Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Drive-By Shooting in Othello Park

Posted by on Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:44 PM

A 21-year-old Seatac man was taken to Harborview earlier tonight after a drive-by shooting in the Othello Park neighborhood.

According to SPD spokeswoman Renee Witt, the man was walking near Rainier Ave S and S Fontanelle when four men pulled up in a car and opened fire on the 21-year-old man.

Witt says the man was hit in the arm and was transported to Harborview with non-life-threatening injuries.

Officers have stopped a car near the scene which matches a description given by witnesses.

Yesterday, King County Prosecutors filed murder and attempted murder charges against four men who allegedly opened fire on a car in SeaTac with an AK-47 on April 7th, wounding one man and killing another.

The shooting was apparently retaliation for another shooting in South Seattle earlier that day.

SPD has not indicated that tonight's shooting is related to either of these incidents.

Police are also investigating yet another shooting, which took place Saturday night in Judkins Park.

 

Comments (122) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Is this the room the Slog set aside for the Klan meeting?
Posted by And so it begins... on April 15, 2009 at 12:02 AM
2
No.

This is where angry feminists are discussing foreign films.

Try down the hall.
Posted by Ackham on April 15, 2009 at 12:10 AM
3
No, not at all. We are just grumpy pit bull owners that decided to shoot at random strangers with our AK -47's.
Posted by Ice Lube on April 15, 2009 at 2:48 AM
4
All of these shootings happen in or near the neighborhood I live in. These areas are diverse w/ many different kinds of people living here. However, it's always the same people shooting at and killing one another. It isn't a black thing - it's a gang thing. Bring on the gentrification!
Posted by Lee on April 15, 2009 at 6:37 AM
5
You know, if these thugs spent time in the military, they might actually learn to shoot straight and save the rest of us the bill from Harborview.

Seriously, these clowns couldn't hit an elephant with a shot gun from 10 feet away. 90% of the time the victim is only wounded! They can't even achieve anything in their chosen field of thuggery.
Posted by Stupid White Man on April 15, 2009 at 7:22 AM
6
And the mayor's running for election again why???
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on April 15, 2009 at 7:38 AM
7
The Mayor and the SPD ignore the SE in so many ways. While they kept telling everyone that crime was down across the city, the SE residents were looking around and saying: "Really?" Bang. Bang.

Thanks to Rainier Valley Post http://www.rainiervalleypost.com it only took six months of hounding them, but in January they admitted that crime in SE Seattle was up 20%! F$#% Queen Anne and their little graffiti issues. Get down here and start doing something SPD. The mayor sucks and ignores the SE. If you live south of I-90 and between Rainier and MLK you're screwed.
Posted by ducking bullets on April 15, 2009 at 7:47 AM
8
Right, start cracking down and then watch the NAACP, ACLU go nuts and start suing the SPD.

You reap what you sow.

Meanwhile up here on the Northside the gang war between Wallingford and Fremont is getting ugly. After our kids went over there and called their kids 'stinky petruli neo-hippies', a bunch of Fremont kids came over and called some of our women 'stroller baby bitches'. One kid was even overheard claiming our independent coffee shops 'couldn't pull a decent espresso shot if our baby mamas depended on it'.
Posted by Stupid White Man on April 15, 2009 at 7:53 AM
9
I officially don't give a shit. Can we just let these idiots have an all-out war to the death already?
Posted by jessejb on April 15, 2009 at 7:53 AM
10
a haiku:

Pirates rule the oceans,
Thugs rule the streets of Seattle,
I thought Obama would be better...
Posted by didn't you? on April 15, 2009 at 8:10 AM
11
@ 10, that's not haiku
Posted by you ignorant doofus on April 15, 2009 at 8:25 AM
12
Black people are just exactly the same as white people in every way, and they certainly don't commit a vastly disproportionate amount of violent crime, either. Celebrate diversity!

ooooops....

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/ra…

Homicide trends in the U.S.

Trends by race

Racial differences exist, with blacks disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders

In 2005, homicide victimization rates for blacks were 6 times higher than the rates for whites.

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites

Homicide Type by Race, 1976-2005 > Offenders > Black > 52.2%

94% of black victims were killed by blacks

===============

Remember - in the USA, all blacks of all ages and sexes make up only about 13% of the population. Blacks make up only about 8% of Seattle.
Posted by Epic Racist Troll Oppressing Blacks With Facts on April 15, 2009 at 8:28 AM
13
Are you done, Eppy? Your statistics haven't changed and you've offered no analysis aside from a regurgitation of stats.

I'd really like to know the cause, solution, correlation between location, age, income level, extenuating circumstances surrounding the case and so on and so forth.

Unless, of course, all you have are statistics you cribbed without context from a DoJ website and a handful of context-less "see! I was right" news stories that most anyone can access if their sole search criteria is race and severity of crime. Oh, right.

OMG LIBRULS CONDONE CRIME AND PROTECKT BLACKS HOW DARE THEY STOOPID WHITE LIBRULS. ACKNOLLIJ THE PROBLEM ACKNOLLIJ IT!!
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 8:43 AM
14
(Also, I'd like to thank you again for accepting the bait and driving up ad revenue for The Stranger. I think you should ask for a cut!)
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 8:44 AM
15
"I'd really like to know the cause, solution, correlation between location, age, income level, extenuating circumstances surrounding the case and so on and so forth."

- Oh yes, because all those things excuse rape and murder.
Posted by you are a dumbass on April 15, 2009 at 9:03 AM
16
Hey Baconcat - go move to Detroit. It is 88% black and really cheap. You should love it there!
Posted by what? you aren't so into that idea? well golly on April 15, 2009 at 9:05 AM
17
Oh oh, the troll with a thousand names is riled up. Now you gone and dun it baconcat.
Posted by troll is racist, a virgin, and ugly on April 15, 2009 at 9:07 AM
18
Insults are magic words that progressive white-guilt Seattle liberals use to make unpleasant facts about black crime magically vanish!

If we just ignore all the facts, and think of clever ways to insult the people who have the bad taste to actually point out all the facts, why, all those ugly facts about reality will just go away!
Posted by I am insulting you right now on April 15, 2009 at 9:10 AM
19
11 no, but it is sarcasm
Posted by but if you have to explain it it's not nearly as much fun on April 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM
20
I wish the racist/virgin/ugly/many-named troll would at least learn how to spell "patchouli."
Posted by lily on April 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM
21
@16
White Seattle liberals (do they come in any other color?) are totally cool with the concept of Negroes; as long as they personally don't have to deal with the reality.
Posted by If you are open-minded enough your brains can roll right out on April 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM
22
Hey, is this the "fact based discussion on racism" that someone promised me?

No, it's just more of the same BS.

However, let's see if the anonymous troll can start a "fact based discussion on racism." This is your one and only chance. Hint: What is the larger meaning of these numbers? Who do YOU think crime rates are so high among blacks? Do you think that if it weren't Republican PC to deny class differences in this nation, that you'd find similar crime rates if you did states by income rather than race?

LOL @ 11.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 9:19 AM
23
@20 - that is someone else, I am the Epic Racist Troll ... there are more of us than you realize!
Posted by Epic Racist Troll Celebrating Divershitty on April 15, 2009 at 9:19 AM
24
Why are crime rates so high among blacks? High testosterone and low intelligence. Most black women have higher testosterone levels than most Asian men, for example. Blacks also have smaller cranial capacity... that means smaller brains. Smaller brains means less intelligence. Higher testosterone means more impulsive, aggressive behavior. There you go.

Reality itself is racist.

Funny how a bunch of evolution-believing atheists (I am one too) take it as a matter of absolute faith that all groups evolved exactly equally.
Posted by Faith-Based Equality on April 15, 2009 at 9:24 AM
25
@22
If you adjust for income you still find differences between the races for rates of crime.
Posted by explain that on April 15, 2009 at 9:35 AM
26
@24, that's interesting. Because, you know, Vietnam and Cambodia and China and Laos and Thailand and Korea have just been havens of peace (not to mention the paradise of all the Asian countries ending in -stan); the Viet Cong and Khmer Rouge must have been some pansy little operations. That b.s. about testosterone levels and violence just explains EVERYTHING. You're such a genius.
Posted by lily on April 15, 2009 at 9:35 AM
27
I think I spotted some suspicious characters who may have done it.

They're waving signs about how they want to tea bag people.
Posted by Will in Seattle on April 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM
28
Listening to rap music, buying into the cultural values it promotes and idolizing entertainers (of all types; athletes, rappers, etc) is poor preparation for a fulfilling life.
Posted by is it racist to observe this? I hope not! on April 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM
29
26
With all their faults and shortcomings the Asian nations (and all others on the planet) still stand head and sholders above sub-Saharan Africa in terms of functional societies.
Posted by UNESCO on April 15, 2009 at 9:43 AM
30
@ 25, prove it. Where are your stats and studies? And can't you answer the other questions? What affect do you think centuries of slavery and another century-plus of marginalization have on the mindset of most African Americans?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 9:44 AM
31
@ 29, do you think the fact that Asia had settled cultures for many millennia while sub-Sahara Africa had hunter-gatherer tribal societies into modern times plays a role in this disparity?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 9:47 AM
32
@30 - it seems you are agreeing that most blacks are stupid and violent... the only disagreement seems to be WHY so many of them are so stupid and violent.

The only place that blacks are still enslaved is in every sub-Saharan African country on Earth, according to the UN. Many of these slave families have been enslaved for well over 300 years. But they are all enslaved by other blacks, so you never hear liberals or blacks whine about it - it just does not fit their agenda.

So who forced those poor oppressed Africans to enslave other Africans hundreds of years ago?

Why do we constantly hear liberals and blacks whine about "white racism" or "white oppression" while they constantly ignore the fact that in the USA, 94% of all blacks killed are killed by other blacks?
Posted by evil questions on April 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM
33
@30
You brought it up @22. You know that it is true which is why you won't post the statistics yourself.

@30
What accounts for the mindset of Africans?
A guilty conscious from centuries of selling each other into slavery (a current practice, btw)?
A guilty conscious from the mindnumbingly cruel sadistic sexual torture and abuse inflicted on the women of the continent?
What is your insight, Matt?
Posted by we really want to know on April 15, 2009 at 9:52 AM
34
@31 - see, you just acknowledged that sub-Saharan African societies are thousands of years behind everyone else.

When did they achieve an equal cultural and intellectual level with the West or Asia? I must have missed that part.

If they actually have, WHO was it that prodded them there?
Posted by Faith-Based Equality on April 15, 2009 at 9:53 AM
35
@16: Pfft, not even in the top 10 homicides per capita list, you amateur. And I've lived there, by the way. I was never attacked and the only time I heard a gunshot was a white kid blowing out his neighbor's car tires. I did see a guy who looked non-white peeing on the People Mover, though.

@18: You're the one pretending the South doesn't exist, Brother Jedrich.

@24: Please cite a few studies, thanks.
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 9:54 AM
36
31
Humanity originated in Africa.
Why are they so far behind?
Posted by we really want to know on April 15, 2009 at 9:55 AM
37
@32: Because white liberals complaining about white conservatives complaining about black people has been the name of the game for decades.

Nobody wants to offer solutions because they'd be unpopular ("spend lots and lots and lots and lots of money, but stay far away" say the liberals, "mass graves" say the conservacists).
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 9:58 AM
38
If Africa was the cradle of humanity, it was an indifferent kindergarten at best. Europe and Asia were humanity's finishing schools.

It always amazes me that people say "but everyone evolved from Africans" without realizing just exactly what that implies!
Posted by there is no god and evolution is real, somehow all is equal on April 15, 2009 at 9:59 AM
39
@30
Wave after wave of immigrants have come to America, been mistreated and exploited, pulled themselves up, worked within the American system and succeded, leaving blacks behind.
As long as a group looks outside itself for someone to blame it will never begin to solve it's problems.
Posted by the American Dream works for EVERYONE who tries on April 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM
40
Troll, you brought it up. The onus is all on you and not on me at all. But let me spit out some of the words you try to put in my mouth....

@ 32, I agree that crime rates are disproportionately high for black people. Only a klansman would conclude that "all blacks are stupid and violent." See? You're a racist! Case closed.

@ 34, going from tribal society to settled society isn't necessarily a step forward. That's your cultural bias (which is racist) talking.

@ 33, I think European colonization has something to do with this, don't you? Or is the white man just blameless?

See, you fail to answer any question seriously. You lose, I win again.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:02 AM
41
@ 39, no other group was enslaved for centuries. Fail.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM
42
Matt you keep addressing multiple posters as one person.
Posted by try to keep up on April 15, 2009 at 10:04 AM
43
@41 "@ 39, no other group was enslaved for centuries. Fail."

Well gee, I wonder why?

It couldn't have been a lack of intelligence and primitive mentality and no technological know-how. That couldn't be it at all.
Posted by Epic Troll on April 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM
44
They are one person.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM
45
@44 keep on telling yourself that but it just is not true
Posted by we are legion on April 15, 2009 at 10:07 AM
46
"White Seattle liberals (do they come in any other color?) are totally cool with the concept of Negroes"

You're right! Travel up to the Great White North (North of the Ship canal, south of 85th + Queen Anne, Madison Park and Magnolia) and all you'll meet are tolerant, liberal whites. Of course, the blackest thing around are Obama stickers on Subarus. Tolerance has its limits.

Here's a fine example of Northside, liberal diversity:

http://www.phinneywood.com/2009/03/02/st…
Posted by Stupid White Man on April 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM
47
If America is so unjust to blacks why do none ever emmigrate to majority black nations?
Is it because, for all it's faults, America is still the greatest nation on the earth in which a black can live?
And is it because America offers blacks infinitely more opportunity and justice than any of the 44 black run nations on the planet?
Is that why, Matt?
Posted by the American Dream works for EVERYONE who tries on April 15, 2009 at 10:10 AM
48
@ 45, yeah, right, sure there are more than one of you.

@ 47, you seem to be blaming the victims of colonization, who were left on their own to figure things out while being exploited by neocolonial multinationals, for having a less than successful time running countries whose boundaries were arbitrarily drawn by departing Europeans who didn't give a shit? Hmm.... And it's still not fair to call you racist? Poor baby.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM
49
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34557…

Serum testosterone levels in healthy young black and white men.

Blacks in the United States have the highest prostate cancer rate in the world and nearly twice that of whites in the United States. The 2:1 black-to-white ratio in prostate cancer rates is already apparent at age 45 years, the age at which the earliest prostate cancer cases occur. This finding suggests that the factor(s) responsible for the difference in rates occurs, or first occurs, early in life. Testosterone has been hypothesized to play a role in the etiology of prostate cancer, because testosterone and its metabolite, dihydrotestosterone, are the principal trophic hormones that regulate growth and function of epithelial prostate tissue. This report gives the results of assays of circulating steroid hormone levels in white and black college students in Los Angeles, CA. Mean testosterone levels in blacks were 19% higher than in whites, and free testosterone levels were 21% higher. Both these differences were statistically significant. Adjustment by analysis of covariance for time of sampling, age, weight, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and use of prescription drugs somewhat reduced the differences. After these adjustments were made, blacks had a 15% higher testosterone level and a 13% higher free testosterone level. A 15% difference in circulating testosterone levels could readily explain a twofold difference in prostate cancer risk.

======================================

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob…

Genetic and environmental contributions to cranial capacity in black and white adolescents

Abstract

Data from 236 pairs of twins (472 individuals) aged 13 to 17 years were used to examine genetic and environmental factors influencing cranial size, an indirect estimate of brain volume. Measures were taken of zygosity, head lenght, head breadth, age, sex, race, height, and weight for 187 males and 285 females, 222 Whites and 250 Blacks. Cranial size was estimated from head length and head breadth using standard equations. Group differences were found. Cranial capacity increased over age 13 to 17 from 1,233 cm3 to 1,279 cm3. After adjusting for the effects of age and body size, boys averaged 1,290 cm3 and girls 1,229 cm3, Whites averaged 1,269 cm3 and Blacks 1,251 cm3. Intraclass correlations were calculated and models fitted of proportionate genetic and environmental contributions to variance. Depending on particular corrections for body size, heritabilities for the sample as a whole ranged from 38% to 51% with 6% to 20% due to common environment and from 42% to 52% due to unique (nonshared) environmental factors, including error variance. The proportionate contributions did not vary systematically by sex and the seemingly higher range of heritabilities estimated for Whites than for Blacks (47% to 56% against 12% to 31%) and the lower range of common environment effects for Whites than for Blacks (28% to 32% against 42% to 46%) did not differ significantly. In conclusion, it is indicated that genetic factors are required to account for the phenotypic variance in cranial capacity and that further research is required on whether environmental factors exert more influence in Black populations than in White populations.

More...
Posted by reality itself is racist - deal with it on April 15, 2009 at 10:15 AM
50
Okay kid, it's been fun beating you at your own game again. I'll check back in a few hours but will bid you adieu for now.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:16 AM
51
bwwah haw that's a shitty way to admit defeat, Matt.

Guess what, I don't care if you insult me, I don't care if you call me a racist, because I recognize reality on its own terms, not on how I would like it to be. Sure I'm racist, big deal, never denied it. I've never committed a crime of any kind other than speeding and I don't advocate violence to anyone.

Gee I am so awful for recognizing how shitty reality itself is. Waaaah!
Posted by Reality sucks on April 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM
52
Can anyone explain Alabama, then? We're on a roll it seems.
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 10:23 AM
53
Sure. Alabama is populated by the genetic white-trash dead-end backwaters of the white race. See, I'm racist (geneticist) against my own race too!
Posted by not playing favorites, reality sucks all around on April 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM
54
I'd rather be the poorest redneckist white trashiest Alabaman that a clueless full of shit Seattle Liberal...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHsDa9_HS…
Posted by PROUD to be Sweet Home ALABAMA on April 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM
55
@53: You know, I respect your consistency even though you're using science for eeeeeeevil.

Especially since your reply is made into high comedy by @54.
Posted by Baconcat on April 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM
56
The only place that blacks are still enslaved is in every sub-Saharan African country on Earth, according to the UN. Many of these slave families have been enslaved for well over 300 years.


Shut the fuck up, liar. Eat shit and die, you inferior toad.
Posted by keshmeshi on April 15, 2009 at 11:03 AM
57
@55
What do you mean?
@53, @54, @55 and @56 are all the same poster!
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 11:23 AM
58
56
I think the lying inferior toad, were he here, would ask you for some actual facts otherwise; not that we didn't enjoy your tantrum.
Posted by what is your version? on April 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM
59
Well it looks like things are going swimmingly in here...
Posted by JF on April 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM
60
@56 - Hey Kuntmushy, here are some facts for your naive face. You are the toad. You shut the fuck up. I guess the BBC and the UN and UNICEF are all racist for mentioning facts. You have no arguments, you have no facts, all you have are insults. Here is an insult for you: You are such a retarded liberal white-guilt stereotype.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/365202…

Scale of African slavery revealed


The trafficked children can face terrible physical and emotional abuse

The trafficking of human beings is a problem in every African country, says the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef).

The report, which covers 53 African nations, says children are the biggest victims in what is a very complex phenomenon.

It describes how they are forced into slavery, recruited as child soldiers or sold into prostitution.

========
Posted by know the facts before flinging insults because you look dumb on April 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM
61
Hmm, checking back in to see a ridiculous claim of victory from the troll (yeah, when you don't back up anything you say, you win! Except in real life, dope). Oh, and a sockpuppet using my name @ 57. But, no "fact based discussion" going on. RonK will be disappointed.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM
62
How dare that racist evil toad organization, Anti-Slavery.org, point out unpleasant facts that white-guilt Seattle liberals like Kuntmushy don't like!

http://www.antislavery.org/archive/other…

Trafficking of children in West Africa - focus on Mali and
Côte d'Ivoire

Trafficking of children in West Africa is widespread and increasing. The countries involved include Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, Benin, Gabon, Ghana, Togo, Nigeria, Niger, and Burkina Faso.

Boys and girls, as young as seven, are trafficked, primarily for their labour. The journeys involved can be dangerous and there have been reports of children dying along the route, particularly when travelling by sea in unseaworthy vessels. The children are smuggled both within national boundaries and across international frontiers, sometimes with the collaboration of border guards.

Poverty is central to why parents send their children to work. The prospect of good wages in a wealthier country, such as Gabon or Côte d'Ivoire, seems an acceptable option. But the realities of what most of these children have to face along the route and once they reach their destination are not widely known. Although many of those who are trafficked ultimately do not earn the money promised and the conditions in which they are forced to live and work range from basic to brutal, the reality of one less mouth to feed for a poor household makes a significant difference.

The lure of well-paid work not only attracts parents, but in some cases children go to 'recruiters' themselves, often believing that they will have a good job in the city. However, a recent UNICEF report found that only 13 per cent of these children went willingly.

Apart from the dangerous journey which most of these children face, they are forced to work long hours in harsh conditions. Their working hours, regardless of age and sex, range from ten to 20 hours per day, up to seven days a week, without any time for rest, recreation or education. Basic food, health, sanitation and clothing requirements are not met, and sometimes they are not paid. In addition, they face beatings and other forms of physical abuse from their employer and, particularly in the case of child domestics, are at risk of sexual exploitation by the family employing them. A significant number run away, but unable to return home or find alternative employment, they resort to prostitution to earn a living.

Trafficking from Mali to Côte d'Ivoire
The majority of those trafficked from Mali are boys from the areas of Ségou, Sikasso and Mopti. Networks for trafficking children to Côte d'Ivoire were established in the early 1990s following a demand for cheap labour on its cotton plantations. Most children are recruited by intermediaries and sold on to plantation owners. But some are promised work by relatives or friends and are sent through family networks to work on plantations, in mines, in construction and other types of manual labour where they end up working as slaves.

Because traffickers frequently come from the same region as the children whom they recruit, it is easier for this practice to be hidden as they may know the families and the area. If arrested by police at the border it is not unusual for parents to defend the trafficker saying that he had their permission to take the child across the border for work. Most believe the trafficker's promise that he will find the child well-paid work.

According to a Malian national study, children work for between 5000 and 10,000 FCFA (Ł5 to Ł10) per month. But, in reality, most get no money at all. Instead, this salary is paid to the intermediary, or their labour is used to repay the cost of their transport and maintenance and they can end up working for years without being paid.

A national study in Côte d'Ivoire found that employers paid intermediaries between 50,000 and 75,000 FCFA. Intermediaries also earn money by selling the children to employers.

Isolated from their family, community and culture these children are under the trafficker's and employer's complete control, vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. Conditions are basic and with no consideration for safety standards. On plantations they are poisoned by the chemicals used in farming, they suffer skin diseases, heat stroke, increased heart rate, malnutrition as well as physical abuse.

The story of 'ID' is typical of the hardship these children experience. Now 15 years old, he has returned to Mali after two years, having been trafficked to work on a coffee and yam plantation in Bouafle, Côte d'Ivoire.

'Our day began at 5am. Carrying heavy tools on our head, we had to walk six kilometres through mud and stones in bare feet to reach the fields. By the time we reached them we were soaked through and exhausted. Once we arrived the overseer showed us the area we each had to plant before the day's end. We were afraid of what he would do to us if we could not finish the work. This threat and the threat of being denied food if we could not finish in time forced us to work quickly. The work was hard and bending all day gave us back pains. If we were ill and couldn't work we were afraid that we would be tortured to death. One day I witnessed two of my colleagues being tortured for trying to escape. They became seriously ill and died.'

Estimates of the numbers of children involved in this human trade vary. Based on the numbers of children who were repatriated and arrested at the border, the Malian Consular Office in Abidjan estimates that between 1995 and 1998 more than 600 children, mainly boys, were trafficked from Mali. In 1998 UNICEF reported between 10,000 and 15,000 Malian boys were working on plantations in Côte d'Ivoire. However, this figure does not identify how many were trafficked and how many are employed legally.

Because of the nature of this illegal trade, corruption and the lack of a centralised system for collecting data, accurate statistics have not been compiled.

The conditions and the cost
The effect of trafficking on children is devastating. Apart from the deprivations referred to above, they are in danger of being cut off from their roots, losing contact with their families and their culture. They are denied the fundamental rights of education and recreation crucial to their social and psychological development. Many never return home and can be trafficked more than once. Even when they do manage to return to their villages, they face difficulties in adjustment.

There are several international conventions prohibiting child trafficking. These include the 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade and of Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery; the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Organisation of African Unity's African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child; and International Labour Organisation Convention 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labour. Despite these laws, many of which have been ratified by the countries where trafficking takes place, the number of children being trafficked in West Africa appears to be on the increase.

What is being done
The urgency of this problem is being acknowledged by the governments concerned. A significant step was taken on 6 September 2000 when Mali and Côte d'Ivoire signed an agreement on prohibiting the illegal trafficking of children for labour between the two countries. The accord states that both countries must develop legislation regarding the movement of children abroad.

At a meeting hosted by UNICEF and the International Labour Organisation in Libreville, Gabon from 22-24 February 2000, officials from West and Central African states agreed to A Common Platform of Action which proposes the creation of laws designed to protect child workers, improvements in the system of taking child victims of trafficking into custody, and the strengthening of co-operation among governments. Members also proposed the establishment of transit and reception centres for returned children.

Currently, Mali, as well as Benin and Togo, are the only countries in the region that have formulated specific programmes to fight trafficking.

In 1998, Mali established a Consultative National Commission on Child Trafficking. It also created the Ministry for Children and Family -- one of its tasks is the repatriation of children who return from plantations in Côte d'Ivoire. To facilitate this, in February 2000, the Ministry invited Anti-Slavery to help with the formulation of a programme for rehabilitating children who had been trafficked to Côte d'Ivoire. The government is also working with local NGOs on programmes of rehabilitation.
More...
Posted by Don't confuse me with facts! Waaaaah! Facts are Racist! on April 15, 2009 at 11:47 AM
63
Oh my goodness, look at what those awful racists at CommonDreams.org wrote! The horror! How dare they have the bad taste to point out facts. They must be toads.

http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0507…

African Slavery and Its Denial by Blacks
by Salim Muwakkil

Does slavery still exist in Africa? That question was rudely inserted into the national conversation last month when a ship from the West African nation of Benin reportedly was lost while ferrying child slaves. Although that story turned out to be overblown, it helped pull the cover off one of Africa's dirtiest secrets: slavery persists.

According to UNICEF estimates, there are 200,000 child slaves in West and Central Africa. Most of those forced into involuntary servitude are in economic bondage, with the boys being sold to cotton and cocoa plantations and the girls ending up as domestic workers and vulnerable to sexual exploitation.



Posted by facts make me cry on April 15, 2009 at 11:51 AM
64
Oh no! Those awful racists at the BBC are at it again!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/409157…

Slavery: Mauritania's best kept secret
By Pascale Harter
BBC News, Nouakchott

Skyra is a runaway Mauritanian slave. Her earliest childhood memories are of fetching water, tending animals and cooking and cleaning.


Skyra was born into slavery - but her children are now free
"I was tied up all night and all day. They only untied me so I could do my chores. In the end I could barely move my limbs."

She never earnt a single penny.

"All those years," she told me, "and I don't even own a goat".

Mohamed could not tell me his surname or his age.

As a slave he didn't own the right to either.

But in a candlelit shack in the sandy outskirts of the capital, Nouakchott, he told me the story of his life.

"I don't know how I became a slave," he told me.

"I was just born one. My family were slaves. We did all the hard work for our master and all we received in return was beatings."

Proof

After three attempts at making slavery illegal, the latest as recently as 1981, Mauritania has finally enacted a law which goes further than ever before, making slave ownership punishable with a fine or prison sentence.

I would rather they shot me dead and buried me right there than return with my master

Mohamed
But a year on, and no-one has yet been prosecuted under the new law. "We enacted it just to meet international standards," says Bamariam Koita, director of the government's Human Rights Commission.

Mr Koita maintains that no-one has been prosecuted because slavery was abolished long ago in Mauritania.

"Have you seen a slave? Have you seen a slave market? Of course you haven't," he puffed, confidently answering his own question.

He has a point. Human beings in chains are not bought and sold in the full glare of Nouakchott's market. It's even worse than that, according to Boubakar Messaoud, founder of the local association SOS Slaves.

"A captured slave knows freedom, so to keep him you have to chain him," says Mr Messaoud.

"But a Mauritanian slave, whose parents and grandparents before him were slaves, doesn't need chains. He has been brought up as a domesticated animal."

Rape

Skyra was born to a slave mother so there was never any question she would be anything else. She remembers the years she spent treated like an animal.

"They raped me often," she says shaking with anger.

Officials say slavery does not exist
"At night, when everyone was asleep, they came for me and I couldn't stop them. If I had been free I would never have let this happen to me".

A living reminder of her slavery nestles in Skyra's lap, another sleeps at her feet, on the floor of her corrugated iron shack.

"My master is the father of my first child, my master's son is the father of my second child and my baby girl's father was my master's nephew".

In this way says Boubakar Messaoud, "We have achieved what the American plantation owners dreamed of - the breeding of perfectly submissive slaves".

Count the slaves

Skyra was not perfectly submissive. Her small insurrections earned her beatings until she found the strength - and the opportunity - to run away. She was determined that her children would not be born into slavery as she had been.

Mohamed escaped his master when soldiers passed by his isolated village in the desert. "When my master demanded the soldiers hand me over, I told them I would rather they shot me dead and buried me right there than return with my master."

In answer to the Mauritanian government's assertion that slavery no longer exists in Mauritania, Mohamed recites the names of the family members he left behind in slavery. "If I tell you their names, can you count them?" he asked shyly. "I was never taught". There are eight members of his immediate family still living as slaves, and Mohamed tells me there are many more in Mauritania.

It is difficult to know how many though. International human rights organisations such as Amnesty International are prevented from entering the country to conduct research.

"Not only has the government denied the existence of slavery and failed to respond to cases brought to its attention," says Amnesty, "it has hampered the activities of organisations which are working on the issue, including by refusing to grant such organisations official recognition."

Boubakar Messaoud and other members of SOS Slaves have been imprisoned and harassed by the authorities for their anti-slavery campaigning.

It seems the government has little interest in really wiping out slavery. Meanwhile slavery remains Mauritania's best kept open secret.

"Everyone knew we were slaves," said Mohamed. "It's a normal thing, to have slaves in Mauritania."


More...
Posted by where did you go, Kuntmushy? on April 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM
65
looks like the troll has the facts on his side in regards to modern African slavery
Posted by not the same guy on April 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM
66
65 is the same guy.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 11:58 AM
67
Oh gawd won't someone stop those awful racist toads at the BBC from destroying my naive outlook on life???

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fr…

Born to be a slave in Niger

By Hilary Andersson
BBC Africa Correspondent, Niger

Slavery continues to blight the lives of many millions around the world. Although officially abolished in some countries two centuries ago, people trafficking, bonded labour and child labour still exist.


Slaves come from the poorest communities in Niger

There are some places on earth that few outsiders visit or know about, vast empty sections of the earth where time has stood still for centuries.

Niger is one of those places. It is a country that you can drive through for hours without seeing a soul.

A nation of vast, barren and windswept landscapes, a country of people who live almost entirely off cattle, and off the labour of human slaves.

Slavery in Niger is not an obscure thing, nor a curious relic of the past, it is an intrinsic part of society today.

A Nigerian study has found that almost 8% of the population are slaves.

You wonder how this can be in the 21st Century and why people do not know about it?

We began a journey to find out more.

Humiliation

We drove for hundreds of miles north across the desert. There were no roads for much of the journey and our cars rattled and jarred across plains set with, what seemed like, solidified waves of sand every few feet.



We choked on the dust, hour after hour, wondering if we would ever see another human being at all in this desolate place, let alone a slave.

We were heading for a well, owned by a local nomadic leader and we had been told he, like many here, owned slaves.

We eventually found his tents and reversed our cars immediately, hoping to locate his slaves without his knowledge first, so that we could speak freely to them, without them being afraid of intimidation.

We found the slaves' tents some way off, and there we met Fatima, a mother of seven children.

She lived in a scrawny brown tent that rose no higher than my elbow off the ground. Her children were all around and one of them had a face bloated with a terrible infection for which she had no medicine.

She seemed humiliated by her status, but seemed to have no greater expectations of her life


Fatima told us she had been working for her master for as long as she could remember.

She said her master did not pay her, but fed and clothed her.

"What can I do?" she said. "I have no money, I need food, I have children and so if I can work for a man who at least feeds me then that is good."

When I asked her if she was a slave she looked at the ground, and said yes.

She seemed humiliated by her status, but seemed to have no greater expectations of her life.

Appalling abuse

When we spoke to her masters they denied owning slaves. The practice of slavery was outlawed in Niger last year.

Trading in slaves has been banned in Niger since the days of the French colonists in the last century, but ownership of slaves was never specifically banned.

Most slaves in Niger today are the descendents of slaves who were kidnapped in wars and raids centuries ago, and were simply born into their status.

Many slaves in Niger are appallingly abused by their masters.

Slave children are taken away from their parents before they are two-years-old, to break the bonds between parent and child and to eliminate any sense of identity.

The children grow up working in the house of the master.


Assibit was born into slavery, as was her mother and her husband

The slave owners encourage the slaves to reproduce to increase their numbers, sometimes even determining when they have sexual intercourse.

They treat the slaves like their cattle.

Slaves are often beaten for small misdemeanours.

They work long hours and are sometimes deprived of food as punishment.

There are documented cases of slaves being stripped naked in front of their families to humiliate them, of female slaves being raped by their owners, and even of male slaves being castrated by their owners as punishment.

Hopes and fears

Assibit, another slave we met, could not bear the punishment any longer and ran away from her master last July, leaving her husband, also a slave, behind.

She undertook a traumatic journey back to her former owner with us and a human rights worker to see if, under Niger's new laws, her husband could be freed.

When we got to his tents, she lowered herself in the seat so that she would not be seen.

The human rights activist confronted the owner, a lanky thin older man, surrounded by his tall sons.

They became aggressive and began to shout at us to turn off our cameras and leave.

They screamed that the human rights activist was a slave too, and that he deserved a beating.

An entire section of the population would have to be taught that they are not intrinsically inferior to others


We tried to retreat into the car, but our vehicle was stuck in the deep soft sand and would not move.

Eventually, with the sons banging on the windows the car began to plough forward slowly, and we fled.

When Assibit first ran away from her owners she was asked what it was like to be free, but she did not understand the question.

She did not understand the concept of freedom, or even the word.

When I arrived in Niger, I could barely believe that slavery exists in this century on such a scale, but when I left I could not see how it could end in our generation.

Ending slavery in Niger would require a social revolution.

An entire section of the population would have to be taught that they are not intrinsically inferior to others, but that is what they have believed for generations.

The slave owners, and the establishment, are reluctant to teach them.

More...
Posted by facts are scary and sad on April 15, 2009 at 12:00 PM
68
@66 - even if it is the same guy he still has the facts on his side
Posted by you can't choose your facts on April 15, 2009 at 12:01 PM
69
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?repo…

NIGER: Survey finds over 870,000 are still slaves

Photo: IRIN
Niger, where slavery is still prevalent
NIAMEY, 13 May 2003 (IRIN) - Although Niger recently passed new tougher laws against slavery, more than 870,000 people - about seven percent of the country's population - still live in conditions of forced labour, according to Timidria, a local human rights group.

The organisation, whose name means "Brotherhood" in the Tuareg language, recently announced the results of a survey conducted in August last year in six of Niger's eights administrative regions. This showed that 870,364 people still worked in servitude. The vast majority - 602,000 - were in the southwestern Tillaberry region, where the capital Niamey is situated.

Slavery is a long ingrained tradition in this poor landlocked country of 11 million people on the southern edge of the Sahara, which achieved independence from France in 1960.

Timidria said the custom was especially prevalant amongst nomadic pastoralists of the Tuareg tribe.

Its survey found that, apart from Tillaberry, the main concentrations of slaves were in Agadez region in the desert north, where 87,000 people were living conditions of forced labour, and in Tahoua region, adjacent to Tillaberry in the southwest, where it found 59,000 slaves.

Over the years, numerous workshops and symposiums have been held to expose the continuation of slavery in Niger. Parliament recently passed a law which recognises "slavery and slave-like practices" as crimes punishable with a prison sentence of up to 30 years.

The International Labour Organization defines as "forced labour" any activity which an individual is forced to perform services under threat of punishment without his or her own consent. This international definition excludes national military service, communal service or work imposed to an individual sentenced to communal service.

In Africa, Niger, Mauritania and Sudan are considered the main countries were slavery persists.

Many slave-owners interviewed by Timidria said the forced labourers were an inheritance and a responsibility.

"We inherited these slaves from our parents, but I did not know it was slavery", the organisation quoted one Tuareg chief as saying. "They are victims who don't want to leave us".

According to university professor, El Back Adam, Niger's slaves refuse to leave their masters despite the terrible conditions in which they live, because at least "they have a roof under their head and something to eat."

More...
Posted by I could do this all day! on April 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM
70
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?repo…

NIGER: Slavery - an unbroken chain

Photo: IRIN/ G. Cranston
Both of 25-year-old Azara's children were conceived when her master raped her. Even though they are his children, he classes them as his slaves
NIAMEY, 21 March 2005 (IRIN) - Despite the fierce desert wind and 40 degree Celsius temperature, the exhausted young woman sat with her two children outside a lean-to hut made of rattan mats, on the southern fringes of the Sahara.

Azara, 25, haltingly began to tell the story of her life as a modern-day slave born into bondage, like her parents and grandparents before her. She was owned by a nomadic Tuareg tribesman who roamed the vast expanses of northern Niger.

“I can’t remember any specific times that were bad; my whole past is marked with hard memories,” she told IRIN.

“I had to pound millet and fetch water all the time. I worked day and night. I had to do whatever my master told me to do. It was out of the question to say no.

“If I ever I refused I was beaten so hard. I tried once to resist but he beat me.” In 2003, she finally escaped.

Azara is one of at least 43,000 people born into slavery in Niger, a landlocked West African country with a population of 12 million, comprising eight main ethnic groups.

In 2004, the UN classed the country as the second poorest in the world.

Although it has the world’s highest birth rate, average life-expectancy is just 45 years. Seventy-eight percent of the population is illiterate, according to UNICEF.

Slavery dates back for centuries in Niger. When the country claimed independence from France in 1960, the practice was outlawed, in theory. It was finally criminalised - with a 30-year jail-term on conviction - in 2003, after five years of lobbying by Anti-Slavery International and Nigerien human-rights group Timidria.

Fearing imprisonment under the new law, a Tuareg chief who headed 19 clans in western Niger promised in late 2004 that he would release every one of the 7,000 slaves owned by his people for generations.

Timidria and its partners were overjoyed. After a decade of tireless work, the first slaves ever released in Niger would be set free at a desert ceremony set for 5 March 2005, in the village of Inates, 277 km northwest of the capital, Niamey.

International observers and journalists were invited to witness the historic event.

Anti-Slavery International called it “exceptional” - a worldwide one-off, unlike anything seen since the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade more than a century earlier.

Instead, on the day, no slaves were released.

U-turns and manouevres

Arissal Ag Amdague, the Tuareg chief, stood up before the assembled dignitaries, including a delegation from the Nigerien Human Rights Commission, and denied that neither he nor any of his 19 clans owned any slaves.


Chief Arissal Ag Amdague backtracked at a meeting held on 5 March, in Ates in far west Niger, on written promises he made to free all 7,000 slaves his people own in western Niger
“Slavery doesn’t exist in Inates,” he declared. "Nobody has told me they have seen slaves. If someone has slaves they must tell me.”

Dozens of Nigeriens (and one Malian) in Arissal’s territory - and the region around Tahoua, 565km northeast of Niamey - had told IRIN in the days before the ceremony that they had experienced slavery.

The chief himself had signed a pledge with Timidria, dated September 21 2004, entitled ‘Freeing of slaves’, which agreed to the release.

There is still no clear understanding about why he changed his position so dramatically.

Anti-Slavery International says it has spoken to Nigerien and international observers who witnessed Arissal and his subordinates being visited by a government delegation, led by the Nigerien Human Rights Commission, soon before the ceremony was to take place. They say the delegation intimidated the chief and his juniors into denying slavery existed.

David Ould, deputy director of Anti-Slavery International, told IRIN: “We are pretty depressed the events took the turn they did.

“Despite [the Niger’s Human Rights] Commission and the government making strong statements about the new law and their intention to see it enforced, they have followed this with statements that slavery does not exist in Niger, sending out a confusing message about their intentions.”

Ould added “It is also very worrying to hear of the Niger government’s intimidation of the population. We are concerned it appears to be moving away from a position that slavery does exist in Niger to one of denial.”

Niger’s government, which is a signatory to International Labour Organisation conventions against forced labour, adopted the new anti-slavery provisions in the country's penal code in May 2003. They came into force 12 months later.

These provide for prison terms of 10 to 30 years, and fines of one million CFA francs (US $2,123), to five million CFA francs ($10,617) for people found guilty of enslavement.


Lonpo Garba (right), head of Niger's Human Rights Commission. Garba stated that slavery does not exist in Niger - contradicting estimates of more than 43,000 people in bondage
Similar penalties are applicable to “a master or his accomplice [who] has sexual relations with a woman considered a slave, or the wife of a man considered a slave”, and “to anyone found guilty of placing a woman considered a slave at the disposal of another person, with a view to having sexual relations”.

Niger’s Human Rights Commissioner Lonpo Garba, who attended the 5 March ceremony, claimed there was no slavery in Niger any more.

He said Arissal only agreed to a staged release in return for cash from Timidria and others; money intended to ease the former slaves’ integration into free society.

“We made a survey which did not prove the existence of these 7,000 slaves there [in Inates],” Garba told IRIN. “The commission does not deny the existence of slavery in Niger in the past, but [there are] not 7,000 slaves in today’s Niger.

“We deem that organising a slave release ceremony is unacceptable as it appears groundless and in contradiction with Niger’s laws” , he announced.

However, the testimonies collected by IRIN, which echo earlier reports gathered by Anti-Slavery International, indicate that the practice is still widespread across the southern Sahara - in Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Sudan.

Azara, who escaped into the care of Timidria in late 2003, told how she was never paid for her day-long labours for her master.

“We had to sleep outside unless it rained,” she said.

“Our master was nomadic Tuareg so we lived in tents, moving every two months.”

There have been reports of slaves having to move their master’s tents four times a day, to make sure they are always in the shade.

“It was us slaves who had to fold the tents and move them,” Azara confirmed.

“If it was far away we used donkeys, but if it was close we had to carry it on our head.”

Another young woman, 20-year-old Tamada, fled over the border into Niger from her life of slavery in neighbouring Mali. She has two children – the first born when she was 12.


Tamada, 20, from Niger, escaped from her life of slavery in Mali. “The situation of a slave is more than I can describe. There was so much violence, verbal insults, spitting.”
“My master used to beat me so often,” she said.

“When I looked after the animals, sometimes one would run off; if this happened I would be beaten.

“The situation of a slave is more than I can describe. There was so much violence, verbal insults, spitting.

“If we didn’t do what we were told we would be hit so hard. I was made to clear up my masters faeces. I was so afraid of him.”

History of enslavement

Descent-based slavery, where generations of the same family are born into bondage, is traditionally practised by at least four of Niger’s eight ethnic groups. It is especially rife among the warlike Tuareg, in the wild deserts of north and west Niger, who roam near the borders with Mali and Algeria.

Historically, the Tuareg swelled the ranks of their slaves during war raids into other peoples’ lands.

Their demand for bonded labourers increased in the 19th century, when they began to settle in northern Niger and farm, according to a March 2004 report edited by Galy Kadir Abdelkader for Anti-Slavery International and Timidria.

“Slaves constituted the principal labour force in warlike societies,” Abdelkader wrote.

“Their numbers kept increasing and, in the region of Say on the right bank of the river Niger, it is estimated that three-quarters of the population around 1904-1905 was composed of slaves.”

War was then the main source of supply of slaves, although many were bought at slave markets, run mostly by indigenous peoples.

The trade was not driven by international demand as was seen further south in Africa, according to Abdelkader’s report, entitled 'Slavery in Niger, Historical, Legal and Contemporary Perspectives'.

Otherwise slaves were bartered, kidnapped, pawned or passed on as dowry.

Although French colonisers stamped out trafficking and slave markets, they refused to class bonded-workers as slaves, terming them ‘voluntary labourers’ in a 1905 survey.

This fudged classification carried over into independence half a century later (Niger was proclaimed an autonomous republic in 1958, and gained full independence in 1960), when slavery was outlawed under Niger’s first constitution.

However, it carried no penalty.

In a bid to quell dissent amongst the powerful Tuareg – and other slave-owning tribes – the first post-colonial administrations welcomed slave masters into the government.

Niger’s minister of nomadic affairs between independence and 1974 was a provincial chief, who had a powerful interest amongst his clansmen not to discuss slavery.

A 1974 coup ushered in 13 years of military dictatorship under Seyni Kountché, who also brought in slave masters to chair local authorities.

“Chiefs were considered not only as agents of the state, but also as judges, and especially custodians of the traditions,” said Abdelkader.

“In such conditions, it is easy to understand that the ‘justiciable’ slave could not find any attentive ears, since both tradition and religion recognised and legitimised slavery, which was not sanctioned by the law.”

Despite the change in the country’s penal code to criminalise the practice, human-rights groups working in Niger describe ongoing abuses.

“In Niger, slavery is a real and current phenomenon that is alive today,” said Ilguiilas Weila, president of Timidria.


A slave girl in north west Niger. “I was born into slavery, my parents are also slaves..” She wears a bracelet on her ankle, a symbol of slavery.
“Masters control their slaves not only through abuse, humiliation and violence, but also through psychological control. The master indoctrinates his slaves and keeps them in complete ignorance and far away from town centres.

“This indoctrination consists of separating the child from his parents from a very young age, in order to traumatise the child, so that he sees himself as an inferior person, born only to serve others and to accept the humiliation that will be inflicted on him throughout his life.”

Weila, whose organisation has 300,000 members and 636 regional offices throughout Niger, explained how religion was sometimes involved: “A slave does not have a family. Left in obscurity, he is often told that God has willed this to happen, in order to cultivate a fatalistic acceptance of his being a slave.

“Wherever they go, slaves are only an addition to the workforce, an accessory whose views or opinions do not count in affairs of social or political management.”

There were high hopes that Arissal’s grand gesture to free all his slaves would serve as a powerful message to other slave masters that the force of the new law was being brought to bear on them.

Preparations for the release took nearly a year. The vast majority of the slaves to be freed had never handled money before, they had no possessions, no concept of trade or of how to handle economic independence.


A young Nigerien slave collects water from a traditional well in far west Niger.
Overnight, they would have been handed the choice where to live, who to marry, where to work, and they would for the first time have had the right to demand payment for their labour.

Supported by international donors, Timidria collected enough food, clothing and shelter to care for the first 7,000 freed for six months - enough time to sensitise them to a life making decisions for themselves.

Community schools, cereal stores, seed banks, wells and health clinics were to be established.

Most of the freed slaves were expected to stay where they were, but to be wage-earning employees for their former masters who had until then paid them nothing.

“The biggest immediate change would have been psychological - they would no longer have had to follow orders,” Romana Cacchioli, Anti-Slavery International’s Africa programme director, told IRIN.

“The slaves see themselves, as their masters have always told them they are, as no more than dogs.

“The ceremony was to be symbolic, a first step towards their emancipation and restoring their human dignity.

“It was the beginning of a long road.”

Anti-slavery campaigners will now begin again to pressure the Niger government to search out and prosecute slave masters, as it promised to do in May 2003 when the new law was enacted.

Until then, the only former slaves able to live a free life are those, like Azara and Tamada, who managed to escape.


Sabila, 15 has been repeatedly mistreated by her slave master, often being raped. She was born into slavery
Sabila's story

Sabila – not her real name – is 15 years old, and was born into slavery. She lives with her master in a village 100 km outside the central Niger town of Tahoua.

Timid and unsure of herself, she spoke to IRIN out of sight of other slaves, in a tattered mud-and-thatch hut outside her village.

“My family are all slaves to my master’s family. I have to work so hard, fetching water and firewood, and other domestic work,” she said.

“He forces me to sleep with him so many times. The times I have tried to refuse he beats me. This all started when I was about seven years old.

“He takes me into his room, unclothes me and rapes me. It makes me so sad. I reported it to my father but he, like me, can’t do anything, because he too is a slave.”

Unusually for a slave in Niger, Sabila was allowed by her master to go to school, after a teacher threatened to take him to court if he refused.

“He was afraid and agreed that if I worked for him in the mornings and evenings I could go.


A metal anklet worn only by the slave-classes of Nigerien society. There are more than 43,000 slaves in Niger, and while none where the shackles commonly associated with the slave trade, these anklets serve as a powerful symbolic reminder they are classed apart.
“I have studied up to Class Five, but now he has refused to let me go any longer.

"At school when the teachers taught us about slavery, they teach that it goes back to the transatlantic slave trade and that it doesn’t exist anymore.

“I am too afraid to say anything.”

Sabila’s master has a daughter who moved to Nigeria to marry, and he wants to take Sabila there and give her to his daughter as a gift.

“When my parents found out they were not happy, and asked our master to let me stay with them. He said no, she is my slave, she must come with me.

“I have refused. He is preparing to go now; I am so afraid that he will kidnap me and take me with him.”

The 15-year-old’s future is unclear.

“I am still living and working for him. I have been having problems with my periods, they have not been normal and I have had bad pains.

“The last time I had a period was about three or four months ago. My master raped me three months ago.”

More...
Posted by plenty more where that came from! on April 15, 2009 at 12:04 PM
71
His facts aren't the problem, it's the way he cherry picks them and makes completely unsupported conclusions with them.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:06 PM
72
Dammit BBC! You are making Kuntmushy look stupid! Racists!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/fr…

Ghana's trapped slaves

Togbe Adzimashi Adukpo is a priest - he is also a slave master

By Humphrey Hawksley in eastern Ghana
The woman let her bright green cloth slip down to reveal her breasts. But she did not care.

The African heat seeped through a hazy sky, drying up everything around and sapping strength.

The girls are my slaves - they are the property of my shrine"

Togbe Adzimashi Adukpo
She hauled up a bucket from a well, spilling water on the dirt ground, then rested by burying her head in her hands. Her rounded, scarred shoulders showed years of hard labour.

When she looked up, her eyes were completely blank as if no longer able to reflect pain, happiness, or any of those basic human emotions.

Hutealor Wede does not know how old she is, nor can she remember how long she has been in the village of Fiato Avendrpedo in eastern Ghana. All she knows is that she is a slave and likely to die there.

"My grandfather had illegal sex with a woman," she says, expressionless. "The gods punished our family.

"I was the virgin daughter, so I was brought to this village and given to the priest to stop the disasters happening.

"I have to do everything for the priest. Anything he wants."

Law ignored

Hutealor Wede is a victim of Trokosi, which from the local dialect literally means slavery to the gods.

It is part of a traditional religion where the priest mediates between the people and the gods - and of course interprets what they want. Three years ago a law was passed specifically to ban it, with a minimum punishment of three years in jail.

Agbogbe Hodui: Faces daily humiliation

But no woman has been freed because of it and no-one has been arrested.

Human rights groups are now meeting in Accra to try to put pressure on the government to stamp it out. The new president, John Kufuor, has pledged to implement the law in full.

"Young girls should be in educational establishments not in the harem of some fetish priest," he told the BBC.
More...
Posted by let's all ignore the facts and they will magically vanish! on April 15, 2009 at 12:06 PM
73
Oh no! Smithsonian.com is revealed to be a hotbed of racist lying toads too! Kuntmushy better get right on it!

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/people-pla…

Born into Bondage
Despite denials by government officials, slavery remains a way of life in the African nation of Niger
By Paul Raffaele
Smithsonian magazine

(that one is 11 pages long so you can look at it yourself)
Posted by can't stop the facts! on April 15, 2009 at 12:09 PM
74
You realize that this has no bearing at all on American crime, don't you?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:10 PM
75
Just keep telling yourself whatever it is that gets you through the day, Matt.
Posted by sure, sure on April 15, 2009 at 12:12 PM
76
I'm not the one with that problem.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:15 PM
77
Matt, you're like a guy standing under a waterfall insisting that he's not getting wet.
Posted by even the other trolls are embarrassed for you on April 15, 2009 at 12:19 PM
78
You're still projecting.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM
79
To sum it up:

Blacks commit more violent crime per capita than any race - FACT - see #12

Blacks have more testosterone and smaller craniums : FACT - see #49

Black slavery still exists - in every sub-Saharan Africa - where blacks enslave other blacks: FACT - see #s 60, 62, 63, 64, 67, 69, 70, 72, & 73
Posted by keep on trying to insult reality away, though on April 15, 2009 at 12:24 PM
80
oops, typo, should be "in every sub-Saharan African country"

I am sure this totally destroys my credibility with the Seattle Grammar Police. Waaaah!
Posted by focus on grammar, not facts! on April 15, 2009 at 12:26 PM
81
So what do you suggest we do about it?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:28 PM
82
They didn't sample the troll or else he would have leveled out the study on cranium size.
Posted by Facts ARE harsh things aren't they troll? on April 15, 2009 at 12:32 PM
83
My first suggestion is to stop flinging insults when confronted with facts that do not agree with your naive worldview.
Posted by cuz then you look stupid when the facts come out on April 15, 2009 at 12:33 PM
84
@82 - WOW! Your amazing insult REALLY DID make all the facts go away! Good goin'!
Posted by insults make reality vanish and are great arguments vs facts on April 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM
85
Hmmm, when I read aloud 83's comments it sounds like crickets chirping. Could that be because you don't have any answers? Could it be because, for all the facts at your disposal, it doesn't add up to shit? Could it be because you're STILL afraid to just write your racist conclusions that you can only hint at?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:37 PM
86
Hmmm, 10 minutes and no response. Figures.

Bye, troll.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM
87
sorry, was taking a shit.

if my comment sounds like crickets chirping, then yours sound like toads farting.

I already said I was a racist. Did you miss that? At least I backed up my horrible immoral thoughtcrime with some facts. What do you have besides insults?
Posted by insult the facts away some more, it is funny! on April 15, 2009 at 12:52 PM
88
@87,

African-Americans make up 13 percent of the country's illicit drug users. 74 percent of those who are sentenced to prison for drug possession are African-American.

But there's no institutional racism here, right?

I bet you're really pissed that a brilliant black man is President, too.

Posted by Mr. X on April 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM
89
@88 maybe that's because they stupidly do their drugs blatantly right out in the open like all the ones that smoke weed and crack at 3rd and Pine etc, and because most whites who do drugs are smart enough to be discreet about it and do them at home... just a remote possibility ;)
Posted by but that would make too much sense, wouldn't it? on April 15, 2009 at 1:25 PM
90
Reality wins again... politically-correct naivete loses again... imagine that!
Posted by reality sucks if you have not noticed already on April 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM
91
The Conchords take on urban violence....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0pTICdrL…
Posted by kiwi's couldn't be racist on April 15, 2009 at 2:56 PM
92
90
Matt from Denver won this one.
Posted by definitely not Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:05 PM
93
@ 92 - you made me spit out my drink laughing at that one
Posted by keep trying, keep denying, reality wins every time on April 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM
94
@ 93, yes, reality wins every time.
Posted by Guess what, you're in denial of reality on April 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM
95
you must have missed #79 or chosen to completely ignore it then
Posted by because that is the reality on April 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM
96
Conjecture: Matt and the racist troll are the same poster.

Matt is a classic internet troll (compulsively engaging in insincere argument and getting off on the heat, not the light).

His objective here seems to be setting the table to make the racist troll look good, building traffic and suckering bystanders into the mix.

At best he's a Colmes to the R.T.'s Hannity, but he seems much more devoted than that.
Posted by RonK, Seattle on April 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM
97
RonK, you're a dope.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM
98
I am the racist troll and I am definitely not Matt in Denver. If Matt in Denver is making me look good, that is the fault of his own shitty arguing technique.

I can't help it if, even after presented with indisputable facts from neutral and anti-racist sources (UN, BBC, Human Rights Watch etc) he still continues to deny the facts about reality.

And what ever happened to keshmeshi? Remember, it said I was a lying toad because I had said that blacks still enslave other blacks in Africa, and have done so for the last few hundred years at least. Well, I completely disproved keshmeshi, due to its shitty arguing technique too.

You Seattle white-guilt liberals need to learn to argue with facts and not insults because when you have no facts and only emotional insults it makes you look extra-stupid when proven to be totally wrong.
Posted by Evil Racist Troll, not Matt in wherever the fuck he is on April 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM
99
Yeah, like it's possible for ANYONE to make you look good.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:25 PM
100
Oops, almost forgot - Troll, you never say what the facts MEAN. That's why all your facts don't mean shit. If this were a court case, even the friendliest judge would throw it out because you aren't making a case.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:27 PM
101
heavy on insults, short on facts, that's Matt in Denver for sure
Posted by I don't care if I look good because I know the facts on April 15, 2009 at 3:27 PM
102
How many times do I have to spell it out for you, Matt?

Fact: Blacks commit the most violent crime per capita in the USA

Fact: Blacks have more testosterone, smaller cranial capacity, more impulsive behavior, less intelligence (on average)

Fact: Africans have themselves to blame for slavery

AND FACT: Pointing out any of the facts above makes people like Matt in Denver shit their pants in indignation.

====

THEREFORE: Blacks are different from whites in many ways. Celebrate diversity!
Posted by cuz diversity is our greatest strength on April 15, 2009 at 3:31 PM
103
@ 102, That's your conclusion?

Oh yeah, I'm the one with a reality perception problem. Yep.

Better ask the orderlies for your meds.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:32 PM
104
White power!

The President is near....
Posted by Gabby Johnson on April 15, 2009 at 3:33 PM
105
Keep the insults coming, Matt, one day the facts might vanish!

Posted by your insults are hurting my feewings waaaaah - not a fact on April 15, 2009 at 3:34 PM
106
Like the facts that institutional and systematic racism is a mitigating factor? Is that one of the facts you mean?
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:36 PM
107
If by "mitigating factor" you mean "excuse for rape and murder", then NO.
Posted by but keep trying! this is fun! on April 15, 2009 at 3:37 PM
108
No. I mean as a source of all these problems.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM
109
You seem to have missed the part about slavery existing in Africa for hundreds of years, even before contact with whites. You also seem to have missed the part about cranial capacity, testosterone levels and how they relate to lower intelligence and poor impulse control. You seem to have a huge problem with reading comprehension in general.
Posted by but it has to all be YT's fault! My Prof at Evergreen said! on April 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM
110
No, just a problem with people who are long on "facts" but short on finding logical conclusions with them, or even lacking the bravery to say outright what they mean. I mean, way to chicken out at 102.

RonK, this is why you don't reason with trolls.

Thanks for playing! I gotta go catch a bus now, since it's almost 5 here.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 3:46 PM
111
Well Matt, what other logical conclusions can you come to about a group of people who commit the most horrific sexual violence of anyone wherever they are found anywhere in the world, have smaller cranial capacity, proven lower intelligence, poor impulse control, and a history of enslaving and committing genocide on one another? It seems like a logical conclusion could be that they are naturally violent and stupid. Is that clear enough for you or do we have to go through another hundred posts for you to get it?
Posted by Reading Is Fundamental on April 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
112
from #110: "RonK, this is why you don't reason with trolls."

So what exactly have you been trying to do this whole time, "Matt from Denver"?
Posted by work on those "reasoning skills" on April 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM
113
mmm. smaller brains and more testosterone. just the way i like em.
Posted by schmoopie.bukulina on April 15, 2009 at 5:27 PM
114
The African-American Academy was the poorest performing school in Seattle for years in a row, even though its express purpose was to raise black kid's grades and test scores by being "Afrocentric".

I wonder why?
Posted by Samuel on April 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM
115
@ 112, remember all those questions I asked above at 22 and 30? The ones you ignored because the answers would undermine your position? (No, current conditions in Africa have nothing to do with historical conditions in America.) Those are reasoning skills - I have and you lack them. You wouldn't be racist if you did.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM
116
Re: your question @ #21: "Do you think that if it weren't Republican PC to deny class differences in this nation, that you'd find similar crime rates if you did states by income rather than race?"

- I'm not a Republican (I voted for Obama, believe it or not, in the hopes that his example would improve black men's behavior - probably totally naive on my part) so I don't know what they think, but if crime is related to income, then why are children of black middle-class parents more likely to become poor? Maybe there is some correlation?

================
http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_report…

"the intergenerational analysis reveals a significant difference in the extent to which parents are able to pass their economic advantages onto their children. Whereas children of white middle-income parents tend to exceed their parents in income, a majority of black children of middle-income parents fall below their parents in income and economic status."

Columbia sociologist Ronald B. Mincy, who was an advisor to the Pew study, says they went over the results again and again to make sure they were right. "There is a lot of downward mobility among African Americans," he told the Washington Post. “We don't have an explanation."
=======================================================

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-298.html

For decades critics of the public schools have been saying, "You can't solve educational problems by throwing money at them." The education establishment and its supporters have replied, "No one's ever tried." In Kansas City they did try. To improve the education of black students and encourage desegregation, a federal judge invited the Kansas City, Missouri, School District to come up with a cost-is-no-object educational plan and ordered local and state taxpayers to find the money to pay for it.

Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per pupil--more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers' salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country.

The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration.

The Kansas City experiment suggests that, indeed, educational problems can't be solved by throwing money at them, that the structural problems of our current educational system are far more important than a lack of material resources, and that the focus on desegregation diverted attention from the real problem, low achievement.

===================

Regarding your question @ #30, you are basically again agreeing that many blacks are stupid and violent, but you are saying that white oppression made them that way, not nature and genetics. Fine. The bottom line is that there is still a huge population of irreparibly stupid and violent people for the next few generations at least.

I really don't care WHY someone is stupid and violent. The fact that they are stupid and violent and very likely will remain that way is really all I need to know.
More...
Posted by stupid violent people are likely to remain stupid & violent on April 15, 2009 at 6:44 PM
117
guaranteed the attacker was not white

http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattle911/arc…

Timely Warning Notification of a Criminal Incident
04/14/09
Suspect in University District Assault Arrested

This message to members of the University community is being sent in the interest of public safety and in compliance with federal law requiring timely warning notification of crimes committed on or near campus.

On Tuesday, April 14, 2009 at 8:13 p.m., a female UW student was assaulted at the intersection of University Way, N.E. and N.E. 41st Street. The perpetrator asked her for twenty dollars, was refused and asked for the money a second time. After the second refusal, the suspect punched the victim in the face. The suspect then fled the scene but was located by a UWPD officer a few blocks away. The suspect was detained, positively identified by a witness, and subsequently arrested by Seattle Police and booked into King County jail. The victim was treated at the scene by medics.

Posted by but don't let facts spoil your fun on April 15, 2009 at 6:52 PM
118
the troll focuses only on crime and race, what a sad, sad existence of fear and petty distrust. sure these things happen and there may be "facts" behind them, but come on, the majority of people, of any race are good... and bad shit can happen in many ways at the hands of many different kinds of people. you can worry about stupid shit spewed by stupid childish people, or you can live.

this obsession is evidence of a truly sick mind.
Posted by one off observation for the humane out there on April 15, 2009 at 7:20 PM
119
So, there's downward mobility? Hmmm.... How does that support your case exactly?

Um, no, there's absolutely no way to interpret that statement as "agreeing that blacks are violent and stupid." It wasn't even in response to such an allegation.

However, it appears that you are conceding that you have no solution to offer, nor are interested in finding one. I can't see any other way to take your last paragraph at 116.

Well, it's been fun sparring with you over two threads, but you've admitted everything we need to know about you and undermined any credibility (which was none IMO) you might have had, even with a guy like RonK.

Thank you and good night.
Posted by Matt from Denver on April 15, 2009 at 10:55 PM
120
The tragedy and horror of a drive by shooting is over shadowed by the nonsense "race" arguements.

Please do some serious unbiased research about Africa and African-Americans. The generalizations made here about Africa and African-Americans were simplistic and silly.

The justice system in the US punishes race, income and then the crime...in that order. Pretending that the system is just and fair is a joke. There are two different systems in this country. The DOJ statistical "facts" arguement is a joke.

To the racist all "blacks" are to be blamed for the action of an individual-when something bad happens.
A lot of white men(young and old) go on shooting sprees. Maybe it is their massive cranial capacity and lower testosterone levels.

I am still confused why slaverey in some country in Africa is relevent or particulary signifigant to African Americans. Can African Americans buy slaves in Africa and ship them to the US to work in cotton fields? Seriously...why is this supposed to be revelent to African Americans and one one else?

Racism really does make one stupid.
Posted by darn darkies... on April 16, 2009 at 2:53 AM
121
The reason slavery in Africa was brought up so much was because keshmeshi claimed that the present-day, continued, centuries-old practice of blacks enslaving other blacks in Africa was a lie.

As you can see, it is not a lie.
Posted by keshmeshi got that one wrong on April 16, 2009 at 6:24 AM
122
Huh.

http://www.norwaypost.no/content/view/21…

Immigrants behind most cases of aggravated sexual assault

The Oslo Police have over the past three years investigated 41 cases of aggravated sexual assault, which resulted in rape. All of them were carried out by non-western immigrants to Norway.

The police now urge that more efforts be put into preventive measures among men with immigrant background.

The police have investigated all reported cases of aggravated sexual assault over the past three years, and have gained a clear imprssion of the offenders:

Most of the rapists have a Kurdish or African background, NRK reports. The cases of aggravated sexual assults all have one thing in common, namely the use of gross violence.

(NRK)
Posted by gee whiz on April 16, 2009 at 4:05 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy