Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

The Dead and Us

Posted by Charles Mudede on Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM

Yesterday, I proposed that one reason why Lizzy Burns found it possible to replace Mary Burns, her dead sister, as Engel's lover is that the relationship the dead had with the living was much closer then than it is now.

In [their] world, the ghost of Mary Burns could actually live within her sister. And so, sleeping with Engels had nothing to do with Lizzy but the ghost "creeping between the lines."

To this theory, PC declared:

Absolutely nothing to do with ghosts or the other CM mumbo jumbo.

The reason why I made this proposal had nothing to do with pure air. The inspiration of the thought came from the historical transformation of a particular American sport, lacrosse.


Today, we the game exists in the context of a competition. In the past, however, the game was more theatrical than competitive. The Native American tribes that played lacrosse organized it in this way: on one side, the living; on the other, the dead. And the though the living did their best to win, put on a great show, the dead won every time. In short, the game was played to appease the unknown but powerfully felt forces of dead.
3c52/1241027098-lacrosse.jpg
As time passed and cultures changed, the relationship with the dead also changed. The sport was transformed to meet these changes. The dead were removed as opponents, and it became a competition of the living against the living.
f356/1241027121-sticks.jpg
Why this modification in the first place? Why wasn't the theatrical element preserved, transferred from one reality to the next? Because it made no sense to us, the moderns (we have not always been modern), the humanists, the worldly types. And our sports and entertainments do not exist in isolation but reflect dominant economic and cultural tendencies.

An example: Last Friday, the cover of USA Today had a story about how NFL teams are looking for players with more versatility. They want footballers who can switch roles during a play. This new necessity has much to do with the fact that the original type of footballer does not reflect the worker in the current society but one in an older order dominated by the factory model, the Fordist world of mass production. Like the Footballer, the factory worker of that time specialized in one thing and did that one thing his whole life. That kind of work, or specialization, is now fast vanishing in our society and what we find more and more are workers who do several jobs, not only through a lifetime but also in a single day. Indeed, Marx's dream of a communist utopia is USA today.

“In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic.”

The current transformation happening in football corresponds with the transformation happening in the economic life or realities of our society—an economic life that weirdly corresponds to Marx's idea of communism. (By the way, this passage by Marx is famous because it's one of the few times he attempted to describe what life under communism would be like.) So, because the moderns relationship with death was different from than the one experienced by the inventors of lacrosse, the meaning of the sport was transformed to fit the existing or prevailing realities. Death is not a stable thing.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Like my pappy used to say, if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, bury them in bullshit.
Posted by Banna on April 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM
2
Do you have a source you can show for your claims about the original form of Lacrosse?
Posted by Foggen on April 29, 2009 at 11:50 AM
3
What. The. Fuck.

Lacrosse was not, not, not played "between the living and the dead". That doesn't even make any sense. It originated as part of a religious ritual and cultural expression (not unlike the Mesoamerican ball game), yes, but the teams were both live people, and yes, they were competitive.
Posted by Fnarf on April 29, 2009 at 11:52 AM
4
Oh, and your understanding of the roles of different kinds of football players is flawed. Versatility, yes, very good. That doesn't mean that tackles are going to start to look more like wide receivers, or vice versa. Quite the opposite.
Posted by Fnarf on April 29, 2009 at 11:54 AM
5
I'd like to bring the discussion full circle by theorizing that many football players probably have had sex with their wives' sisters.
Posted by Joe M on April 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM
6
Also, you do realize that that quote by Marx is utter horseshit. Gee, I think I'll be a professional video game player today. And tomorrow. And the day after that, ad infinitum. It's nice to know that I'm doing my part for society.
Posted by Foggen on April 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM
7
Despite the logical argument that is (probably) made in this post, I was so bored that I quit reading 3/4 of the way through. Blog readers, even more than paper subscribers, like their information clean and clear (of over analysis, rickety metaphors, and far-out correlations) and without references they are unfamiliar with.

You might be more witty and accurate than the commenters, Charles (and I bet you are), but when you write in a way that's easily perceived as aggrandizing and know-it-all (not saying you are!), you're fueling the creeper attacks.

Golob does a great job at being informative so that most people understand he's brainier than they are. But when he does it, you imagine him with a charming smile, a t-shirt and jeans -- approachable and friendly.

In other words, Charles, save us the reality of how stupid we really are. Thanks.
Posted by Shelby on April 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM
8
I am continually amazed that Mudede can keep up this level of writing, day in, day out. Most put-on and satire artists, even greats like The Onion, have off days and pieces that read like they should be funny, but just aren't. Charles never fails to be hilarious in his sendups of the kind of masturbatory pseudo-intellectual claptrap I remember from high school English class.

Bravo, Charles, and keep it up!
Posted by also on April 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM
9
Your theory is blown up by the fact that it was only in recent decades that football players became so specialized. Not that long ago they played both offense and defense while quarterbacks and receivers oftten doubled as placekickers and punters.

That era, interestingly, closely corresponds with the heyday of factory production in the U.S.

But hey, nice try.
Posted by bigyaz on April 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM
10
ALSO: "Footballers"? Really?
Posted by Foggen on April 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM
11
for aesthetic reasons, i refuse to use "football players."
Posted by charles tonderai mudede on April 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
12
11 - right on.
Posted by Lloyd Clydesdale on April 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM
13
Another example of "not even wrong:" a fabricated premise followed by a string of other things the eyes have passed over, all connected with no explainable logic.

Fortunately, there's a treatment for this disorder: college.
Posted by N on April 29, 2009 at 12:33 PM
14
I miss the old versions of the games.

Lacrosse - losing team sacrificed.

Football - broken bones and no steroids.

Footballers (aka soccer) - bleeding fans and players.

Ruggers (rugby) - there is nothing like a scrum in the almost freezing mud as the leaves cover over your bleeding body, IMHO.

Well, that's my opinion from playing them.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM
15
What a bunch of baloney. Football started with the Ivy League, back before getting a degree in law meant you would become a lawyer. Those gentlemen were not specialists who could only perform one task.

And the most likely reason for what's-her-name's sister to take what's-her-name's place is that she would otherwise have been cast penniless into the street.

Why do they even publish Mudede? Wait- don't answer that, Dan- I'm pretty sure I don't want to hear it.
Posted by serial catowner on April 29, 2009 at 12:45 PM
16
@14: you don't miss any of those things, shithead. If you miss Hillsborough you can go fuck yourself.
Posted by Fnarf on April 29, 2009 at 12:51 PM
17
9, theories are meant to be exploded. but the fordist era did not end until late 60s. the bridge between post fordism and fordism is 67 to 73.
Posted by mudede on April 29, 2009 at 1:04 PM
18
I'm SURE lacross rackets will beat the fuck out the dead JUST fine.

We have a mondern relationship with the dead it's called zombies, I think.

Seems to be the same to me.
Posted by mrbanana on April 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM
19
Good one Charles. Next time I say something overwrought and based on a fundamentally flawed premise, and somebody else has the good sense to point out how wrong it is, I will steal your line: theories are meant to be exploded! And then maybe I'll quibble about some details.
Posted by john t on April 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM
20
For the life of me, I've never been to Hillsborough or any of the other abbatoirs you frequent, Fnarf.

But I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express once when I went to Disneyland.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM
21
Oh my god. This is such bullshit. This whole article. Wow. Is there ever a point where things just ARE?
Posted by douchus on April 29, 2009 at 4:13 PM
22
"Absolutely nothing to do with ghosts or the other CM mumbo jumbo."

If there must be a god in the house, must be,
Saying things in the rooms and on the stair,

Let him move as the sunlight moves on the floor,
Or moonlight, silently, as Plato’s ghost

Or Aristotle’s skeleton. Let him hang out
His stars on the wall. He must dwell quietly.
Posted by Furcifer on April 29, 2009 at 8:18 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use