Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Sunday, April 5, 2009

"Chic-inflected privileged-white-boy solipsism."

Posted by on Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:10 PM

Hilton Als reviews Nature Theater of Oklahoma for the New Yorker and it is not pretty.

To review: NTOO, from NYC, have been serious critical darlings, inspiring breathless panegyrics in America and Europe for their lo-fi

The Village Voice:

One of New York’s most talented ensembles… their shows are smart, witty, highly physical, and eager to twist notions of theatricality.

The New York Times:

Nature Theater of Oklahoma is that rare, wondrous type of theatrical sustenance: You leave blissful and sated, yet wanting more.

Hilton Als last January:

[NTOO's] “Poetics: A Ballet Brut,” which was just part of the Public Theatre’s “Under the Radar” festival, demonstrated how much fun the pie-in-the-face aesthetic can be.

And so on.

They came to Seattle, inspired a de-Suggests (it wasn't that the emperor was wearing no clothes so much as the emperor was in a ratty t-shirt and stained boxer shorts) and a spirited argument in Slog comments:

I fucking love this show full stop... The piece is an attempt, I think, to be heartfelt and real, and to use a million alienation devices (bad accents, overacting, repetitive found gestures, goofy costumes, dance breaks) as a way of letting you listen to everyday conversations without associating them with specific persons or situations (the only proper nouns, till the very end, are brands of soda, movie actors, New York City, and acronyms for office forms). Through that transmutation, the conversations don't actually take on weight, but you can hear in them a general hum of loneliness, desire, frustration, ambition, and love. (The alienation devices, I should point out, are also often crack-you-up funny.)

"No Dice" is a gimmick plain and simple. It was an effective gimmick for the time and place it was produced but it is still a gimmick and over the course of time this gimmick, like all gimmicks has become dated and worn thin... It's Pop Art with a short shelf life

(A side note: A friend of an On the Boards employee didn't like No Dice. That employee told Pavol of NTOO. Pavol responded: "Tell your friend he has no soul." The employee was unsure whether Pavol was kidding.)

NTOO has a new show called Rambo Solo (the title says it all). Als is having none of it:

For ninety-five minutes, in “Rambo Solo” (at the Soho Rep), an execrable piece conceived by Pavol Liska and Kelly Copper, who head the Nature Theatre of Oklahoma, we watch as Oberzan runs around the narrow stage that substitutes for his apartment (much of the audience sits on pillows on the floor, perhaps to give us a sense of what hanging out at Oberzan’s place might feel like), acting out the movie in a grating, Stallone-inflected accent and providing more commentary than anyone could stand.

As Oberzan demands our attention—he barely takes a breath—we are confronted with video projections of the actor, actually in his apartment, doing the same things we’re watching him do live. Anger mounts at the sheer hubris of this enterprise. It may be a commentary on the nature of performance, but it is itself an utterly objectionable one, reflective only of a certain kind of chic-inflected privileged-white-boy solipsism. Watching “Rambo Solo,” you learn less than nothing about absurdist theatre, but, as you leave the show, you may feel absurd for having sat through it.

It is the duty of the regional critic to fight the provincialism of New York*, and the hype surrounding NTOO and Will Eno are examples of both. So it's heartening to see the New Yorker call out NTOO.

And all you artists who've been poorly reviewed, then seethed at seeing less-deserving artists get laurels (and let's be honest: aren't they all less deserving?)—I can feel your schadenfreude all the way over here.

* Belated credit where it's due: I first heard that line from the mouth of Jen Graves.

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Wow. You sound really bitter. Do you really hate artists that have worked extremely hard for 15 years, for no money and no glory, and then finally have some success? Also: Hilton Als is a racist. I can't believe a respectable publication like the New Yorker would print a phrase like "privileged white-boy solipsism." Needless to say, Hilton sees everything through his prism of his imagined victimhood. Consider the reverse. If a writer penned a phrase consisting of "(derogatory adjective) black-boy (derogatory adjective)," the uproar would be heard across the country, people would get fired, and Al Sharpton would have his latest photo-op. Als' statement is the kind of writing that sets race-relations backwards, not forwards.
Posted by Zachary Oberzan on April 9, 2009 at 12:04 PM
2
So... now we can't call out white privilege where we (think) we see it?

You're really reaching for an indictment, Zachary.
Posted by Billy on April 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM
3
You see, I can't even bring the topic up without being pounced on, where as it is fair game for Hilton. Is the term "white-boy" necessary to point out where one thinks they see white privilege?? Can I use the term "black-boy" if I want to point out the hypocrisy of black writers where I think I see it? Ok then. Hilton Als' race-baiting black-boy discrimination can not even be argued against because he is black. It's a free ticket to denigrate white people, even if they are completely undeserving.

I'll say nothing of myself, but the director, Pavol Liska, is an immigrant from a poor farming village in Slovakia. He came to America when he was 18 to work on a farm. He taught himself English. He got into a college in Oklahoma. They recognized his abilities and soon he was transferred to the Ivy Leagues. He then came out and struggled in NYC for 15 years, working as a security guard and janitor, while trying to make theater whenever and however he could. He is one of the hardest-working, disciplined people I've ever met. Is this "privileged white-boy solipsism?" If he were black, Hilton would be singing his praises, for over-coming nearly insurmountable obstacles. I'm sure the review would have read much much differently were that the case. But he's white, so his success must have stemmed from that factor, I suppose. Blatant racism.
Posted by Zachary Oberzan on April 9, 2009 at 9:06 PM
4
I think you're just looking for a reason to discredit Als's critique. Als disses all kinds of directors, white and black, and in this case he's dissing your aesthetic as precious: "reflective only of a certain kind of chic-inflected privileged-white-boy solipsism." Which is not addressing Pavol's background, but this show. Als complimented "Poetics." So he's clearly not against honkies-qua-honkies.
Posted by Billy on April 10, 2009 at 5:53 PM
5
No, this has nothing to do with his critique, asinine as it is. Even if you are dissing an aesthetic as "privileged white boy," it is as insulting as a white writer suggesting that the aesthetic of a play is "ghetto black boy." And if such phraseology was used in an extremely unflattering review, I guarantee there would be an uproar. You don't have to be Ann Coulter to see a double standard here.

Anyway, the fact that the author of this Stranger article revels in the disparagement of our company, when we have done no wrong to him whatsoever, speaks volumes about his mentality and that of this publication. If you don't like something, fine. But don't whine about it and take cheap shots, when all we've ever done is struggle and work hard. What are we suppose to do, apologize for our success?
Posted by Zachary Oberzan on April 23, 2009 at 7:58 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy