As Washington Buzz was winding down last night, a man spontaneously accosted me about Initiative 100, which would block the city from building a new jail. He insisted that the initiative—the city's worst nightmare, by the sound of things—would make it onto the ballot and The Stranger shouldn't doubt it. Had The Stranger said it wouldn’t make the ballot? No, he said, but it’s something we should think about.
The man must have heard I’d been speaking to I-100 campaign manager Natalie Novak, who mentioned that the campaign has gathered only 4,000 to 5,000 signatures since filing the measure on January 23. She plans to turn in the roughly 18,000 valid the signatures by June 1 to make the general election ballot. “We have to get 386 signatures a day, which is nothing,” she said. But that is something. Given that at least quarter of all signatures are usually invalid for some reason (people move, aren’t registered at the address they signed on the petition, give a fake name, etc.), the group will likely need over 25,000 signatures to make the ballot. Plus, the group decided to use all volunteer signatures. That—averaging more like 500 signatures a day without paid petitioners—will be incredibly difficult.
“You don’t know who I am,” the man said, “But the question isn’t whether this will make it onto the ballot; it’s just a question of whether it makes it on the November ballot or the March [2010] ballot.” I didn’t want to be a dick, but I wanted to say, “You don’t know who I am.” I wanted to tell him that I know exactly how hard it is to get a city initiative on the ballot. I filed Initiative 75 and we worked like dogs and spent a ton of dough to qualify for the ballot, even suing the city for illegally invalidating certain signatures, and just barely made it on the ballot (we lost the court case but won the initiative in 2003). Since then, only four of the 25 city initiatives filed have made the ballot (Initiatives 77, 83, 88, and 91, says Deputy City Clerk Carol Shenk). But I didn’t say that to the guy; instead I’m telling everyone, because I actually am a dick. If I-100 gathers enough signatures by the July 23 turn-in deadline, they will likely miss the general election cut-off but qualify for next March’s special-election ballot. But I wouldn’t want to run a progressive measure on the March special-election ballot, which historically has some of the lowest voter turnout and oldest electorate. Conventional wisdom says those voters are more conservative and generally more inclined to support things like cops and jails. So if you want to help, I think this is the I-100 website.
Comments (26) RSS