Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

This Makes My Brain Hurt

Posted by on Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:08 PM

19c1/1239134475-barnesandfuckingnoble1.jpgBarnes and Noble has just launched an ugly, ugly website called Blogging Booksellers. This is clearly supposed to be a way for the company to try to do that local bookseller thing that independent bookstores do, only with a whole lot of corporate control. It's allegedly a way for Barnes and Noble employees to share local book news. Using that hot new viral technique known as "blogging."

Of course, I don't think that B&N knows what a blog is, because these aren't blog posts so much as videos. Also, Seattle's Blogging Bookseller is a woman named Kirsty. Her local book news? You should read Silent in the Grave, by Deanna Raybourn. Raybourn lives in Virginia. But it's local because, um, Kirsty's from here!

And local bookselling is certainly important, isn't it, Barnes & Noble? Of course it is! Never mind the fact that you're responsible for hundreds—maybe thousands—of independent bookstores going out of business in America and around the world. It says right on your website, in faux-handwritten letters:06e6/1239134833-barnesandfuckingnoble2.jpg

Now I have a question: Is this irony or am I just sick to my stomach?

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I don't think that B&N knows what a blog is, because these aren't blog posts so much as videos


You do realize that there's something called video blogging, don't you? Guess not.
Posted by N on April 7, 2009 at 4:21 PM
2
Wow, you mean millions of American consumers aren't to blame? Gee, how'd all 'em Barnes get up?
Posted by EEEVILLL COOORRRPORAAATIONZZ! on April 7, 2009 at 4:23 PM
3
Irony is lost on idiots and big corporations.
Posted by Greg on April 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM
4
That means amazon is twice as local as Bastards & 'Nads. it is bookselling and it is headquartered locally.
Posted by vooodooo84 on April 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM
5
Especially ironic because I have never found B&N employees who seem even remotely interested in books.
Posted by Patti on April 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM
6
That font looks just like Question Time!

The only good bookselling blog I've found is Bookride.
Posted by Fnarf on April 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM
7
ya know, it IS kind of sad when big chains kill off locally owned independent book stores, but why should books be any different than any other commodity? Why is it a greater day for mourning when your local "Book Nook" is forced to close than when it's "Barney's Friendly Hardware" or "Appleoff Family Appliance"? Is the corporate commercialization of certain kinds of businesses taboo because those businesses are cute and beloved?

That's kind of silly.

We live in a capitalist society where the goal is to make increasing large amounts of profit. That's both a good and a bad thing but the alternatives are totalitarianism and socialism. Socialism has some advantages, but it's not perfect, and is it really the responsibility of a socialist government to financially support heartfelt businesses like indie bookstores, because they make us feel warm and fuzzy on the inside?

uh, no.
Posted by michael strangeways on April 7, 2009 at 4:48 PM
8
The reason, Michael, is that good local bookstores cater to serious readers -- people who know and like intelligent books -- books that often either get lost in the oceans of horsecrap that B&N stacks their tables with, or can't be found there at all. So when B&N drives your local shop out, the tastes of the stupid take precedence, which is a loss.

Similarly, if Home Despot drives a hardware store like Hardwick's out of biz, the community loses -- because Hardwick's carries stuff that HD has never heard of, and has no interest in.
Posted by Fnarf on April 7, 2009 at 5:09 PM
9
grrr. i know not everyone is into the battle of the indie vs corporate bookstore, but it's kinda hard to hear that people don't understand why having lots of cool local bookstores are important. as a heads up to y'all, big huge chains (that's b&n and amazon, borders is kinda dying) consolidate power, because they represent so much of the market. so not only is your lovely bookshop where the people know books going out of business, but a book that b&n passes on (and because they're so huge, they often get to see what books the pubs are interested in putting out before they're even published) will probably never get published at all. i've had author friends whose books were bought or dropped by a publisher because of what a b&n buyer decided. because books are a specific type of format that takes time and effort and money to put together (more so than a magazine or a blog) they are well-suited to providing certain types of information (long, in-depth studies of some phenomenon or war or historical figure) and telling certain types of stories (i think really delicious ones). if b&n, which is not run by people who like or care about the content of books but simply which books will move, essentially makes many (most?) of the decisions about what books will be published, then this particular medium is being run by jerks. it's a monopoly on this important form of information. that sucks for all of us.
Posted by anna on April 7, 2009 at 8:21 PM
10
Paul, reading the swill you dish out makes me quite sure you don't have a clue what a blog is.

Posted by rjh on April 7, 2009 at 8:42 PM
11
Why is Michigan in the eastern zone but Illinois isn't? I'll answer my own question: that map is stupid.
Posted by mynameisnick on April 7, 2009 at 11:20 PM
12
Books are way more expensive these days than they ought to be. Even pulp trash costs $8 today instead of the $2 that they cost 20 years ago. And hardcover books are much worse. A new popular title will set you back $40. Barnes and Noble and Borders are at least partly responsible for the Publishers raising the prices so much, because they can then offer 30% off books without batting an eye. Independent booksellers can't do that.

So never mind the friendly local store vs. cold corporation narrative. The real problem is that the big bookstores didn't engage in honest capitalism any more than most people in the real estate market did. And similarly, the consumer is paying higher costs on books just to subsidize a now failing publishing and corporate bookselling industry.

I guess if the publishing industry mirrors the housing bubble and bursts, some good will come out of it in much lower prices, at least.
Posted by Chris in Tampa on April 8, 2009 at 1:58 AM
13
The "associates" on the floor at B & N aren't allowed to access the internet on their computers. The videos are probably done by actors.
Posted by dee on April 8, 2009 at 6:10 AM
14
oh, give me a fuckin' break.

yes, I loooooove good indie bookstores but this notion that every town and neighborhood in America was once dotted with hardwood floored, exposed brick, indirectly lit, cinnamon/patchouli scented, cheery little indie bookstores lovingly stocked and run by bookloving hippies with grey ponytails and happy librarian-type ladies is so much bullshit. For one thing, those kinds of stores have ALWAYS been the exception, not the norm and 90% of them came into existence in the late 60's and early 70's founded by book loving, arty/litty, hippie types; they're a fairly recent thing. You found/find them in college towns, arty resort towns, and bohemian neighborhoods in large cities but not in the vast majority of America. The greatest number of indie booksellers in this country were small glorified newstands/stationary/card stores...they had a long wall of magazines, a small room or area of kid lit (maybe), quite a lot of space devoted to cards and gifts and racks and racks of mass-market, popular paperbacks...there wasn't much devoted to non-fiction or serious literature and most of those stores were very suspicious of hardbacks and trade sized books. When you've been reading about the 200 or 300 or 400 indie bookstores that close every year for the last 25 years, the majority of the stores closing, were those kinds of stores, and yes, it is sad when ANY kind of bookstore closes, but these weren't the kinds of bookstores that y'all revere. And yes, the big guys are largely responsible for their demise which is sad but does it make the big guys evil by their mere presence? No, it doesn't. The advent of the chains meant that millions of people had access to a much wider variety of books than ever before, especially people that live outside of liberal, arty areas and the urban core. That's a good thing. The big stores like B&N and Borders that really started to grow in the 90's exposed people to an even larger inventory; they have history sections that are larger than many neighborhood indie stores! Does that mean I don't still shop at indie stores? Of course not. I love having a bookstore in my neighborhood, locally owned and operated by an owner who loves books. But if Michael at BaileyCoy doesn't have a book I really, really want and I know I can get that book downtown at Borders, I'm going to go buy it at Borders and not wait the two weeks it would take if I ordered it at BaileyCoy. And for folks in the sticks; the Pocatellos and Topekas and Amarillos of the world, their local big bookseller is the only option they have and to be honest, probably the best option they've ever had.

(as for the big chains having a negative impact on publishing, that's a different kettle of stinky fish...but most chains can have some kind of negative impact on their suppliers which leads to standardization and blandness in everything from fashion to home decor...)

(and as for the loving attentions of indie bookstore clerks, that's also a lot of horseshit...for every nice, knowledgible, helpful clerk I've met 4 that were either irritating, hipster jerks or idiots that didn't know what they were doing...like in most retail stores...book retailing is NOT a sacred brother/sisterhood)

More...
Posted by michael strangeways on April 8, 2009 at 10:59 AM
15
I apologize for the length of that...I got carried away.

And for the record, I've always preferred Borders to B&N. Borders has/had better buyers, selection, staff and prices.

And, B&N had a stupid dresscode for its employees, at least back in the day.

And, that IS one fucking ugly website.
Posted by michael strangeways on April 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM
16
deep breath, michael.
Posted by Layne on April 8, 2009 at 11:42 AM
17
Michael -

I appreciate your support your support of Bailey/Coy, truly I do. But I swear to you that 90% of my special orders arrive within 3 days - 5 days at the most. And if you can't wait that long I'll call Elliot Bay or University Bookstore or any other indie and have them hold it for you - ship it to you, even. Just FYI...
Posted by michael wells on April 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM
18
Hi Paul,

Here are some facts concerning the Blogging Booksellers: the store staff who volunteer for this are issued with a Flip camera a set of loose guidelines - basically how to position the camera etc and not to tape for too long. They vlog about what they want to vlog about - what they're reading, liking and recommending, what's happening in the store etc. Sometimes they talk about local writers, other times not - totally up to them. They upload the video file to the site and the vlog is published. That's it.

If you don't like the look of the showpage, then view the vlogs in the library player here:

http://tinyurl.com/dzjdqc

- it's more basic but quite serviceable!

Best wishes,

Mike

Posted by Mike on April 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM
19
hold on - Questionland looks just the same as the blogging book logo thingy. That means it muts be really ugly too right? or is your bad taste better than theirs?
Posted by zootalors on April 13, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy