Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, May 29, 2009

Steinbrueck Endorses: Bloom/Bagshaw, Miller/Rosencrantz

Posted by on Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:38 PM

Just got off the phone with former city council member Peter Steinbrueck (whose enthusiastic support for council candidate David Bloom last night made me question his prior endorsement of Sally Bagshaw, Bloom's opponent), who confirms that he has, indeed, endorsed both Bloom and Bagshaw. Steinbrueck's explanation, in part:

Endorsements are a tricky thing, especially for high-profile endorsers, because everyone wants your endorsement. ... I'm absolutely, unqualifiedly behind [Bloom's] candidacy, but he didn't decide on his seat until after I had endorsed Sally. She was the first person I endorsed. I have a personal and family connection with her and... I'm happy to dual endorse both of them. ... I consider David an activist ally for many years. He's a really decent person. Sally is too.

Steinbrueck confirmed that he's also endorsed two candidates in the six-way Position 8 race: Robert Rosencrantz, a landlord and three-time council candidate, and David Miller, a north Seattle neighborhood activist. His reasoning:

I've known Robert for a long time and he's certainly more conservative than other candidates, but the guy has a lot of integrity. He's passionate and determined. He does have a difficult time communicating with people, [Ed: Um, yeah] but he's very thoughtful, principled, and purposeful... David is someone I've been talking with throughout the campaign. He lives close to my neighborhood [Northgate], so there's a geographic tie-in. I've found him to be smart, analytical, and effective. He's an interesting balance of a neighborhood and a small-business guy.

Asked if he wouldn't rather have a council full of lefty, progressive types like Nick Licata (who was described, at Bloom's event last night, as the only remaining "real" progressive on the council), Steinbrueck responded vehemently, "No way! Nor would I want nine of me on there! I think the council as a legislative body benefits from having a range of viewpoints and also some range on their political perspective, which is pretty darn narrow in Seattle."

OH AND (update): Steinbrueck told me last night that he has no plans to endorse anyone in the mayoral primary, but that he would consider endorsing his frequent council adversary Jan Drago in the general, if both she and Nickels make t through, "if she changes her message" to appeal to neighborhoods outside downtown and to present a clear contrast with Nickels. No way will Steinbrueck be endorsing Nickels, though.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Baconcat 1
Completely underwhelmed by all of them.

Time to go with the status quo. Maybe Nickels will do something this next term that really sets someone spectacular off and gets us a good race.
Posted by Baconcat on May 29, 2009 at 3:52 PM
2
dual endorsements = worthless
Posted by yy on May 29, 2009 at 4:18 PM
Will in Seattle 3
I agree that those were underwhelming.

Dual endorsements are a fact of life in a Top Two Primary, though.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 29, 2009 at 4:23 PM
pissy mcslogbot 4
People for The Bard Crawl Party endorse the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern ticket.
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on May 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM
5
All bow before the wisdom of Peter Steinbrueck, ECB's departed best source on the council.

Peter's pretzel logic on his endorsements would make a fine piece in the Harvard Lampoon and Exhibit #312 on why he should NOT ever get serious consideration as a mayor.

ECB, give up on Peter. Try Darcy.
Posted by When a writer is in love with her source (cont.) on May 29, 2009 at 4:45 PM
6
"All viewpoints are valid and deserve representation."

Typical.
Posted by PC on May 29, 2009 at 5:31 PM
7
i want there to be some deep message about the pointlessness of "the seattle way" here...but instead i think it's just a guy with two friends in the same race
Posted by aff on May 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Mahtli69 8
What a tool.
Posted by Mahtli69 on May 29, 2009 at 11:49 PM
9
David Miller is opposite of Peter Steinbrueck in terms of his land use views. While Steinbrueck is an environmentalist and an urbanist, Miller believes that there should be no zoning changes in Seattle and that developers should pay mitigation fees for building denser communities. His first priority is preservation of single family zoning and keeping traffic low and slow in single family neighborhoods. Also, Miller's tree crusades are thinly veiled attempts to prevent development.
Posted by JCK on May 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM
10
Dual endorsements are WEAK.
Posted by Trevor on May 30, 2009 at 11:04 AM
11
Will,
non partisan primaries have always been top two.
Posted by eddiew on May 30, 2009 at 11:32 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy