Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Sisters Are Doing It...

Posted by on Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:28 AM

A passage from a review of a new biography of Marx's intellectual partner, Engels:

He had always been an involuntary factory owner. Without agreeing to tend his German father’s business interests in Manchester he would have lacked the income for himself and Marx to live in the comfort they took as their right. The profligate Marx was constantly on the edge of penury. Engels counted his pennies (or rather his tens of thousands of pounds) more carefully but did not stint in his pleasures. He rode out regularly with the prestigious and costly Cheshire Hounds. He drank wine of quality and ­Pilsner beer in quantity. He treated himself to bevies of young women, including prostitutes. He dressed in fashion.

Engels kept up bourgeois appearances by holding his capitalist and communist lives separate. The frock-coated German industrialist bought a second home in Manchester where he installed his fiery Irish mistress Mary Burns and welcomed his socialist comrades. Mary’s sister Lizzy took her place as his lover when she died.

Mary dies and her sister, Lizzy, replaces her? Something feels wrong about this. I wonder if this uneasy feeling results from the cultural distance between us and Engels' world.


A possibility: In that particular social space and time, having sex with the man who had sex with your dead sister was not troubling but practical. Mary and Lizzy look alike. And because they grew up with (or were conditioned by) the same social pressures (parents, family, friends), the two are likely to desire the same type of man. That is one way of looking at it. Another is to see it as a sense of duty to the dead. It's a sense or form of love that diminished to nothing as our society evolved and became more positive. Lizzy was expressing a love for her sister by loving the man she once loved. Her body filling in a physical and emotional absence. But the love is not for Engels but for her sister's love of him. The difference, however, is almost imperceptible.

The grave does not have this kind of power on us. The dead in our world are dead and gone. A writer of the present moment could not speak of the dead in the way, say, Ibsen did in his moment, which was Engels' moment, the peak of the 19th century:


Mrs. Alving. I will tell you what I mean by that. I am frightened
and timid, because I am obsessed by the presence of ghosts that I
never can get rid of,

Manders. The presence of what?

Mrs. Alving. Ghosts. When I heard Regina and Oswald in there, it
was just like seeing ghosts before my eyes. I am half inclined to
think we are all ghosts, Mr. Manders. It is not only what we have
inherited from our fathers and mothers that exists again in us,
but all sorts of old dead ideas and all kinds of old dead beliefs
and things of that kind. They are not actually alive in us; but
there they are dormant, all the same, and we can never be rid of
them. Whenever I take up a newspaper and read it, I fancy I see
ghosts creeping between the lines. There must be ghosts all over
the world. They must be as countless as the grains of the sands,
it seems to me. And we are so miserably afraid of the light, all
of us.


In this world, the ghost of Mary Burns could actually live within her sister. And so, sleeping with Engels had nothing to do with Lizzy but the ghost "creeping between the lines." Let's not forget the Queen of the 19th century, Victoria. After her husband, Prince Albert, died, she slept with the cast of his hand in her hand. She outlived him by 40 years.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Damn, Engels was somewhat of a pimp.
Posted by shub-negrorath on April 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM
2
Marrying the sister of your dead wife has been a common practice in many human societies since the dawn of time, and still is done in many cultures.

It's a method of ensuring genetic compatibility - the kids of you and your wife are genetically similar to those of her sister and you, and by participating in child rearing she ensures gene transmission while ensuring her family is also looked after (e.g. parents etc).

Plus, if she's hot, it's really wicked fun.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 28, 2009 at 11:31 AM
3
Good lord, puts Wilt Chamberlain to shame.
Posted by Baconcat on April 28, 2009 at 11:31 AM
4
marrying a sibling of the former w or h is common, too, because until recently there was little concept of love as the basis of marriage (that is, not our individualized romantic love); instead it was seen as a business like match process involving class, culture, property, stability, etc., so going with the sibling was no more remarkable than um, you know, sticking with the GM Pontiac line for a new car.

Absolutely nothing to do with ghosts or the other CM mumbo jumbo.

And btw no, nobody is an involuntary factory owner.
Posted by PC on April 28, 2009 at 11:40 AM
5
And who could forget our own Jefferson sleeping his wife half sister/slave.
Posted by Loveschild on April 28, 2009 at 11:41 AM
6
@5 - at least she bargained for her kids freedom.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM
7
Marx n' muh dik n' shit
Posted by Foucault and Tits and Charles Muhdik on April 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM
8
Freud did the same thing - he shared an apartment with his wife's sister, whom many believed to be his mistress.
Posted by Vasya on April 28, 2009 at 2:21 PM
9
How is this important?
Posted by STJA on April 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM
10
After Queen Mary I of England died in 1548, she too was succeeded by her sister Lizzy.

It's a thing.
Posted by FangDoc on April 28, 2009 at 4:37 PM
11
MUDEDE DID NOT HAVE A CHILDHOOD. THUS, HE HAS NO SINCE OF IRONY. HE DOES NOT WEAR IRONYED SHIRTS EITHER. PERSONALLY, YAM DISGUSTED BY YOUR PETTY-INTELLY-BOURG WRITING, AND MORE-SO SUPER-PLUS-PISS'OD THAT YOU DECIDED TO WRITE ABOOT THAT PART OF THE QUOTATION. YOU SIR, ARE DNE. I CHALLENGE YOU TO A DABAIT ON ANY SUCH SUBJECT OF YOUR CHOOSING AT ANYSUCH ESTABLISHMENT IN TOWN, WHICH I WILL GLADLY AND HANDLY DEFEAT YOU IN.

MISSIVE BITCH OUT.
Posted by LAWriM0RRh0tTiEEey on April 28, 2009 at 9:16 PM
12
Have we let go of the ghosts that confined our thinking in this new era of socialist enlightenment, or do we still cling to our bourgeois appearances.
Posted by m on April 29, 2009 at 12:45 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy