Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, May 1, 2009

The City's Gutless Enforcement Against Developers

Posted by on Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM

The Seattle Department of Transportation says it’s stepping up enforcement against developers who block sidewalks, thereby pushing pedestrians into traffic, but the crackdown appears nonexistent.

I posted a photo yesterday of a construction project on East Union Street that put a “sidewalk closed” sign in front of a Honey Bucket, halfway up the block. “We see that as a violation,” says SDoT spokesman Rick Sheridan, who called me after he saw the post. In recent months, he says, street-use inspectors have been focusing on pedestrian access around developments. (They also have a complaint line if a construction site is breaking the rules: (206) 684-5253.) But SDoT should know that its enforcement standards—even when it actually enforces them—are toothless.

Brian de Place, who manages SDoT’s street-use permitting, says the developer on East Union Street should be placing "sidewalk closed" signs at each end of the block so pedestrians cross the street at the intersection. He then clarified the exact location of the site.

So what's the increased enforcement look like? Today the intersection looks the same:

d1f8/1241208903-21st_and_union.jpg

Sheridan says he doesn't have data to show more enforcement since last August, when the city auditor reported that more must be done to protect walkers, cyclists, and disabled people around construction sites.

In response to the audit, Sheridan says SDoT is drafting a proposal to increase pedestrian mobility, due by June. The proposal will identify high-priority downtown streets and would require developers to maintain walkways at all block-long construction sites. But people are already supposed to cross the street to avoid any construction project, so all construction projects are, in effect, block-long closures to pedestrians. Realistically, the goal should be getting pedestrians around construction projects without crossing the street.

SDoT is being willfully naïve about human behavior. People don’t cross the street to avoid construction projects. They walk in the street, as we have documented here and here, and SDoT knows it. When speaking to Sheridan and de Place, I asked if our city, like several other cities, could require most developers to barricade pedestrian lanes in the parking lane. “I don’t know if in all instances that pedestrian flow needs to be facilitated on [the same] side of the street,” says Sheridan. Agreed, not in all instances, but in the overwhelming majority of cases there’s no reason not to. For example, at a site on East Pike Street today, there's plenty of room in the parking lane for a barricaded pedestrian pathway:

1b7d/1241209270-pike_parking_lane.jpg

“We need to balance the needs of the all users. Can we take away the parking lane? I can’t speak to this site,” said de Place.

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I can't decide if you are freaking out about this or if it is a worthy cause...
Posted by Ped on May 1, 2009 at 2:20 PM
2
And they WOULD have gotten away with it...

If it hadn't been for that meddling reporter guy.

Granted, it's not the top issue on everybody's minds, but it's one of those obnoxious things that CAN be made better with even a little attention.
Posted by Ackham on May 1, 2009 at 2:22 PM
3
"balance the needs of all users" my ass. How about just calling it like it is - "give away the store to developers"
Posted by Mr. X on May 1, 2009 at 2:26 PM
4
I think it is more the construction company than the developer...but if you need a Boogey Man, you can't do better than them.
Posted by Just Sayin' on May 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM
5
If people can't be bothered to not walk in traffic and/or pay attention to traffic around them while they are in traffic, they deserve whatever happens. It's really not rocket science to deal with this -- cross the fucking street. If you can't manage to deal with this situation, how do you make it through the rest of the day without pissing in your pants because nobody reminded you not to?
Posted by Good Grief on May 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM
6
Dominic, you have a fatal misunderstanding of the city employee. His job is not to get out of his chair and go do stuff. His job is to write reports. The guy you talked to is probably writing a memo about effective communication with the public right now -- or maybe even preparing his presentation at a seminar about communicating with the public.

The only SDOT employees who actually go places and do stuff are the guys who supervise the cutting of channels for cable and other utilities across freshly-repaved streets, rendering the repaving useless. Your picture is probably going to accomplish nothing except get some guy in trouble for authorizing street work without making sure it would ruin a year's worth of just-completed street work.
Posted by Fnarf on May 1, 2009 at 2:34 PM
7
i live in the area and agree, although I am so damn pysched to see that developmennt happen. GENTRIFY!

seriously, go to the top of Jackson by Hidmo and ride your bike down toward the ID, no brakes. Then post about that.

Saving you the life-threatening experience, what you're gonna find is bike lanes that no longer exist, huge steel plates, and gaps b/w those huge steel plates that could fit a tire in them. only a matter of time before somebody cracks open their head on that one.
Posted by dacoach on May 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM
8
Y'know, Parks and Recreation hasn't quite managed to hit its stride yet, but I did enjoy this line, that I think helps describe city government:

“He doesn’t do a lot of work around here. He shows zero initiative. He’s not a team player. He never wants to go that extra mile. Tom is exactly what I’m looking for in a government employee.”
Posted by laterite on May 1, 2009 at 3:01 PM
9
@5,

How does that work for someone who's in a wheelchair? Or are they at fault for allowing themselves to get sick or be involved in an accident?
Posted by keshmeshi on May 1, 2009 at 3:03 PM
10
The other option (if not careening at high speed) for "Sidewalk Closed" signs, is a very, very simple action of 'No, it's right there. Watch me walk on it motherfucker.'
Posted by cranky ped on May 1, 2009 at 3:07 PM
11
SDOT doesn't ever do a damned thing about this or similar issues. They hope that by dragging their feet 99% of complainers will stop and go away, so they only ever have to get out behind their desks for 1% of complaints. Similar foot-dragging happens if you complain about trucks or residential streets.

Developers and truck drivers know this, so no one ever follows the rules. And none of them ever will.
Posted by Simac on May 1, 2009 at 3:14 PM
12
@5: I MIGHT agree with you if it were one isolated construction site. However, when you have to cross back and forth across the street 6+ fucking times on the same goddamn street (Pine) to get downtown from Capitol Hill like you did last summer it's fucking ridiculous. How hard is it to carve out 5 fucking feet for people to walk past, leaving the street at least semi-pedestrian friendly?
Posted by Queen of Sleaze on May 1, 2009 at 3:15 PM
13
I live and work near all this - Domenic is the only hysteria queen who gives a shit.

I cross the street, or look before I walk around - glad to see somebody working and some money flowing.

Small life people like to whine. And it really doesn't matter what the topic is about.

So whine on and on and on ... I am on my way for ice cream and late afternoon sex.

And here is hoping with the good weather, there will be some construction boy skin showing soon ... Domenic can worry about the side walk easement.
Posted by Ace on May 1, 2009 at 3:28 PM
14
@7: Bike hobbyists are a hazard to themselves, not just pedestrians on sidewalks? Whodathunkit.

If you want the city to care, you'd better make at least a reasonable effort to show them you actually use those bike lanes they put in. The fact that so many bike hobbyists still ride on the sidewalk is pretty much cementing the glacial pace of SDOT and the city in making more bike lanes and better amenities specially tailored for the bike hobbyist community.
Posted by Baconcat on May 1, 2009 at 3:39 PM
15
@14: as much as I think cyclists are just as big of douchebags as motorists, peds, and everyone else, there is often a very good reason why we don't ride in bike lanes. Debris, dooring, grates, manhole covers, and so on. Bike lanes are often death zones.

Realize that there may be circumstances you don't perceive in the world around you and other people may be reacting to those circumstances more intelligently then you are.
Posted by Lilting Missive on May 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM
16
Want to help?

Report all construction trucks that are parked illegally.
Posted by Fight the Power! on May 1, 2009 at 4:08 PM
17
yeah, let's make it even more onerous for developers and builders to work in this city - that'll help keep architects and engineers employed!
Posted by Max Solomon on May 1, 2009 at 5:06 PM
18
The issue here is that Seattle doesn't have enough pedestrians that detouring across the street creates a problem for the city.

In New York, that strategy would be disasterous for two reasons. 1) New Yorkers are not passive lemmings who obey any sign no matter who put it there. 2) There simply ISN'T ROOM for double the people on the other sidewalk. Having a closed sidewalk at rush-hour in Midtown Manhattan and doing nothing about it would result in losing a full car lane to lawless pedestrians.

So until a negative consequence (beyond whiney letters) results from construction co-opting a sidewalk, SDOT has no pressure to do anything about it, period.

Clearly the answer here is, don't cross the street. Walk right in the street, using as much of the traffic lane as possible, and get hit by a car. After three or four of us get hit, they'll change their policy.

So come on, Seattle, take one for the team.
Posted by Free Lunch on May 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM
19
6, 8, 11, 18 hike! LOL right on! seattle is such a joke when it comes to pedestrian and bike "mobility". The bike plan is nothing more than a photo op for the mayor. I'd be very worried worried about them eliminating the staff who act as advocates within the department for bicycle and pedestrian programs. I mean, befoe the ink on the master plan was dry they had eliminated all bike routes in SE Seattle, done a 180 on bike lanes on Stoneway, then spent $40 to $60 thousand of taxpayer money to reverse their position to finally put in the damn bike lanes, and mostly all the bike plan has meant is they've slapped a lot of paint on "sharrows". Lastly don't forget the mayoy demoted the department's only internationally recognized expert in pedestrian mobility (lagerwey). Sharrows my ass! Yes I'd be very worried they are getting rid of the people in the department who know anything about bike and pedestrian mobility due to budget cuts. Yes of course the "bike lanes" are really "death zones" - any cyclist who values their life rides on the sidewalk jere (though there are alot who act like they have a deathwish). Bryce was acting lawfully in a city-marked bike lane when he was murdered by a construction truck at an intersection that the city knew they should have put in a bike box but didn't want to be bothered with doing so - I'm surprised the family didn't wring the city's (I mean taxpayers) neck for several million dollars due to willfully incompetent intersection design - which by the way remains in the same design just waiting for the next law-abiding bicycler to be murdered, again. What needs to happen is the tort tort laws need to changed so victimes can personally sue individual city employees for shoddy decisions and enforcement. If you can take away their retirement and future earnings then maybe they'll start doing the jobs the taxpayers are supposedly paying them for. As it works now it's another lawsuit, another payouut from the public till, and the employee who caused it more often than not gets promoted. Seriously.
More...
Posted by Seattle is a sick joke on May 1, 2009 at 8:51 PM
20
Agree with #12. Right now you can't walk down Mercer without crossing the street twice because of the biotech and Amazon construction. It wouldn't be that big of a deal if there wasn't so much traffic.

Anyway, walking Mercer became such a hassle that I've switched to a less convenient bus to avoid it altogether.
Posted by pissymelissy on May 1, 2009 at 9:03 PM
21
There was an article in the PI a while back that said the city was considering doing what Washington DC does and requiring the developers leave the sidewalks open by doing things like using shipping containers with the ends cut out.

I get so tired of walking halfway down a block to find the rest closed construction, so I have to walk often out of my way, or walk in the street. Pedestrians have enough to deal with as it is. We should not have to detour at the benefit of developers who could easilt afford taking some measures to keep the sidewalks open during thier construction.
Posted by eric1972sea on May 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM
22
@6, you get partial credit. You correctly pointed out that the city employee's job is not to get out of his chair and go do stuff. However his job is not to write reports but rather to manage consultant contracts. Consultants are the ones who right the actual reports.
Posted by Mud Baby on May 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM
23
dacoach made a good point. Even sharrows are toast in these construction zones. I tried to bike up Denny the other day. It was TOTALLY BLOCKED OFF to facilitate a construction project! I had to go miles out of my way to get to Capitol Hill.
Posted by Mud Baby on May 3, 2009 at 8:43 AM
24
Wait; someone who has lived Seattle for even a week has any shock that the municipal government favors the developers? Look around you, look what's been done over the last 25, 30? The municipal government has always been the lap dogs of the downtown business interests and the real estate interests. Surprise!
Posted by You Big Weirdo on May 4, 2009 at 12:35 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy