
In a new review on Artdish, Gary Faigin declares it Best in (Not Very Good) Show. Gayle Clemans of the Times says it's "worth a visit alone." (Here's his review, her review, and my review of the same show.)
Why is this? I am truly stumped. I can think of about 15 paintings in that show that are far more interesting than this one. In fact, I'd include every single one on this link in that category.
Comments (10) RSS