Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, April 30, 2009

"I'm a fierce advocate for gay and lesbian Americans."

Posted by on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:13 PM

On inauguration day the Obama administration launched the White House's new website. Gays and lesbians disheartened by Obama's selection of Rick Warren—an anti-gay bigot (and a liar)—to give the invocation took comfort in the prominence given gay rights on the new White House website. Obama's gay rights agenda was listed under "civil rights," another nice signal (which I praised on Salon this week), and not under "gay rights," as if gay rights were somehow separate and distinct from civil rights. The Obama administration committed itself to repealing DOMA, DADT, supporting adoption rights for same-sex couples (which took a big hit on election day), and supporting HIV prevention efforts. Well that was then.

Hey, President Obama! Where did that famous list of commitments to LGBT rights go on your website? Within five minutes of Obama's swearing-in, a heavily detailed list of eight promises to us were posted: repeal DADT, support ENDA, expand adoption rights, etc. There's no mention of DADT or adoption rights or HIV prevention anymore, here's the two sentences that remain: "President Obama also continues to support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity. He supports full civil unions and federal rights for LGBT couples and opposes a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage."

Joe links to what's on the White House website today versus what was posted on the White House website on inauguration day.

When Obama was criticized for selecting Warren he responded by saying that he was a "fierce advocate" for gay rights. WTF, Mr. President?

 

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
A politician who lied?

Shocking!
Posted by Jason Josephes on April 30, 2009 at 1:23 PM
2
I already wrote him: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Posted by MC_BK on April 30, 2009 at 1:25 PM
3
What #1 said. I'm soooooo surprised.
Posted by Mr. Poe on April 30, 2009 at 1:25 PM
4
Well, considering the whole thing (across all issues) has changed and has gone from a list of priorities to a list of accomplishments and vague directives, I wouldn't be surprised if they decided "hey, instead of priorities, let's talk up whatever we do like we smashed barriers", so anything that's a work in progress or isn't a basic policy position is probably going to vanish.

ENDA is still up there since it's a work in progress. Everything else? Ehhhh.
Posted by Baconcat on April 30, 2009 at 1:33 PM
5
Might it be possible that the White House site is going to highlight issues as they become an immediate focus of the administration, rather than make a long wish-list that never changes? (I noticed that "curing cancer" is not listed under Health Care, but that doesn't mean President Obama doesn't want it to happen.) Under the Civil Rights tab right now are things that are currently being discussed, such as anti-discrimination laws and expanding hate crimes legislation. Once there has been action on these issues, I predict new ones will take their place.
Posted by Bub on April 30, 2009 at 1:35 PM
6
Isn't this post a bit disingenuous, Dan? Obama has abandoned gay rights? Did anyone actually contact them to see if the priorities have changed or would that prevent another rousing round of "thrown under the bus?" I really don't see how you can assume this means Obama is no longer pursuing gay rights goals simply because of a change in the white house website.
Posted by hal on April 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM
7
If only we'd voted for McCain/Palin
Posted by sad gay on April 30, 2009 at 1:47 PM
8
"The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Law" is going to be signed. He signed on to the U.N. charter for gay rights. This is a man with enormous challenges. I can imagine his every waking hour taken up by important and crucial decisions. I trust him. Not that the pressure should not be kept on him, but come on. He's on our side and he's moving things forward for us.
Posted by Vince on April 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM
9
Ditto to everything #8 said.
Posted by Lawks A Lordy on April 30, 2009 at 2:12 PM
10
Oouuuuch. Not again.
Posted by david on April 30, 2009 at 2:12 PM
11
I don't think he's on our side at all so much as he's not set against us. Will he veto any legislation? No. Not at all. Would he lift a finger for it before it hits his desk? Nope...
Posted by Seth on April 30, 2009 at 2:14 PM
12
HIV prevention was moved to another area.
Posted by Jason on April 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM
13
OBAMA THREW US UNDER THE BUS AND NOW SAVAGE IS CRYING HIS CROCODILE TEARS JUST LIKE HIS MOVIE WELL IVE GOT NEWS FOR MR SAVAGE DYKES OF SIZE, SELF-ACTUALIZED QUEERS AND RADICAL FAIRIES WERE THROWN UNDER THE BUS YEARS AGO BY THE STRANGER THE RPLACE MAFIA AND THE GENOCIDEAL GENTRIFICATION OF TRADITIONAL QUEER SPACES ON THE HILL SO I DONT FEEL SORRY FOR SAVAGE IN FACT I THINK ITS FUNNY AND ILL LAUGH ABOUT IT UNTIL THE LOAD US ON THE CATTLE CARS AND SEND US TO THE CAMPS
Posted by PISSED OFF FAIRY on April 30, 2009 at 2:48 PM
14
@6 "another rousing round of "thrown under the bus?"

I love that song! Come on everybody, sing it with me:

Another one thrown under the bus ...

No takers?
Posted by Indy on April 30, 2009 at 3:08 PM
15
Dan, do you realize the differences between the realties of campaigning versus GOVERNING? If you can't understand the difference in what it takes to get elected and what it takes to get things done, then you're even more politically ignorant than I thought. You have to give these things time. The economic crisis, war on terror, etc. are gonna priorities for now. You're just gonna have to be patient and stop posting combative rhetoric that nobody with half a brain would believe.
Posted by Savage, go take Political Science 101, seriously on April 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM
16
Obama caved to Turkey on this one.
Posted by BLC on April 30, 2009 at 3:15 PM
17
It's all about gay rights, all the time!
Posted by Angry Dyke or Drama Queen on April 30, 2009 at 3:38 PM
18
Backtracking is not progress. It is not hope. It is not change.
Posted by Raphael on April 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM
19
@14,

You should do it to the tune of 99 bottles of beer on the wall.
Posted by keshmeshi on April 30, 2009 at 4:13 PM
20
the Civil Rights page when from a list of agenda items to a sort of progress report.

i'd have preferred they kept the list and placed the progress report on another page. but people really do read too much into this stuff.

we have enough enemies and the list of those who hate us is long enough. why do people insist on seeing enemies where they don't exist?
Posted by not falling for it on April 30, 2009 at 4:17 PM
21
If this is a shift in communication strategy and not indicative of a shift in commitment to LGBT issues by the adminstration then it's poorly considered and quite tone deaf.

WebNerd 1: "Hey, I've got a great idea! Now that we've been *so clear* about our commitment to civil rights for LGBT people, let's get rid of most of it and get out our next wave of messaging."
WebNerd 2: "Yeah, I'm sure that LGBT Americans won't think that we're abandoning them and their families, even though every progressive administration in recent memory has failed to deliver on similar promises."

I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for now, but to miss the deja vu quality of this experience and castigate people for the concerns it provokes isn't reasonable.
Posted by The Gay Curmudgeon on April 30, 2009 at 5:24 PM
22
Dan, nice language in the Salon piece. Trying to out do Perez?
Grow up, if you are addressing the President; even hypothetically.
Posted by your on must think your potty mouth is sooo cool on April 30, 2009 at 5:48 PM
23
22
your Son must think your potty mouth is sooo cool
Posted by as you were. . . . . on April 30, 2009 at 5:49 PM
24
Yawn. A website is not a policy position. And -- I know it seems unlikely, but bear with me -- there are a few other things going on in the world right now.

Every poll shows rapid and positive change on the rights front. Like #8 said, Obama signed important legislation and subscribed to a UN charter. Yes, more progress would be nice, but the guy's been in office just over three months. And he's facing two foreign wars, a huge financial crisis, and now this flu thing. His stated goals include meaningful health care reform.

Maybe, just maybe, expecting huge dramatic action instantly is a little unrealistic?
Posted by also on May 1, 2009 at 8:08 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy