Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

The Morning News

Posted by Erica C. Barnett on Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM

Settled: Family of teen killed by dump truck settles with company for an undisclosed amount.

Settled?: Smithfield says its factory farm had nothing to do with swine flu outbreak; Tom Philpott's not so sure.

Confirmed!: Sebelius is health and human services secretary.

Suspended: Cuba halts flights to and from Mexico.

Worried: Half of Washington residents concerned about losing jobs.

Good Luck With That: Pakistan moves to flush out Taliban.

That's One Way to Spin It: Republican chair Steele says Specter leaving party is all part of GOP "strategy."

Was That "Strategic," Too?: Steele (again!) says GOP does not regret taking pandemic preparedness money out of stimulus; "We didn't know there was going to be a flu pandemic!"

$57 Million a Day: That's how much the Mexico City economy is losing due to swine flu.

Thanks for Your Shitty Economy, Pro-Lifers: Downturn leads to more abortions, requests for birth control.

Asshole: Facebook founder says it'd be better if women couldn't vote.

Asshole: Ryanair founder says only "slumdwellers" have to worry about swine flu.

Recipe of the Day: Kumquat Lamb Tagine (Recipe and photo via No Recipes)

7690/1240958047-lamb_tagine-3.jpg

for spice rub
2 whole cinnamon sticks
1 1/2 tsp whole coriander seed
1/2 tsp whole cumin seed
1/4 tsp whole fennel seed
1/4 tsp all spice
8 whole cloves
3 green cardamom pods
1 tsp black peppercorns
1/4 C kosher salt (use less if using regular table salt)
3 lbs lamb breast

for braising
water
1/2 large onion roughly chopped
1 large carrot roughly chopped
1 large celery stalk roughly chopped
1 cinnamon stick
2″ piece of ginger sliced

for tagine
1 large onion sliced thin
1/2 lbs kumquat cut in half, seeds removed
1 1/2 cups of braising liquid
braised lamb breasts
1/2 C honey
2 tsp ground cinnamon
1 tsp ground coriander
1/4 tsp ground cumin
1/8 tsp ground cloves

Put the cinnamon, coriander, cumin, fennel, all spice, cloves and cardamom in a small pan and toast until fragrant, moving constantly with a swirling motion to prevent them from burning. Put the toasted spices in a blender with the salt and pepper and grind. Pour the mixture over the lamb breasts and rub to coat thoroughly. Cover and refrigerate for at least 48 hours.

When the lamb is done curing, rinse off all the extra spices and salt, then add them to a heavy bottomed pot along with the onion, carrot, celery, cinnamon stick and ginger. Cover with water then bring to a boil. Skim off any brown foam and fat that accumulates. Cover and turn down the heat to low. Cook until the ribs are almost tender (about 1 1/2 to 2 hours), skimming off any fat periodically.

Remove the ribs from the liquid and strain the broth into a bowl, discarding the solids. Wash out the pot and return to medium heat with a splash of oil. Saute the onions and kumquats until the onions are tender and just starting to brown. Add the rest of the ingredients for the tagine and simmer uncovered until the liquid is mostly gone.

Garnish with mint or cilantro and serve with couscous or rice.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I retract comments saying the Speecter shift is great. On reflection, they should have let him die in his primary so that a real Democrat like Sestak would take that seat against a right winger like Toomey. this deal was arranged by Biden and Specter in a typical Senator-Senator, insider fashion. The grass roots building for a real Democrat is cut out. The shift of Specter isn't really going to change his vote on anything -- he said that! So why should Obama endorse Specter in a primary against someone like Sestak? Taking him at his word that his shift won't change his vote on anything, this is not a good deal. And it's certainly not "change" for Joe Biden and Specter to work out who the next senator from Penn. is going to be.
Posted by PC on April 29, 2009 at 9:46 AM
2
The Facebook headline is incorrect. It wasn't the founder, it was an outside investor in the company. Different guy, still an asshole.
Posted by Michael on April 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM
3
I've never seen "Lamb breast" in the stores...too many ingredients for the unemployed masses, anyhow.
Posted by muggims on April 29, 2009 at 9:48 AM
4
There are only five women I can think of who deserve the right to vote. They'd understand it if they couldn't.
Posted by erica is a man on April 29, 2009 at 9:49 AM
5
I'm not sure if it's accurate to call Peter Thiel a founder of Facebook. Isn't Mark Zuckerburg the founder? I think Thiel was more of an investor than a founder...

Anyways, his initial statement isn't that offensive:
Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.

He basically seems to be saying that since women aren't in favor of libertarianism, libertarianism, along with the idea of a capitalist democracy, suffered (and the idea of a social democracy took hold). Not much controversial there. Except for the clear contempt he has for people who don't agree with the libertarian view. A few lines later he refers to the "unthinking demos that guides so-called 'social democracy'." Presumably referring back to those women and "welfare beneficiaries".

So typical of the Ayn Rand libertarians -- to think that they're so smart, and anyone who was as smart as them would obviously agree with them, so clearly all people who are not libertarians are stupid.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on April 29, 2009 at 9:55 AM
6
@2 & @5 beat me to it.
Posted by Shelby on April 29, 2009 at 10:04 AM
7
Erica,

Shouldn't the Bryce Lewis' family sued the company that made Bryce Lewis' fixed gear bike?

Your assertation was that it was the bike that caused the accident. Still stand by that?
Posted by Jeff on April 29, 2009 at 10:05 AM
8
LOL--for a second I read that as Pakistan is going to flush out the "Toiletban"!
Posted by Timmytee on April 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM
9
He's also saying that poor or unemployed people (welfare beneficiarys) shouldn't vote, but nobody seems to have a problem with that.
Posted by robot on April 29, 2009 at 10:23 AM
10
"I remain committed to the faith of my teenage years: to authentic human freedom as a precondition for the highest good." So says Thiel right at the start of that essay. What's so authentic about not allowing women to vote Peter?

See...this is partly what cured me of my own libertarian delusion back during the Reagan years. So many of them turned out to be your usual hard right nutcases, appropriating libertarian rhetoric about individual freedom so they wouldn't look like the bunch of John Birch Society lunatics they actually were.
Posted by Bruce Garrett on April 29, 2009 at 10:27 AM
11
Asshole: Erica C. Barnett stole wine from a Cap. Hill business
Posted by Takes one to know one on April 29, 2009 at 10:31 AM
12
Worse A..hole, the guys who keep posting like @11 does.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM
13
"We didn't know there would be a flu pandemic" says it all about the GOP. Always a day late and a dollar short doesn't cut it anymore, Mr. Steele.
Posted by Vince on April 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM
14
Just a point -- he's not saying that women or the poor shouldn't be able to vote, just that the country went to shit after they were allowed to (or rather, his view of what the country should be like...).
Posted by Julie in Eugene on April 29, 2009 at 10:34 AM
15
@12 jajajaj. Will can't say ass.
Posted by Jason Zape on April 29, 2009 at 10:45 AM
16
If women didn't vote, McCain would be president and there would be a Republican national majority. If men weren't allowed to vote, there would be a national majority in favor of gay marriage, marijuana decriminalization, and universal health care. Al Gore and John Kerry would have been elected president and George W. Bush would just be a former governor from Texas.

I would be the first in line to vote to take away suffrage from men.
Posted by man on April 29, 2009 at 10:47 AM
17
Quick, go throw all of your accumulated wealth away, quit your job, throw away your shoes, and go live on a farm. That's what living before the 1920s was like for most people. I like the commenter who said "libertarians: fascists who smoke pot".
Posted by Fnarf on April 29, 2009 at 10:55 AM
18
It's interesting how these guys always miss the part in American history where the government gave away, or sold at very low cost, huge swathes of land. That giveaway did result in tangible benefits (people could cultivate the land and build wealth), compared to the social safety net which more frequently just keeps people from falling into more desperate poverty.

But I guess giving away free shit is perfectly fine as long as it's done by driving other people off their land (and killing them) rather than by increasing the marginal tax rate by 3 percent.

Assholes like this are never more than half as smart as they think they are.
Posted by keshmeshi on April 29, 2009 at 11:38 AM
19
That plate of Kumquat Lamb Tagine looks pretty, but it also looks really annoying to eat.
Posted by Dougsf on April 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM
20
18 but half as smart as we think we are is still way smarter than you, sister
Posted by Asshole on April 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM
21
"Just a point -- he's not saying that women or the poor shouldn't be able to vote, just that the country went to shit after they were allowed to..."

I'm not sure that's saying something different. On the other hand, if he's saying there that he's concluded that libertarian ideals don't produce the result that libertarians have been saying they would for decades now, I'd agree with him on that.
Posted by Bruce Garrett on April 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM
22
@20,

Yes, and your incomprehensibility is such impressive evidence of that.

Get a life, idiot.
Posted by keshmeshi on April 29, 2009 at 1:01 PM
23
@Keshmeshi: I think the amount of interesting trolls on here has gone way down. It's like they aren't even trying anymore. Or maybe the clever trolls left and now the void is filled with morons? What is your take, cause it seems they are just really getting lazy and/or more stupid.
Posted by Original Monique on April 29, 2009 at 1:21 PM
24
@23 i still liked it better when a bellevue ave post was considered trolling...
Posted by infrequent on April 29, 2009 at 2:33 PM
25
Lamb is so gross. It's like eating someone's poodle.
Posted by Bauhaus on April 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use