Granted, Simon Johnson, a professor at MIT’s Sloan School of Management, was the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund during the last years of the Bush period, 2007 and 2008, but his article in The Atlantic, "The Quiet Coup," makes several interesting points, the most interesting (and also central) of which is this:
Big banks [in the United States] , it seems, have only gained political strength since the crisis began. And this is not surprising. With the financial system so fragile, the damage that a major bank failure could cause—Lehman was small relative to Citigroup or Bank of America—is much greater than it would be during ordinary times. The banks have been exploiting this fear as they wring favorable deals out of Washington. Bank of America obtained its second bailout package (in January) after warning the government that it might not be able to go through with the acquisition of Merrill Lynch, a prospect that Treasury did not want to consider.The challenges the United States faces are familiar territory to the people at the IMF. If you hid the name of the country and just showed them the numbers, there is no doubt what old IMF hands would say: nationalize troubled banks and break them up as necessary.
Comments (8) RSS