Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Seattle, Teabagged: The Video

Posted by on Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM

Video from yesterday... Paul Constant interviews.


 

Comments (47) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
A fantastic ending to the video, Kelly and Paul. Hilarious.

"Honestly, I wouldn't even vote for him."

Honestly, myself, I think the "I'm running" thing didn't go long enough. It was a fantastic thing to watch.
Posted by Sam on April 16, 2009 at 7:37 PM
2
Oh, it's pronounced Ein? I always pronounced it like Ann! And people say these tea parties are useless!
Posted by Hal on April 16, 2009 at 7:42 PM
3
Tea Pitchforks? I smell a new band name.
Posted by Luckier on April 16, 2009 at 7:47 PM
4
slog, here are some photos i took. feel free to enjoy my camera phone photography skills.

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cf…
Posted by murp on April 16, 2009 at 7:55 PM
5
The counter-protester dude was kinda useless. I mean, after someone said "it's not about paying taxes, it's about wasting them," he just fumbled. Points for trying and all, but he really walked straight into that one.
Posted by Lee on April 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM
6

SLOG...congrats. This video out does any of the media you've lifted from other places.

Please...more original content like this makes the site fantastique!!!
Posted by Jacobin Swine on April 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM
7
The Slog is a piece of shit because the people who work for the Slog have lots of neocon friends who stand to gain a lot of power from the downfall of America's middle class. Fuck you, Slog. This story deserves a lot more respect than you have for your own species, you paid-for losers.
Posted by Jim Harmon on April 16, 2009 at 8:27 PM
8
Keep up this "Stranger Video" stuff and I might even check this page more than once every couple of days. Entertain me!
Posted by jessejb on April 16, 2009 at 8:29 PM
9
@7 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

(heart,)
Paul Constant
Posted by Paul Constant on April 16, 2009 at 8:32 PM
10
And fuck you, too, Paul Constant. Paid-for dork.
Posted by paul constant is paid for on April 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM
11
If I'm paid-for, where's my goddamned money?
Posted by Paul Constant on April 16, 2009 at 8:39 PM
12
I AGREE WITH JIM HARMON AND WHILE WERE AT IT WHERE IS THE COVERAGE OF ALTERNATIVE QUEERS, SELF-ACTUALIZED FAIRIES AND DYKES OF SIZE AND OR COLOR SINCE NONE OF THEM FIT IN DAN SAVAGES RPLACE IDEAL AND WOULDNT BE ALLOWED ON HIS PRECIOUS VASHON I GUESS THEY DONT COUNT
Posted by PISSED-OFF QUEER on April 16, 2009 at 8:47 PM
13
Someone explain to them what "tea bag" means, fercrissakes.

Also, Sweden and Denmark have the highest tax rates in the world and their countries are waaaaaaaaay nicer than ours. And guess what? They've got waaaaaaaay more freedom.

Guess who has the lowest tax rates: Qatar. They have no personal income tax so none of your wages would be taxed if you lived in Qatar. Too bad most of their foreign labor is forced labor. But, hey, their slaves don't have to pay income tax, so you'd probably would find Qatar far superior to Sweden, Denmark, and France...those horrible, horrible hell holes.

http://www.forbes.com/global/2008/0407/0…
Posted by yucca flower on April 16, 2009 at 9:10 PM
14
@ 13: What is with these anti-tax folks warning that - oooh, scary - we're going to turn into France? Have any of them been to France? I would love to live in France. Their children are well-educated, healthcare is affordable, and they have access to cheap wine and delicious cheese.
Posted by Luckier on April 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM
15
I have seen this movie before and it's called "Wag the Dog". Theatrical outrage concocted by some folks at the RNC. So transparent
Posted by blah on April 16, 2009 at 10:08 PM
16
what do all these "with us or against us" nutjobs have against the altruistic aims of things like world war 1, world war 2, ending the holoacust, ending slavery.

fuckin pricks.
Posted by mike on April 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM
17
@14,

Evil, evil France's marginal tax rates top out at around 50 percent, which is what our tax rates were during most of Reagan's presidency. But they're so socialist, donchaknow?
Posted by keshmeshi on April 16, 2009 at 10:21 PM
18
OMG, the Stranger is just BUSTIN' out with neocon friends. Like pustules. I heard that Bill Kristol is redecorating the office bathroom AS I TYPE THIS.
Posted by Fnarf on April 16, 2009 at 10:37 PM
19
I think it's safe to say that most of the tea-baggers (hee hee!) will be paying less in taxes under Obama. And also that bailing out giant, powerful corporations is hardly socialism.

I just don't get it.
Posted by Irving on April 16, 2009 at 10:49 PM
20
This "France is Socialist" meme is hilarious. Rightists in Europe sure as hell aren't against taxes or medical care-- but get into spending for other things and watch the fur fly.
Posted by Baconcat on April 16, 2009 at 10:59 PM
21
I dunno ... It's incredibly refreshing to me to see a bunch of conservative douche-bags marginalized, freaking out about taxes/God/abortion/socialism, and reduced to comparing the US to pre-WW2 Germany. They are not unified and the message is incoherent. Fucking awesome!
Posted by Mahtli69 on April 16, 2009 at 11:28 PM
22
@ pissed off queer, i actually agree with a lot of what you have to say, but the goddamm caps are getting goddamm annoying.

also, @ 14 pencil me in for delicious cheese, please.
Posted by xo on April 16, 2009 at 11:29 PM
23
Mr Crawford: Go back to misc.market. Leave Slog for us gay liberal fascists.
Posted by nbc@andrew.cmu.edu on April 16, 2009 at 11:32 PM
24
Dear Paul Constant,

I can't tell you how much I wish the counter-protester was at all articulate. It's really a tragedy that he was such an epic fail.

Love, Jocelyn.

P.S. I love you.
Posted by Jocelyn on April 16, 2009 at 11:49 PM
25
Dear Jocelyn,

It was incredibly disappointing for me, too. I had high hopes for him. At least he was trying, I guess.

(heart,)
Paul

P.S. It is impossible to love paid-for middle-class-destroying tools of neocon hatred. But you're very sweet.
Posted by Paul Constant on April 17, 2009 at 12:03 AM
26
Wow, wow, wow. They really are out of their minds, aren't they? We have to reject altruism? We have to give up living for others? How the fuck this twisted "moral code" jibes with anything resembling Christianity is way beyond me.

It's something of a relief to see that there isn't yet a racial component to the shit that goes on in public - it would have been easy to add a star of David to that hideous list of slanderous logos they plastered Barney Frank with. And of course Obama.

Still, we can all see it's only a matter of time. Scary stuff. Well done Paul, we need more of this kind of journalism.
Posted by Gurldoggie on April 17, 2009 at 1:12 AM
27
The Ayn Rand follower was so adorably confused. He gave a good regurgitation of the party line but failed to notice the irony of supporting a protest by the people Objectivists hate. Objectivists reject both Democrats and Republicans as moochers. They are just mooching for different crowds.

Comparing America today to the America in "Atlas Shrugged" is just like comparing it to Nazi Germany. Actually it's a crazier comparison.

Go live in your gulch already. The rest of us have work to do.
Posted by kresblamania on April 17, 2009 at 6:41 AM
28
@11
Like all good patriotic Liberals you gave it all to the Government, right?
Posted by Liberal douchebag moochers never make money to pay taxes on on April 17, 2009 at 7:14 AM
29
26
"journalist" report a story objectively.
"tools" don't.
compare and contrast.
Posted by tool with a camera on April 17, 2009 at 7:31 AM
30
5
24
You guys are wrong.
counter dude had it down cold...

You give all your money to the government and don't question how they use it;
they know better than us what should be done with our money;
and you are greedy if you don't cheerfully go along with it.
Posted by if you disagree maybe you're not as Liberal as you think on April 17, 2009 at 7:36 AM
31
We should care where are taxes are going, but it seems odd that the tea-baggers only found interest on the subject since last inauguration day.

Posted by Rob in Baltimore on April 17, 2009 at 8:02 AM
32
Nice video.
Posted by kim in portland on April 17, 2009 at 8:08 AM
33
Paul, I feel for you. A serious bookie being forced to stand by and just listen as paeans are sung of Ayn Rand is just torture. I can only hope that off camera you told that lout that Ayn Rand is just self-indulgent tripe that simplifies reality beyond all recognition.
Posted by spudbeach on April 17, 2009 at 8:21 AM
34
@27 - "How the fuck this twisted "moral code" jibes with anything resembling Christianity is way beyond me."

That's just it ... It doesn't. That's why the strange marriage between fiscal conservatives and social conservatives was destined for failure. It also shows why Bush was such an effective leader for the right back in 2000. He unified these factions. Of course, by the end, he'd pissed off both groups.

It's also why Sarah Palin is dangerous. Despite her obvious lack of qualifications and intellect, she's another "uniter".
Posted by Mahtli69 on April 17, 2009 at 8:42 AM
Posted by BradIsMyHero on April 17, 2009 at 8:50 AM
36
@31 - It's not his ideas that were bad (although it's hard to say because he was SO inarticulate). What was wrong with him was his inability to communicate in a way that was at all effective. He couldn't explain himself to the camera, his sign was a mess, and he couldn't engage that other guy (who was a great deal MORE articulate) in real discussion.

I'm pretty sure I'm actually MORE liberal than I think I am, if that's even possible. That doesn't change the fact that that guy was an epic fail.
Posted by Jocelyn on April 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM
37
It would be nice if the voice audio wasn't only in the left channel.
Posted by charlie k on April 17, 2009 at 9:50 AM
38
@31: Uh, no. If you believe that everyone on the left is complacent about where our tax dollars go, you're just the right-wing version of the poor kid in that video. And you've been successfully wedged out of the real discussion by the teabaggers at Fox.

The reason the "Tea Parties" were stupid is precisely because they had nothing to do with taxation (most participants will see a tax cut this year) and everything to do with a false and sanctimonious claim that representative democracy has disenfranched them. Not only is this false, but the premise of their entire disagreement with current policy is that deficit spending in a recession is "wasteful."

And anyone who's paying attention knows better. We're in the midst of a dramatic supply-side surplus, and people are losing their jobs, hours, homes, and liquidity because of it. The stupidity of the tea baggers isn't their objection to "out of control spending," it's their refusal to engage with the real reasons that we need government stimulus of demand in order to stave off the worst-case scenario (i.e., 20% unemployment, a lost generation).

Really. That's the question you're being asked to address. And instead, you all keep repeating that Obama is a socialist, and that the government's budget exists on a scale you have trouble conceiving. Your fears and neuroses are not valid public policy positions.
Posted by Lee on April 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM
39
39
Come on, Lee.
The whole point of the exercise was to get under your skin.
How'd we do?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6-5g78Nr…
Posted by hear the song of people who will not be slaves! on April 17, 2009 at 11:00 AM
40
@40: Oh, I see. So the tea partiers are really just impish trickster spirits, as opposed to a movement built around a populist sentiment or quantifiable intellectual position.

I guess you got me!!!11!
Posted by Lee on April 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM
41
Great video Paul and Kelly. Can the Stranger do a Point-Counter Point video with the tea-baggers and someone rational?
Posted by Original Monique on April 17, 2009 at 11:06 AM
42
41
They are sort of like
anti-War
anti-Bush
protesters.
Posted by that has worked out very well so far... on April 17, 2009 at 11:20 AM
43
I thought that first guy was pretty cute until he said "Ayn Rand Center." Eww.
Posted by Patrick Colvin on April 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM
44
44, I'd being saying, "Shhhh, don't speak, don't speak."
Posted by Rob in Baltimore on April 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM
45
I'd still do the Ayn Rand guy....just sayin'
Posted by hot 4 tea on April 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM
46
@44,45 - Plus his voice was annoying. Better to gag him, I say.
Posted by Jocelyn on April 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM
47
I teabagged my bf on Teabag Day.
Posted by onion on April 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy