Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, June 1, 2009

We're Winning: Nevada & New Hampshire

Posted by on Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:37 AM

The state legislature in Nevada this weekend overrode twice-and-soon-thrice divorced Governor Jim Gibbons' veto of a domestic partnership bill. This aspect of the Nevada's DP bill must have been drafted to ease the fears of those Nevadans terrified by the prospect of gay wedding ceremonies:

The measure states, among other things, that no "solemnization ceremony" is required and it's "left to the dictates and conscience of partners entering into a domestic partnership" whether to have such a ceremony.

Yeah, we wouldn't the gays screwing up the solemnity of marriage as observed in the state of Nevada, home of the drive-by wedding chapel. And... is that a dictate in your pocket or are you just glad to be solemnizing me?

Sorry, didn't sleep last night: And in New Hampshire on Friday state legislators added language—redundant language—to that state's gay marriage bill protecting "religious institutions and people of religious faith" from marauding gay wedding parties. The governor of New Hampshire, who requested the amendment, has indicated that he will sign the bill, which faces one more procedural vote before it lands on his desk.

Opponents of gay marriage oppose the new version of the bill, of course, just as they opposed the previous version and would oppose any and all possible versions of a marriage equality bill. Their current objection: State anti-discrimination statutes might compel anti-gay florists to sell wedding bouquets to fags and dykes planning their legal gay weddings, weddings that rabidly anti-gay florists might object to on religious grounds. But it's hard to see this bill doing any additional harm to New Hampshire's anti-gay florist community: the law in New Hampshire already bars discrimination based on sexual orientation—against gay or straight people—in credit, public accommodation, services, etc.

Which means that the state's anti-gay-florists have long been compelled to sell wedding bouquets to gay and lesbian couples whose consciences dictated that they hold "solemnization ceremonies"—or commitment ceremonies—prior to the legalization of same-sex marriage in New Hampshire.

If the plight of anti-gay florists is the best objection opponents of marriage equality have got... we're really winning.

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
COMTE 1
Does NH even HAVE a sizable "anti-gay floral industry"? How would such florists even manage to stay in business?
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on June 1, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Womyn2me 2
is there such a thing as an anti-gay floral industry?

Anyway, I was thinking a documentary of a couple getting their domestic partnership/marriage licenses in every state that its available would kind of be fun... how married would you really be at the end of it?

Dan, do this for your people.
Posted by Womyn2me http://http:\\www.shelleyandlaura.com on June 1, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Vince 3
If we can't use "marriage" why not use "wedlock"? Wedding ceremonies instead of marriage ceremonies.
Posted by Vince on June 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM
4
yet another boring I'M GAY post by Dan Savage #48587987
Posted by zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz on June 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM
5
Freaking finally. Nevada resident here, and I've been increasingly pissed by the lack of gay marriage in a state where the most famous city has billboards on trucks advertising prostitutes.

Excuse me. ESCORTS.

Time to dig out my Bert and Ernie Tee for the inevitable protest when lawmakers screw it up.
Posted by Blah on June 1, 2009 at 12:58 PM
6
DEAR GOD - THE PROGRESS -

Nevada is run by Casino money and influence. Three cheers for it is good for business to let all
people lead their private lives and move into this century.

Interesting and gratifying as state by state, we pass MAJOR legislation. Pride is going to joy heaped on joy ... get ready America.
Posted by Aarondia on June 1, 2009 at 12:59 PM
memorex 7
There's something about the phrase "anti-gay florist" that really amuses me, but I can't quite seem to put my finger on it? Hmmm. . .
Posted by memorex on June 1, 2009 at 3:46 PM
emote_control 8
There are straight florists?
Posted by emote_control on June 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM
COMTE 9
Not too boring for you to comment though, eh @4?
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on June 1, 2009 at 9:04 PM
10
Oh no! Save the anti-gay florists! They might have to charge exorbitant fees to provide brightly colored ornaments that will die in a day or so. The horror!

Also, couldn't any service vendor (florist, photographer, dj, etc) simply claim they are already booked on the day of the nuptials? Hell, I've had florists turn me down because they are booked for my wedding day and I'm straight. Unless....anti-straight florists! I guess we should outlaw hetero marriage to protect their rights, huh?
Posted by Jen D on June 2, 2009 at 5:54 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy