Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Re-bar Happy Hour?

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Apparently there's some sort of happy hour thing at Re-bar today—which doesn't usually open this early—and it involves some sort of food or something. That's all I know.

Frank Blethen on the Couch

Posted by Eli Sanders on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM

Who knew that in 2001, just as the fortunes of the Seattle Times Company were really starting to tip, some researchers from the Harvard Business School were allowed to conduct a study of the company's majority-owners, the Blethen family?

Seattle reporter Bill Richards knew—or recently found out—and he shares the results of this study, which involved juicy talks between Frank Blethen and a clinical psychologist, in a fascinating article in the current issue of Seattle Business monthly.

The name of the Harvard study: “The Blethen Family and the Seattle Times Company.” Its findings:

The 24-page report is an unusually detailed discussion of the internal workings of the usually secretive Times Co. and, more remarkable still, of the Blethens themselves. John Davis, a small-business expert and senior lecturer at the business school who wrote the case study, says that Blethen family members, including Frank Blethen, provided most of the case study’s information.

“I thought they were extraordinarily forthcoming,” Davis says, “especially given the sad family history they’ve had.”

According to Davis and Cathy Quinn, a clinical psychologist based in Beverly Hills, Calif., who did most of the interviewing for the study, the fourth generation of Blethens currently managing the Times Co.—Frank and his cousins—set out to use the company as the vehicle to rebuild their own families from what Davis and Quinn call “the toxic Blethen family atmosphere” of the past. Previous generations of Blethens “were physically absent and emotionally remote,” they wrote. Frank Blethen complained that his father, Frank Sr., who had divorced five times, never sent him a birthday card or letter, and never called, throughout Frank Jr.’s adolescence.

Blethen took a summer job at The Seattle Times when he was 21, living with his father in a hotel in Seattle. “During that summer, his father asked Frank what he would like to do at the newspaper after college graduation,” Davis and Quinn write. “Frank explained to him that he had no interest in a career at the paper and that he had only worked there to become acquainted with his father.”

The alleged daddy issues go on, as does Richards's great chronology of how the city's dominant daily won a newspaper war while at the same time losing (or nearly losing) the financial-solvency battle. Media gossipers and other interested parties: read it.

UPDATE: Apparently this Harvard report has been circulating for a few years. My bad. If it's new to you, it's still worth reading about.

Is The Antichrist Gay? And Is He Single?

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM

Slog reader Pete surfed over to the Frontiersman from my post about Rev. Ron Hamman's column ("Will the Antichrist Be A Homosexual?"). Check out the ad that popped up alongside Hamman's piece:

48a0/1243552215-antichristdate.jpg

When I clicked over the box had an ad for RSVP Gay Cruises. Coincidence? Or a sign that when the antichrist comes he'll be gay and single and wearing a Speedo?

Seattle Police Accidently Release Domestic Violence Murder Suspect

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM

Update: Seattle Police Department spokesman Sean Whitcomb says Alvarez-Guerrero has been taken into custody in Fresno, California.

Seattle police are searching for a 40-year-old murder suspect after he was released from police custody early this morning.

Around midnight, police were called to am apartment complex in the 7400 block of Rainier Avenue S about a domestic disturbance between two roommates. Police separated the two men and arrested Valente Alvarez-Guerrero and took him to the South Precinct. Three hours later, Alvarez-Guerrero was released.

At 7am, police were again summoned to the apartment building after Alvarez-Guerrero's roommate was found stabbed to death in a building hallway.

At a media briefing this afternoon, SPD assistant chief Nick Metz said the department "has some questions as to why" Alvarez-Guerrero was released.

Domestic violence law require officers to book the aggressor. It is unclear in this case why Alvarez-Guerrero was not booked into King County Jail.

Metz says two officers and a sergeant have been put on administrative reassignment and an investigation is being conducted by the Office of Professional Accountability.

Sign of the Times

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Last year, at the Book Expo in Los Angeles, the Staples Center was awash in giant advertising banners. You can always tell which books the publishers have sunk the most money into on the basis of the enormous fucking signs on display in the lobby. The biggest banner last year was for Call Me Ted, Ted Turner's autobiography. I have never seen anybody read or review this book in real life, but the publisher put a gigantic amount of money behind the book, pushing it relentlessly on bookselers.

4592/1243533734-macookbook.jpg1492/1243533888-bigreddog.jpg
This year, because everything sucks for the publishing industry, the signs are a little less ostentatious. Here we have a sign from Harlequin featuring a cookbook by insanely popular romance author Debbie Macomber. (Click to engorge, although it's really not that interesting.)

There was also an inflatable Clifford the Big Red Dog:(Click to turn Clifford into a giant, red, throbbing blotch on your monitor.)

In fact, the only real ostentatious show of publisher swagger is this: BEHOLD DAN BROWN'S DOOM COCK:

e363/1243533289-danbrown_ssymbol.jpg(You will note that this photo is 666 pixels high. Coincidence? I THINK NOT.)

34b5/1243533497-cspanuae.jpgBut the most curious thing, besides the C-SPAN bus that was taking up a ton of space in the Javits Center, is the sign advertising a new participant in BEA: The United Arab Emirates. Does this mean the Middle East is absconding with America's staggering literary might? Could be. Stay tuned.

Protecting Marriage From The Gays and The Spellchecks

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:56 PM

Here's NOM's new ad (via The Gay Atheist)...

Is it petty to point out that the National Organization for Marriage misspelled the word "marriage" in their ad?

d098/1243551121-nommarraige.jpg

And what's with the voiceover?

Remember That Catholic Priest Who Got Caught Kissing a Woman?

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM

And the Catholic church suspended him and told him he would have to choose between the priesthood and his girlfriend? Well, he chose the priesthood—the the Episcopal priesthood.

Father Alberto Cutie, an internationally known Catholic priest who admitted having a romantic affair and breaking his vow of celibacy, is joining the Episcopal Church to be with the woman he loves, he said Thursday.

Thanks to Slog tipper Gitai.

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM

Didn't think I'd have occasion to seek your advice, but here we are. I'm a gay male, 22, and things are going swimmingly with my boyfriend, 21, of close to four months. Plenty of things I like about a man are present and accounted for... except where it comes to your area of expertise, of course. My sex drive is low and his is nonexistent. On top of that, he's never had a sexual experience. As in never, ever. We've been grown-ups and had candid, serious discussions about what we like, what we want, where our comfort zones lie, the whole ordeal. We came away with the understanding that since he's on the spot with his zero experience, the ball is in his court. My body is his to do what he will with whenever the spirit moves him. He's since taken this situation as an excuse to never bring it up again.

We're intellectually compatible. We like each other and jive physically and we don't have any awkwardness sharing a bed and doing the cuddle thing. But he just has... not... made a move for my dick in our three-hour morning contortion sessions. I entered this relationship thinking that some day I'd like him to fuck me, but I'm discovering more and more that his hang-up isn't nervousness, inexperience, or fear, but the fact that he just doesn't seem to want to have sex with anyone. Ever.

I like him bunches, and he's a tough catch to throw back, but I see myself with three options:

1. Go back on our deal and initiate sex my damned self.
2. Part ways with him when I move out west in a couple of months.
3. Dump his ass right this second.

Your thoughts?

Limited In My Patience

Talking about sex with a brand new boyfriend should be a pleasure, LIMP, not an ordeal. If you're not still in the honeymoon stage at four months—if you're not still besotted with each other and if you're not in each others' pants constantly*—you should be anxious to throw him back, LIMP, not reluctant. Thank God you're moving west, LIMP, as that event provides you with a graceful, face-saving, low-stress exit. Stop stressing about your sex life with this guy because you're not to have either—sex with him, a life with him—and enjoy the cuddles until you take off.

* "constantly" in this context is relative, of course, and depends on the relative libidos of the folks involved.

Because Nothing Says "Congratulations on Your Gay Marriage!" Like a Limited Edition Cast-Resin Sculpture of Octomom

Posted by David Schmader on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:28 PM

pinkie.jpg

As you probably know because I refuse to shut up about it, my guy Jake and I are one of the 18,000 same-sex couples that got married in California during last year's 18-week window of marriage equality, and whose marriage remains—arbitrarily and incriminatingly—legal despite the CA Supreme Court's decision to uphold Prop 8.

Basically, the only effect the decision to uphold Prop 8 had on us was to render our marriage an oddly meaningful novelty item, which makes the wedding present I was given today by a trio of coworkers absolutely perfect.

What you need to know that the above photo can't tell you: On the bottom of the sculpture is the title—"String of Babies"—along with the edition number ("3/200") and the artist's signature (illegible). Also, the whole thing smells really weird. Like, poison latex, or Nadya Suleman's soul.

Thanks, co-workers! (Also, for you size queens out there, the piece is roughly twelve inches wide.)

Youth Pastor Watch

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:17 PM

9f58/1243548939-ypwnies.jpgGregory Nies played Santa Claus in Lititz Springs Park. He was a youth group leader at the Lititz United Methodist Church, served on Borough Council and ran for mayor three times. And on Wednesday, Nies was arrested, accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl.

Nies, 56, of South Spruce Street, was charged by borough police with inappropriately touching, hugging and kissing the girl on several occasions when she spent the night in his family's home, according to a police affidavit.... The investigation, which began last month when the girl contacted Lititz police, also marked the end of Nies' third attempt to run for mayor of the borough, when he lost the Republican endorsement and suddenly withdrew from the race.

Nies, who is married and has children, surrendered Wednesday morning before District Judge Daniel Garrett.... The girl told police that Nies had sexual-type contact with her eight times when she was spending the evening at his home. In addition to kissing and hugging, when they were alone together in the basement, according to court documents, the girl said Nies repeatedly had sexual contact with her, touching her private areas, telling her "this is what dads do."

Mike O'Brien: Staying Put

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM

City Council Position 8 candidate Mike O'Brien, who has lately been the subject of rumors that he plans to leave the crowded seat to run against Position 2 incumbent Richard Conlin, says he's staying in the race he's in. "I've heard just this week that I'm running against [Position 6 incumbent] Nick Licata, Richard Conlin, and [Position 4 candidate] Sally Bagshaw," he told me, laughing. "No. I'm running for Position 8 and I plan to stay there."

From a political reporter's POV, that's too bad. A race between O'Brien (former chair of the local Sierra Club chapter and a vocal opponent of the 2007 roads and transit ballot measure) and Conlin (an incrementalist enviro who's often been perceived as wishy-washy) would've been interesting. And it would have given O'Brien an opportunity to stand out and draw comparisons in a way that the six-way race for Position 8—featuring a landlord, two sons of prominent former Seattle officeholders, a neighborhood activist, and a city transportation employee—makes difficult.

There Was a Press Conference

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:39 PM

Book Expo America had its first-ever press conference today. It was very press conference-y. The main speaker was Lance Fensterman, who is the Vice President of Books, Publishing and Pop Culture for Reed Exhibitions (the company that organizes BEA). It is at once weird and admirable that, up until now, BEA has never really courted the press, but at this conference, Fensterman made a mad run for the media.

"You as members of the media, besides our bookselling friends, are probably the most important contingent" of the show, Fensterman said. This was because "BEA at its core is really about content and connectivity," and about "Content in all its form and content creators." Somewhere else in the great hall, I'm sure a bookseller died of a heart attack as soon as Fensterman said those words. Fensterman also said that BEA was about "opening a dialogue" and I literally yawned when he said that.

He also acknowledged the problems in the publishing industry: "It's been an interesting year," Fensterman said. "The numbers are positive. I feel good where we're at." (This had to be an outright lie, but that's what press conferences are for, amIrite?) Here are some numbers that he quoted:

Attendance is down 14% from 2007's BEA in New York, but attendance is up 30% from last year's show in Los Angeles. This isn't so surprising, since I could throw a rock pretty much anywhere in Manhattan and take out the eye of someone who works in the publishing industry (and it might just come to that.) If you have a show in publishing's back yard, of course more people are going to come out. But the media attendance at the show is up 20% from 2007. "We like you," Fensterman said to the room full of journalists. The show's square footage is down about 21%. Fensterman repeated some previously reported news: New York City will be BEA's home for the next four years (next year's show was supposed to be in Las Vegas before the industry tanked, which is a shame: A Vegas show would have exploded my head with glee), and the show is going to a weekday schedule as opposed to a weekend one. Fensterman said it would be "A more focused event." I think this means fewer parties.

Fensterman talked about content a lot. Apparently, Steven Tyler ("of Aerosmith") and Chuck Klosterman will be appearing at BEA, and this is apparently exciting: "For the first time, we've put content on the show floor." Also, Borders.com has set up a studio to interview 70 authors over the next three days.

Then this guy named Tom Allen who is the Chief Executive Officer of something called the Association of American Publishers got up to talk. I really zoned the fuck out. All I heard was that the "book publishing industry faces an array of significant and diverse challenges." And then "blah blah blah...frankly, the lifeblood of this democracy." The end.

Then Oren Teicher, the Chief Executive Officer of the American Booksellers Association, noted that though "we are an industry undergoing dramatic change," he was "delighted" to see that BEA bookseller attendance was the same this year as last year. And then the press conference ended after all the reporters fell asleep. After the presser, I asked Fensterman about those bookseller attendance numbers: BEA and the ABA literally had to give away attendance for free to get those bookseller numbers back up to where they were last year. "We should've said that in the press conference, you're absolutely right," he said, but he noted that "It was just $75, and the real cost is in the air travel and the hotels, and so we were just giving them a little break." And then Fensterman said he was a big fan of Dan Savage, and downloaded the podcast every week. Yay, Dan!

What He Said

Posted by Jonathan Golob on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:51 PM

Matt Taibbi, at TrueSlant:

Having written one of many articles identifying [former AIG chief] Cassano as a key cause of the crisis, I guess I and people like me should have seen this coming — that at some point down the road a general consensus would form blaming some rogue individual for the financial crisis. And while Joe Cassano is certainly as guilty as a person can be, the notion that he alone is responsible for this mess is not only appalling but extremely dangerous. The people who would believe such a thing are the same people who believe that this crisis might have been avoided if a few minor changes had been made. I’ve heard people say, for instance, that much havoc could have been avoidded if there had just been a law mandating margin requirements for CDS contracts, so that people like Cassano couldn’t make bets without the money to pay off.

This is bullshit. And it’s dangerous bullshit. The problem isn’t a few technical glitches in the system that allowed the Cassanos of the world to drive Mack Trucks of leverage through a loophole or two. The problem is, at its roots, a profound collapse of morals on Wall Street that would have found its way to financial destruction using any available set of instruments and laws. We are talking about people who sold giant rafts of bullshit mortgages to pensions, who stuck municipalities, innocent taxpayers, with time-bombs of subprime debt. And not just one trader here and there, but thousands of them, with the sober approval of the highest level executives in the biggest firms. On its most basic level what these people did is rip off huge institutional investors — old people, taxpayers, you and me — by finding ways to game the system and trick the big institutional fund managers into buying what they thought were safe investments, but were actually financial lemons that could barely make it out of the lot.

It doesn’t matter what tools they used. That’s immaterial. Is it true that the CDO made it easier to fool the ratings agencies, made it simpler to sell crap as AAA-rated paper? Yes. But the operative problem here isn’t the CDO but the fact that someone who makes a million dollars a year was willing to sell crap as a safe investment to pensioners. An honest man does not do this. Are there used-car dealers who would? Sure. But that’s why we joke about used car dealers, and only trust them about as far as we can throw them, and generally don’t buy used cars until we’ve had our mechanic look under the hood.

With one amendment. There is nothing new about this sort of amoral, sociopathic and ultimately catastrophic behavior on Wall Street.

The Truth of Truth

Posted by Charles Mudede on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:49 PM

What connects the substance of this image...
e4ee/1243542568-rethewtshbdfd.jpg

...to the substance of this image?
7600/1243542735-1-1.jpg

We see in both what is true arising from its opposite, what is false. In the first, the facade is the building (meaning, the fake is not faking); in the second, the deceit results in an honest statement. Truths can grow in any climate—good or bad.

Hooverville Rebuilds

Posted by Bethany Jean Clement on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:19 PM

8345/1243541578-6a00d83451ede369e2011570ad6add970b-800wi.jpg

...that's the bar, not the shantytown.

I went there for Bar Exam in September—a week after John McCain said that "the fundamentals of our economy are still strong"—and while it was/will be a fun place, the name combined with $10 pitchers of Rainier combined with the beginnings of an actual latter-day Hooverville around there causes some cognitive dissonance. (There are free peanuts.) People live in campers under the West Seattle Bridge, people sleep under onramps to the viaduct, and, from observations made this past week on a bike ride around the neighborhood, a makeshift tent city has sprung up in the weeds along the railroad tracks on East Marginal Way. Can't we take care of our loonies and drug addicts better than this?

Anyhooverville, then there was a fire—accidental, started by an overheated ceiling fan. Now it appears Hooverville will rise again.

Photo courtesy of putative.

Tags:

Re: Queen For a Day

Posted by Eli Sanders on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM

Heartwarming, definitely, but something similar happened almost exactly eight years ago—and not in homo-filled Los Angeles, but up in tiny Ferndale, Wa., near the border with Canada.

FERNDALE, Whatcom County - People in this town are annoyed with Krystal Bennett. It's not because she's a lesbian, they say, but because she demeaned a time-honored high-school tradition.

What happened is this: On April 28, at the Ferndale High School senior prom, Bennett was voted prom king.

I remember this not just because I ended up interviewing the lesbian prom king, but because later that summer I watched the very sweet sight of Krystal Bennett—who had, in the intervening months, become a target of Fred Phelps—marching happily in Seattle's gay pride parade.

Did Somebody Say Books?

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:00 PM

I have arrived in New York City. The weather here is awful: Drizzly and muggy and sticky and generally everything that displeases me about the east coast. But I'm in a friend's lovely West Village apartment and excited to finally hit up Book Expo America. The first and only official event today is an introductory press conference, but I'm also going to a party thrown by the literary magazine Granta tonight.

But before I begin my reportage of the day's events, in order to get everybody in a bookish mood, I would like to share this photo of a tattoo, which came from this blog, and was pointed out by Slog tipper Jocelyn via Facebook:

945c/1243513190-37jsqlofrnybstrr0u82b9tho1_500.jpg

Sometimes, we book editors need to see this sort of thing to remind us why we're in the business in the first place, you know? Tattoos like that really make it all worthwhile.

Man Shot in Head Goes Back to Bed

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:52 PM

A 25-year-old Capitol Hill man called police last week after he was shot in the head while he slept.

According to a police report, on May 22nd, at about 10:30pm, the man was sleeping in his apartment in the 300 block of E Harrison Street when someone fired a bullet into his bedroom.

The report says the bullet penetrated his apartment wall and his pillow, and struck him in the head. The man apparently "felt well enough to sleep through the evening" and notified police the following day at 6:30 p.m.

Officers searched the man's bedroom and a found .22 or .25 caliber bullet inside the man's pillow. "An entry and exit wound in the pillow could clearly be seen," the report says, noting that officers found blood on the man's pillow, although he only sustained minor injuries and declined medical attention.

Police determined the bullet was fired from an adjacent apartment and tried knocking on the door. When no one answered, the SWAT team entered the apartment and located a pellet gun, but nothing that would have fired the bullet found in the man's pillow.

Officers locked up the apartment and left a note telling the neighbor to contact the East Precinct. Police are still investigating and have not made any arrests.

Asphalt Alchemy: Converting Streets into Parks

Posted by Dominic Holden on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM

The city is considering a new plan for parks: Rather than purchasing expensive private parcels of land, some of which remain as parking lots for years without funding to complete parks, the city would save money by converting streets, which the city already owns. Tonight, the parks department’s board of commissioners will hear a plan to tear up five blocks of Bell Street, between First and Fifth Avenues, whittling traffic down to one lane, and replacing the other lanes with lawns, trees, shrubs, and the like. Here’s a cross section:

0460/1243537644-bell_concept_cross_section.jpg

And here’s a pigeon’s-eye view:

e0d1/1243537668-bell_concept.jpg

The project would create about 17,000 square feet of green space, says Donald Harris, the parks department’s Property and Acquisition Services Manager. "Given the high cost of land in the downtown area, more creative ways of providing park space need to be found, particularly taking advantage of already owned City infrastructure," he wrote in a letter to the parks board of commissioners on May 20. Recent purchases of private land for parks, he notes, have cost the city from $300 to $350 per square foot. By that metric, a project of this size on a city street would save about $5 million in land costs. The city would also realize savings by coinciding park construction with work by Seattle City Light, which needs to replace electrical utilities on Bell Street, and by partnering with developers, who were planning to spend money on street improvements on Bell Street anyway. The project would cost about $2.5 million, funded by last November’s pro-parks levy.

Here's how Bell Street looks now:

Harris will present his ideas to the city council’s parks committee tomorrow morning; he hopes the public can begin shaping the design of the project by July.

"Hopefully this is the first of several park boulevards downtown, providing linkages to the waterfront, downtown, and South Lake Union," Harris says. He says that some community groups have already begin clamoring for a park in their neighborhoods, including in the Pike-Pine corridor downtown.

And Gary Johnson, a planner for the Department of Planning and Development, says that there has been interest in a similar park in Ballard. "We are interested in making this happen on a much broader scale," he says.

The Lonely, Unanswered Questions

Posted by Megan Seling on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:21 PM

Did you know you can search for unanswered questions in Questionland? It's true! Just click on the tab on the homepage that says "unanswered" to see all the questions that have yet to be touched!

Here are just a few of the current unanswered questions (maybe you have the knowledge no one else has?):

*What were the questions asked at SIFF's Spike Lee Q&A on 5/27/09?

*What are some good romantic spots in Victoria, BC?

*What are the lyrics in Alan Parson's 'What Goes UP'?

*Has anyone tried Dahn Yoga?

*What are the tuition fees for kitchen academy?

Do you have the answer? Go! Flaunt that sexy brain of yours!

Meanwhile in Wasilla

Posted by Dan Savage on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:19 PM

Pastor Ron Hamman writing in the "Religion Views" column in the local daily considers the odds that the antichrist will be a homosexual:

Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy. Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy.... But will the Antichrist be a homosexual? Having seen what the Bible says of sodomy, we have no further to look than the book of Daniel, chapter 11 to find our answer. It says, “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard... the desire of women....” As I said at the onset, I am not the first to draw attention to this, but the verbiage is clear.

Is it?

But good news first: if the antichrist is a homo that means Barack Obama can't be the antichrist, Michele's arms notwithstanding. Unless...

You've gotta be careful when people start using ellipses and brackets in selected bible quotes. So I looked up the passage that Rev. Hamman references to prove that the antichrist is a 'mo. Now I'm not a biblical scholar—and neither, it seems, is Rev. Hammon—but it seems clear that Daniel isn't talking about the antichrist in chapter 11 or any other chapter. The last few chapters of Daniel are given over to "apocalyptic visions," which read like stories of then-impending regional conflicts, references to existing kingdoms and empires, and not to the end-times fireworks favored by Christian nutters. It's just Daniel riffing on some kings who'll be ruling the area soon, some of them good, some of them bad. There's no second coming hinted at in Daniel, no rapture, no Jesus references at all. (Daniel is in the Old Testament.) Here's the passage Rev. Hamman cites— whole chapter here—with brackets and ellipses removed:

11:36 The king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods; and he shall prosper until the indignation be accomplished; for that which is determined shall be done.

11:37 Neither shall he regard the gods of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god; for he shall magnify himself above all.

Read the entire chapter and it's clear why a modern conservative might regard this particular king as a potential antichrist: when he isn't waging war he's out there collecting taxes. So even if he's not the antichrist he's still a close second: a socialist. But a homo? Okay, so he's not all that interested in women. But that seems tied to the his narcissism and self-regard—he exalts himself in all things, blah blah blah—and not necessarily because this particular king is doing (or going to be doing) dudes. Considering Daniel's low opinion of this king, Rev. Hamman, I'm thinking Daniel would've included dude-banging on his bill of particulars if this king would indeed be banging dudes. Why would Daniel leave that out? Why would he task an Alaskan pastor with inferring homosexual acts thousands of years after he wrote this chapter?

But look on the bright side, Rev.: this means Barack Obama could still be the antichrist. We'll just have to wait and see.

In the meantime... Biblical Brackets & Ellipses is a game that anyone can play!

[Rev. Hamman] shall come even on the fattest... and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers... Yes, they who eat of his dainties shall destroy [Rev. Hammon].

Could these verses from Daniel be any clearer? Rev. Hamman likes to blow loads on the faces of hugely obese sex partners ("comes on [not in] the fattest"), enjoys Twittering ("he shall do that which his fathers have not done"), and will one day bleed to death after his penis is bitten off during a group oral sex encounter gone awry ("they who eat of his dainties will destroy [Rev. Hamman].")

That's too bad for Rev. Hamman, but verbiage—mine and Daniel's—couldn't be clearer.

A couple of other quick thoughts: sodomy was the only sin that so pissed off God that he came down from heaven and destroyed the place? What about the flood? And did God Himself come down to the twin cities to verify the sodomitical goings on? Was He inspecting the sheets for evidence of buggering or something? And careful, Rev. Hammon, you don't want to attract attention to the bits of the bible where the authors acknowledge the existence of other gods, competing gods, even if their god gets to be the god-of-gods.

This line appears at the end of Rev. Hamman's think piece:

Ron Hamman is pastor for Independent Baptist Church of Wasilla. Contact him at 357-4229.

The area code up there is 907.

Re: Talking Back to "State of the Start-ups"

Posted by Eli Sanders on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Also in response to State of the Start-ups, Seattle Times executive editor David Boardman writes in an e-mail (bolds his):

Hi, Eli.

Just read your story on the online-only endeavors, and took note of the P-I again crowing about their traffic growth. You might be interested to know that by the same measurement tool, Omniture, unique visitors to Seattletimes.com for the month of April were up 16 percent (as opposed to PI.com's 1.6 percent) and our page views were up 20 percent. (Ask them about their page views.)

Oh, snap. A Times vs. PI.com page-view smackdown. I've sent an e-mail to Michelle Nicolosi, executive producer for SeattlePI.com, asking about her site's April page views.

Lunchtime Quickie

Posted by Kelly O on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Videos like this give me faith in the human race again. Meet Patches.

thanks Shurtluff!

"Counterintuitive" Does Not Mean "Correct"

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:01 PM

Skip Berger gets all giddy at Crosscut this week over an "unexpected" report that, surprise, confirms what he already believes—cities are bad, suburbs are good, and any effort to rein in exurban sprawl is both doomed and counter to the natural order of things. His column begins, breathlessly, thus:

Okay, this is really interesting because it turns some conventional wisdom on its head. It turns out that the suburbs are not populated with urban refugees. Writing at NewGeography, Wendell Cox comes across what he calls an "unexpected truth:"

Much has been written about how suburbs have taken people away from the city and that now suburbanites need to return back to where they came. But in reality most suburbs of large cities have grown not from the migration of local city-dwellers but from migration from small towns and the countryside.

Wendell Cox, Wendell Cox.... Wait a minute, could that be the same Wendell Cox who has spent much of the past two decades as a professional anti-transit activist? The same Wendell Cox who has written anti-transit screeds for such impartial publications as the National Review Online and the Heritage Foundation)? The same Wendell Cox who's on the payroll of the American Highway Users Alliance, a pro-highway group created by GM? The same Wendell Cox who is affiliated with the Reason Foundation, the far-right-wing/libertarian think tank? The same Wendell Cox who praised Houston as a fine example of urban planning and transportation management? The same Wendell Cox who makes his living on the speaking circuit arguing against land-use regulations? The same Wendell Cox who wants the federal government to lower clean-air standards? The same Wendell Cox who says the government should stop building transit and just buy everyone cars? The same Wendell Cox who has repeatedly been caught peddling wild inaccuracies (such as his claim that "no new light rail system carries more than a third of the volume of a single freeway lane," his claim that we can achieve all the emissions reductions we need by investing in hydrogen cars, and his claim (in a paper calling Obama supporters "enemies of the American Dream") that "'Green' houses can make it possible... [for] Americans [to] continue their favored suburban life style"?

Yep, that Wendell Cox.

Far from being an "unexpected truth," then, Cox's supposed revelation—that suburbs are awesome, that sprawl is inevitable, and that cities are bad—is exactly the philosophy he's been selling (and profiting from) for decades.

Anyway, the core of Cox's argument, as summarized by Berger, is this:

In looking at data from modern, "first world" countries, including the United States, Cox finds that while the suburbs are growing, most of the newcomers are migrating from smaller cities and rural areas, even in cities like St. Louis that have rapidly depopulated over the last 50 years. And this strong suburban growth is occurring even in the most mass-transit-friendly cities. ...

Cox argues that suburbs need to be seen differently, not as the hostile "other" to core cities:

[S]uburbs have to be seen not as the enemies of the city, as just a modern expression of urbanization. They are neither the enemies of the city, nor are their residents likely to move "back" there. You cannot move back to someplace you did not come from.

In other words, the idea that suburbanites can be enticed back into dense urban cores is unlikely. In fact, the bigger cores grow and flourish, the more likely they will generate new sprawl.

Apparently, Berger has never heard of confusing correlation with causation. Just because cities sprawl outward now, doesn't mean that cities are themselves the cause of sprawl. No, sprawl is caused by lax growth management rules and by government policies that heavily subsidize auto travel at the expense of alternatives like mass transit and affordable urban housing. Moreover, arguments in favor of mass transit and affordable urban housing are not, as Berger and his ilk insist, an argument that existing suburbs are somehow evil and should be bulldozed down, but arguments for developing in a smarter way in the future. Just because something has always been one way—for example, as Berger notes, because Seattle's suburbs have continued to grow—doesn't mean it must always remain that way. Nor does the fact that suburban sprawl exists make suburban sprawl the natural order of things. Government policies have supported sprawl for decades. Maybe, instead of treating government subsidies for sprawl and highways as if they were ordained by God, it's time to change those policies.

Comics! They're Not Just for Kids Anymore!

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:24 AM

Oh, dear:

In an obscenity first, a U.S. comic book collector has pleaded guilty to importing and possessing Japanese manga books depicting illustrations of child sex abuse and bestiality.

(For the one person who doesn't know: Manga is the word for Japanese comics.) The manga is from the Lollicon subgenre, which depicts explicit sexual acts with (apparently) underage girls. A representative for the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund says: "“The drawings are not obscene and are not tantamount to pornography. They are lines on paper.” (This is perhaps the first lawyerly comment to ever be cribbed from Robert Crumb.)

This raises an important question. On the one hand, I am a huge believer in freedom of the press and artistic expression. On the other hand, I've seen some manga and anime that really squicks me the fuck out, and on a personal level, I would not miss it if it were gone. On the other hand, I really enjoyed Lost Girls, despite the squickiness.

@SEAshows

The Stranger's Twitter Feed of Seattle Shows
  • Loading Tweets
    loading

Follow @SEAshows
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use