Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Lost Season Finale Open Thread

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:23 PM

Is Locke really gonna kill Jacob?

What's the frickin' deal with the statue? TELL ME!

Will Juliet, Sawyer and Kate get it on?

Will the Losties have to find a Humpback whale before they travel back to the future?

Which character will get bumped off tonight?

Will this show ever make sense?

None of these questions (except for maybe the first three) will be answered in tonight's LOST FINALE OPEN THREAD!!!

Drago Deciding Within the Next 10 Days "At the Outside"

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:14 PM

Just got off the phone with potential mayoral candidate (and retiring city council member) Jan Drago, who says she'll decide within a week to ten days "at the outside" whether she'll challenge two-term mayor Greg Nickels. Drago's polling shows that she wins 45 to 24 in a two-way lineup with Nickels. Nickels' campaign spokesman Sandeep Kaushik criticized the poll results Drago released, noting that they didn't include other primary candidates or the results of "uninformed" voters (i.e. voters who weren't told about Drago's long history on the council, the fact that she would be the only female mayor in 80 years, or that she'd been a small business owner). Drago's response: "The purpose of the poll was to determine if I was a viable candidate and clearly the answer to that is yes. And it also showed that the mayor was weaker than previously seen. Not only has he not gotten, stronger or stabilized, his numbers continue to decline." As for the lack of questions about other candidates, Drago said: "Fair enough. It was not an expensive poll and we didn't ask a primary question with the whole field. .. This was only to find out what my viability was." On that front, Drago says, she's encouraged. "I am very, very gratified by the results." She says she'll make her decision in "max, ten days."

Brock Huard Makes Good on His Promise

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:55 PM

5e6f/1242258196-brockhuardeatslikeagirl.gif Oh, look, everybody. One day after I called out eating contest loser Brock Huard for not posting the promised eating contest video on his blog, what happens?

The video of the eating contest finally gets posted on Brock Huard's blog. It's not as well-edited as Kelly's video, but it gives a different perspective on the event. Pop on over to see Huard's loser-y side of things.

Quite the Pitch

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:31 PM

Gary Randall—president of Faith and Freedom, carpetbagger, tax evader, opportunist, etc.—admits on his blog today that support for his anti-gay referendum is crumbling:

This is going to be a battle of, as they say, epic proportion, with many on the other side already declaring those of us who are defending marriage, dead on arrival.

Some whom we thought would support us have opted out. Words can not adequately express how very much we need your financial support in this matter.

Of course there's no message more encouraging to donors than saying your opponents have claimed victory and your army is toast.

Okay, This Is the Nerdiest Post I'll Put Up All Day

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:25 PM

4846/1242248272-shredder2.jpgThis is from the end of April, but I'm willing to bet you haven't seen it yet: This person has written poems about the entire cast of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. The entire suite is titled "Go Ninja Go Ninja Go."

Here's part of Shredder:

Working in the office is part of Shredder’s community service after he was found guilty of a string of mail frauds.

Every day the Fat Man says,

- Tina, I need you to dispose of these delicate documents.

And Tina takes them through to the copyroom.

Shredder is in there, sitting up on the surface next to the trimmer, looking at his knees.

I especially like Krang.

(Via ...///.///../.././/./////...///)

No, You Can't Build That Here

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:55 PM

Developers couldn't construct certain buildings in Capitol Hill’s Pike/Pine neighborhood under new rules being discussed tonight at City Hall. Among the changes: the face of a building couldn’t run more than a half block along Pike or Pine Streets, nor could businesses use backlit awning signs or illuminated box signs. The regulations would ban block-long buildings like this one. It’s part of City Council Member Tom Rasmussen’s Pike/Pine conservation project launched last year, intending to retain the character of the neighborhood by banning massive, dull devlopment and protecting buildings that house historic arts and nightlife uses.

The meeting begins at 5:30 p.m. in the city council chambers of City Hall, 600 4th Avenue. The proposed ordinance is here.

But several individuals say Rasmussen’s proposal is gutless. They want to and add incentives to preserve buildings over 75 years old and limit the footprint of new buildings to avoid monolithic buildings.

The Polyclinic, a medical facility that needs to expand it’s campus, is likely to address city council's planning and land-use committee tonight. The Polyclinic may want to tear down an old auto warehouse it owns at the corner of Broadway and Union, which reflects of the auto-row style of buildings around the Pike/Pine neighborhood. “It would be tragic if we went through all of this work and the first project out of the box is the Polyclinic tearing down a building,” says City Council Member Sally Clark, chair of the city’s land-use committee.

Mayor Drago?

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:27 PM

Publicola got a copy of the results of retiring city council member Jan Drago's robo-poll, and things look pretty damn good for a Drago run: the veteran council member beats unpopular mayor Greg Nickels in a side-by-side lineup 45 to 24. Other interesting stats from the poll: 70 percent of voters have a negative impression of Nickels; just 23 percent approve of him; and if the election were held today, just 15 percent would vote to reelect him. Nickels's unpopularity, combined with the fact that Drago would be the only well-known woman in a mayoral field that currently includes five men (the other woman in the race, pro-viaduct activist Dorli Rainey, is a political unknown) will make Drago a formidable opponent if she runs.

UPDATE: Nickels's campaign spokesman, Sandeep Kaushik, responds, pointing out that Drago only gave Josh a partial list of poll responses (responses that didn't include, for example, a head-to-head lineup between all seven candidates). Kaushik also points out that the numbers above refer to the "informed horse race"—that is, responses voters gave after receiving positive information about Drago, such as the fact that she would be the first female mayor in 80 years, the fact that she pushed for dog parks, and the fact that she has served on the city council for 16 years. Personally, I'm not convinced that those factors matter all that much; the fact that she's a woman is obvious; many of the details about her long political career are widely known; and her "anybody-but-Nickels" is evident in Nickels's low approval ratings. Yes, other candidates might be able to beat him, too, but Drago has at least a small leg up—in the form, as mentioned above, of experience, name recognition, and gender.

How to Make Old Trek Into New Trek

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:25 PM

I promise this is the nerdiest thing I will post all day. Somebody has J.J. Abrams-ized classic Star Trek:

And someone else has written copious notes about how well the new Trek movie fits into the old continuity.

(Via.)

Headline of the Day

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM

Sorry, Bethany, but I think this is the headline of the day...

New Afghan Gen. Has Manhunter Reputation

Well, Manhunt is owned by a Republican douchebag...

To Charles

Posted by Jonathan Golob on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM

It is time to restart our debate into the origins of life; new evidence arrived.

One more secret of abiogenesis has revealed itself in this week's Nature:

It is well established that the evolution of life passed through an early stage in which RNA played central roles in both inheritance and catalysis — roles that are currently played by DNA and protein enzymes, respectively. But where did the RNA come from?

Experiments reported by Powner et al. (page 239 of this issue) provide fresh insight into the chemical processes that might have led to the emergence of information-coding nucleic acids on early Earth....

The authors' path to RNA begins with the same starting materials used in many recent studies of prebiotic chemistry, but differs in the order in which they are combined. When the structurally simplest sugar, glycolaldehyde, reacts with the simplest derivative of cyanide and ammonia, cyanamide, a complex mixture of undesired compounds is formed. But Powner et al. add a third ingredient — phosphate — to the mix. In their reaction, phosphate acts as both a pH buffer and a catalyst, thereby short-circuiting the network of possible unwanted reactions and leading instead to the fast, efficient synthesis of a key intermediate known as 2-aminooxazole...

The authors wrap up their synthetic tour de force by using ultraviolet light to clean up the reaction mixture. They report that ultraviolet irradiation destroys side products while simultaneously converting some of the desired ribocytidine product to ribouridine (the second pyrimidine component of RNA). The development of this complex photochemistry required remarkable mechanistic insight from Powner and colleagues, who not only correctly predicted that ultraviolet irradiation would destroy the majority of the by-products, but also that the desired ribonucleotides would withstand such treatment.

RNA from the sort of chemical brew that one would expect to find in a pre-biotic Earth. Genius!

This Week in the Film Section: Outrage

Posted by Lindy West on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:05 PM

Outrage.jpg

David Schmader on Kirby Dick's politician-outing documentary:

Three years later comes Outrage, which finds Dick devoting a similar procedural tenacity to a far more explosive subject: America's closeted gay politicians, whose conflicting histories of "secret" homosexual activity and public anti-gay legislation have long taunted those who know of both. Historically, the subject of closeted politicians has proven so distasteful that general media outlets wouldn't touch it, but Dick (who's straight, by the way) wisely seizes this moment of unprecedented support for gay equality to dissolve the glass closet and name names. Among the subjects: former Idaho senator Larry Craig and Florida governor Charlie Crist (both professed heterosexuals with public histories of homosexuality and ugly anti-gay voting records), as well as former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey and former Arizona congressman Jim Kolbe, both of whom preempted public outings by outing themselves and who supply the film with valuable insights on post-closet life. (McGreevey's major contribution: proving that an unctuous ex—closet case can be just as creepy as an unctuous closet case.)

Read the whole thing HERE.

Savage Love Letter of the Day

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:03 PM

I just wanted to congratulate you on a well-written response to PILL. The approach you recommend worked extremely well for me when I was growing up—it was important to me to wait until I turned 18 to have actual vaginal intercourse for a variety of personal reasons. I had a boyfriend, though, who waited happily for four years with plenty of oral sex and mutual masturbation, and it was very nice to have my first penetrative sex with someone I knew well, trusted, and had an established sexual rapport with. I would heartily recommend that course of action for any young woman and believe that well-done alternative sex can satisfy her young man until she is ready.

Happy Men Are Patient

Thanks for sharing, HMAP.

Another Venus

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM

Upon seeing and reading about this:b3bb/1242247758-picture_4.png

No one would mistake the Stone Age ivory carving for a Venus de Milo. The voluptuous woman depicted is, to say the least, earthier, with huge, projecting breasts and sexually explicit genitalia...

...Nicholas J. Conard, an archaeologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, who found the small carving in a cave last year, says it is at least 35,000 years old, “one of the oldest known examples of figurative art” in the world. It is about 5,000 years older than some other so-called Venus artifacts made by early populations of Homo sapiens in Europe.



What the image of the "Venus of Hohle Fels" immediately linked with in my mind was the memory of a passage in the middle of Wikipedia's entry for Alexander Hamilton:
In spring 1779, Hamilton asked his friend John Laurens to find him a wife in South Carolina:

"She must be young—handsome (I lay most stress upon a good shape) Sensible (a little learning will do) —well bred... chaste and tender (I am an enthusiast in my notions of fidelity and fondness); of some good nature—a great deal of generosity (she must neither love money nor scolding, for I dislike equally a termagant and an economist)—In politics, I am indifferent what side she may be of—I think I have arguments that will safely convert her to mine—As to religion a moderate stock will satisfy me—She must believe in God and hate a saint. But as to fortune, the larger stock of that the better."

From the beginning of consciousness, the stress has been on the shape.


This post owes its brief life to Eli Sanders.

A Sink Under the Great Blue Sky

Posted by Jen Graves on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:44 PM

I'm loving this surprising little early Joe Park that's up at Western Bridge along with Wolfgang Staehle's Niagara.

Sink, 1995, oil on canvas, 18 1/2 by 20 inches
ce16/1242229143-park.jpg

Same Old, Same Old

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:41 PM

The Seattle chapter of the American Institute of Architects is putting out a call for designs for residential buildings that provide "progressive solutions for urban living." The criteria, according to the AIA press release, include "forward looking solutions," "new models," and "innovative approaches to economic inclusion."

So why does the panel of "public judges" consist of two Crosscut columnists (Knute Berger, one of the city's most voluble opponents of growth and density, and Kent Kammerer, a prominent neighborhood activist who opposes increasing density even around transit stops) and a real-estate agent who described the minimal density increases associated with mother-in-law apartments as "not pleasant" on his blog?

The competition also includes a jury of professional architects. But it would be nice if the "public" view included someone who actually supports new, forward-looking solutions, instead of three guys who oppose even the most modest changes to Seattle's single-family neighborhoods (and thus support the old, backward-looking "solution" that is suburban sprawl).

The Poetry of Linkage

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:27 PM

9e54/1242239916-fresh_sausage.jpgMolly Gaudry has published a poem titled on her blog that is entirely made out of lines from other people's blogs. And each line is a link back to the source of the line. It's not necessarily a great poem, but the idea is interesting. It seems as though someone could make a nice Morning News-style roundup of the day's events by putting it in link-poem format. I think the contextualization would be interesting.

(Via. Sausage photo from The Brooklyn Pork Store.)

Bruce Harrell Wants You to Come to His Press Conference. There Will Be Candy.

Posted by Jonah Spangenthal-Lee on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:14 PM

City Councilmember Bruce Harrell sent out an email to about 100 city hall staffers earlier today promising them candy if they showed up to his press conference on the digital broadcast changeover. Really:

Okay, now that I got your attention. Today (5/3) at 3:15 in Bertha KL room, I am asking for about 15-20 of you to volunteer for about 15 minutes. All you have to do is attend and look engaged:) I received a call from the FCC late last week, requesting that I present a 30 day countdown for the digital tv transition. It is a press conference format and Seattle Channel 21 will be there. A few of you have already agreed and they are entitled to free candy for the rest of the year:) I would like to have about 12 more people. Will you press reply if you can attend. In all seriousness, our Committee has put a lot of energy into equipping our citizens to prepare for the transition and I agreed to accommodate the FCC on their late notice since they made the overture to us. Thanks for helping out a colleague.

Bruce A. Harrell
Seattle City Councilmember

5b68/1242248848-7098_dt.jpgOh, Bruce. I'm sorry to have to keep razzing you on Slog. But really? Any city hall reporter worth their snuff would notice that they're in a press conference packed with city hall staffers scarfing down boxes of Whitman's Samplers.

You can watch video of Harrell's sure-to-be-packed press conference here at 3:15 or show up to the Bertha Knight-Landes room at city hall.

"The Fierce Urgency of Whenever"

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:14 PM

This post at Andrew Sullivan's blog is required reading:

I lived through eight years of the Clintons and then eight years of Bush. Through it all, gay people were treated at the federal level like embarrassments or impediments. With Clinton, we were the means to raise money. With Bush, we were the means to leverage votes by exploiting bigotry. Obama seemed in the campaign to promise something else.... But I have a sickeningly familiar feeling in my stomach, and the feeling deepens with every interaction with the Obama team on these issues. They want them to go away. They want us to go away.

Here we are, in the summer of 2009, with gay servicemembers still being fired for the fact of their orientation. Here we are, with marriage rights spreading through the country and world and a president who cannot bring himself even to acknowledge these breakthroughs in civil rights, and having no plan in any distant future to do anything about it at a federal level. Here I am, facing a looming deadline to be forced to leave my American husband for good, and relocate abroad because the HIV travel and immigration ban remains in force and I have slowly run out of options (unlike most non-Americans with HIV who have no options at all).

And what is Obama doing about any of these things? What is he even intending at some point to do about these things? So far as I can read the administration, the answer is: nada.

At roughly the same time Andrew was posting this blistering critique to his blog—please go read the whole thing—I was staring blankly into a camera at KING 5 waiting to go on MSNBC. I was asked to come on Andrea Mitchell's show to talk about the controversy surrounding Obama's invitation to give the commencement address at Notre Dame University this weekend. (The invite is controversial because Notre Dame is a Catholic university and Obama is pro-choice... just like a majority of American Catholics. And Obama supports stem-cell research... just like a majority of American Catholics. And a majority of American Catholics voted for Obama—so you can see why the invite is controversial.) I wasn't there to discuss the Obama's administration's abysmal record, thus far, on gay issues. But Andrea Mitchell asked and I did my best to tell:

If I had known that Mitchell was going to ask me about this I would've been better prepared. But if I had known the question was coming I'm afraid I would've had to contradict my good friend Andrew. Fact is, Obama has "acknowledge [the] breakthroughs in civil rights" that we've seen in Iowa and other states. And here it is:

See? Obama has acknowledged the breakthroughs in civil rights for gay Americans! He told a joke about it at the White House Correspondents' Dinner this weekend. (You were there, Andrew, didn't you catch it?) Barack Obama condescended to use marriage equality as a punch line; he made, essentially, a Chuck & Larry joke about two straight dudes—Obama and Axelrod—running off to Iowa to "make it official" with the queers and their "partners." And that's hilarious, you see, because Obama and Axelrod aren't actually homos! So they don't need to go to Iowa to make it official! They can get married—to women—in all fifty states! HA!

The more I think about the joke Obama told at the WHCD the more ticked off I get. We're witnessing rapid and historic progress in the fight for gay equality and Barack Obama, who campaigned on our issues and described himself as a "fierce advocate" of gay and lesbian equality, hasn't acknowledged the breakthroughs in Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine in a setting or a with comments that are in any way equal to the significance of this historic moment. The best he can do—all he's willing to do—is toss off an Adam-Sandler-level joke.

So here's what I would've said if I'd been prepared for the question: Our lives, our families, and our rights are not a joke, Mr. President. The discrimination faced by gay people—whether coupled and single—is distressingly real and persists even for same-sex couples in Iowa and other states where gay marriage is legal. Stop fucking around and start delivering on your campaign promises to us, to our families, and to our children.

A Call for Actual Common Sense, Not the Folksy Kind

Posted by Jen Graves on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:00 PM

bf32/1242248283-dr392d17.jpgA few minutes ago I went on KUOW to talk to Ross Reynolds on "The Conversation," about public art. The subject for today was the editorial in this morning's Seattle Times by state Sen. Steve Hobbs (D-Lake Stevens)—in which Hobbs decrees art to be the enemy of teachers, the sick, and the poor.

If we could just cancel public art for the next two years, he writes, we could save our state. Why, oh why, is art so damned selfish?

"I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anymore!" Hobbs veritably yells in his editorial.

Then, on the radio, he declared public art a "luxury" and a "sacred cow." He said he didn't want to kill it, he just wanted to do some "cowtipping."

Hobbs has the right idea: The legislation he proposed is as intelligent as cowtipping.

Does any of this sound familiar? It's exactly the same debate we were having when the National Endowment for the Arts had to get on its knees and beg to be included, for the miniscule price tag of $50 million in the $787 billion federal bailout.

It's also the same debate we've been having since Jesse Helms made it obvious that art, due to its subjective nature, would be the easiest target for public ire—the easiest way for politicians to distract the public from real problems.

PUBLIC ART FUNDING IS A RED HERRING, PEOPLE. If we'd fined every politician who tried to use public art for his or her own gain in the last 20 years (thanks, Patty!), we could have paid for art/music/dance/etc teachers in public schools this whole time. Imagine!

The state spends about $2 million a year on public art, in an approximately $15 billion operating budget. Public art spending accounts for .013 percent of the state's budget.

Please ask your legislators to focus their time and money on fixing the other 99.987 percent of the budget. Please ask your newspapers and broadcasters (as much as they can) to disallow idiotic, ancient, false debates.

I'm sorry to be belligerent about this, but it is infuriating to have this dumb conversation year after year after year, whether the economy is up or down or in-between, and whether the politicians are Democrats, Republicans, or space invaders.

Most important of all for every intelligent person out there: Don't let anybody, ever, say that art is preventing Americans from being educated, fed, and cared for.

We're mad as hell, and we're not going to take it anymore.

UPDATE: One more thing: On the radio, Ross Reynolds was also interviewing Washington State Arts Commission executive director Kris Tucker, whose office oversees public art in the state. Tucker talked soft, about "quality of life" and making our buildings "better." Tucker basically refused to engage.

Blech. Why didn't you call him on his shit, Kris? And where were your numbers?

Kris, I realize that you and your office have to spend most of your time convincing legislators about your point of view, and maybe very different things need to be said in those private meetings, but this was a public forum, and you should have creamed him—or sent someone who could.

Re: TPM's Josh Marshall on Human Spam

Posted by Dominic Holden on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:42 PM

Oh, nooooez! Josh Marshall and Dan Savage are miffed about people actualizing the progressive agenda they advocate for. If only the DNC hasn't fundraised on the streets of every American city in 2006 and 2008—with some success, if it needs pointing out—then life would have been more convenient. Why, those lowly activists aren't even people. They're "spam." Of course, if groups that Josh and Dan support weren't raising money, finding new members, and generally hustling their agenda... then certain bloggers could get upset.

Magic Mushrooms

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM

2e26/1242246635-smurfs_color_pictures_sleeping_smur.jpgEngineering students claim to have developed a kind of mushroom that could potentially replace plastics, packaging materials, and insulation.

In a lab, workers grow mycelia, the roots of mushrooms that look like gobs of white and brown fiber. In place of dirt, the roots grow in agricultural by-products, which creates a series of intertwining fibers which give the product its rigidity. Then, they simply place the mixture in a mold and let it grow for a couple of weeks until it’s super dense (1 cubic inch has 8 MILES of fibers). After that they shove them in an oven to dry and presto, you’ve got a finished product.

One day we might all live in mushrooms.

Headline of the Day

Posted by Bethany Jean Clement on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM

Eggs, Hashbrowns and a Gun?

...An early morning run for breakfast at the Waffle House on Paxville Highway in Manning turned terribly wrong for Crystal Samuel.

"I thought I was gonna get me an All-Star," says Samuel. A popular meal on the menu. "Grits, sausage, toast, eggs and a waffle," says Samuel.

She didn't get what she came for...

Nutty story here.

Thanks to Slog tipper Reggie.

News From the Animal Kingdom

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:24 PM

WaPo reports:

NEW HAVEN, Conn. — A chimpanzee that mauled a Connecticut woman had the anti-anxiety drug Xanax in its system, according to toxicology tests, but investigators haven't determined whether the drug played a role in the attack, a prosecutor said Wednesday.

The 200-pound chimp, named Travis, attacked Stamford resident Charla Nash on Feb. 16. She lost her hands, nose, lips and eyelids in the attack. Doctors at Ohio's Cleveland Clinic say she is blind and faces two years of surgical procedures.

Nash's family has sued Herold for $50 million. The suit alleges, among other things, that she had given Travis medication that further upset the animal.

"I think it provides tremendous support for the plaintiff's case," said Paul Slager, a catastrophic injury attorney in Stamford. "I think it's understood by everyone that Xanax is medication intended to be used by people, not animals. I suspect that experts will agree it's difficult to predict how an animal like a chimpanzee would respond to taking a medication like Xanax."


Travis's owner suffers from a problem that I believe is common among pet owners. This class of humans can not make a distinction between people and other creatures. It is true that all living things are made by the same stuff and processes, but real differences do exist between these living things. As close as we are to chimps genetically, for example, the few differences express big differences. The chimp body is not the same as the human body. The chimp nervous system is not the same as the human nervous system. Ours is far more complicated than theirs. These difference must be respected. Do not give your pets Xanax.


This post owes its brief life to Bethany Jean Clement.

TPM's Josh Marshall on Human Spam

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM

He takes a hardline...

Proper punishment for people who harass you as you're walking down the sidewalk trying to get you to sign up and give money to their organization? Fines and imprisonment? Or summary execution?

Looks like Josh is closer to my position, Dom, than he is to yours.

Every Child Deserves a Mother and a Father

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:56 PM

New York:

A Bronx man who strangled his pregnant 14-year-old daughter and threw her naked body in a boiler last year was also the father of her unborn child, according to prosecutors. Miguel Matias, 36, appeared in Bronx Supreme Court Tuesday as prosecutors consolidated the two indictments against him—an earlier one for his daughter's murder on Feb. 16, 2008, and the newest one for second-degree rape and incest....

Matias confessed to the murder, saying he was driven to strangle Anna with an electrical cord when he caught her writing "sex things" on her computer, police said.

@SEAshows

The Stranger's Twitter Feed of Seattle Shows
  • Loading Tweets
    loading

Follow @SEAshows
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use