Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Meanwhile in Wasilla

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Pastor Ron Hamman writing in the "Religion Views" column in the local daily considers the odds that the antichrist will be a homosexual:

Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy. Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy.... But will the Antichrist be a homosexual? Having seen what the Bible says of sodomy, we have no further to look than the book of Daniel, chapter 11 to find our answer. It says, “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard... the desire of women....” As I said at the onset, I am not the first to draw attention to this, but the verbiage is clear.

Is it?

But good news first: if the antichrist is a homo that means Barack Obama can't be the antichrist, Michele's arms notwithstanding. Unless...

You've gotta be careful when people start using ellipses and brackets in selected bible quotes. So I looked up the passage that Rev. Hamman references to prove that the antichrist is a 'mo. Now I'm not a biblical scholar—and neither, it seems, is Rev. Hammon—but it seems clear that Daniel isn't talking about the antichrist in chapter 11 or any other chapter. The last few chapters of Daniel are given over to "apocalyptic visions," which read like stories of then-impending regional conflicts, references to existing kingdoms and empires, and not to the end-times fireworks favored by Christian nutters. It's just Daniel riffing on some kings who'll be ruling the area soon, some of them good, some of them bad. There's no second coming hinted at in Daniel, no rapture, no Jesus references at all. (Daniel is in the Old Testament.) Here's the passage Rev. Hamman cites— whole chapter here—with brackets and ellipses removed:

11:36 The king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods; and he shall prosper until the indignation be accomplished; for that which is determined shall be done.

11:37 Neither shall he regard the gods of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god; for he shall magnify himself above all.

Read the entire chapter and it's clear why a modern conservative might regard this particular king as a potential antichrist: when he isn't waging war he's out there collecting taxes. So even if he's not the antichrist he's still a close second: a socialist. But a homo? Okay, so he's not all that interested in women. But that seems tied to the his narcissism and self-regard—he exalts himself in all things, blah blah blah—and not necessarily because this particular king is doing (or going to be doing) dudes. Considering Daniel's low opinion of this king, Rev. Hamman, I'm thinking Daniel would've included dude-banging on his bill of particulars if this king would indeed be banging dudes. Why would Daniel leave that out? Why would he task an Alaskan pastor with inferring homosexual acts thousands of years after he wrote this chapter?

But look on the bright side, Rev.: this means Barack Obama could still be the antichrist. We'll just have to wait and see.

In the meantime... Biblical Brackets & Ellipses is a game that anyone can play!

[Rev. Hamman] shall come even on the fattest... and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers... Yes, they who eat of his dainties shall destroy [Rev. Hammon].

Could these verses from Daniel be any clearer? Rev. Hamman likes to blow loads on the faces of hugely obese sex partners ("comes on [not in] the fattest"), enjoys Twittering ("he shall do that which his fathers have not done"), and will one day bleed to death after his penis is bitten off during a group oral sex encounter gone awry ("they who eat of his dainties will destroy [Rev. Hamman].")

That's too bad for Rev. Hamman, but verbiage—mine and Daniel's—couldn't be clearer.

A couple of other quick thoughts: sodomy was the only sin that so pissed off God that he came down from heaven and destroyed the place? What about the flood? And did God Himself come down to the twin cities to verify the sodomitical goings on? Was He inspecting the sheets for evidence of buggering or something? And careful, Rev. Hammon, you don't want to attract attention to the bits of the bible where the authors acknowledge the existence of other gods, competing gods, even if their god gets to be the god-of-gods.

This line appears at the end of Rev. Hamman's think piece:

Ron Hamman is pastor for Independent Baptist Church of Wasilla. Contact him at 357-4229.

The area code up there is 907.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (63) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Mr. Poe 1
I had a fear I was the Antichrist when I was a young little believer. It was all based on this weird dream I had where Jesus was trying to build this shitty warehouse in the middle of a river of sparkling acid, and he kept telling me it can't be complete until I do my part. At no point did he call me the Antichrist, but I was sure that's what he was saying, even though it doesn't make any sense. You know how dreams are. Anyway, there was also a black teenage boy in the dream, trying to get out of a hallway of blasting speakers. I woke up and ran to my parents bedroom in tears. Oddly enough, and this is the only recurring dream I've had, I had it again a couple years later when I kind of had a brain. The warehouse was finished and I wasn't allowed in, and Jesus was nowhere to be seen.

Being a kid is the best drug ever.
Posted by Mr. Poe on May 28, 2009 at 12:37 PM
2
I assumed Daniel was referring to the Pope.
Posted by RDM on May 28, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Rob in Baltimore 3
Don't forget the Tower of Babel. The Bible says God came down personally to destroy that, and cause everyone to speak different languages too. According to the Bible, if they people succeeded in building the tower, they would have reached, and gotten into Heaven without dying first, and going through God's patented soul sorting process. Well, that just wouldn't do. I guess God has since moved Heaven a bit higher since then?
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://domaflipflop.com/ on May 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Rob in Baltimore 4
2, You know that description does sound more like the Pope now that you mention it.
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://domaflipflop.com/ on May 28, 2009 at 12:45 PM
5
some one reads pharygula?
Posted by whateeeeeever on May 28, 2009 at 12:47 PM
6
I like how God punishes for raping angels, and the apparently obvious big problem with that isn't the A) having sex with angels or B) rape, but that sodomy was used to do the raping.
Posted by Ian on May 28, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Julie in Eugene 7
I thought we'd already determined that you are the antichrist, Dan. Daniel Keenan Savage = 6 + 6 + 6.

That's all the proof I need to believe that the antichrist is a homosexual.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on May 28, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Lily Fluffbottom 8
Seriously, why can't Alaska keep its mouth shut?
Posted by Lily Fluffbottom http://lilyfluffbottom.blogspot.com on May 28, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Urgutha Forka 9
The way the bible hates on women, you'd think they would assume the antichrist is going to be female.

If so, I hope I get to sleep with her!
Posted by Urgutha Forka on May 28, 2009 at 12:59 PM
10
I wouldn't even ask Alaska for its autograph.
Posted by K. West on May 28, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Urgutha Forka 11
@7,
Hmmm... good point. But wait, Ronald Wilson Reagan ALSO equals 6+6+6!

That means Reagan was a homo, right?
Posted by Urgutha Forka on May 28, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Bonefish 12
Messenger: "Lord! LORD! Come quick! The citizens of Sodom are committing rape!"
God: "Yeah, OK."
Messenger: "No, my Lord, they're raping your angels! The ones you sent."
God: "mm-hmm. I'll get right on it."
Messenger: "But my Lord! They're GAY raping them. Up the ASS. With SODOMY!"
God: "WHAAAT? SODOMY?!?! GRAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUGH!" *Hellfire* *Brimstone*
Posted by Bonefish on May 28, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Adie 13
Why don't we ask loveschild?
Posted by Adie on May 28, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Jeremy from Seattle 14
Is it desire women, or women's desire? He may totally like fucking the ladies, but not care if they get off on it.

Man, the antichrist is a DICK.

*Gasp* its Cheney!!
Posted by Jeremy from Seattle http://www.x-dezyn.com on May 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Rob in Baltimore 15
7, Well, the Angels didn't actually get raped. Lot offered up his virgin daughters to the rape mob instead. What a great dad. You know what his daughters got him for Father's Day? Sons/grandsons. Each daughter had sex with him, and got pregnant. But that was after they fled the doomed city, and Lot's wife was turned into a pillar of salt. No wonder Lot was so horny. Ain't the Bible fun!
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://domaflipflop.com/ on May 28, 2009 at 1:03 PM
Adie 16
Also, don't many straight people "commit" sodomy on a regular basis as well? Maybe the antichrist is a little kinky...
Posted by Adie on May 28, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Bonefish 17
And here I may end up working in Alaska for a couple years. Oh well, at least I'd be working in the wilderness/ocean, and not in the middle of any weird church settlement towns. Wish me luck. If I return to the northwest with a King James Bible, a bruised-up wife, and a Matt Sheppard in Hell sign, you all have permission to put me out of my misery.

PS- No offense to Alaskans reading this. You're not all like that, blah blah blah. Feel free to make some "socks in sandals" jokes about northwesterners if you want.
Posted by Bonefish on May 28, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Rob in Baltimore 18
My post at 15 should be addressed to 6, not 7.
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://domaflipflop.com/ on May 28, 2009 at 1:05 PM
19
This is fun! Here's another passage about Rev. Hammon having drunken sex with his daughters:

Genesis 19:30-36

[Rev. Hammon] and his two daughters left [Wasilla] and settled in the mountains, for he was afraid to stay in [Wasilla]. He and his two daughters lived in a cave.

One day the older daughter said to the younger, "Our father is old, and there is no man around here to lie with us, as is the custom all over the earth. Let's get our father to drink wine and then lie with him and preserve our family line through our father."

That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and lay with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

The next day the older daughter said to the younger, "Last night I lay with my father. Let's get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and lie with him so we can preserve our family line through our father." So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went and lay with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.

So both of [Rev. Hammon]'s daughters became pregnant by their father.


Fun Fact: Know who that quote is actually about? Lot. Yeah, the same Lot who had to take his family and run from the Homostorm™.

So, for those keeping track:

straight drunken incest=good.
Homosex=bad.

And now you know!
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on May 28, 2009 at 1:07 PM
20
Damn. 15 beat me to it.
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on May 28, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Bonefish 21
14: That was also my take on it, when I read Hammon's edited quote. The antichrist is just terrible at sex, and has no interest in improving. Sounds like a lot of fundies to me.
Posted by Bonefish on May 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM
22
Satan is gay in the South Park movie. That proves it for me.
Posted by LeslieC on May 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM
23
Satan is gay in the South Park movie. That proves it for me.
Posted by LeslieC on May 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM
24
Sodom and Sodomy is entirely misappropriated by contemporary interpreters of the bible.

Try to follow...

One thing that the bible does is to try to codify behavior to reflect societal anecdotes, problems, and hardships at the time (for instance, certain meats and shellfish being off-limits or a sin because they were actually quite dangerous at the time do to unsanitary practices)

Anyway the sin here might have more to do with the rape and overpowering of other men in the context of war rather than in the loving and sexual kind of sodomy as we now know it.

The fable/biblical passage is probably an attempt to deter such behavior that is common in warring societies, which both towns were.
Posted by StillNon on May 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM
25
*due to, @/from 24
Posted by StillNon on May 28, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Lily Fluffbottom 26
17: Yeah... we wear socks with sandals up here, too. Dammit.
Posted by Lily Fluffbottom http://lilyfluffbottom.blogspot.com on May 28, 2009 at 1:18 PM
27
What are the odds the ac is a 'mo? One in ten.
Posted by hey hey on May 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM
lark 28
Dan,
I agree its silly for Rev. Hamman to ponder whether the Anti-Christ is homosexual or not. But, if Rev. Hamman wants a candidate for Anti-Christ how about this healthy hetero:

http://a11news.com/1985/desmond-hatchett…

21 children BEFORE the age of 30 y/o! Yeah, he's pretty "bad" all right. What an irresponsible prick. Those poor children and those idiot women, their mothers. WTF! A bloody tragedy.
Posted by lark on May 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM
Rob in Baltimore 29
19, and to top that off, 2 Peter 2 says that Lot was "a righteous man". Pushing your daughters out the door so that they can be raped seems more wrong-eous.
Posted by Rob in Baltimore http://domaflipflop.com/ on May 28, 2009 at 1:28 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 30
So if Sodom invented sodomy, what's Gomorrah's claim to fame?
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on May 28, 2009 at 1:28 PM
Jeremy from Seattle 31
@30 Mebbe Gomorrah is a mistranslation. Mebbe it's Gonorrah.
Posted by Jeremy from Seattle http://www.x-dezyn.com on May 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM
32
Besides the pure idiocy of taking this text and applying it to anything happening today, the quote from Dan 11:37 seems to differ depending on which translation you are using. My Catholic Bible (THE NEW AMERICAN BIBLE) reads: "He shall have no regard for the gods of his ancestors or for the one in whom women delight; for no god shall he have regard, because he shall make himself greater than all." This is very different. The point being is the subject of this verse puts himself before everyone's gods -- even some god that women of his day seemed to like a lot (whoever that might have been). The anotation of the text proffered by the version of the Bible I have says that "[i]nstead of venerating Apollo, one of the gods of his ancestors, Antiochus venerated and even identified himself with Zeus Olympios, whom the Romans equated with the god of their fortress in Rome, Jupiter Capitolinus, the god of strongholds." So this Rev. Idiot can't even read his own damn scripture. What a jerk!
Posted by DC Bill on May 28, 2009 at 1:43 PM
kim in portland 33
I have always understood and read Chapter 11 in Daniel to be a chapter containing prophecy:

Prophecies concerning Persia and Greece (11: 2-4)
Prophecies concerning Egypt and Syria (11: 5-35)
Prophecies concerning the antichrist (11: 36-45)

vs. 37 (NIV) He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the one desired by women, no will he regard any god, but will exalt himself.

"The one desired by women," is a reference to Christ and his being born of a woman.

vs. 37 (The Amplified Bible) He shall not regard the gods of his fathers or Him [to Whom] women desire [to give birth -- the Messiah] or any other god, for he shall magnify himself above all.

vs. 37 (New Living Translation) He will have no regard for the gods of his ancestors, or for the god beloved of women, or for any god, for he will boast that he is greater than them all.

"or for the god beloved of women," is viewed as a reference to Christ, born of a woman and loved by Mary, Martha, Mary Magadlene, Mary the mother of Joses, Salome, and of course his mother Mary.

I don't grasp Mr Hamman's connection at all.
Posted by kim in portland on May 28, 2009 at 1:48 PM
emma's bee 34
After all the kerfuffle over and insistency upon a direct reading of Genesis, who knew the fundies were so adept at inventively interpreting other books as allegories?
Posted by emma's bee on May 28, 2009 at 2:04 PM
Doctor Memory 35
Sodomy is the only sin for which God personally came down to earth to smite the sinners? Um, did Rev. Hamman's theology classes skip over the entire fucking book of Exodus?! Even if your familiarity with it extends no further than watching "The Ten Commandments", it's hard to miss the part where God himself comes down and kills the firstborn of all the Egyptians...
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on May 28, 2009 at 2:07 PM
kim in portland 36
30,

Silly, sodomy is a Middle English word. It isn't in the Bible at all, because they spoke ancient Hebrew and the Septuagint was recorded in ancient Greek. And, Gomorrah is guilty of the same sins of greed, lack of hospitality, denial of justice, neglect of the poor, adulterous worship of pagan gods (it's all in the Old Testament) that people of Sodom were.
Posted by kim in portland on May 28, 2009 at 2:07 PM
37
And would someone point out to me where in the Bible we find a good example of a healthy heterosexual marriage? They are few and far between.
Posted by seattle mike on May 28, 2009 at 2:12 PM
38
Clearly, the devil will be a eunuch.
Or an eight year old boy.
Posted by K on May 28, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Mr. Poe 39
Whoa, holy shit. You guys are really taking this seriously. Hammon has inadvertently (and successfully) trolled you all.
Posted by Mr. Poe on May 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM
Hernandez 40
Conclusion: if you're willing to take enough liberties with context, translation and semantics, you can pretty much make the Bible say ANYTHING you want it to. Same with any holy book. This is why religious fundamentalism (the belief that one has a monopoly on truth and interpretation of scripture) is so stupid and so dangerous.
Posted by Hernandez on May 28, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Baconcat 41
@30: Fluffernutters
Posted by Baconcat on May 28, 2009 at 3:29 PM
The Amazing Jim 42
Is it too late to join the Alaskan Independece Party? Is it a problem that I don't live in Alaska?
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on May 28, 2009 at 3:33 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 43
I make up Bible verses all the time. It's easy! Just say something ridiculous, and put some numbers after it. I try to always credit the book of Platitudes, Beverly, Irving or Nancy. Sometimes the Gospels of Saul and Bruce.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://post.thestranger.com/seattle/MyProfile?oid=1500457 on May 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM
44
"Sodom was named after sodomy and Gomorrah was named after an even weirder move."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bar3GOzDN…
Posted by St. Beretta on May 28, 2009 at 5:14 PM
45
ah.
The filthy heathen perverts making sport with the Holy Word.
typical.
When the West coast slides into the abyss like a flushed turd on the edge of the bowl know that the last sound you hear will be America howling it's delight...
Posted by Yea Verily on May 28, 2009 at 6:11 PM
46
I had a religian TA who knew a lot about the Bible and biblical history. I asked him sodom and gomorrah meant, he said it was hospitality.

Lot took care of his guests, and tried to protect them. The rest of the town tried to rape them.
Posted by Elle on May 28, 2009 at 7:22 PM
47
45, It's my dream that the area west of Iowa and east of Denver (the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and most of Texas) will be swallowed up into the earth, and we can celebrate the loss of what is essentially nothing.

and if then everything south of the Mason/Dixon were to separate into a different continent, my joy would be complete. Those people would last about two weeks on their own before dying off.

Oh, and Alaska? I'm just waiting for oil to stop being the fuel of choice, and they can all just freeze to death. Their mummified remains will be another tourist attraction for the summer cruise months.
Posted by kill them all, let jesus sort them out on May 28, 2009 at 8:24 PM
48
Ezekiel 16:49 " 'Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. ...'"
Posted by lori, ohio on May 28, 2009 at 9:41 PM
Uriel-238 49
Saying that the last recorded acts of the Sodomites -- the demands for same-gender sex -- are proof that they were destroyed for homosexuality is like saying that a condemned man cursing his guards on the way to his execution is being executed for cursing the guards. Sodom was judged worthy of destruction before the incident with Lot and the angels. -- Inge Anderson

Fun facts about Sodom and Gomorrah
~ S'dom (from which we get the city's name) means burnt
~ Amorah (from which, blah, blah, blah) means a ruined heap
~ These names were given after their destruction. Their real names, like the real cities, have been lost to time.
~ The mob at Lot's door asked to have the strangers (the angels) sent out so that they might know the angels.
~ This verb to know, the Hebrew yada is the social version of the verb as in Yeah, I know Jim. We went to school together at state. contrast to shakab as in Oh, yeah, Jim a hottie. I hope to know him at the next party.
~ In a conspicuous error, the NIV translates yada in this case as if it were shakab.

The source of this fascinating data also covers the reason why we think fags are responsible for Gods WMD strike on these two cities. Evidently the Church had been observed to be responsible for the same sins that brought doom upon Sodom and Gomorrah. And I ain't talking about their randy priests and monks.

You can find it here: http://www.religioustolerance.org/dixon_…
Posted by Uriel-238 on May 28, 2009 at 10:09 PM
RainMan 50
@48: Ezekiel is a fascinating book. Chapter 23, verse 20: "For she doted upon her paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses."

Maybe she lived in Enumclaw?
Posted by RainMan on May 28, 2009 at 10:35 PM
COMTE 51
@45:

It's a comfort to see that your grasp of geology and plate tectonics appears to be about on-par with Hammon's understanding of his own "holy book".
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on May 28, 2009 at 10:47 PM
52
Mike Malloy(AirAmericaRadio's 9-12am time slot) acted like an Atlanta fundie to get Hamman on his show tonight. Mike was very good at it, but as soon as Hamman hung up after agreeing how evil the Internet is, Mike gave a few sighs and called himself a demon and did the speaking in tongues silliness before going off-air. Amazing how the fundies take it all SO serious, isn't it?
"ha ha...ha."-The Joker.
Posted by midnitetoker on May 29, 2009 at 1:00 AM
53
51
you girls keep repeating that "hospitality" BS about Sodom if it makes you feel better.
I hear death by fire isn't nearly as painful as it looks...
Posted by Whistling Past the Graveyard on May 29, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Uriel-238 54
WPtG @53, you know, I'd rather be blinded by the searing flash of God's nuclear strike, battered relentlessly but somehow survive the shockwave, and then endure the agony of my irradiated flesh, piece by piece, falling off my bones before I ultimately black out from shock into oblivion than I would one day look in the mirror and realize I've become a belligerent, ignorant, intolerant asshole like yourself.

Just because we don't believe in the popularly regarded misinterpretations of a poorly translated archaic text doesn't mean we don't have a sense of righteousness.

I suspect you and your ilk will be direly disappointed in heaven once you cross through its gaping maw into its threshold, or rather would be, if you still had the capacity to feel disappointment.
Posted by Uriel-238 on May 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM
55
54
I'm sure you won't be disappointed.
Posted by do you smell smoke?... on May 29, 2009 at 2:21 PM
56
54 FTW
Posted by MFD on May 29, 2009 at 5:40 PM
Uriel-238 57
dyss @54, as a self proclaimed skeptic, I'll believe it when I see it.

Bill O'Reilly was kind enough to declare my town fair game to the Axis of Evil, dropping it to the bottom of their kill list. Your deity has been left to its own devices.
Posted by Uriel-238 on May 29, 2009 at 6:12 PM
58
Sure, Lot was a lousy father, but he was a hell of a host!
Posted by Missy Miss on May 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM
59
http://www.mikemalloy.com/bits/2009_0529…
Posted by Truthseeker Prime on May 30, 2009 at 8:37 PM
60
There is only one passage in the Bible that explicitly addressed WHY God destroyed Sodom.

"Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy."

That's from the English Standard Version (available in searchable full text at http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/) and I think it's pretty clear that homosexuality was not really the problem.
Posted by patrickpatrick on June 2, 2009 at 1:04 PM
61
Crap. I almost forgot. That's the unedited whole of Ezekial 19:49. Good times. It's even better in context, so definitely look it up.
Posted by patrickpatrick on June 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM
62
Make that SIXTEEN forty-nine.
Posted by patrickpatrick on June 2, 2009 at 1:08 PM
63
here in Colorado the queers mostly congregate in boulder and denver counties, they seem harmless, hell, we even have a queer representative.Who cares? why not just live your own life and not worry about who's buggering whom. Although the flamers seem a little ridiculous. but so do all the people who parade up and down the street. Look at me, I'm(fill in whatever you want to be looked at for eg. black, mexican,queer,veteran,christian,irish,or various politicalgroups each promoting their unique brand of stupidity.
Posted by dhermit on June 23, 2009 at 12:12 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use