
Wasn't he a Buddhist or something? If he was I doubt he was engaging in freak sex.

Farewell grasshopper.
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on June 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM
Suz 29
Who said Buddhists aren't freaky? You're hanging around the wrong kind of Buddhists.
Posted by Suz on June 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM
30
@17 Because penises are dirty filthy things and even just hearing the word will do irreparable harm to children who will then grow up to be whores, drug addicts, and politicians?
Posted by redwulf25_ci on June 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM
31
Wow, I find it surprising that LC doesn't condemn this but does condemn same-sex marriage equality.

Better dead than equal, LC? That makes you less than human and less than worthless.
Posted by Widow on June 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM
Heather 32
Last year Carradine was in a movie called "My Suicide." The movie he was filming at the time of his death was called "Stretch." Shame on me for noticing this.
Posted by Heather on June 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM
Loveschild 33
Suz, sexual attachments defeat the purpose of the eradication of all suffering according to Buddhist ethics. Look up the five precepts and the eightfold path. And the Buddha stated clearly that both monks and nuns and laypersons should refrain from committing sexual misconduct. I think 'erotic asphyxiation' qualifies as a sexual misconduct.
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on June 4, 2009 at 4:41 PM
wench 34
LC, that's like saying Catholic priests never have sex with boys. Because it's against their religion, doncha know. They're also not supposed to have abortions or premarital sex, and yet they do seem to indulge in those as well.
Posted by wench on June 4, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Julie in Eugene 35
@28 & 33 Because all religious people follow all of the precepts of their religion at all times? And nobody ever gives in to temptation? This man's religion has zero to do with the likelihood that he died from autoerotic asphyxiation.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on June 4, 2009 at 4:50 PM
wench 36
And for the record, while it is a tragedy, I'm with @4 on this one. There are worse ways to go, and he was probably quite happy at the time. Of course it's an embarrassing way to die, and there will be jokes... but when it comes down to it, not a bad way to go.

Admittedly, I'm looking at this purely from his perspective and not that of his family. Totally different take from their perspective.
Posted by wench on June 4, 2009 at 4:57 PM
McGee 37
So as a buddhist auto-erotic asphyxiation is strictly forbidden so that couldn't possibly be the cause of death? Therefore it must be suicide on which the buddha is peachy-keen?
Posted by McGee on June 4, 2009 at 5:00 PM
pissy mcslogbot 38
Spankin to the Grave, the newsletter for The National Erotic Asphyxiation Association affirms their motto has always been:

"You can have my genitalia when you pry 'em from my cold hands."
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on June 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM
pissy mcslogbot 39

..."cold, dead hands" yadda...
because that clarification makes the sentiment so much less wrong.
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on June 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM
kim in portland 40
Perhaps, Buddhist precepts are used differently than say scripture from the Bible when being observed for daily conduct and actions.

Buddhist Sexual Ethics
by Winton Higgins

Buddhist Sexual Ethics

Religious traditions help us to find our basic orientations in many aspects of our lives. The most important aspect of our lives is how we interact with others. Among other things, this means religions often have a lot to say about sexual ethics. What sexual ethics does Buddhism promote? In this area our tradition speaks more quietly than others, which can leave newcomers wondering if it addresses the subject at all. In fact it speaks quite firmly. In opening up the subject I'll highlight those questions that bear on the issues raised by various liberation movements - by the women's movement, by gays and lesbians, and by the smaller sexual minorities. I don't think I could be too wide off the mark in saying that all these movements whatever else they are about, are engaging with various forms of prejudice, and with violence and violations based on those prejudices.

Prejudices against women and against sexual minorities are usually reinforced by certain standard features of social psychology, such as intolerance of difference and the often deep-seated insecurities of those who regard themselves as 'normal' but aren't quite sure. An important ingredient in this nasty little cocktail, however, is various forms of prejudice, inhibition and repression associated with theistic religious fundamentalism.

Like all religions, Buddhism takes a strong ethical stand in human affairs and sexual behaviour in particular. The most common formulation of Buddhist ethics are the five precents:

I undertake the training precept of:

1. Refraining from harming living beings/practising loving kindness
2. Refraining from taking the non-given/practising generosity
3. Refraining from committing sexual misconduct/practising contentment
4. Refraining from false speech/practising truthful communication
5. Refraining from intoxicants/practising mindfulness.

These precepts take the form of voluntary, personal undertakings. They are not commandments; there is no god in Buddhism, so none to issue any.

The precepts express basic principles rather than fixed, legalistic rules that any one action falls inside or outside of. Like any non-fundamentalist ethical system, Buddhism provides us with general guiding principles while in no way relieving us of the obligation to make appropriate moral judgements in each morally significant situation we come across. Moral judgement is never a question of blindly applying a rule.

The five precepts constitute an integrated set - each precept supports the others. To know what 'sexual misconduct' means you look at the other precepts. 'Sexual misconduct', in the spirit of the precepts as a job lot, means any sexual conduct involving violence, manipulation or deceit - conduct that therefore leads to suffering and trouble. By contrast good sexual conduct is based on loving kindness, generosity, honesty, and mental and emotional clarity - conduct that has good results.

More...
Posted by kim in portland http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/fast-paced_video_provides_a_fu.html on June 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy