Yesterday, I proposed that one reason why Lizzy Burns found it possible to replace Mary Burns, her dead sister, as Engel's lover is that the relationship the dead had with the living was much closer then than it is now.
In [their] world, the ghost of Mary Burns could actually live within her sister. And so, sleeping with Engels had nothing to do with Lizzy but the ghost "creeping between the lines."
To this theory, PC declared:
Absolutely nothing to do with ghosts or the other CM mumbo jumbo.
Today, we the game exists in the context of a competition. In the past, however, the game was more theatrical than competitive. The Native American tribes that played lacrosse organized it in this way: on one side, the living; on the other, the dead. And the though the living did their best to win, put on a great show, the dead won every time. In short, the game was played to appease the unknown but powerfully felt forces of dead.
As time passed and cultures changed, the relationship with the dead also changed. The sport was transformed to meet these changes. The dead were removed as opponents, and it became a competition of the living against the living. 
Why this modification in the first place? Why wasn't the theatrical element preserved, transferred from one reality to the next? Because it made no sense to us, the moderns (we have not always been modern), the humanists, the worldly types. And our sports and entertainments do not exist in isolation but reflect dominant economic and cultural tendencies.
An example: Last Friday, the cover of USA Today had a story about how NFL teams are looking for players with more versatility. They want footballers who can switch roles during a play. This new necessity has much to do with the fact that the original type of footballer does not reflect the worker in the current society but one in an older order dominated by the factory model, the Fordist world of mass production. Like the Footballer, the factory worker of that time specialized in one thing and did that one thing his whole life. That kind of work, or specialization, is now fast vanishing in our society and what we find more and more are workers who do several jobs, not only through a lifetime but also in a single day. Indeed, Marx's dream of a communist utopia is USA today.
“In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic.”
Comments (22) RSS