Search

Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

« The Morning News | Ideology Today »

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Sex / Film It's a Porno...About Nothing!

Posted by David Schmader on Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:57 AM

Except making me want to be dead.

4d9e/1240416156-8c806708_620-1.jpg

Learn more about Seinfeld: An XXX Parody at Adult Video News. (Link NSFW, and while you're there, be sure to check out the page-right ad for Coctomom, who's apparently been caught "hunting more sperm." And see more upsetting Seinfeld stills here.)

Thanks for the horror, WoW Report.

Share via

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment

Where's Newman?

Posted by The Mail Never Stops on April 22, 2009 at 9:22 AM

A show with three men and one woman in it cannot possibly a good porno parody make.

Posted by The CHZA on April 22, 2009 at 9:23 AM

Do they really say "An XXX Parody"? I'm sorry, but I think when most people see "XXX" they say "triple X," not "ex ex ex." So wouldn't "A XXX Parody" make more sense? Let's focus on the important issues here, people.

Posted by Levislade on April 22, 2009 at 9:27 AM

I sure hope Uncle Leo makes an appearance.

Posted by Jason Josephes on April 22, 2009 at 9:28 AM

Festivus for the rest of us.

Posted by eugene boi on April 22, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Seinfeld ended in '98. Isn't 11 years a bit late for a parody?

Posted by Matt from Denver on April 22, 2009 at 9:30 AM

you don't need a xxx actress to make me want to jump in the sack with elaine. Julia Louis-Dreyfus gets me going

Posted by Your Name There on April 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM

Isn't all porn about nothing, really? And isn't this Kelly O's beat (so to speak. . . )

Posted by Chicago Fan on April 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM

No, Matt, it's way too early. The most recent other ones have been parodies of shows from the 60s.

Posted by Greg on April 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM

There's a strong sindication market.

Posted by see what i did there? on April 22, 2009 at 9:35 AM

That George character has put me off of sex for eternity, I'm afraid.

Posted by Fnarf on April 22, 2009 at 9:50 AM

@11 - Apparently George was re-written as a non-sex role. (Yes, I clicked on the link)

They could do so much with "Man Hands..."

Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on April 22, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Wait @12, so you mean the guy is cast in a porn movie, but doesn't get to have sex? With anyone?

That just seems, so, well, unfair, I guess.

Posted by COMTE on April 22, 2009 at 10:26 AM

Unfair for him. Fair for everyone else, especially his partners.

Posted by Fnarf on April 22, 2009 at 10:29 AM

Damn, Sasha Grey is in everything.

Posted by Fisti on April 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM

@2: It makes for a good gay porn parody. You could start from the whole "it moved" premise and move into "the initiation of George."

Except George is the anti-sex. As is Jerry.

Posted by dwight moody on April 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM

@3... ha! the site actually lists it as "A XXX Parody"

Posted by infrequent on April 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM

I've been talking about XXX parodies for months and months.

I've avoided this one because, well, I HATE SEINFELD. There I said it. The most un-funny show I've ever seen. I hate it so much, I can't even watch the shitty porn version of it.

Posted by KELLY O on April 22, 2009 at 10:49 AM

At least we won't have to witness George's shrinkage. I'm holding out for the Honeymooners XXX remake, which should be equally appealing.

Posted by avatar on April 22, 2009 at 11:53 AM

Ms. O at 18: This post was just supposed to function as a teaser for what I'd hoped would be your forthcoming review of the final product. Please, please reconsider your position.

Posted by David Schmader on April 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM

At 20: I'll review it, only if you watch it with me...

Posted by KELLY O on April 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM

Perhaps we can live-Slog it....

Posted by David Schmader on April 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I saw Heinfeld in like '96. That was more timely.

Posted by Dickloaf on April 22, 2009 at 3:38 PM

@ The CHZA,

I dunno...it has some possibilities.

Also, why did they get a celebrity impersonator to play Kramer. At this point in Michael Richards career, I'm sure he isn't going to be too picky about roles.

Posted by Y.F. on April 22, 2009 at 5:26 PM

NEWMAN!

Posted by chubby chaser on April 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM