Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, May 4, 2009

Influenza

Posted by on Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:14 PM

7043/1241471710-b00528_h1n1_flu_sml.jpg

As a pathogen, influenza is the cat's pajamas; influenza puts the ortho in orthomyxovirus, the segments in its RNA genome and the misery in sneeze droplets everywhere.

Let's unpack H1N1 and H5N1. The 'N' in both stands for neuraminidase, a fancy way for saying "snot eating enzyme." The virus needs to get to the juicy cells at the back of the throat. Our bodies pour out copious amounts of snot in defense, forming a sticky wall of doom for all manner of pathogens. Stuck on the outside of every flu virus is a sea of this neuraminidase enzyme. The enzyme gobbles up the snot, allowing the virus to reach the cells lining our throat. In comes the 'H' or hemagglutinin protein, also located on the outside of the virus. Hemagglutinin binds the salicylate receptors located on the outside of almost all cells (salicylate is a special way of saying aspirin), dragging the virus into the cells. Once inside, you're infected. Huzzah for our little virus. Go team!

Influenza has been around for a while—co-evolving with many other species beyond man. As a result, different versions of the H and N enzymes have split off over time. The numbers after H and N in a flu virus name indicate the rough genetic heritage of a given flu's enzymes. H1 and H5 are like Montagues and Capulets—alike in kind if not kin. A given H (or N) is accomplishing the same task, but in slightly different ways.

In comes the home team. If the B-cells in our immune system can make antibodies against the neuraminidase and hemagglutinin, blocking their function, we can stop the virus. Making antibodies takes time. While we're waiting, CD8 T-cells (cytotoxic T-cells) come in and kill any of our own cells that are infected with virus, a sort of controlled Kamikaze mission in defense of the Home Islands. (Dead cells can't make more copies of the virus; once you're infected, brother cell, it's too late to save you.) With each kill, the CD8 cells release a little bit of activating cytokine and become a bit more bold. This self-death is a large part of the misery of the flu. You are sore because your body is literally killing itself in battle. It takes a week or two for the B-cells to start pumping out antibodies to a new(-ish) virus, at which point the CD8 cells are told to lay off, and take a break.

What we have here is the co-evolution of a host and parasite. My favorite! This sort of host-pathogen interaction is an evolutionary saddle-point, with two possible resolutions:

1. All out battle to the death! Host and pathogen strike fast and hard, in an all-out effort against the other. This is true misery for both, with the eventual true end to this situation the extinction of the pathogen, or host and pathogen together.

2. A detente. The pathogen tries to go out its business in the least offensive way possible, with the host ignoring the pathogen (due to the lack of mayhem perhaps making the pathogen invisible to the host). The eventual end of this evolutionary path is the pathogen becoming commensal, completely harmless. Tons of viruses end up this way, including Kaposi Sarcoma virus. Eventually, a once-pathogen can actually become symbiotic, helping its host out in life, and benefiting as a result. Consider this the environmentalist bug gameplan.

Which path a host and pathogen take is dependent upon a bit of other environmental factors, and also pure random chance. A typical year's influenza tends towards plan #2, thanks to antigenic drift. Even within a given family of the viral enzymes, thanks to mutation, the surface proteins of the virus are constantly drifting. For example, the 2007-2008 and 2006-2007 flu seaons both had H1N1 influenzas in circulation. In a year's time, the viral proteins had mutated enough to ensure that people infected with the 2006-7 version of H1N1 could be reinfected with the 2007-8 version. The antibodies we developed in the 2006-7 were good enough to slow down the 2007-08 virus, but not stop it entirely. The CD8 cells still needed to be activated, but not as much as they would for a totally new virus. This is the start of a detente, with the full-scale war held back by the similarity between the 2006-7 virus to the 2007-8 H1N1 virus allowing the older antibodies to work a little and hold the infection in check. So long as a given influenza virus has been around humans for a while, it'll trend to a detente-style interaction with the human host, holding back the carnage.

What makes this new swine H1N1 virus so concerning is that it's never been seen by humans before. As a result, none of our existing memory B-cells have an antibody that even wings these H1N1 proteins. We cannot hold back the initial infection at all. The initial defense against the virus is completely reliant upon those destructive CD8 T-cells. This can select for viruses employing strategy #1 (all-out battle) this Spring, Summer and Fall until the next flu season starts; this H1N1 might have a detente with swine, but has no such arrangement with the human immune system.

If the CD8 cells get excited enough by the unusually aggressive virus (a cytokine storm), the lungs of the young and healthy get trashed during these early stages of meeting. People in their twenties and thirties will die in numbers not seen during the more typical detente-style human-flu interaction.

We honestly have no clue how this virus will re-emerge in the Fall. It could be just like a regular-old flu, or it could be a monster that has undergone extensive selection for virulence. The furious-paced efforts to develop and manufacture a vaccine are our safety net.

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
However, the key point to remember is lethality.

If the virus kills too many people too quickly, it can't spread as easily - infected subjects are isolated more easily and it can't spread much. This is why Ebola, although horrific, is not that bad (ok, that plus it's connected with people messing with bat caves, so you just immunize the villages ahead of the spread).

If it's too weak it dies and can't spread.

An epidemic is when it's lethal but has either a long infection period with minor or few symptoms (HIV/AIDS) - or it's lethal only to some - usually this is in the range of 10 to 20 percent lethality for infected hosts.

If it's in the sweet spot of 10 to 20 percent (give or take 5 percent and things like long infectious period with few telltale symptoms) then we're toast.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 2:27 PM
2
Shut the fuck up, Will.
Posted by Mr. Poe on May 4, 2009 at 2:34 PM
Sam Machkovech 3
Please attach this screed to every stupid article out there that has called the flu scare an overreaction, particularly the moronic Saturday headline on the Times.

Attaching a question mark to a headline ("From Outbreak to Overreaction?") is the wimp's way of making a declaration. Grow some spines or back off, Times eds.
Posted by Sam Machkovech http://www.samred.com on May 4, 2009 at 2:37 PM
4
Thank you, Dr. Golob, very nice! Zimmer's book Parasite Rex gives a great peek into parasites/viruses, too.
Posted by Patti on May 4, 2009 at 2:37 PM
Arsenic7 5
I don't know if I'd completely agree with that, Will.

Take the bubonic plague. Very deadly to human beings, and utterly so, without antibiotics, and yet it spread throughout the world because it's animal hosts, including the flea of the black rat, were not as severely affected.

Though I will say, sure, it's not exactly slaughtering it's normal HOST organism, but it is definitely lethal.

Anyway, my point is that what you're talking about isn't necessarily a "key" point.
Posted by Arsenic7 on May 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Jonathan Golob 6
@Patti: I can totally second the Parasite Rex suggestion. It's a magnificent book, particularly for anyone unsure or unclear about evolution.
Posted by Jonathan Golob http://dearscience.org on May 4, 2009 at 2:41 PM
7
Even without mutation the virus could beome more lethal and widespread during the flu season, and the S Hemisphere has flu seasons starting soon. So we'll see.
I'm optimistic for two reasons: genetic modeling seems to indicate a rather low rate of transmission. It just doesn't take to human hosts all that well. Also the virus has a peculiar matrix protein which likely means that any vaccine will be at least somewhat effecitve against versions of the virus that have different versions of the more rapidly evoloving surface proteins.
Posted by kinaidos on May 4, 2009 at 2:53 PM
Renton Mike 8
...CD8 T-cells (cytotoxic T-cells) come in and kill any of our own cells that are infected with virus, a sort of controlled Kamikaze mission in defense of the Home Islands.
Sounds like a classic zombie situation to me.
Posted by Renton Mike on May 4, 2009 at 3:23 PM
stinkbug 9
Jonathan, to what extent do you make use of disinfecting sprays, sanitizers, etc.?
Posted by stinkbug on May 4, 2009 at 3:30 PM
Abby 10
Oh, Golob, you do make me swoon.
Posted by Abby on May 4, 2009 at 3:31 PM
gayatheist 11
Thank you for explaining this. It really helps. I'm going to make a link to this on my blog. Thanks Again.
Posted by gayatheist http://www.thegayatheist.com/ on May 4, 2009 at 3:43 PM
BombasticMO 12
Nice one Doc. :)
Posted by BombasticMO http://www.BombasticMo.com on May 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM
Will in Seattle 13
@2 for the America-hating win.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM
14
@Will and Arsenic-
Arsenic hints at an important point but doesn't state it explicitly. Pathogens that are shared via human to human contact generally evolve to be less harmful or fatal to their hosts. The common cold spreads best if humans it infects are walking around, going to work, and touching doorknobs across the city.
However, as Arsenic points out, many human diseases are not spread by human-to-human contact but by vectors: malaria and mosquitoes, the plague and rats/fleas(?), etc. These diseases spread best by incapacitating humans, thus keeping them from avoiding the vectors (swatting mosquitoes and the like).
There is not one ideal strategy for a virus to take.
Posted by Hayley on May 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Will in Seattle 15
@5 - yes, but the flu is primarily not a species hopping infestation that uses carrier hosts to spread - it's primarily human-to-human.

We're not dealing with the Black Death, which may have created both Capitalism and Liberalism by making large quantities of assets easily available and driving up skill rewards for trained professionals, we're dealing with the flu.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 4:05 PM
Will in Seattle 16
@14 - malaria is a parasite. please stay on topic.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Will in STL 17
I learned everything I need to know about pathogens from: http://tinyurl.com/pandemi2
Posted by Will in STL http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=1309320113&ref=profile on May 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM
18
Will, parasites and viruses are enough alike for both to be relevant to this conversation.
Posted by Patti on May 4, 2009 at 4:16 PM
19
Great post! Dr. Golob. Thanks for taking the time to explain this.
Posted by Vitamin.D.Deficiency on May 4, 2009 at 4:16 PM
20
@18

Will isn't here to be rude to other people or contribute to any conversation. He's here to prove to some ugly fat bitch OL that he's crazy intelligent, and quite the catch.
Posted by Mr. Poe on May 4, 2009 at 4:25 PM
Jonathan Golob 21
I cut a section that directly compared influenza to Malaria. Both have segmented genomes, easing these sorts of antigentic shifts.

This feature why there is still annual flu, whereas measles and mumps (both paramyxoviruses, similar to influenza but without segmented genomes) are largely gone with vaccination.

@stinkbug: Flu pandemic or not, I really try to wash my hands with soap and water immediately upon getting home and before eating. I'm better at keeping up with the former; routines really help.

I'll also keep around some alcohol gel for when I'm out and about. This, plus no kids, helps keep me well when many other people get the colds running around.

For cleaning surfaces, little works better than dilute (~ < 1%) bleach solutions. Just watch your clothing; it'll turn pink!
Posted by Jonathan Golob http://dearscience.org on May 4, 2009 at 5:10 PM
Will in Seattle 22
LOL, Mr. Poe. My date for the party this week is a hot lawyer.

But good follow up @21 - bleach is also useful if you have certain skin conditions.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on May 4, 2009 at 8:19 PM
Madashell 23
Thanks, Dr Golob. In nursing school, I tried to draw an algorithm for immune and inflammatory response, just to get my brain wrapped around this soap opera's characters. It's an amazing thing, really, that we have this sophisticated system at the cellular level. Thanks for s'plaining to us.

I'm also annoyed with news items that suggest alarmism among public health officials. I worry that people will see H1N1: Episode 1 as a matter of crying wolf and won't take the news seriously, should its meaner and deadlier sequel make a debut.
Posted by Madashell on May 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM
Diana 24
What a great explanation. So much better to understand how things work than to just be told to wash your hands.

Question: If H1N1 mutates and comes back next fall in a more deadly form, will the folks who got it this spring be immune?
Posted by Diana on May 4, 2009 at 11:17 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy