Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, April 24, 2009

Anti-Government Blogger Gets Rich at Government Expense

Posted by on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM

Stefan Sharkansky, a right-wing blogger who remains convinced that Christine Gregoire "stole" the 2004 election, just made $225,000 off a settlement with King County, which took two years to provide him with the names of every single person who voted in the 2004 governor's election, the Seattle Times reports. Maybe now he can finally afford to tip more than 10 percent.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
This makes me want to puke.
Posted by seandr on April 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM
2
To be fair, looting the government for personal gain with a secondary goal of driving it into insolvency is perfectly consistent with the ideals of the modern conservative movement.
Posted by Adam Smith's Invisible Hand on April 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM
3
I always tip about 20% when I select a wine.
Posted by red wine is delicious on April 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM
4
Thanks Stefan, for constantly complaining about how our tax dollars are put to bad use and personally taking as much as dozens of households would pay to the county.
Posted by kurisu on April 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM
5
Perhaps we should tea-bag this guy.

To protest wasteful spending of government money.

And I'm NOT referring to literal bags of tea by using that phrase.
Posted by Ackham on April 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM
6
Can you afford to buy your own wine yet?
Posted by you and fnarf should buttfuck on April 24, 2009 at 12:55 PM
7
ECB, what's with your perverse hostility to open government?

By the way, greater than thirty days have elapsed since you copped a plea for stealing wine from QFC. One of the conditions of the plea was that you perform community service. For whom did you perform community service?
Posted by What organization? on April 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM
8
Just remember, don't spit in his food, even if he undertips.

It's best just to let someone else do that.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 24, 2009 at 1:26 PM
9
Much like how red states wouldn't survive without the government largesse doled on their secessionist asses - the right-wing bloggers wouldn't survive without the various forms of wingnut welfare (usually from people like Scaife or Moon, but sometimes unsuspecting donors, a la Eyman).

I think the economy would actually improve if they up and "went Galt".
Posted by jcricket on April 24, 2009 at 1:29 PM
10
ECB, also you are a sloppy reporter. The County took greater than three years to satisfy the public records request.
Posted by What organization? on April 24, 2009 at 1:30 PM
11
How much wine would $225,000 buy?
Posted by how would I know, I never buy any.... on April 24, 2009 at 1:32 PM
12
Didn't this guy used to write a column for the stranger?
Posted by Jude Fawley on April 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM
13
You are sloppy times two. He just wanted the records for King County?
Posted by Are you drunk on wine, or do you need an editor? on April 24, 2009 at 1:54 PM
14
Nice way to be apart of the problem.
Posted by Chris on April 24, 2009 at 1:55 PM
15
The County deserves it. FOIA and public records exist for a reason, and stonewalling and/or incompetence should get smacked around hard. It's our information.
Posted by Troy on April 24, 2009 at 2:13 PM
16
The County fucks up and you direct your hostility to the successful plaintiff.
Posted by The County isn't the only one that's fucked up. on April 24, 2009 at 2:13 PM
17
@16 yes, sometimes overly-litigious people can be pretty annoying - especially if they are technically right but missed the point in every other way imaginable.
Posted by infrequent on April 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM
18
Sharkansky is a fucktard of monumental proportions and I am always happy to see additional mention of his ridiculousness with that waitress. Every once in a while I wonder how that poor child is managing through life, given the 2 parents he was dealt.

All his douchebaggery aside, it is pretty screwed up that Kingco took so long to fulfill his request. I'm curious what he thought he would find, since a judge in central washington long ago ruled that there was nothing to see here, folks?

I'd love to see him do the right thing and donate his settlement back to the county (or at least *somewhere* useful) but I am sure a jackass like him would never do that. Someone should look up his address and post it here (a la the Laurelhurst lady) so we can all stop by and ask him for a loan...
Posted by Good Grief on April 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM
19
Wow, I would have been happier with a MUCH smaller settlement....





















maybe something in the $8-10 range.

Posted by this doesn't get old on April 24, 2009 at 2:39 PM
20
The Sharkansky tax.

I love it - a right-winger using a frivolous lawsuit to teach a lesson, and taking money from the government. It's like bizzaro world.

The Republican Party will continue to get smoked in elections until they realize that everyone knows how ass-backwards their morals/beliefs are.
Posted by d-squared on April 24, 2009 at 2:41 PM
21
that man is a welfare king.
Posted by infrequent on April 24, 2009 at 2:49 PM
22
@20,

The guy is a world-class A-hole, but KC would never have settled if the lawsuit was frivolous.

Obeying the law. It's not just a good idea, it's, well, um, the law.

Posted by Mr. X on April 24, 2009 at 3:29 PM
23
All the criticism should be directed at the county, why the hell did it take three years? I think Sharkansky is a prick, but I don't feel that because of that he deserves lesser government accountability.
Posted by WA on April 24, 2009 at 4:03 PM
24
no - not all the criticism should be directed at the county. not until sharkansky proves a point to all this. sure, it seems like the county was wrong, and had to pay for that mistake. but i can blame this agenda-driven hack for pursuing a partisan matter to the detriment of the very county he is supposedly looking out for.

especially when conservatives are usually the ones complaining about big payouts for relatively minor offenses; especially when we are in a recession; etc...
Posted by infrequent on April 24, 2009 at 4:13 PM
25
Ugh, more parasitic wingnut welfare.

Sharkansky can totes make it up to us and do humanity a favor by sucking off a shotgun.
Posted by Original Andrew on April 24, 2009 at 4:51 PM
26
Let's read the account of a true professional:

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_wa…
Posted by What organization? on April 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM
27
And in completely unrelated news, sales of firearms and concrete used in bunker construction boomed in King county today...
Posted by Agent of Chaos on April 24, 2009 at 5:51 PM
28
Like Josh Feit, ECB is a spent force, all used up. Her wad is shot. She's like a porn star who's been in the business too long.
Posted by Gerard Damiano on April 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM
29
Between this and the Yousoufian case, KC appears to have a problem complying with the law. There's no way they would have settled for that much money if they were in the right.
Posted by Reader on April 24, 2009 at 8:07 PM
30
Let's boycott their adverstisers. Continue to read the paper online and on paper. Let's school 'em'.
Posted by Let's teach 'em a lesson. on April 24, 2009 at 9:10 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy